Translate

Showing posts with label education for domestication. Show all posts
Showing posts with label education for domestication. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 06, 2023

Must-See Movie on Education: "Radical" win this year's Festival Favorite Award at the 2023 Sundance Film Festival

Friends:

I highly recommend that you see the movie, "Radical," that is showing here in Austin at the Galaxy Theater through December 13th. The brilliant Mexican actor, Eugenio Derbez, won this year's Festival Favorite Award at the 2023 Sundance Film Festival. Congratulations to director and writer Christopher Zalla who—as you can hear in this interview, got approached by Derbez, who expressed an eagerness at wanting to be cast in the film. Check out the interview. The recounting, the narrative of the making of the movie itself sounds so magical and wondrous.

It's similar to a degree to other movies described by Goldstein in his November 3, 2023 review appearing in the Los Angeles Times, but also very different in that this is a film about Mexico, addressing what life and existence meant in 2011 with the drug cartels in power and the daily experiences of horror and violence, particularly on the Mexican side of the U.S.-Mexico border in Matamoros, Tamaulipas—and within view of Elon Musk's Space X located at the state's furthest, southern tip in Boca Chica in Brownsville, Texas.
Christopher Zalla

What may also distinguish it from other films in this genre is that the teacher, Sergio (played by Eugenio Derbez), expresses not knowing what he is doing. However, Sergio does know more than he realizes in that he knows what schools should not be when they fail to educate youth for liberation and opt instead—in the words of the late Brazilian educator, Paolo Friere—"to educate for domestication."

"Radical," is a word never used once in the film, sidestepping language and taking the viewer, along with his students, straight to the classroom floor. It speaks to the exquisitely combined powers of groundedness, the power of an exuberant teacher's authentic, expressive caring for his initially reluctant students.

Albeit circuitously, this birthed a de facto, curriculum and pedagogy that sparked the flame of inventiveness and curiosity by centering it in the youth themselves. His approach incited his students to learn and experience the joy of imagination and the ability to create, something often denied for both students and teachers embedded in patriarchal and paternalistic school "reform" models that are highly scripted and over-prescribed. 

Such approaches, in contrast, are fully about order and control. Staffed with over-burdened teachers for little pay and precious little respect, such schools "succeed" when they break our children's spirits with mind-numbing curricula, low expectations, and high-stakes tests.

"Death by PowerPoint," is an expression I recently heard from a teacher experiencing Mike Moses' and his charter company's, Third Futures Schools, curriculum, in what used to be the Houston Independent School District. The Third Futures curriculum is already being administered locally at Méndez Middle School in Austin, Texas. I heard from someone there who a week ago told me that "It's a total school-to-prison pipeline." 

Watch out, friends and community. The neoliberals took over the Houston Independent School District and are not just headed our way, but already here. Literally. 

The irony is that these agendas come almost exclusively from people who themselves benefitted from a public education! Texas Education Agency (TEA) Commissioner Mike Morath himself! You can listen to him yourself here. 



It's pathetic to hear Commissioner Morath absolve himself from the Houston Independent School District takeover. Feigning innocence, he is no better than the aloof, Mexican bureaucrats that Sergio confronted in the film when asking them to provide the school with computers. Spare me. Por favor!

How could we in Austin let this happen to Méndez...? Geez, what a deal for neoliberals. Our communities get disenfranchised and they profit mightily from our children's failures—as exhibited on high-stakes tests that are—and have been—handmaidens to charterization, corporatization, and privatization of public education, generally. 

Not unlike Governor Abbott's plot to dismantle public education through vouchers, this parallel agenda disenfranchises our communities and is thus politically helpful to those that neither believe in, nor want, democracy, and prioritize instead, the preservation of the incumbencies of those in power. 

I appreciate the film's critique of the kind of education that treats children and youth like objects as emblematic of close to 25 years of high-stakes testing, that are part of this very same system of organized failure and disempowerment. In the meantime, the private sector generates eye-popping profits. And this, with our precious public school tax dollars flowing out of the classroom into their pockets. This, despite students ultimately doing exceedingly well on the ENLACE test despite vast inequities that the film and context make clear. Cheers to Zalla for his unblinking look at life under crisis.

I found it to be gripping from beginning to end and super hard to hold back the tears at least a couple of times. I even found myself not wanting it to end because I wanted to know what happened to all the youth, as well as to engage the implicit question of educating youth toward improbable futures. I like to think that whereas there is an undeniable impact of underinvestment, that any intervention that maximizes students' potential for future achievement is worth undertaking, since learning is not just in the immediate, but life-long, as well.

I think that we should organize viewings of this film in our classrooms and communities everywhere to get us talking about the education we seek for our youth and ways to get us there.

A final comment. There really is so much joy and power in this film that I am confident that all of these youth and adult actors were profoundly impacted. Zalla, too! What a gift to the world! 

Kudos to Eugenio Derbéz, Christopher Zalla, and the entire team for helping us to envision the world anew. 🧡💚🧡

Sí se puede! Yes we can!

-Angela Valenzuela



Review: ‘Radical’ uses an old syllabus but still scores highly on the inspiration scale

Eugenio Derbez, standing, in the movie “Radical.”
 
(Pantelion Films)


By Gary Goldstein | Nov.3, 2023 | Los Angeles Times

One of the more reliable movie subgenres involves the idealistic teacher who turns around a group of underachieving, often unruly and disadvantaged students. From such earlier films as “The Blackboard Jungle,” “To Sir, With Love” and “Up the Down Staircase” to later entries including “Stand and Deliver,” “Dangerous Minds” and 2008’s Palme d’Or-winning “The Class,” who doesn’t love stories about inspiring educators who help young folks beat the odds?

The latest addition to this admirable bunch is “Radical,” a lovely and touching true-life portrait based on Joshua Davis’ 2013 Wired magazine article “A Radical Way of Unleashing a Generation of Geniuses.” The movie, anchored by a wonderful turn by Mexican superstar Eugenio Derbez, kicked off this year’s Sundance Film Festival, where it won the Festival Favorite Award.

Derbez, seen on American screens in the Oscar-winning “CODA” (in which he also notably played a teacher), stars as the real-life Sergio Juárez Correa, who in 2011 joined the teaching staff of José Urbina López Primary School in the border city of Matamoros, Mexico. (The film was shot mainly in and around San Salvador Atenco, a town outside Mexico City.)

Matamoros is a dusty, impoverished place beset by crime, corruption and apathy, all of which contribute to the state of its struggling elementary school, nicknamed “the School of Punishment,” where funding, test scores and student engagement are consistently, perhaps irrevocably low. That is until Correa — all jaunty, rules-be-damned enthusiasm — sweeps in at the start of the fall semester to teach sixth grade. He’s expecting an assist from the school’s computers but soon discovers they were stolen four years ago and never replaced.

Neither his wide-eyed students nor the rundown facility’s portly principal, Chucho (a winning Daniel Haddad), know what to make of Correa, who immediately steamrolls past traditional teaching methods, reimagines his classroom’s desks as lifeboats and launches into a rousing lesson about staying afloat, a resonant theme here.





There’s a learning curve, of course, but the eager kids soon find themselves on Team Correa, invigorated by his “radical” classroom stylings, intrigued by his references to such advanced topics as physics and philosophy, and encouraged by how he lets them each learn at their own pace. This includes eschewing any preparation for the standardized national exams, which Correa abhors but the school system unequivocally embraces.

It’s affecting and heartening to see Correa’s students blossom before our eyes, gaining a confidence and curiosity long suppressed by their bleak environment and the school’s stale methodology. Chucho and Correa become good friends as well, as the principal is won over by the new teacher’s creativity, commitment and elan.

Typical of these films, the story zeroes in on a handful of students, offering vivid snapshots of their home and personal lives and the intrusive effects on their schooling. First, there’s the pretty, quiet Paloma (Jennifer Trejo), a nascent math and science prodigy, who helps her ailing father (Gilberto Barraza) mine salable scrap metal from the smelly garbage dump near their makeshift home. Though her suspicious dad initially thinks Correa is filling Paloma’s young head with overly big and unattainable ideas, the teacher helps him to realize — and support — the girl’s potential. (The real Paloma broke a national record that term for her standardized test scores and later made the cover of Wired, which unironically dubbed her “The Next Steve Jobs.”)


Eugenio Derbez in the movie “Radical.”
(Pantelion Films)



Then there’s Nico (Danilo Guardiola), who begins as the class clown but goes on to appreciate his studies and inch away from the criminal activity he’s been drawn into by his older brother (Victor Estrada) and a local gang leader (Manuel Cruz Vivas). But will education alone be enough to set him on the right path?

Finally, there’s Lupe (Mia Fernanda Solis), the eldest child in a growing family, whose new love of books and philosophy may have to take a back seat to her responsibilities at home. (She and Nico are amalgamations of Correa’s other real-life students.)

Despite the story’s upward trajectory, Kenyan-born writer-director Christopher Zalla (Sundance’s 2007 Grand Jury Prize winner, “Padre Nuestro,” a.k.a. “Sangre de Mi Sangre”) lays in enough credible obstacles, including an especially heartbreaking one, to add effective tension and pathos to Correa’s and the kids’ journey.

If the script can sometimes feel a tad pro forma, the film still proves an authentically moving and involving crowd-pleaser. (Though, at a bit more than two hours, it might have benefited from some judicious trimming.)

It should also be noted that, while the real Correa was 31 when the movie takes place, Derbez, also a producer here, turned 62 in September. Regardless, the buoyant, youthful actor convincingly embodies the role (his character does drop in a sly comment about being “a little too old” to be a new father again) and makes a warm, engaging and memorable lead.


'Radical'

In Spanish, with English subtitles

Rating: PG-13, for some strong violent content, thematic material and strong language

Running time: 2 hours, 6 minutes

Playing: In limited release







Wednesday, April 13, 2022

A revealing gender divide for Latinos and Political Clues for 2022 by Jazmine Ulloa | April 12, 2022 | New York Times

I hope that this piece gets the attention it deserves. It speaks, among other things, to the miseducation of our youth and how this translates into the disenfranchisement of our community. It's easy to point the finger at the community, to blame them for their lack of political literacy. 

While, as discussed herein, this is frequently true, the onus resides in a system that refuses to even acknowledge what could be an ennobling curriculum that teaches them of the incredible sacrifices that have been historically made by members of their own community for them to have the right to vote and thusly, exercise agency over their own futures. Borrowing from the late Brazilian educator, Paolo Freire, instead of getting educated for liberation, they are educated for domestication, to be powerless and alienated from schools, policy struggles, and politics, as a whole. If they only new that this, too, is their inheritance...

Considering that education for domestication is the status quo, viewed from this perspective, the educational system is actually succeeding in protecting the incumbencies of those in power who unsurprisingly, do not prioritize equitable school funding policies to provide this vast community with the same high quality education that their peers receive in the most well-funded schools in our state and nation. Not only has "wokeism" not even been a factor in their own political formation, the powers that be seek to ensure that it never manifests to begin with.

All is not lost as these youth remain teachable. And for this, we advocate, and will continue to do so.

-Angela Valenzuela

A new report exploring young Latinos’ views on immigration sheds light on one of the most important voter groups in the midterm elections, and found a noteworthy gender divide.

QAnon conspiracy theories were one of many forms of online misinformation that targeted Latino voters during the 2020 election.Jeff Swensen/Getty Images

Greetings from your co-host Leah Askarinam. Blake Hounshell is off this week. We have an item tonight from our colleague Jazmine Ulloa, who reports on a new analysis of young Latinos’ media habits.

Online disinformation hit Latino communities hard ahead of the 2020 presidential election.

It came in the form of videos, tweets and WhatsApp messages, YouTube videos and the rants of Spanish-language radio hosts. It included false reports of widespread violence on the streets of Democratic cities after the murder of George Floyd, QAnon conspiracy theories, and overblown claims of terrorists and criminals crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.

As the most egregious material spread online — and in the private text chains of young Latinos’ tías and tíos — organizers with United We Dream Action, an immigrant rights organization founded and led by young immigrants, jumped into the fray. The group trained members to provide accurate information to their families and friends and create shareable content across social media platforms that was meant to dispel anti-immigrant and anti-Black narratives.

Now, with the 2022 midterms months away and both parties scrambling for the votes of one of the most crucial swing groups in American politics, the organization released a report today that more deeply explores Latinos’ online engagement with material about immigration. Long exploited by bad actors on the web, the contentious issue is widely expected to be pivotal in elections across the country.

The immigrant advocacy network teamed up with Harmony Labs, a nonprofit research group in New York, to study the television and online consumption habits of more than 20,000 Latinos nationwide who agreed to share their data from Jan. 1 to Aug. 31, 2021. Latinos over 36 were more likely to encounter polarizing anti-immigrant narratives than other cohorts, the analysis found, mainly through right-wing news sites, television and YouTube.

It also found an interesting gender divide among younger Latinos.

Latinas ages 18 to 35 drew from a much wider variety of news and entertainment sources than their older counterparts, the analysis found, and were more likely to seek out stories not just about immigration policy but also about immigrants and the immigrant experience.

Their search queries and content consumption were curious and community-driven, reflecting “a desire to understand and engage with the people and world around them,” according to the findings.

But Latino men in the same age cohort were far different. Those surveyed tended to inhabit “a very insular, virtual world,” the researchers said. Many young Latino men spent much of their time online engaging with anime and fantasy gaming, and did not absorb much media about immigration or immigrants at all, either positive or negative. When they did consume immigration content, it tended to be about policy and stemmed from conservative-leaning sources.

GameStop stocks and Covid news

Beyond that, their news consumption choices tended to be more individualistic and entrepreneurial. Of 45,000 articles read by Latinos in the first nine months of 2021, only two topics appeared to grab the attention of large numbers of young Latino men: the amateurs who drove up the stock price of GameStop, and Covid-related school closures.

Both young Latinos and Latinas demonstrated less interest in politics, and for the young men, the top “political” personalities were influencers who discuss a broad variety of cultural topics and fall across the political spectrum: Philip DeFranco, Joe Rogan and Mr. Beast.

The vacuum of political information for young Latino men, coupled with their desire for economic stability and penchant for individualism, is likely to leave that group more susceptible to right-wing anti-immigrant narratives and disinformation in the future, the groups concluded.

This uniquely positions young Latino men for negative arguments “that there isn’t enough for them and that someone else is taking their opportunities,” said Juanita Monsalve, the senior marketing and creative director for United We Dream Action. But it also creates an opportunity to intervene with counter-messaging, she added.

“We have this research to figure out how to create culturally responsive content and show up in the spaces where they want to consume it,” Monsalve said.

The report’s findings track with previous research on Latinos’ political leanings — and they add to the picture that is emerging of how these voters are newly up for grabs.

Latinos in general tend to lean Democratic, but in 2020, Donald Trump improved his performance among these voters in some parts of the country, and with working-class Latino men in particular, by centering his messaging on the economy.

Young Latinas are likely to be more liberal than their male peers, and are more worried about social justice and equity issues like racism, immigration and climate change.

Organizers with United We Dream Action, an immigrant rights organization that has worked to dispel online misinformation targeting Latinos.Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters


More young Latino men voted for Trump in 2020 than they did in 2016, but whether Republicans will continue to build support among the demographic “is an open question,” said Vladimir Enrique Medenica, an assistant professor at the University of Delaware and director of survey research at the University of Chicago’s GenForward project, which surveys voters ages 18-36.

What is known, he said, is that many have no interest in politics, or they identify as independent or do not have an affiliation to either major political party. This is partly because many feel alienated from politics and unrepresented by either party.

Many also face greater barriers to college education and economic opportunities, both of which help shape people’s political views and can be particularly important to the process of politicization for second-generation Latinos, whose parents immigrated to the United States and who may not have developed a strong attachment to either Democrats or Republicans, Medenica said.

Opening for Republicans

In Florida, where Spanish-language hosts have amplified anti-Black narratives and exaggerated claims of election fraud, Republicans have seen an opening to appeal to more young Latino men through YouTube and social media, said Andrea Cristina Mercado, the executive director of Florida Rising, a racial justice organization focused on building political power for marginalized communities.

As an example, she pointed to an ad released last month by Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida with the U.F.C. fighter Jorge Masvidal, who is of Cuban and Peruvian descent.

To counter any political messages this election cycle meant to sow racism, division or voter confusion, Mercado’s group has been relying on “promotoras de la verdad,” Latina organizers who serve as “truth warriors” and have been canvassing homes to combat misinformation on issues including the coronavirus, vaccines, Florida’s recently passed law restricting classroom discussion about sexual orientation and gender identity, and the upcoming midterms.

“Latina women are organizing to take back the narrative and the disinformation poisoning our community,” Mercado said. But they cannot do it alone, she added.