Saturday, October 03, 2009

Study Shows Better Scores for Charter School Students

Interesting findings from Hoxby's revisit to the charter effect debate. I'm curious to see the differences in background characteristics of the students in her sample. If I recall correctly, this was an issue in her last study. I'm also curious how ELLs were addressed. Some things to think about for any of you jumping in to read her report.

In any case it's always good news to see where urban youth are being served and try to identify practices that work, though even those things are hard to get to when we're solely basing what works on test performance. From the conclusion in this article it doesn't sound like the study is getting to the point of identifying practices that work and that are scalable for all children in a way that doesn't require them to have to relocate to a new school, that might sometimes be outside of their communities.

Some thoughts that come to mind when I read these studies and how they get translated into the political debate on this issue.


Published: September 22, 2009

Students who entered lotteries and won spots in New York City charter schools performed better on state exams than students who entered the same lotteries but did not secure charter school seats, according to a study by a Stanford University economist being released Tuesday.

Charter schools, which are privately run but publicly financed, have been faring well on standardized tests in recent years. But skeptics have discounted their success by accusing them of “creaming” the best students, saying that the most motivated students and engaged parents are the ones who apply for the spots.

The study’s methodology addresses that issue by comparing charter school students with students of traditional schools who applied for charter spots but did not get them. Most of the city’s 99 charter schools admit students by lottery.

The report is part of a multiyear study examining the performance of charter schools in New York City by Caroline M. Hoxby, a Stanford economist who has written extensively about her research on charter schools and vouchers.

Ms. Hoxby found that students who attended a charter school from kindergarten to eighth grade would nearly match the performance of their peers in affluent suburban communities on state math exams by the time they entered high school, a phenomenon she characterizes as closing the “Harlem-Scarsdale” achievement gap. The results are somewhat less striking in English, where students closed 66 percent of the gap, according to the study.

“I wanted to look at something that reflects the reality of what goes on in the New York area,” Ms. Hoxby said in an interview. “In terms of life outcomes, I think we just don’t know yet. This is not the silver bullet, but this is showing a major and lasting difference.”

By the third grade, according to the study, the average charter school student was 5.3 points ahead on state exams in English compared with students who were not admitted to the charter schools. In math, the students were 5.8 points ahead. Most tests are scored on a scale of roughly 475 to 800.

The gap between students in charter schools and those in traditional public schools widened the longer students remained in the charter schools, according to the report.

Ms. Hoxby did not reach any conclusions about what practices at the schools caused the jump, but she noted that many charter schools had extended school days and school years, many required students to attend classes on Saturdays and most paid teachers based on their performance and responsibility, rather than the traditional teachers’ union salary scales.

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and the schools chancellor, Joel I. Klein, have embraced charter schools as a key to their effort to overhaul the city’s school system. Mr. Klein has made an effort to recruit charter school operators that have been successful in other parts of the country to open schools throughout the city, particularly in the South Bronx, Central Brooklyn and Harlem.

There are approximately 30,000 students in charter schools in the city, and another 40,000 students on waiting lists to be admitted to those schools.

No comments:

Post a Comment