Translate

Showing posts with label Ruben Cortez. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ruben Cortez. Show all posts

Friday, June 10, 2022

INVITATION: 7th Annual Statewide [VIRTUAL] Summit on Mexican American Studies TOMORROW—June 11, 2022

FREE AND OPEN TO THE PUBLIC

Dear Friends and Colleagues:

Please join us tomorrow morning on Saturday, June 11, 2022 for our 7th Annual Statewide  [VIRTUAL] Summit on Mexican American Studies where an array of topics will get discussed. I, along with El Librotraficante, Tony Diaz, are on a panel where policy and politics will get discussed. As you can see from the flyer announcement, we are featuring other important breakout sessions focused on Elementary-level, and high school Social Studies, Fine Arts, Literature, higher education, and community engagement. Texas State Rep. Christina Morales, who championed House Bill 1504 in the 2021 87th legislative session with significant bipartisan support, will be one of our honored guests. Also present will be Texas SBOE Members Ruben Cortez, and Marisa Perez-Diaz who will offer SBOE updates to our community (see next week's SBOE agenda [pdf]). Other highlights are tributes to the legendary Dr. Rudy Acuña and the beloved late Dr. Rolando Hinojosa-Smith, together with a call to legislative action by Dr. Emilio Zamora in the wake of the Uvalde tragedy.This event is sponsored by the NACCS Tejas Foco, an organization that has been advocating for Ethnic Studies getting taught in the curriculum since 2013. As a consequence of our actions, Texas now offers TEKS standards-aligned, elective courses in Mexican American and African American Studies. Native American Studies is on a calendar for review by the SBOE, with Asian American Studies in the wings right now so that ultimately, it, too, shall get taught in our schools.We are well aware that powerful forces would like to silence us. That's not going to happen. We will not be silenced. What for anyway? We offer the sacred knowledge, ancestral wisdom, policy solutions, and healing medicine that are good for the soul.



-Angela Valenzuela

Note: To register, just put your camera on the QR code that will link to an Eventbrite invitation to get you registered and a calendar Invite.

Sunday, February 07, 2021

Despite a school year turned upside down by the coronavirus, standardized testing in Texas will go on.

Disappointing, but not surprising. We need to stop testing kids so that we can actually educate them.

You can hear Commissioner Morath defend his position here.

It should matter what teachers and parents say on the matter as they are the ones closest to the classroom and are most aware of how this testing culture is so detrimental to classroom instruction.

Please Texas, let's cancel these tests this spring. 

We must all challenge this madness.

-Angela Valenzuela

Despite a school year turned upside down by the coronavirus, standardized testing in Texas will go on.

Sarah Asch | Austin American-Statesman

February 3, 2021

A few things will be different for the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, however. Grade promotion requirements have been waived for students in grades five and eight, but high school seniors still must pass the exams to graduate. And the Texas Education Agency will not grade districts based on the results.

Many other things will be the same, including a requirement that students take the test in person, even if they have been learning remotely during the pandemic.

The testing plan has its critics. Democrats in the Texas House renewed calls Wednesday to cancel the test this year, saying that the STAAR test does not provide an accurate picture of how students and schools are performing. 

 “We cannot ask our schools to take on the burden of scheduling in-person STAARs for all the students across the state," state Rep. Alma Allen, D-Houston, said during a news conference. "We’re in the middle of a life-threatening pandemic. We also cannot ask our teachers or our school personnel, students and families to put themselves at risk for an unnecessary test.”

The state's largest teacher union also has urged state officials to suspend testing this year.

Supporters of the test say it will be crucial in measuring how much students have learned during the pandemic.

The test provides information about student achievement that can be used to inform changes and target resources to schools and students that need the greatest support, a Texas Education Agency spokesperson said. 

State Rep. Dan Huberty, R-Houston, who has served as the chairman of the House Education Committee, said standardized testing is the best way to get a clear picture of where students stand compared to statewide learning goals. Standardized testing also is required by the national Every Student Succeeds Act in order for states to receive federal education funding, he said. 

“We want to figure out how far behind kids are,” he told the American-Statesman. “We need to get a baseline because we didn’t take the test last year. We need to figure out where kids stand.” 

More flexibility

State education officials say they are offering more flexibility for when districts can schedule the tests, typically administered in the spring, which include not only the STAAR but also the STAAR Alternate 2 for special education, and the Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System and its alternate. 

As in years past, districts can test students online or on paper, although all testing will occur in an in-person setting.

Heather Sheffield, board president for Texans Advocating for Meaningful Student Assessments, does not think the state should conduct the STAAR this year. She said the test results do not give teachers information fast enough to help students.

“It’s really autopsy data, teachers aren’t getting the results quickly,” she said. “Why are we spending money on a test that doesn’t really help our teachers and shuts down our schools for days or really weeks at a time?” 

Sheffield wants the state to move away from the STAAR and toward a test that provides meaningful data and is not high stakes. She is glad that TEA is not giving districts A-F grades this year and would like to see the state transition to a rating system that does not rely only on standardized tests.

She's also pushing to eliminate tying the exam with graduation for high school seniors.

Huberty said that high school students who fail end-of-course assessments but meet certain requirements still have a path to graduate by receiving approval from an individual graduation committee.

'Unnecessary spending'

Clay Robison, spokesperson for the Texas State Teachers Association, which represents about 68,000 state teachers, said the group believes standardized testing and testing-based accountability should end. Robison said the test discriminates against students of color, low income students and students whose first language isn't English. If state education officials want to understand how students are performing, they should sit down with teachers, he said.

Robison said that money spent on the STAAR test could be better spent on other, more pressing things.

“It’s unnecessary spending,” he said. “It’s not a fair or effective way to measure student progress, nor is it an effective or fair way to measure teacher evaluations.”

Robison also questioned the state's commitment to spend $338 million to transitioning the test online, which was announced last month. This includes a three-year $262 million contract with the Washington, D.C.-based Cambium Assessment to manage the administration, scoring and reporting on an online testing platform.

London-based Pearson, which has been involved in Texas testing for four decades, was awarded $126 million over the same three years to develop the assessments. Pearson also has an existing testing contract that ends in August.

These two companies will take over from Educational Testing Service, which has a contract that ends on Aug. 31. 

Thursday, January 09, 2020

Join me in supporting Ruben Cortez for Texas Senate!

On the topic of Latino elected officials (see previous post to this blog), we can all actually do something that helps move the needle in exactly the direction that we need.  And who better than our beloved, personal friend, leader, and advocate, Ruben Cortez.  

To be sure, without Ruben's outstanding leadership on the Texas State Board of Education, we wouldn't have Ethnic Studies in the state of Texas. Mexican American, and African American, Studies are now official secondary electives.  Native American and Indigenous, as well as Asian American, Studies, will soon become official state education policy, as well.

Thanks, Ruben, for your outstanding leadership and for being such a warm, caring, and committed activist, as well as progressive politician, in general, to boot.  We need you in the Texas Senate!

Please consider making a contribution to his campaign here.

Sí se puede!  Yes we can!

-Angela Valenzuela

JOIN THE #RESISTANCE

Please help us grow our grassroots #resistance by adding your name to our e-mail list today.

Somos la Voz del Valle! 


Contact Us:
Ruben@RubenforTexas.com or 956-750-2882
Facebook
Twitter
Website
Po. Ad. Paid for by Ruben Cortez for Senate Campaign.

Thursday, February 01, 2018

Update on Texas SBOE's Consideration of a Mexican American Studies Course



For those of you keeping up with this story, Tuesday evening's consideration by the Texas State Board of Education (SBOE) of our community's long-standing demand for a Mexican American Studies (MAS) course in state curriculum got muddled in an ad hoc discussion about Latino Studies and whether the course should actually be the latter than the former.  

Excuse me, this is a board that doesn't know diddly squat about the differences between MAS and "Latino Studies," nor has it ever cared.  As award-winning UTRGV Professor Stephanie Alvarez brilliantly explained about these two courses that she has actually taught, namely, MAS and Latino Studies, the latter is taught east of the Mississippi River and the former, west of it.  Ours is a distinct history in Texas with respect to Mexico, the border, and Mexican Americans that one has to grasp if one hopes to understand the experiences of other non-Mexican Latino groups in Texas.  It's a different history for Latinos east of the Mississippi and so these courses are radically different.  


Dr. Alvarez herself is a Cubana and she adheres passionately to this view in her leadership and instruction as Director of MAS at her home institution in South Texas. But not even this, her expert testimony, swayed the board discussion. It was as if she had not spoken at all.  Same for the rest of us present who also testified.


Plus, our community of NACCS Tejas foco scholars—and other allies like the Texas Freedom Network and the broader REST Coalition—have been solidly advocating for MAS since 2014.  While we are a large, breathing, statewide constituency, Latino Studies has no such counterpart.  We should know.  They would have surfaced by now.


This is not to say that there aren't some Latino Studies scholars who, by the way, haven't done this serious advocacy or in-depth K-12 curriculum development work that may seek to profit from our efforts—and God forbid—actually get a course that no one either teaches or is prepared to teach by the end of next April's SBOE meeting.  While stranger things have happened, it's not over 'til it's over.


Disturbingly, while SBOE agenda item 10 made no reference at all to Latino Studies, that is what surfaced in conversation—not, of course, with our statewide constituency—but with the Anglo members of the board itself, resulting in concomitant board inaction as Dr. Trini Gonzales' piece below lays out.  This unwillingness to give the community an official course in state curriculum is dismissive and insulting.


  As I expressed earlier on Facebook,
"Tony Diaz is totally on point that the problem is not that our community doesn't play by the rules, but rather the opposite: The rule makers, the Texas State Board of Education, does not [begin listening at 4:20]. In reference to the antics by the Texas State Board of Education, they indeed "keep moving the goal posts," changing the rules and playing us through their politics of manufactured uncertainty and confusion.

Not those, of course, that have championed Mexican American Studies like Ruben Cortez, Marisa B. Perez , or Erika Beltran who fight the good fight, and do so honorably and in the full light of day.

Hats off to our community gathered from far and wide, and to our students, too, who got a lesson in cultural chauvinism and white supremacy today, while bearing witness to the mischievious machinations of power.

Keep carrying the torch and remember the Mexican proverb that even when they think they've buried us, we're actually seeds.
Many in our community were, of course, deflated and offended by the board's ploys to divert our agenda.  Community, we must mobilize.  Reach out to your board member that represents you and let them know how you feel.  Find out who represents you here and call them or visit with them.

Also, our organization of scholars and advocates will be discussing next steps with respect to the SBOE to create an MAS class at this year's NACCS TEJAS CONFERENCE.  

Come one, come all.  


Angela Valenzuela
c/s

State board to vote on Mexican American studies in April

Local experts advocated for state curriculum at meeting this week


McALLEN — The State Board of Education listened to testimony from Mexican American studies experts from all over Texas on Tuesday, most advocating for the creation of a state-approved curriculum. While no decision was made, the board indicated a vote is soon  to come.

Advocates of Mexican American studies, MAS, including several from the Rio Grande Valley, traveled to Austin asking for Texas Essential Knowledge Skills, known as TEKS, to be created as a way to standardized learning throughout the State.

The vote on whether or not the Texas Education Agency will create a course curriculum is expected during the board’s meeting in April.


“This is going to be a historic vote in April, because at the end of the day a class is going to be created but what will be decided at that meeting is how that class will look,” said Trinidad Gonzales, history instructor at South Texas College and advocate for the creation of the MAS TEKS.

The board had the opportunity to ask questions of the experts as they seemed not to have a clear understanding of the need behind the curriculum since the courses are currently being taught in some districts.

If approved, the TEKS would provide districts that wish to offer the course all necessary materials that ensure every student has a solid base of knowledge in the subject before leaving the system, advocates argued, as well as providing guidelines to textbook makers to supplement the courses.
School districts currently have two avenues to teach the course — as a dual-enrollment course or using a course curriculum developed by the Houston school district.

But while the two methods provide a viable avenue for districts to adopt the course, there are no clear guidelines of what the curriculum can and should include, making it hard for districts to want to invest the resources needed to develop them. The same goes for textbook publishers.

“This doesn’t have to take a long time,” said board member Ruben Cortez Jr. “These individuals here and probably others that are represented here today have offered as we’ve done in the past to be a working group with the agency to help develop this. You’ve got decades and decades of experience here from all universities across the state.”
SBOE Member Rubén Cortez
 Cortez was one of the board members who called for the item to be discussed, and expressed his desire to approve a working group on the Mexican American studies curriculum. “This has obviously gone long enough,” he said.

The discussion on the need for statewide curriculum and guidance on the subject has been going on for about three years. And the board has already placed the subject on its list of possible future courses.

Another issue discussed was the possibility of creating a Latino studies course as well or instead.
Having two courses would be ideal, Gonzales said, but this could take a long time and the fact that there is already some framework to guide the creation of curriculum for the Mexican American studies course would speed the process.

“There’s some board members who want to do a Latino studies class, there are other board members who want the Mexican American studies class, and then there’s the other option of having a Mexican American studies class that includes Latino studies,” Gonzales said.

TEA staff was present at the meeting to discuss the feasibility of the project. At some point, Monica Martinez, associate commissioner of standards and policy, said the agency doesn’t have the resources necessary to compensate a committee of experts to help create the TEKS.

The agency usually summons experts from across the state for guidance and compensates them for lodging and other expenses. But those present said they would be willing to freely volunteer their time.

For now, Gonzales said the National Association of Chicana ChicanoStudies-Tejas Foco Working Group, of which he is a member, will meet next month to discuss their options as the SBOE vote approaches.

“It seems like a general consensus of all the speakers by the end of the testimony is that whatever that class is, it has to be based on Mexican American Studies,” he said. “Including a Latino studies or the creation of a separate Latino studies course as another option.”
dperez-hernandez@themonitor.com

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

Commentary: How SBOE could advance plan for Mexican-American studies, by Dr. Trinidad Gonzales


A hearing on Mexican American Studies curriculum for secondary public education in the state of Texas is happening today at the Texas State Board of Education meeting at the William B. Travis Building, 1701 North Congress.  Feel free to join us, beginning at 1PM.  

As a member of the K-12 committee of the National Association of Chicana Chicano Studies-Tejas Foco Working Group [@NACCSTejasFoco] referenced below, and as expressed by another member, Dr. Trinidad Gonzales, who penned this op-ed, let's get this matter resolved in a way that honors teachers throughout the state that are already teaching Mexican American Studies.

Here are the primary options as laid out by Dr. Gonzales:

  • The board can simply vote to have the innovative course curriculum become the official TEKS standard, or have the TEA develop the state standard from the various curricula.
  • The Tejas Foco working group can help provide experts on Mexican-American studies to develop new state standards — if the board chooses the latter option. The first option is the most ideal though, because it is already approved curriculum.

Hoping that the board simply votes for having the existing innovative course curriculum get approved.  This has been a long hard, indeed historic, struggle for curricular inclusion.  Stay tuned.

-Angela Valenzuela

Commentary: How SBOE could advance plan for Mexican-American studies 

 



The Board of Education is considering the development of state standards — formally known by educators as Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills — for a Mexican-American studies course Tuesday during its general meeting.

The first time this course was proposed was in 2014 — by Ruben Cortez, the board’s District 2 representative. Instead of creating the course, the board sought the submission of textbooks for a possible class as a compromise between supporters and those who were against the idea.
Three years later, the issue of creating the course has arisen again — though this time, the debate is whether the State Board of Education will allow the creation of state standards for a widely taught course. During the intervening years, the Texas Education Agency approved an innovative Mexican-American studies course. The innovation course — and Mexican-American history dual-enrollment classes — both have sweeping support across the state.

VIEWPOINTS: Will this be the year for a Mexican-American studies curriculum?
 
The National Association of Chicana Chicano Studies-Tejas Foco Working Group has determined that during the last school year, more than 400 students took a Mexican-American studies course across the state. The research is based on data from the TEA and Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board data.

Prior to these pathways toward teaching Mexican-American studies, instructors utilized the Social Studies Special Topics course to teach it. The course focuses on research skills, so a wide range of content can be used for instructional purposes. TEA data only indicates how many special topics courses are taught, not what their content is. As a result, courses on Mexican-American studies taught under this category are not included in the working group’s calculation. The Working Group’s estimates is likely an undercount.

So, unlike 2014, the board is no longer debating the creation of a unique class but approving state standards for curriculum alignment of a course that is being taught throughout the state with various curricula. Two primary options are available for the state board to meets its statuary obligations of establishing curriculum:

• The board can simply vote to have the innovative course curriculum become the official TEKS standard, or have the TEA develop the state standard from the various curricula.
• The Tejas Foco working group can help provide experts on Mexican-American studies to develop new state standards — if the board chooses the latter option. The first option is the most ideal though, because it is already approved curriculum.


There are three reasons for the need of curriculum alignment: First, because of the fragmented nature of the curricula, it is time to establish statewide standards to help bring coherence to a widely taught course. Second, publishers have not sought to create textbooks for the course because of a lack of input to help authors align the text to statewide standards. Third, while many school districts have developed courses on Mexican-American studies, many cannot because they lack the curriculum experts to do so — and because there is a lack of official textbooks that they can use. Establishing the TEKS standard would solve these issues.

It is time to recognize that courses on Mexican-American studies exist in Texas — and that the only way forward is for the state board to approve the creation statewide standards. There are no longer any pedagogical or bureaucratic reasons not to do so.

Gonzales is a history instructor at South Texas College and a member of the National Association of Chicana Chicano Studies-Tejas Foco Working Group.