Translate

Monday, January 25, 2021

TCEP Brown Bag: 87th Texas Legislature--Lawmaking in a Non-traditional Redistricting Session, featuring Ramiro Canales, Jan. 29, 2021 at Noon

Dear Students, Friends and Colleagues:

On behalf of the Texas Center for Education Policy, I am happy to invite you to a presentation by the legendary Ramiro Canales who will provide an overview of Texas policymaking in a simultaneous redistricting and COVID context. Please read his bio below, bring your lunch and partake of Mr. Canales' flare for the excitement that he brings to every legislative session, especially one's involving redistricting.


Time: Friday, January 25, 2021, at 12:00 pm CT 


You can view this event here.

-Angela Valenzuela, PH.D., Director

Texas Center for Education Policy




RAMIRO CANALES BIOGRAPHY

___________

     Ramiro Canales is a former migrant farmworker from Santa Rosa, Texas in the Lower Rio Grande Valley. After graduating as salutatorian of his class from Santa Rosa High School in 1987, he earned a Bachelor of Arts in International Studies degree from Southwestern University, Texas' first university, in 1991.  In 1994, he earned a Master of Public Affairs degree from the LBJ School of Public Affairs at UT-Austin.  In 1998, he earned his law degree from The University of Texas School of Law.

     Mr. Canales began volunteering at the Texas Capitol in 1989 as a legislative intern for the late State Representative Irma Rangel, the author of the “Top Ten Percent” law, and became her chief of staff in 1995. He has served as a staff attorney for the Texas Association of Community Health Centers; as the assistant executive director for governmental relations at the Texas Association of School Administrators (TASA); as an assistant attorney general for Texas Attorneys General John Cornyn and Greg Abbott; and as a lecturer on the Texas legislative process at The University of Texas at Austin.  

     Mr. Canales is an experienced litigator, appellate lawyer, and a “public policy engineer” a/k/a/ lobbyist.  He is the founder of the Legislative Boot Camp®, an intensive one-day training program on how things really work at the Texas Legislature.  

     His proudest achievement is earning his bachelor's, master's, and doctorate degrees without owning a car.

      ***

  

Sunday, January 24, 2021

These Textbooks In Thousands Of K-12 Schools Echo Trump’s Talking Points

I'll repeat again as I often say, "curriculum is the reproduction of consciousness." This is a sobering and troubling read on what is getting taught to many students in many Christian K-12 schools.  

As we know from many years of battle before the Texas State Board of Education—about which I have blogged repeatedly in the context of the battle for Ethnic Studies, a right-wing agenda has similarly held sway in Texas' K-12 standards and text book selection battles. These battles are important and we as a polity need to be more involved, including running for these posts.

-Angela Valenzuela

These Textbooks In Thousands Of K-12 Schools Echo Trump’s Talking Points

Their religion-centered, anti-Democrat, anti-science, anti-multicultural message mirrors the Christian nationalism seen at the U.S. Capitol riot.
Rebecca Klein | Huffington Post

01/15/2021 09:11 AM ET 

Christian textbooks used in thousands of schools around the country teach that President Barack Obama helped spur destructive Black Lives Matter protests, that the Democrats’ choice of 2016 nominee Hillary Clinton reflected their focus on identity politics, and that President Donald Trump is the “fighter” Republicans want, a HuffPost analysis has found.

The analysis, which focused on three popular textbooks from two major publishers of Christian educational materials ― Abeka and BJU Press ― looked at how the books teach the Trump era of politics. We found that all three are characterized by a skewed version of history and a sense that the country is experiencing an urgent moral decline that can only be fixed by conservative Christian policies. Language used in the books overlaps with the rhetoric of Christian nationalism, often with overtones of nativism, militarism and racism as well.

Scholars say textbooks like these, with their alternate versions of history and emphasis on Christian national identity, represent one small part of the conditions that lead to events like last week’s riot at the U.S. Capitol, an episode that was permeated with the symbols of Christian nationalism. Before storming the Capitol, some groups prayed in the name of Jesus and asked for divine protection. They flew Christian and “Jesus 2020” flags and pointed to Trump’s presidency as the will of God. The linkage between Christian beliefs and the violent attack on Congress has since pushed evangelical leaders to confront their own relationship with Trump and their support for the rioters.

“These textbooks made this brand of nationalism more mainstream,” said Kathleen Wellman, a Southern Methodist University history professor who is working on a book about the two Christian publishers. “I’m struck by how coherent of a worldview [the textbooks] promote and how thoroughly it resonates in current culture.” 

Representatives from BJU Press and Abeka did not respond to inquiries about how many schools use their products. However, a 2017 HuffPost investigation found that about one-third of Christian schools participating in private school choice programs used a curriculum created by these two publishers or a similar company called Accelerated Christian Education, amounting to around 2,400 schools. The number of schools using these company’s products that do not participate in a voucher program likely amounts to thousands more. (Voucher programs allow students to use taxpayer funds to attend private schools.) 

Both Abeka and BJU Press have ties to Christian colleges. Abeka was launched in the 1970s by Arlin and Beka Horton, who also founded Pensacola Christian College, a Florida institution that outlaws dancing and other “satanic practices,” such as astrology. BJU Press is affiliated with the evangelical Bob Jones University in Greenville, South Carolina, which famously lost its tax-exempt status after banning interracial dating in the ’80s, a policy it didn’t reverse until 2000.

“We unequivocally condemn any rhetoric that promotes illegal or violent behavior,” Amy Yohe, managing editor of Abeka Publishing, told HuffPost. “One of Abeka’s core goals is to teach constructive citizenship through textbooks that accurately represent the facts of history, enabling students to learn from the life lessons it teaches, both positive and negative.”

BJU Press did not respond to requests for comment.

However, scholars who study religion in America say that many of the ideas present in the publishers’ textbooks overlap with rhetoric heard from the rioters last week. Christian nationalists argue that the United States was founded as a Christian nation and has a special covenant with God, meaning that its citizens must implement a particular vision for this country or they will fall out of favor with God. The textbooks parrot these ideas, said Andrew Whitehead, associate professor of sociology and director of the Association of Religion Data Archives at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.

“As we see in these textbooks, they’re afraid of outside forces or the U.S. won’t be what it should be,” said Whitehead. “There’s always a particular prescription ― they have to be on God’s good side. I think that’s a big part of it.”

Passages from the textbooks reflect an overarching worldview in which America is constantly moving away from a moral center, with Christians on the front lines beating back the forces of immorality. 

One passage in an 11th-grade U.S. history textbook from Abeka states, “Although many false philosophies were popular in America before 2000, the new millennium heralded a dramatic acceptance of immoral ideology on a national scale. … Three such philosophies are globalism, environmentalism, and postmodernism.” 

“Believing religion — particularly Christianity — to be divisive, globalists discourage its influence on public life,” it continues.

By parroting such conservative political views under the guise of Christianity, the textbooks give those views more legitimacy, making it difficult to distinguish between fact and opinion. While all textbooks, including the secular, cherry-pick narratives and have their biases, these ones fuse a religious worldview with Trumpian talking points using anti-media and anti-immigrant rhetoric. 

“Obviously it’s too simplistic to say these textbooks are causing people to think something, but they play a unique role in giving visual credibility to these ideas by having them be in a very traditionally trustworthy artifact,” said Adam Laats, professor of history and education at New York state’s Binghamton University. “There’s a sense that they couldn’t put it in a schoolbook if it wasn’t true.”

HuffPost’s previous investigation of these textbooks found that they also dismiss evolution as junk science, characterize Nelson Mandela as a “marxist agitator” who helped drive South Africa to “radical affirmative action,” and suggest that Satan hatched the idea of modern psychology. Many of the schools that use these books also ban LGBTQ students and families, and the books repeatedly condemn homosexuality. At one point in an Abeka textbook, slavery is described in purely economic terms, saying that “slaves seemed to be better investments than indentured servants.”

“I absolutely thought of these textbooks when watching what played out last week,” Wellman said. “It’s the anti-science culture, anti-elite, the identification of Christianity with military culture.”



Trump supporters gather near the east front door of the U.S. Capitol after groups breached the building's security on Jan. 6, 2021. 

When discussing protests against the Iraq War and President George W. Bush’s low approval rating at the time, the Abeka 11th-grade U.S. history book points the finger at the media in part, saying that “much of the war opposition in America was the media, supported by a large number of Hollywood entertainers,” and that “spurred on by the media, many Americans wanted a change from the policies of the previous eight years.”

When discussing President Obama, the textbooks accuse him and his administration of stoking racial divisions. Below is a passage from that Abeka history book:

“Many Americans’ views about race relations had improved at the time that Obama was inaugurated. Unfortunately, Americans’ views of race relations declined after Obama came into office. Race riots in places such as Ferguson, Missouri, and Baltimore, Maryland, greatly escalated racial tensions and worsened strife between minorities and local police. President Obama’s attempts to resolve these problems often seemed to make the situation worse.” 

The books do not mention that such protests came in response to the deaths of unarmed Black men, including Michael Brown and Freddie Gray Jr., at the hands of police.

A high-school-level textbook from BJU Press also blames the Black Lives Matter movement for racial discord. It says:

“Despite President Obama’s call for racial harmony, his eight-year term of office saw an intensification of racial discord. Several controversial shootings of black men led to protests, some of which were violent and destructive with black communities bearing the brunt of most of the destruction. Groups such as Black Lives Matter sharpened the divide between police and citizens, and black and white, with divisive rhetoric. Mixed messages from the Obama administration, the Department of Justice in particular, seemed to increase the racial discord.”

The textbook does not mention that those “controversial” shootings were at the hands of police officers or explain the societal changes Black Lives Matter is trying to achieve with its supposedly “divisive rhetoric.” The book does not lay out for its teen readers what those “mixed messages” from the Obama administration were. 

Other targets of the textbooks include “globalists,” environmentalists and “multiculturalists.”

“According to multiculturalists, advancing the achievements of western civilization was an act of hatred toward other cultures. They encouraged people to define themselves by race, sex, or sexual orientation rather than by the pillars of western civilization, such as nation, family, and God,” reads the Abeka American history textbook. “However, many conservatives and Christians within America have attempted to quell these philosophies and once again turn America into a united, moral nation.”

The textbooks don’t give a full-throated endorsement of Trump, noting his crude remarks and previously liberal positions, but they ultimately represent him as someone on the side of Christians who is fighting for their values. One description from the Abeka textbook reads:

“Contrary to the high hopes that Obama’s presidency would bring the country together, Americans were bitterly divided leading up to the election in 2016. The Democratic Party had become increasingly concerned with identity politics, which is the idea that a person’s race, sex, and sexual orientation form the most important parts of their humanity and that politics should reflect that belief. Republicans, meanwhile, believed that their politicians had been too compromising with the increasingly radical left and that they needed a political outsider who would not back down or compromise with the Democrats. 

“... The Republican Party nominated real estate mogul and reality television star Donald Trump from New York, whose determination and bombastic mannerisms gave Republicans the fighter they wanted. As a businessman, Trump stated that he would ‘take the brand of the United States and make it great again.’ However, many conservatives were wary of Trump because of his occasional vulgar speech, his past immoral behavior, and his public support of homosexual marriage; but some were persuaded by Trump’s choice for his running mate — Indiana’s conservative governor Mike Pence.” 

Evangelical Christians were one of Trump’s most important voting blocks. Though white evangelicals only represent about 15% of the electorate, they made up about 23% of the vote during the 2020 election, according to the Associated Press. About 8 in 10 white evangelical Christians voted for Trump last year. 

A passage from an Abeka high school history book.

Images from the Capitol riot felt more familiar than shocking to 28-year-old Mel Garman, who grew up attending evangelical Christian schools.

There were the Christian flags, like the ones she used to pledge allegiance to in school, waving alongside American flags. The rioters’ rhetoric, focused around saving the country, defeating enemies and promoting the will of God, could have come straight out of one of her childhood classrooms, where she said she was taught a distorted version of history with nods to white Christian supremacy. Last week’s insurrectionists could have been her classmates, her teachers, her pastors. She felt a wave of recognition as she watched the pictures on social media. 

“Over the course of my life I can see how what I was taught in Christian schooling has impacted me, and the riots on Jan. 6 played into it. That whole belief system revolves around the idea that you want the rest of the world to think like you,” said Garman, who is now a social worker. “It’s a ‘the ends justify the means’ type of thing.”

Since Jan. 6, popular pro-Trump evangelical leaders have felt driven to judge the rioters’ actions, with some offering full-throttle condemnations and others issuing more temperate responses.

“The Secret Service had to escort the vice president of the United States to safety out of the Capitol building. Gunshots were fired. Tear gas was deployed in the Capitol Rotunda. People were killed. ... This was an assault on law. Attacking the Capitol was not patriotism; it was anarchy,” said Rev. John Hagee of Cornerstone Church in San Antonio during his Sunday sermon, before going on to rally support for law enforcement, according to the Associated Press.

Miles away in Kentucky, Brian Gibson, pastor and founder of His Church, blamed the riot on antifa agitators, a conspiracy theory for which there is no evidence. 

“You don’t get 2 million people together without having some radicals in the crowd or some simple people in the crowd that you could lead anywhere, right?” he said, also greatly exaggerating the size of the crowd that day.

In other places, teachers in public schools that don’t rely on Christian textbooks are struggling to explain to their students the dynamics that allowed such violence to occur. In Chicago, high school teacher Raven Althimer discussed the harsh realities of the insurrection with her students, who are Black.

“They think of when they had Black Lives Matter over the summer, peacefully protesting, and were tear-gassed. People are literally storming the Capitol and nothing is happening to them,” Althimer told HuffPost. “One of my students said, ‘If 20 of us had done that, we all would have been dead.’ I said, ‘No, 20 of you wouldn’t have even gotten that close.’”

News21: Hate in America - This documentary covers the legacy of hate, and how it shaped America

I strongly recommended folks to see this documentary that, among other things, illuminates the connection between fundamentalist Christianity and violence. This is not unlike the kind of violence and terror that people in our country more commonly associates with Islamic extremism. In this case, what we are seeing is homegrown extremism, unfortunately, connected to a long legacy of settler colonialism and white supremacy.

-Angela Valenzuela



Commentary: The steep price of charter schools by Texas State Rep. Mary E. González and Michael Lee

Texas state representative Mary Gonzalez and Michael Lee in this commentary lay out what amounts to a new reason why we should resist funding charter schools as a state, citing of the exportation of our tax dollars to other states as a consequence of approving Learn4Life and Doral charter schools: 

"Exporting your tax dollars to another state removes those funds from the Texas economy, enriching other states at the expense of our own. That’s something we should be reluctant to do at any time, much less in the middle of a global pandemic, historic unemployment and an economic recession. But this is nothing new. These are simply the most recent charter companies with out-of-state ties to be approved to operate in Texas."

A pertinent policy solution that would save at least $882 million that would go to traditional public schools is one where charters receive the same per-student funding as the districts where charters are located (source: Support a legislative agenda for all Texas students in 2019 and level the playing field for public schools). 

-Angela Valenzuela

Commentary: The steep price of charter schools

Charter schools receive an average of $1,150 more per student compared with the traditional school district.
Photo: Tom Reel /Staff photographer

Thursday, January 21, 2021

‘A hack job,’ ‘outright lies’: Trump commission’s ‘1776 Report’ outrages historians

This 1776 Report equates to outright lies and propaganda, not unlike what we saw here in Texas with our famous textbook battle in 2016 and 2017 before the Texas State Board Education with the proposed adoption of a racist, error-riddled textbook offensively titled, "Mexican American Heritage," written by two non-historians named Jaime Riddle and Valarie Angle that would have done enormous damage to our children had it been adopted. You can read all about this in Dr. Emilio Zamora's scathing critique here on this blog.

This book surfaced while many of us were advocating for a high school Mexican American Studies course and texts, with Zamora outlining the following:

The story began last summer when we heard that Momentum Books had proposed to the Texas State Board of Education a textbook for adoption to teach Mexican American Studies in the state’s public schools.  We suspected a problem when we discovered that the owner of the publishing house was Ms. Cynthia Dunbar, a former conservative member of the State Board, an Assistant Law Professor at Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University, a recent Trump delegate to the Republican Party Convention, and a co-chair of Senator Ted Cruz’s presidential campaign.  The selection of the book’s authors, Jaime Riddle and Valarie Angle, also raised concerns.

Relatedly, read "Texas' New Public School Textbooks Promote Climate Change Denial and Downplay SegregationAnd they could end up in your kid's classroom too." 

A major difference is that whereas the Riddle and Angle text at least pretended to be factual--even as the meticulous work of the review team of historians spearheaded by Dr. Zamora identified and reported 407 errors to the SBOE--the 1776 Report, according to public historian Alexis Coe, "[L]acks citations or any indication books were consulted, which explains why it’s riddled in errors, distortions, and outright lies.” 

So pathetic.

I am so happy that President Biden and Vice-President Harris are now in charge, meaning that our nation's highest office will not implicate itself in lies and gaslighting the American public with a false historical, racist narrative that masquerades as truth.

In the meantime, we must always call out such racist texts like these wherever and whenever they surface.

Forewarned is forearmed. 

-Angela Valenzuela

‘A hack job,’ ‘outright lies’: Trump commission’s ‘1776 Report’ outrages historians

President Trump speaks to the White House Conference on American History at the National Archives Museum on Sept. 17 in Washington. (Alex Brandon/AP)

By 

Gillian Brockell

Jan. 20, 2021 at 7:42 a.m. CST

Two days after historians responded with dismay and anger to the White House’s “1776 Commission” report, the Biden transition team announced President-elect Joe Biden would rescind the commission with an executive order on his first day in office.

The report was intended to a version of U.S. history that would “restor[e] patriotic education” in schools. Historians largely condemned it, saying it was filled with errors and partisan politics.

“It’s a hack job. It’s not a work of history,” American Historical Association executive director James Grossman told The Washington Post. “It’s a work of contentious politics designed to stoke culture wars.”

The commission was created in September with a confusing news conference featuring Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson. The 45-page report is largely an attack on decades of historical scholarship, particularly when it comes to the nation’s 400-year-old legacy of slavery, and most of those listed as authors lack any credentials as historians. While claiming to present a nonpartisan history, it compares progressivism to fascism and claims the civil rights movement devolved into “preferential” identity politics “not unlike those advanced by [slavery defender John C.] Calhoun and his followers.”

“I don’t know where to begin,” said public historian Alexis Coe. “This ‘report’ lacks citations or any indication books were consulted, which explains why it’s riddled in errors, distortions, and outright lies.”

Kali Nicole Gross, a history professor at Rutgers and Emory universities and the co-author of “A Black Women’s History of the United States,” said it was “dusty, dated” and “the usual dodge on the long-lasting, harmful impacts of settler-colonialism, enslavement, Jim Crow, the oppression of women, the plight of queer people … as the true threat to democracy.”

Boston University historian Ibram X. Kendi tweeted: “This report makes it seems as if slaveholding founding fathers were abolitionists; that Americans were the early beacon of the global abolitionist movement; that the demise of slavery in the United States was inevitable.”

“It’s very hard to find anything in here that stands as a historical claim, or as the work of a historian. Almost everything in it is wrong, just as a matter of fact,” said Eric Rauchway, a history professor at the University of California at Davis. “I may sound a little incoherent when trying to speak of this, because the report itself is not coherent. It’s like historical wackamole.”

He pointed to sections misinterpreting Puritan John Winthrop’s “city on a hill” speech, and to a section claiming the civil rights movement “came to abandon the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity of colorblind civil rights in favor of ‘group rights.’ ”

“Group rights is not anathema to American principles,” he said, recalling the formation of the Senate. “Why do Wyomingers have 80 times the representation that Californians have if not for group rights?”

Coe, who published a biography of George Washington last year, pointed to a section of the report that claims the first president had “freed all the slaves in his family estate” by the end of his life. In fact, he freed only one enslaved person upon his death; the 254 other enslaved people at Mount Vernon had a much more complicated fate.

George Washington owned slaves and ordered Indians killed. Will a mural of that history be hidden?

Hilary Green, a history professor at the University of Alabama, tweeted a list of books on American history people could read “instead of a certain report.”

Several historians said it was particularly offensive that the report was released on Martin Luther King Jr. Day and included several photos King and quotes they said were taken out of context.

“The suggestion that affirmative action programs are somehow antithetical to the vision of Martin Luther King Jr. is simply ludicrous,” said Princeton historian Kevin M. Kruse. “King was alive when the Johnson administration launched its affirmative action programs and publicly declared his support, specifically noting that it was a logical extension of the struggle for black equality. The document ignores King’s record of support for affirmative action, lamely pointing to the one line conservatives know from his ‘I Have a Dream’ speech and ignoring the rest of his radical record. The fact that this historical distortion of King’s life and work was released on MLK Day makes it even worse.”

Martin Luther King Jr.’s scorn for ‘white moderates’ in his Birmingham jail letter

“It is fitting that this president, who was impeached again, this time for inciting an insurrection in the nation’s capital, would mark his last Martin Luther King Jr. Day in office by attacking the very movement Martin Luther King Jr. was a leader of,” Coe said.

“To say that the racial divisions that have existed for the last half century are due to insistence by African Americans on ‘group rights’ rather than to the depth and breadth of racism, to say that on a page where you have a photograph of Dr. King is offensive to Dr. King’s legacy,” Grossman said.

The commission began in part as a response to the New York Times’s 1619 Project, a group of essays by historians and journalists about the way slavery has shaped the nation.

At the National Archives Museum on Sept. 17, President Trump criticized a New York Times project focused on the first arrival of enslaved Africans in Virginia. (The Washington Post)

Five professors say the 1619 Project should be amended. ‘We disagree,’ says the New York Times.

Even historians who have been critical of the 1619 Project, including Princeton’s Sean Wilentz, dismissed the 1776 report.

“It reduces history to hero worship,” Wilentz wrote in an email. “It's the flip side of those polemics, presented as history, that charge the nation was founded as a slavocracy, and that slavery and white supremacy are the essential themes of American history. It's basically a political document, not history.”

Historian Kevin M. Levin, author of several books about the Civil War, said: “The 1776 report views students as sponges who are expected to absorb a narrative of the American past without question. It views history as set in stone rather than something that needs to be analyzed and interpreted by students.”

The White House also released Monday a long list of historical figures to be featured at Trump’s proposed “National Garden of American Heroes.” Georgetown history professor Adam Rothman compared the report to the list, saying it was “nothing but the National Garden of Heroes in prose form, a stiff and lifeless history of America on a pedestal.”

Grossman, the AHA executive director, said: “This is written as if no historical scholarship has been produced in nearly 70 years, so it’s bereft of any professional historical sensibility at all. There are no historians on this commission. Would you take your car to a garage where there’s no mechanic?”

Teo Armus contributed to this report.


Tuesday, January 12, 2021

Spare the tests, support the children: Forget about standardized exams this year

I'm in total agreement that we need to not be testing this spring in the middle of a pandemic. I've already posted on this, including encouraging folks to sign this petition directed to the federal government: National Call to Suspend High-Stakes Testing in Spring 2021 FairTest.org

While we're at it, we should dedicate time and resources to re-envisioning this system altogether in such a way that it reflects what Ann Cook and Phyllis Tashlik express herein:
"Good assessments grow out of curriculum, and provide deeper inquiry into subjects instead of relying on multiple-choice and formulaic essays. When assessments are imposed arbitrarily, they just encourage simplistic and rote teaching and create rigid categories of “winners” and 'losers.'”

I speak on this very topic of testing and accountability tomorrow with Dr. Lorrie Shepard in a conversation moderated by Peter Dewitt for his online talk show at Education Week. The event is free and open to the public. It takes place next Wednesday, January 13, 2021, from 2:00-3:00 p.m. EST.

 

If you're in Texas, we get going at 1 p.m. CST. Please go to this link to register: https://www.edweek.org/events/online-talk-show/a-seat-at-the-table-with-education-week-testing-accountability#pelcro-on24-form


We need to relegate this top-down, remote control, objectifying, discriminatory, punishing system of testing to the dustbin of history. 

We cannot go on doing the same old thing as if the world hasn't changed when we know that it has. And profoundly so.

-Angela Valenzuela
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS 
JAN 12, 2021  5:00 AM 
Across the country, national and local groups — including the majority of parents — are calling on the federal government to waive standardized testing requirements for states in the spring. New York should be one of the leaders of that effort. Instead, it remains one of only 10 states to link standardized exams, in this case Regents exams, to high school graduation.

We’re in the throes of a pandemic with no consistency to school attendance, WiFi reception, or access to computers. In this climate, not only would a fresh round of standardized tests lack any validity or reliability, they would be a tragic waste of resources and effort.

With a virus run amok, a record number of deaths — particularly in our underserved communities — overburdened hospitals, the loss of jobs and fear of a greater economic breakdown, why inflict more harm on those whose lives and families have already been the most disrupted?

Instead, let’s use stretched budgets to educate kids in ways that will support them and better meet their very real and critical needs, both academic and emotional.

Teachers and school support staff are in the best position to know what those needs are. Throughout this pandemic, teachers have made their relationships with students a priority, staying in contact, scheduling one-on-one conferencing, answering students’ late-night phone calls, and using their teacher-designed assessments — appropriate to what has been taught in class — to understand students’ academic needs and what to focus on next in their lessons and assignments.

Why outsource questions about what students know and can do to companies that produce standardized tests — commercial publishers that don’t know our students or our schools? It was, after all, New York City Schools Chancellor Carranza who recently acknowledged, “Schools right now have a good idea of where their students are...” Teachers, social workers, counselors, administrators and others have been the ones dropping off iPads and art supplies, food and clothing and staying in touch with their students.

Reverting back to standardized testing as the ultimate measure of student progress, doubling down on a decades-long, costly, and failed approach to bridging the educational “gap,” shows a complete lack of imagination and creativity about teaching and learning. It reinforces the spurious notion that teachers and students have no incentive to teach and learn without these tests, and reinforces the norm to simply “teach to the test.” New York should know better and learn from the 1,450 colleges and universities, including CUNY, that have stopped requiring SAT scores.

Good assessments grow out of curriculum, and provide deeper inquiry into subjects instead of relying on multiple-choice and formulaic essays. When assessments are imposed arbitrarily, they just encourage simplistic and rote teaching and create rigid categories of “winners” and “losers.”

We need to use this crisis to reimagine what school can be. Instead of going backwards to policies that serve to sort and rank kids, we need to value higher goals for instruction, gain a deeper appreciation for what learning is, and show respect for kids’ individual talents and interests.

New York already has schools that use teacher-designed performance assessments, presentations, and exhibitions to assess students successfully. Public high schools in the New York Performance Standards Consortium have been graduating students for 20 years using such a system. Students write literary criticism, conduct science experiments, engage in mathematical thinking and conduct historical research. They read and write extensively and present their papers to external evaluators. It works because students take ownership and can demonstrate what they know. They have been doing this in schools from the Bronx to East Flatbush, from the Lower East Side to Rochester and Ithaca.

Learning is complex and assessments should be, too. One test score cannot match the depth and breadth of using multiple forms of assessment. It’s time to refocus our energies on assessments that provide a more complete portrait of a student.

So what can New Yorkers do? We can advocate in Washington and Albany for a testing waiver and launch a national discussion to review the failed policy of our 20-year obsession with standardized testing. The definition of assessment is not testing. Other options exist and can be implemented, with time and training. Petitions online further that cause.

We face enormous challenges as we transition to a post-COVID world. There’s been plenty of talk about social and emotional learning, but we need to do more than just talk. Students need to feel empowered so they can believe in themselves again. That will be the best way to help. More standardized testing will only disempower them and rob them of what they need most — our time, our commitment, our belief in their capacity to learn and grow.

Cook is executive director and co-founder of the New York Performance Standards Consortium. Tashlik is director of the consortium’s Center for Inquiry in Teaching and Learning.



My Thoughts on the Eve of Donald Trump's Impeachment, by Angela Valenzuela, Ph.D.

Friends,

Let's make no mistake here. What happened last Wednesday was a well-oiled. fascist, attempted coup d’etat that arose funded by right-wing donor networks spearheaded by the billionaire Koch brothers and his ecosystem of friends, including the Betsy DeVos family.  For more on this, read The Trump Coup D’Etat and Insurrection Was Long in the Making, And Will Continue by Inderjeet Parmar in The Wire (Jan. 10, 2021) and Republican Attorneys General Dark Money Group Organized Protest Preceding Capitol Mob Attack by Jamie Corey in Documented.net (Jan. 7, 2021).

Aside from ideological differences, at its core, what we're all seeing in the news is fundamentally about race relations and white nationalists’ utterly false equation of corruption with the black and minority vote, that is itself a lie, the big lie, that worked and is working hard to produce an alternative, perilous narrative about the election being stolen.

All of their voter suppression tactics didn’t work, and instead motivated the majority of Americans who see and have a different vision for a new multi-racial, multi ethnic, inclusive, racially just, democratic (small "d") nation. This is in fact what the marches were about this last spring that further got reflected at the ballot box.

We must still address the fact that these insurrectionists live, and will continue to live, in online echo chambers that mirror their white supremacist fears for, and vision of, America. They see and feel themselves as relinquishing power as whites.

We’re always at risk of getting manipulated and simply caught up in such echo chambers that are not to be confused with epistemic bubbles that can be popped with an ounce of truth.

Longer term, the antidote is a good education that widens their world to other possibilities, including the enduring power of democracy that is Indigenous to this continent. For example, read J. D. Stubben's 2000 piece in the Social Science Quarterly titled, "The Indigenous Influence Theory of American Democracy. Check it out. Consider that our country's so-called "exceptionalism" rests on a bedrock of Indigenous forms of governance that has served us well, even as U.S. policies have been oppressive toward Native Americans, historically. Why aren't we teaching this in our public schools? Why aren't our nation's classrooms the laboratories for democracy as John Dewey envisioned? 

We don't even know what we don't know, much less why we're not encouraged to know it.

These white nationalists and our country, as a whole, need a values-based, culturally sustaining education that teaches them this history and that’s opposite of what they’re getting currently, namely, an empty, soul-less, mind-numbing, high-stakes, objectifying, and alienating test-centric curriculum that is frequently a mile wide and an inch deep as per the top-down compliance model that we have in place.

This must change. We need a research-based, authentic assessment system that allows students to take on challenging, meaningful projects that make a difference in their lives, making the world a better place. This is not rocket science. Models exist. We can and must do better. Our students are calling for this when they are calling for test-optional and tested-blind admissions into the university.

They also seek a greater focus on equity and racial justice throughout the college curriculum, calling for greater support for our Ethnic Studies programs. The nationwide movement for Ethnic Studies that I have covered throughout this blog has similarly been voicing these concerns in the K-12 curriculum for at least a decade in its contemporary incarnation. They are calling for Women and Gender Studies, Disability Studies, Native American and Indigenous Studies, Asian American Studies, Puerto Rican/Boricua Studies, Dominican Studies, civics, environmental awareness and courses throughout the curriculum that induce deep, critical thought. If our children do not know who they are or where they are going, any road will get them there. And that's a scary proposition as we can see in full display right now.

In the meantime, let's proceed with impeachment proceedings and please join me in signing this petition from the Working Families Party that will hold these perpetrators to account. My last thought is that, among so many other vile things, Trump wants to rob president-elect Joe Biden and vice-president-elect Kamala Harris and the majority of us that support them from enjoying their victory. We fight back by not allowing cynicism or despair to settle in and getting about the re-building of our nation, in ways big and small. I quote renowned educator Deborah Meier who once expressed the following:

"If there's a problem with democracy, the solution is always more democracy."

Amen. Let's rebuild our country and our nation's schools and classrooms with such words of wisdom in mind.

-Angela Valenzuela

#RacialJustice #democracy #TheBigLie #CoupKluxKlan #GetWoke #ImpeachTrumpAgain

 

Saturday, January 09, 2021

Assessment Reformers Launch Campaign To Suspend High-Stakes Student Testing In Spring 2021

Friends:

I encourage you to sign this National Call to Suspend High-Stakes Testing in Spring 2021 as per the December 2, 2020 press release posted below which now has over 5,000 signatures linked from FairTest.org. I previously served as a board member for many years for this highly-regarded organization that's officially named, "The National Center for Fair & Open Testing."

While you're at it, in states like Texas—that on top of federal testing requirements, additionally administer state-required tests—go ahead and reach out to whoever represents you in the legislature to inform them of both this national movement/petition, and the wrong-headedness of administering state-required tests this spring. 

In addition to the post below, I encourage everyone to read this recent piece by Dr. Lorrie Shepard titled, “Testing Students This Spring Would Be a Mistake.”

In Texas, if you don't know who represents you, please go to this website: https://wrm.capitol.texas.gov/home

Si se puede! Yes we can!

-Angela Valenzuela


National Call to Suspend High-Stakes Testing in Spring 2021

Submitted by Fairtest on December 2, 2020 - 2:09pm 

for further information, contact: Bob Schaeffer (239) 395-6773; mobile  

(239) 699-0468

 

for immediate release Wednesday, December 2, 2020

ASSESSMENT REFORMERS LAUNCH CAMPAIGN TO

SUSPEND HIGH-STAKES STUDENT TESTING IN SPRING 2021;

PETITION CALLS ON BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, STATE LEADERS

 TO LIFT STANDARDIZED EXAM MANDATES

 

Forcing public schools to administer standardized exams to students after COVID-19 disruptions would produce invalid and unfair results while diverting resources from real educational needs, according to a national campaign to cancel Spring 2021 high-stakes tests that was launched today.

A petition to endorse the “National Call to Suspend High-Stakes Testing in Spring 2021” is available online at: https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/suspend-high-stakes-student-testing. Both individuals and organizations are encouraged to sign on.

The campaign is led by FairTest: the National Center for Fair & Open Testing. Initial endorsers include the Network for Public Education and many local groups, such as Save Our Schools New Jersey.

The petition states, “ We call on the U.S. Department of Education to waive provisions of the Every Student Succeeds Act that require states administer standardized exams to students in the 2020-2021 academic year. We also call on the states to cancel their own additional testing mandates and to waive any consequences attached to their results, at least for the current school year.”

FairTest interim Executive Director Bob Schaeffer explained, ”Just last week, U.S. Education Secretary DeVos cancelled this spring’s National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). She recognized that the exams could not be administered safely, fairly, or accurately. We seek suspension of all other state and federal school testing mandates for similar reasons.”

  • Among the points cited in the “National Call” petition:    The results won’t be valid, reliable, or useful. We don’t need test scores to know that low-income children in poorly resourced schools have fallen even farther behind in a pandemic.
  • There are better ways to know how students from different backgrounds and learning needs fared during the pandemic. Instead of more testing, we should be focusing on solutions that address poverty, racial inequities, and school funding disparities.
  • Most parents oppose testing this spring. A mid-October “Understanding America Study” found that 64 percent supported exam suspension. Opposition to testing is strong across all demographic groups, particularly among Black parents, 72 percent of whom favor cancellation.

FairTest’s Schaeffer concluded, “We expect many local school boards, community organizations and educational leaders to endorse this campaign. No test in the world is worth risking the lives of students, teachers and education support personnel.”