From: Packer, Joel [NEA] [mailto:JPacker@nea.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 2:56 PM
By the way, here's how the President's budget proposes to legislatively accomplish his high school reform proposals. As opposed to proposing to actually amending NCLB, the Budget proposes to simply do all this as amendments to the FY 06 education appropriations bill using existing NCLB authorized programs or adding new mandates to Title I.
Here's how:
1) Add two more grades to high school mandated NCLB testing. The budget proposes to add language to the FY 06 education appropriations bill that would provide $250 million for grants to States to develop the additional math and reading tests (interestingly, nothing about additional science tests). Any State that receives Title I funds (which is all states) must develop such assessments and incorporate them into their AYP systems, under "such conditions as the Secretary may establish".
2) High School Intervention: Proposes $1.24 billion for a new program, to be run through the Fund for the Improvement of Education program under NCLB, that would provide formula grants to states (no formula specified) which in turn would provide competitive awards to school districts to "enable them to implement targeted interventions in high-need [undefined] secondary schools". A key piece here is that since part of the funding for this new program comes from the proposed elimination of TRIO Upward Bound, TRIO Talent Search, and GEAR-UP, and those programs have multi-year grants to awardees, more than half of this $1.24 billion ($683 million) will go to pay for such continuation grants.
The only further information provided is this:
High School Interventions. This new initiative would support formula grants to States that wold (sic) in turn award the funds competitively to local educational agencies to enable those entities to implement targeted interventions in high-need secondary schools in order to increase student achievement and narrow achievement gaps between students from different ethnic and racial groups and between disadvantaged students and their more advantaged peers.
3) Mandate that all states participate in 12th grade NAEP: Simply says that as a condition of receiving Title I funds states must do this, "if the Secretary pays the cost of administering such assessments". The budget does propose an additional $22.5 million for such costs.
The overall "new/increased" funding for high school programs in the Bush budget broadly defined includes the following:
Extend NCLB testing for two additional high school grades = $250 million
High School Intervention = $1.240 million
Increase Striving Readers = $175 million
Increase math/science partnerships = $90 million
Increase advanced placement = $22 million
State Scholars Capacity building = $12 million
Mandated NAEP 12th grade state participation= $22.5 million
Total = $1.811 billion
However, these "increases" are paid for by proposed elimination of the following existing high school programs (broadly defined):
Vocational Education State Grants = $1.194 billion
Voc ed tech-prep states grants = $105.8 million
Smaller learning communities = $95.5 million
TRIO Upward Bound = $280 million
TRIO Talent Search = $145 million
GEAR UP = $306 million
Total eliminations = $2.126 billion
NET CUT FOR HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS = $315 million
Joel Packer
Manager, ESEA Policy
Government Relations
NEA
202-822-7329
202-255-0915 (cell)
202-822-7309 (fax)
JPacker@nea.org
This blog on Texas education contains posts on accountability, testing, K-12 education, postsecondary educational attainment, dropouts, bilingual education, immigration, school finance, environmental issues, Ethnic Studies at state and national levels. It also represents my digital footprint, of life and career, as a community-engaged scholar in the College of Education at the University of Texas at Austin.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment