Translate

Showing posts with label totalitarianism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label totalitarianism. Show all posts

Monday, July 08, 2024

Traumatic Homeschooling: How Evangelicals Use Education to Totalize by R. L. Stollar May 7, 2022

Friends,

Wow! This was an eye-opener. I am reading this in the context of my earlier post today on "unschooling." There is much to know about these suspect movements. I would never want to say that all homeschooling or unschooling is bad, but rather that the growing evidence and first-person accounts like this one by R. L. Stollar, are deeply concerning. 

Based on these burgeoning stories and evidence, particularly of horrific stories of child abuse that range from actual harm to children in an unregulated system of education to the "totalism," or indoctrination that is killing children's wills, is resulting in a growing choir of individuals calling for legal and policy reforms to protect children.  Stollar's entire paragraphs on "totalism" is worth reading:

"Totalism is a concept first developed by psychiatrist Robert Jay Lifton in his 1961 book Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism. Totalism is related to totalitarianism, and signifies a psychological form of totalitarianism — the totalitarian monitoring and control of another individual’s behaviors and thoughts. Lifton uses the term to describe the attributes of ideological movements and organizations that aim for total control over people’s behaviors and thoughts. While these movements and organizations may vary in design and goals, they follow common patterns and cause predicable types of psychological damage to those within them."

The evidence gets even more grim as one learns of the cases of child torture where according to a study by pediatrician Barbara Knox (2014) finds that 

“47% [of the tortured children] who had been enrolled in school were removed under the auspice of ‘homeschooling.’” “Homeschooling,” Knox observed, “appears to have been designed to further isolate the child.”

This is terrifying. I am glad that more people are speaking out. 

-Angela Valenzuela


Traumatic Homeschooling: How Evangelicals Use Education to Totalize

Monday, December 30, 2019

Hannah Arendt Explains How Propaganda Uses Lies to Erode All Truth & Morality: Insights from The Origins of Totalitarianism

This merits a close read.  Lies in totalitarian regimes like the one that Trump envisions (we're still a democracy so far, thankfully) function to exercise complete control over followers.  Specifically, the lies function 
"...as a means of fully dominating subordinates, who would have to cast aside all their integrity to repeat outrageous falsehoods and would then be bound to the leader by shame and complicity."
This smacks as a form of psychological entrapment.  Author Michiko Katutani cites Levey who expresses the following.
"Arendt and others recognized, writes Levy, that “being made to repeat an obvious lie makes it clear that you’re powerless.” "
It's called "gaslighting" today and insidiously,
"The result of a consistent and total substitution of lies for factual truth is not that the lie will now be accepted as truth and truth be defamed as a lie, but that the sense by which we take our bearings in the real world—and the category of truth versus falsehood is among the mental means to this end---is being destroyed." (my italics)
"[B]y which we take our bearings in the real word," sounds terribly yucky to me.  Sometimes, that's all we got, our bearings.  And for that to get unmoored as the outcome of a specific intention to make this happen, to intentionally manipulate people—is downright evil.  The master of deception must get called out at this very moment, because that is what it is.  Deception—that by definition, is never as it seems.  And can even be the brightest star in the sky.

Let's call it what it is, my friends.  This is an evil spirit abounding that threatens to consume the whole.  We're not only better than that, mis querid@s.  

We are not that.  This way of knowing and being in the world is not of this land. 

Palabra!

Thanks to Dr. Teresa Cordova for sharing.

-Angela Valenzuela


#AbyaYala #TenemosMemoria #ResistenciaIndigena #madretierra #TurtleIsland #PachaMama
Hannah Arendt Explains How Propaganda Uses Lies to Erode All Truth & Morality: Insights from The Origins of Totalitarianism  
January 24th, 2017
By Michiko Kakutani
 Image by Bernd Schwabe, via Wikimedia Commons 
At least when I was in grade school, we learned the very basics of how the Third Reich came to power in the early 1930s. Paramilitary gangs terrorizing the opposition, the incompetence and opportunism of German conservatives, the Reichstag Fire. And we learned about the critical importance of propaganda, the deliberate misinforming of the public in order to sway opinions en masse and achieve popular support (or at least the appearance of it). While Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels purged Jewish and leftist artists and writers, he built a massive media infrastructure that played, writes PBS, “probably the most important role in creating an atmosphere in Germany that made it possible for the Nazis to commit terrible atrocities against Jews, homosexuals, and other minorities.” 

 How did the minority party of Hitler and Goebbels take over and break the will of the German people so thoroughly that they would allow and participate in mass murder? Post-war scholars of totalitarianism like Theodor Adorno and Hannah Arendt asked that question over and over, for several decades afterward. Their earliest studies on the subject looked at two sides of the equation. Adorno contributed to a massive volume of social psychology called The Authoritarian Personality, which studied individuals predisposed to the appeals of totalitarianism. He invented what he called the F-Scale (“F” for “fascism”), one of several measures he used to theorize the Authoritarian Personality Type.

Arendt, on the other hand, looked closely at the regimes of Hitler and Stalin and their functionaries, at the ideology of scientific racism, and at the mechanism of propaganda in fostering “a curiously varying mixture of gullibility and cynicism with which each member... is expected to react to the changing lying statements of the leaders.” So she wrote in her 1951 Origins of Totalitarianism, going on to elaborate that this “mixture of gullibility and cynicism... is prevalent in all ranks of totalitarian movements": 


 In an ever-changing, incomprehensible world the masses had reached the point where they would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and nothing was true... The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness. 

Why the constant, often blatant lying? For one thing, it functioned as a means of fully dominating subordinates, who would have to cast aside all their integrity to repeat outrageous falsehoods and would then be bound to the leader by shame and complicity. “The great analysts of truth and language in politics”---writes McGill University political philosophy professor Jacob T. Levy---including “George Orwell, Hannah Arendt, Vaclav Havel—can help us recognize this kind of lie for what it is.... Saying something obviously untrue, and making your subordinates repeat it with a straight face in their own voice, is a particularly startling display of power over them. It’s something that was endemic to totalitarianism.” 

 Arendt and others recognized, writes Levy, that “being made to repeat an obvious lie makes it clear that you’re powerless.” She also recognized the function of an avalanche of lies to render a populace powerless to resist, the phenomenon we now refer to as “gaslighting”: 

 The result of a consistent and total substitution of lies for factual truth is not that the lie will now be accepted as truth and truth be defamed as a lie, but that the sense by which we take our bearings in the real world—and the category of truth versus falsehood is among the mental means to this end---is being destroyed. 

 The epistemological ground thus pulled out from under them, most would depend on whatever the leader said, no matter its relation to truth. “The essential conviction shared by all ranks,” Arendt concluded, “from fellow traveler to leader, is that politics is a game of cheating and that the ‘first commandment’ of the movement: ‘The Fuehrer is always right,’ is as necessary for the purposes of world politics, i.e., world-wide cheating, as the rules of military discipline are for the purposes of war.” 

“We too,” writes Jeffrey Isaacs at The Washington Post, “live in dark times"---an allusion to another of Arendt’s sobering analyses—“even if they are different and perhaps less dark.” Arendt wrote Origins of Totalitarianism from research and observations gathered during the 1940s, a very specific historical period. Nonetheless the book, Isaacs remarks, “raises a set of fundamental questions about how tyranny can arise and the dangerous forms of inhumanity to which it can lead.” Arendt's analysis of propaganda and the function of lies seems particularly relevant at this moment. The kinds of blatant lies she wrote of might become so commonplace as to become banal. We might begin to think they are an irrelevant sideshow. This, she suggests, would be a mistake.

Sunday, July 08, 2018

On the Origins of Totalitarianism: Discerning the Mob from the Body Politic by Hannah Arendt


FOOD FOR THOUGHT...

On the importance of the mob to the inner-workings of totalitarianism by German-born, Jewish philosopher, Hannah Arendt:

"The mob is primarily a group in which the residue of all classes are represented. This makes it so easy to mistake the mob for the people, which also comprises all strata of society. While the people in all great revolutions fight for true representation, the mob always will always shout for the 'strong man', the 'great leader.' For the mob hates society from which it is excluded, as well as Parliament where it is not represented." (p. 107)

In this quote from her book, THE ORIGINS OF TOTALITARIANISM, Arendt captures so much of what we are living right now with mobilized mobs running around, seeking revenge, and scapegoating the weak and vulnerable.

Here is a video a friend shared that asks if we are devolving into fascism that I encourage you to see.


En este video analizamos el fenómeno de la extrema derecha global desde la perspectiva de Hannah Arendt y su teoría sobre los orígenes del totalitarismo. Aplicamos los conceptos centrales de Arendt para entender cómo líderes como Trump, Milei, Meloni y otros están implementando las mismas técnicas de deshumanización que ella identificó en los regímenes totalitarios del siglo XX, pero ahora dentro de marcos democráticos formales.
Exploramos los tres pilares fundamentales de la teoría arendtiana aplicados al presente: la creación de "seres humanos superfluos" a través de la deshumanización sistemática, la formación de "masas atomizadas" potenciada por las redes sociales, y la "banalidad del mal" que permite la normalización de discursos autoritarios. Analizamos cómo estos mecanismos operan en la actualidad y qué propone Arendt como formas de resistencia para reconstruir el mundo común.
La teoría de Hannah Arendt explicada claramente a través del análisis de la extrema derecha contemporánea y sus estrategias de poder.
FUENTES PRINCIPALES:
Hannah Arendt:
"Los Orígenes del Totalitarismo"
"La Condición Humana"
"Eichmann en Jerusalén: Un Reporte sobre la Banalidad del Mal"
"Crisis de la República"
"¿Qué es la Política?"

We must all stand up to the mob and all the evil forces that threaten to eclipse the good and kindness that still exists in the world. And we must do so in a good spirit and with a good intention. That way, we will be centered in that which is good and honorable, allowing us to discern the mob from the body politic. 

—Angela Valenzuela

Arendt, H. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism (Vol. 244). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Totalitarianism, American Style


 Powerful piece by Chris Hedges on the anticipated crushing of dissent that stands to befall those that challenge the corporate state. 

-Angela