Segregation and Racial Hierarchies. By the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Mexican Americans lived under a system of segregation that mirrored Jim Crow—what many call Juan Crow. Across Texas and the Southwest, schools, neighborhoods, swimming pools, and even cemeteries were divided by race, with signs declaring, “No Dogs, No Negroes, No
Mexicans” (Acuña, 2021). Children were assigned to “Mexican schools,” which provided inferior instruction and were designed to funnel them into low-wage labor rather than higher education (San Miguel, 1987). My parents grew up under this system and felt its cruelty firsthand—experiencing not only exclusion from opportunity but also the daily indignities of a social order built to deny their worth and potential.Economic Exploitation. Mexican Americans have long been the laboring backbone of the U.S. economy while enduring deep exploitation. During the Bracero Program (1942–1964), millions of Mexican workers were imported under harsh conditions with little pay or protection—what the late Gómez-Quiñones (1994) described as a system that extracted labor while denying dignity. Even beyond that era, Mexican-origin workers were excluded from unions and labor protections, institutionalizing inequality that persisted across generations (Zamora, 1993).
Cultural Suppression and Education. Schools have long functioned as instruments of oppression for Mexican American children. They were punished for speaking Spanish, stripped of cultural expression, and denied affirmation of identity. I have described this as subtractive schooling—an educational practice that systematically devalues students’ identities and erodes their sense of belonging (Valenzuela, 1999).
Building on this concept, Chilean colleagues have developed the idea of educación extractiva (“extractive education”), which describes schooling as a profit-driven enterprise rather than a humanizing one. In this model, students become data points for testing companies and profit streams for private contractors. Like extractive industries, this form of education depletes communities of cultural and intellectual resources while enriching those who control educational policy and technology. Both subtractive and extractive schooling reveal how inequity hides behind the language of reform, privileging efficiency and profit over justice, care, and collective flourishing.
Bilingualism as Resistance. In recent years, bilingual education and cultural pride continue to be seen as threats to assimilationist goals. Even high-achieving Mexican American students face suspicion as they “learn” that monolingualism is preferable to bilingualism and multiculturalism—forms of knowledge that expand our ways of knowing, being, and doing in the world. Rather than being celebrated as assets, these gifts are treated as liabilities that mark students as “foreign.”
This climate of mistrust has deepened since the Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo (2025) ruling, which legitimized racial profiling by allowing ICE to use ethnicity as a proxy for suspicion. The decision underscores how the logic of exclusion persists in U.S. institutions, including schools. When bilingualism and cultural pride are framed as social control—one that polices not only language but also belonging itself.
Oppression persists in new forms. Anti-immigrant laws like Arizona’s SB 1070 normalized racial profiling of Latinos (Menjívar & Tinoco, 2023). Though parts of the law were struck down in Arizona v. United States (2012), its spirit endures in contemporary border enforcement and “papers please” policing. Such policies illustrate how even “defeated” legislation can evolve and reappear in new guises, preserving structures of exclusion under different names.
In education, Ethnic Studies and Mexican American Studies programs have faced censorship and elimination in states like Arizona, reflecting ongoing efforts to silence cultural pride and historical truth (Cammarota & Romero, 2014). Beyond education, Mexican Americans continue to experience disproportionate policing, incarceration, and economic inequality (Rios, 2011, 2017).
Acuña, R. (2021). Occupied America: A history of Chicanos (9th ed.). Pearson.
Cammarota, J., & Romero, A. (2014). Raza studies: The public option for educational revolution. University of Arizona Press.
Kristi Noem, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, et al. v. Pedro Vasquez Perdomo, et al., 25A169 (S. Ct., 2025). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a169_5h25.pdf
Menjívar, C., & Tinoco, N. (2023). The Long Arm of Arizona's SB 1070: Antecedents and Far-reaching Spillover Effects. Oxford University Press.
Montejano, D. (1987). Anglos and Mexicans in the making of Texas, 1836–1986. University of Texas Press.
Muñoz, C. (1989). Youth, identity, power: The Chicano movement. Verso.
Rios, V. M. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of Black and Latino boys, New York University Press.
Rosales, F. A. (1997). Chicano! The history of the Mexican American civil rights movement. Arte Público Press.
San Miguel, G. (1987). 'Let all of them take heed': Mexican Americans and the campaign for educational equality in Texas, 1910–1981. University of Texas Press.
San Miguel, G. (2005). Brown, not white: School integration and the Chicano movement in Houston. Texas A&M University Press.
Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. SUNY Press.
Zamora, E. (2009). Claiming Rights and Righting Wrongs: Mexican Workers and Job Politics during World War II. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.


No comments:
Post a Comment