Do give this op-ed on Senate Bill 37, authored by Dr. Pauline Strong, a close read. I am very concerned that Texans aren't aware of this horrible bill, SB 37 that essentially controls the higher education curriculum premised on the false premise of "woke indoctrination." Geez, how offensive can they be!
We are in a drought state and we have a water crisis, a housing crisis, and growing income inequality. Our leaders should focus on these things rather than wasting time and taxpayer dollars on finding ways to silence professors who might actually critique them. This is not heading in the right direction.
The bill will at some point soon make its way to the House Higher Education Committee where we hope it dies. It is constitutionally not sound.
Do not be fooled that this is not about "fixing" higher education. For starters, it ain't broke! If anything, it's about curtailing faculty governance and turning us into a corporation. We are not a business, and it is unethical for us to be run by a non-elective body—as SB 37 proposes—that has control over curriculum and hiring.
Talk about killing higher education!
This is terrible policy.
-Angela Valenzuela
SB 37 doesn't fix problems at Texas universities. It undermines faculty, students | Opinion
by Pauline Strong
Austin American-Statesman | March 24, 2025
Texas public higher education has been in the crosshairs of right-wing politicians since February 2022. That month, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick threatened “looney Marxist professors” with the end of tenure after the University of Texas faculty council issued a statement affirming its faculty’s right to academic freedom. Patrick’s threats led to the 2023 passage of Senate Bill 17, which banned diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts at universities, and SB 18, which weakened the protections of faculty tenure.
Several Republican-sponsored bills this session go after higher education even further. But in my view, Patrick’s priority bill, SB 37, should be most vehemently opposed by Texans who care about the quality of higher education in this state.
In crafting SB 37, Sen. Brandon Creighton, R-Conroe, has abandoned the culture war language of “wokeness” and “CRT,” or critical race theory. Instead, the bill promises to provide more oversight of universities and promote excellence in higher education.
At first glance, that may sound rather innocuous. But the bill has harmful implications for our public colleges and universities. It will lead to inefficiencies, undermine democratic processes and deny educational liberty and student choice, among other negative effects.
SB 37 would create an Office of Excellence in Higher Education to oversee compliance in our public colleges and universities. But the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board and the Board of Regents already provide such oversight. Adding another layer of bureaucracy will lead to unnecessary government spending and duplicate an infrastructure that already exists.
SB 37 would also require that half of the members of faculty senates and councils be elected. Appointed faculty are more likely to align with the views of the administration, which would reduce the range of perspectives that would be offered in deliberation. The bill would also expand senate membership to constituencies outside the university and limit faculty membership to tenured faculty.
Faculty senates in Texas already serve in an advisory capacity to the president, but under this configuration, only the most elite members of the university workforce — those with tenure — would even be eligible for service. As tenured faculty make up only a minority of the faculty workforce, this severely undermines any semblance of democratic deliberation.
SB 37 would also eliminate minors and certificate programs that politicians determine are under-enrolled. But certificates and minors cost the university virtually nothing to offer. Offering fewer will effectively eliminate students’ ability to seek the credentials they believe are best for them, regardless of the popularity of those studies.
Additionally, SB 37 would place the core curriculum at each institution under the review of an appointed committee. This committee would ensure that “courses do not endorse specific public policies, ideologies or legislation” — a vague provision that in practice could easily lead to state censorship of education.
Like any bureaucratic system, universities could be more efficient in delivering the services the state has asked them to provide. A real inefficiency that should be addressed, for instance, is the increase in highly-paid upper administrative positions at universities that have increasingly taken the work of governance out of the hands of faculty.
But this bill doesn’t fix any real problems in our public colleges and universities. Instead, SB 37 implies that faculty are not experts in the fields in which they’ve spent decades working. It suggests bureaucrats are better at managing organizations than those who labor in them every day. And it contends that students don’t deserve the educational liberty to choose the courses of study that they deem best.
I’m sure if he reached out, Sen. Creighton would find faculty to be willing partners in making our universities the best in the world. Instead, he has proposed a course of action that will greatly hamper our pursuit of excellence. SB 37 is not only bad for Texas colleges and universities, it’s bad for Texas.
Pauline Strong is a professor at the University of Texas and president of the AAUP (American Association of University Professors) chapter at UT Austin.
SB 37 doesn't fix problems at Texas universities. It undermines faculty, students | Opinion
by Pauline Strong
Austin American-Statesman | March 24, 2025
Texas public higher education has been in the crosshairs of right-wing politicians since February 2022. That month, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick threatened “looney Marxist professors” with the end of tenure after the University of Texas faculty council issued a statement affirming its faculty’s right to academic freedom. Patrick’s threats led to the 2023 passage of Senate Bill 17, which banned diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts at universities, and SB 18, which weakened the protections of faculty tenure.
Several Republican-sponsored bills this session go after higher education even further. But in my view, Patrick’s priority bill, SB 37, should be most vehemently opposed by Texans who care about the quality of higher education in this state.
In crafting SB 37, Sen. Brandon Creighton, R-Conroe, has abandoned the culture war language of “wokeness” and “CRT,” or critical race theory. Instead, the bill promises to provide more oversight of universities and promote excellence in higher education.
At first glance, that may sound rather innocuous. But the bill has harmful implications for our public colleges and universities. It will lead to inefficiencies, undermine democratic processes and deny educational liberty and student choice, among other negative effects.
SB 37 would create an Office of Excellence in Higher Education to oversee compliance in our public colleges and universities. But the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board and the Board of Regents already provide such oversight. Adding another layer of bureaucracy will lead to unnecessary government spending and duplicate an infrastructure that already exists.
SB 37 would also require that half of the members of faculty senates and councils be elected. Appointed faculty are more likely to align with the views of the administration, which would reduce the range of perspectives that would be offered in deliberation. The bill would also expand senate membership to constituencies outside the university and limit faculty membership to tenured faculty.
Faculty senates in Texas already serve in an advisory capacity to the president, but under this configuration, only the most elite members of the university workforce — those with tenure — would even be eligible for service. As tenured faculty make up only a minority of the faculty workforce, this severely undermines any semblance of democratic deliberation.
SB 37 would also eliminate minors and certificate programs that politicians determine are under-enrolled. But certificates and minors cost the university virtually nothing to offer. Offering fewer will effectively eliminate students’ ability to seek the credentials they believe are best for them, regardless of the popularity of those studies.
Additionally, SB 37 would place the core curriculum at each institution under the review of an appointed committee. This committee would ensure that “courses do not endorse specific public policies, ideologies or legislation” — a vague provision that in practice could easily lead to state censorship of education.
Like any bureaucratic system, universities could be more efficient in delivering the services the state has asked them to provide. A real inefficiency that should be addressed, for instance, is the increase in highly-paid upper administrative positions at universities that have increasingly taken the work of governance out of the hands of faculty.
But this bill doesn’t fix any real problems in our public colleges and universities. Instead, SB 37 implies that faculty are not experts in the fields in which they’ve spent decades working. It suggests bureaucrats are better at managing organizations than those who labor in them every day. And it contends that students don’t deserve the educational liberty to choose the courses of study that they deem best.
I’m sure if he reached out, Sen. Creighton would find faculty to be willing partners in making our universities the best in the world. Instead, he has proposed a course of action that will greatly hamper our pursuit of excellence. SB 37 is not only bad for Texas colleges and universities, it’s bad for Texas.
Pauline Strong is a professor at the University of Texas and president of the AAUP (American Association of University Professors) chapter at UT Austin.
No comments:
Post a Comment