Translate

Showing posts with label government report. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government report. Show all posts

Sunday, August 14, 2016

No Time to Lose: How to Build a World-Class Education System State by State

Go to this website for the actual, downloadable report recently out of the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).

-Angela

 No Time to Lose: How to Build a World-Class Education System State by State 

8/12/2016

The bad news is most state education systems are falling dangerously behind the world in a number of international comparisons and on our own National Assessment of Educational Progress, leaving the United States overwhelmingly underprepared to succeed in the 21st century economy.
The U.S. workforce, widely acknowledged to be the best educated in the world half a century ago, is now among the least well-educated in the world, according to recent studies.
At this pace, we will struggle to compete economically against even developing nations, and our children will struggle to find jobs in the global economy.
States have found little success. Recent reforms have underperformed because of silver bullet strategies and piecemeal approaches.


















Meanwhile, high-performing countries implement policies and practices and build comprehensive systems that look drastically different from ours, leading them to the success that has eluded states. Pockets of improvement in a few districts or states is not enough to retain our country’s global competitiveness.
The good news is, by studying these other high-performing systems, we are discovering what seems to work. Common elements are present in nearly every world-class education system, including a strong early education system, a reimagined and professionalized teacher workforce, robust career and technical education programs, and a comprehensive, aligned system of education. These elements are not found in the U.S. in a consistent, well-designed manner as they are found in high performers.
We have the ability to turn things around. Much higher-performing, yet less-developed countries—such as Poland and Singapore—have made significant progress developing their education systems in just a decade or two because they felt a strong sense of urgency.
State policymakers, too, can get started right away to turn around our education system by taking immediate steps to:
  • Build an inclusive team and set priorities. 
  • Study and learn from top performers.
  • Create a shared statewide vision.
  • Benchmark policies.
  • Get started on one piece.
  • Work through “messiness.”
  • Invest the time. 
We must directly face these challenges and begin immediately to reimagine and re-engineer our own education system. We must implement meaningful and comprehensive changes that will produce real results for our students.
State legislators must lead this work. Education is first and foremost a state responsibility. Each state can develop its own strategies for building a modern education system that is globally competitive, similar to the approach taken by other high-performing countries.
But we must begin now. There’s no time to lose.

Release Event

2016 NCSL Legislative SummitA media event was held Aug. 9 at the 2016 NCSL Legislative Summit to release “No Time to Lose: How to Build a World-Class Education System State by State” to the media.


About the Study Group

The National Conference of State Legislatures hosted a plenary session during its 2013 Fall Forum to discuss the results of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) most recent survey of what 15-year-olds in industrialized countries could demonstrate about their knowledge of reading, mathematics and science. This survey is known as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Upon hearing of the disappointing performance of students in the U.S., officers of NCSL’s Standing Committee on Education requested that NCSL launch a legislative study into international comparisons of high-performing education systems. They wanted to study other high-performing countries to learn which policies and practices were in place and what lessons the U.S. and individual states might learn from their success. They also wanted to learn about the consequences for our economy and quality of life if we failed to improve our standing.
A bipartisan group of 28 veteran legislators and legislative staff, along with several partners from the private sector, began an 18-month study in 2014. They focused on the highest performing countries on PISA to discover commonalities across their policies and practices. They met with education leaders from these countries, along with national and international experts who study their systems. They also visited several countries to see the differences firsthand.
This first report explains why there’s no time to lose in rebuilding state education systems.  However NCSL’s study group still has questions—and surely the reader does too—about how to design and implement these systemic changes in the states. Where should legislators begin—teacher recruitment or preparation, standards, assessments, early learning? How should states realign their resources? Do some of these policies fit together better into an actionable package? There is still much to learn and discover.
The study group members will continue to meet through 2017 to find the answers to these and other questions by continuing to study and learn from other successful countries, as well as districts and states here in the U.S. Upon completion of our study, the study group will produce a policy roadmap that states can use to guide their reforms, as well as provide support to states ready to embark on these efforts

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

The Condition of Education 2007

From colleague Roberto Calderon. -Angela

Nota: See, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education
Statistics. (2007). _The Condition of Education 2007_ (NCES 2007-064).
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Each major catetory contained in this annual report responds to
individual indicators or subcategories that provide a detailed sketch or
analysis of the major national and regional trends supported by a short
brief containing the principal data arranged in two or three tables.
This is valuable data and is pertinent to all levels and types of public
(and to some extent private) education, and policymaking generally.
Listed below are some of the subcategories that may be of interest to
readers. Please share the information with others whose own work may be
supported by this readily available body of publicly-accessed knowledge.
Though issued annually, the current report charts trends in public
schools from 1972 to 2005 due to the data's availability.

Of significance to Latinos of course is that as a group they are the
major reason why "Nationally, 42% of public school students were
considered part of a racial or ethnic minority group in 2005, an
increase from 22% of students in 1972" (see,
southernstudies.org/facingsouth, June 2007). In addition, the report
found that: "47% of the South's K-12 public school students are now
'ethnic/racial minorities,' up from 30% (mostly African American) in
1972. The West is the only more diverse region, with 54% students of
color." Finally, While the West has the highest number of students
identified as 'Hispanic' (37%), the South has seen the fastest growth:
the proportion of Latino students has more than tripled in the South
from 1972 to 2005, from 5% to over 18%." Altogether, whether we see
what's going in Texas as part of larger national and regional trends in
either the South or West, as this report arranges its data, the numbers
are significant and help explain and contextualize what's going on in
our individual cities, campuses, and so forth, K-20. Local or regional
trends are part and parcel of national trends where ethnicity is
concerned in education.

In K-12 education, for instance, between 1972 and 2005, the total
number of students enrolled changed considerably. Whites decreased from
being 78% of the total in 1972, and stood at 58% in 2005. Blacks for
their part remained relatively stable across the 33-year-period, a
generation's worth, since their numbers went from 15% to 16% of the
national total. The significant increases came in Latino and "Other"
enrollments, where the numbers went from 6% to 20% of the total for
Latinos, and Others, which includes Asians, American Indians, students
of more than one race, and so forth, increased from 1% to 7%.

Attached PDFs Provide Sample of the Data: In the section following the
"Table of Contents" are copied the brief analyses made of the data
pertaining to two separate Indicators. These include "Racial/Ethnic
Distribution of Public School Students" (Indicator 5) and "Undergraduate
Education," Indicator 8. These indicators and policy briefs correspond
to the part of the Table of Contents called "Participation in
Education." You will also find the PDFs for these policy briefs.

The overall link to the National Center for Education Statistics,
Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education is:
. Be sure and bookmark the
site.

Adelante.

Roberto R. Calderón
Historia Chicana [Historia]