Chairman Dan Huberty was justifiably displeased with Drew Scheberle's testimony. As senior vice president of the Austin Chamber of Commerce, what accounts for his opposition anyway, particularly since the proposal is well grounded in research? Why would he oppose the parents, children, community, and representatives anyway? What is his investment in our "shame and blame" model for public education anyway?
In any case, the Texas Center for Education Policy brief explains how IGCs are hardly a watering down of the curriculum or process, but is actually a research-based way that decisions on behalf of students should be done.
My college students are evaluated holistically. In an ideal world, they shouldn't even need grades: What they—and we all need—is evaluation. Same with schools. More evaluation, less grading, turning on its head what we've grown accustomed to doing. Less competition, more collaboration, together with helpful, constructive criticism.
That said, I fully concur with Chairman Huberty. This IS personal. It has BEEN personal. The genesis of this very blog tracks back in 2004 to the struggle for fair and valid assessment in Texas.
Prior to that, since 2000, I also had a listserv focused on such matters and ran that for 6 years or so. I also have a whole book on this.
Time is of the essence. Contact your legislators right away and express support for SB463. If you do not know who represents you, click here to find out.
Thanks, Rep. Huberty for your leadership. I would have gone to the hearing but I was busy with finishing touches to the brief and end-of-semester grading—or should I say, evaluating. The work of a professor...
Comments, criticisms are always welcome.
Angela Valenzuela
@DanHuberty
House education panel gets heated debating alternative graduation route
A House Public Education
Committee hearing became heated Tuesday when Chairman Dan Huberty had a
harsh exchange with a witness speaking against a bill that would let
high school students who fail required state tests graduate, with the
approval of a special committee.
Bob Daemmrich for The Texas Tribune
The temperature rose during a Tuesday House committee debate on a
bill to circumvent high-stakes testing when the chairman lost his temper
with the sole witness testifying in opposition.
Drew Scheberle, senior vice president of the Austin Chamber of Commerce, told the House Public Education Committee that he did not support allowing students who fail standardized tests, including those with disabilities, to take an alternative route to graduation. That got the panel's Chairman Dan Huberty, R-Houston, angry — because his son is dyslexic.
"I'm not going to argue with you about this. You're completely wrong on this," Huberty told Scheberle.
Huberty sponsored Senate Bill 463, which would extend an existing program letting high school students who fail required state tests and end-of-course exams graduate as long as they go through a special committee that agrees they are academically prepared. Huberty later apologized for his outburst, explaining that the piece of legislation has personal relevance for his son, who might need to use the alternative route to graduate.
"I got a little heated there, and I apologize for that," he said.
"But this is very very personal to me. I'm a parent that has a
special-needs child. ... This is a lifeline."
The House versions of the legislation, House Bill 77 and House Bill 966, died without being heard. SB 463 was left pending in the House committee Tuesday.
Committee members — the student's teachers, guardians and administrators — use related classwork and projects to determine whether that student is ready to graduate. About 70 percent of the students eligible to use these committees as an alternate route in 2015-16 actually passed and graduated, according to state data released last month.
Legislators established these committees in 2015, riding a wave of fervor against high-stakes standardized testing. The 2015 law included a clause causing it to expire in September.
Advocates wanted legislators to extend the use of the committees indefinitely. SB 463, authored by Sen. Kel Seliger, R-Amarillo, started off that way, passing unanimously in the Senate Education Committee. But just before the full Senate vote, Seliger changed the bill to cap the use of the committees to 2019, meaning advocates will probably need to prepare for another fight next session.
Theresa Trevino, president of anti-testing group Texans Advocating for Meaningful Student Assessment, asked legislators Tuesday to either remove the new cap or extend it past 2019. "We need to have some sort of safety net for our kids," she said.
Critics argue that making graduation requirements more flexible for some lowers the bar for all Texas students.
Scheberle, an outspoken critic of the graduation committees, said he was happy that the bill now has more restrictions. He praised the amendments to cap them to 2019, and to study how well students do when they graduate without passing one or more required exams. But, he said, he is still opposed to the bill, even for students with disabilities.
"Candidly, this pisses me off," Huberty said. "You know how personal this is. The fact that you came up here to do this really irritates me."
Several parents and advocates testified in favor of the bill Tuesday.
J.W. Lively drove from Denton early in the morning to explain that his daughter only graduated from high school because of the alternate route offered by the graduation committees. Struggling with dyslexia, she took a required English exam six times before she was able to pass it — but was on the verge of succumbing to a failed history test, he said. She only graduated by going before an individual graduation committee, which determined she was ready to graduate, despite the failed exam.
Lively said his three children are all succeeding despite being dyslexic. "They struggle greatly, but they work their tails off," he said.
Read related Tribune coverage here:
Drew Scheberle, senior vice president of the Austin Chamber of Commerce, told the House Public Education Committee that he did not support allowing students who fail standardized tests, including those with disabilities, to take an alternative route to graduation. That got the panel's Chairman Dan Huberty, R-Houston, angry — because his son is dyslexic.
"I'm not going to argue with you about this. You're completely wrong on this," Huberty told Scheberle.
Huberty sponsored Senate Bill 463, which would extend an existing program letting high school students who fail required state tests and end-of-course exams graduate as long as they go through a special committee that agrees they are academically prepared. Huberty later apologized for his outburst, explaining that the piece of legislation has personal relevance for his son, who might need to use the alternative route to graduate.
The House versions of the legislation, House Bill 77 and House Bill 966, died without being heard. SB 463 was left pending in the House committee Tuesday.
Committee members — the student's teachers, guardians and administrators — use related classwork and projects to determine whether that student is ready to graduate. About 70 percent of the students eligible to use these committees as an alternate route in 2015-16 actually passed and graduated, according to state data released last month.
Legislators established these committees in 2015, riding a wave of fervor against high-stakes standardized testing. The 2015 law included a clause causing it to expire in September.
Advocates wanted legislators to extend the use of the committees indefinitely. SB 463, authored by Sen. Kel Seliger, R-Amarillo, started off that way, passing unanimously in the Senate Education Committee. But just before the full Senate vote, Seliger changed the bill to cap the use of the committees to 2019, meaning advocates will probably need to prepare for another fight next session.
Theresa Trevino, president of anti-testing group Texans Advocating for Meaningful Student Assessment, asked legislators Tuesday to either remove the new cap or extend it past 2019. "We need to have some sort of safety net for our kids," she said.
Scheberle, an outspoken critic of the graduation committees, said he was happy that the bill now has more restrictions. He praised the amendments to cap them to 2019, and to study how well students do when they graduate without passing one or more required exams. But, he said, he is still opposed to the bill, even for students with disabilities.
"Candidly, this pisses me off," Huberty said. "You know how personal this is. The fact that you came up here to do this really irritates me."
Several parents and advocates testified in favor of the bill Tuesday.
J.W. Lively drove from Denton early in the morning to explain that his daughter only graduated from high school because of the alternate route offered by the graduation committees. Struggling with dyslexia, she took a required English exam six times before she was able to pass it — but was on the verge of succumbing to a failed history test, he said. She only graduated by going before an individual graduation committee, which determined she was ready to graduate, despite the failed exam.
Lively said his three children are all succeeding despite being dyslexic. "They struggle greatly, but they work their tails off," he said.
Read related Tribune coverage here:
- The Senate passed a bill extending the opportunity for students to graduate even if they haven't passed their required exams by going before a graduation committee.
- The Texas Senate Education Committee heard Tuesday from supporters, and a few critics, of a bill that would make permanent a 2015 law that allows students to graduate even if they haven't passed their required exams by going before a graduation committee.
No comments:
Post a Comment