I, for one, am thrilled about the Biden-Harris ticket. Among other things, she has been strongly opposed to the atrocities against children and families on the U.S.-Mexico border. Our government has brought such pain and suffering to untold numbers people, perhaps especially children who have been traumatized by our reactionary response to their presence along the U.S.-Mexico border.
This blog on Texas education contains posts on higher education, as well as preK-12 policy accountability, testing, bilingual education, immigration, school finance, race, class, and gender issues at both the state and national level. It also represents my digital footprint, of life and career, as a community-engaged scholar in Texas.
Wednesday, August 12, 2020
Kamala Harris' message to immigrants: "We as a nation are better than this"
I, for one, am thrilled about the Biden-Harris ticket. Among other things, she has been strongly opposed to the atrocities against children and families on the U.S.-Mexico border. Our government has brought such pain and suffering to untold numbers people, perhaps especially children who have been traumatized by our reactionary response to their presence along the U.S.-Mexico border.
Why is El Salvador so dangerous? 4 essential reads," by Beth Daley
Catesby Holmes, of "The Conversation," provides a quick synopsis here for folks to acquire an understanding of gang violence in Central American that has resulted in thousands of families fleeing for their lives to the U.S.-Mexico border. In 2016 alone in El Salvador, the country registered a staggering 81.2 murders per 100,000, making it, as stated in this piece below, the "deadliest place in the world that’s not a war zone." I doubt that much has changed given the level of corruption related to gangs' increased political power, that includes their ability to provide political backing to politicians that, as a consequence, sustain, if not institutionalize rampant violence on the streets of El Salvador and other places like Honduras and Guatemala.
It may come as a surprise to you the truth that these violent gangs have their literal origins in the U.S., dating back to the 1980s in Los Angeles. Not only did the gangs become transnational as a result of migration patterns, but the police response in both the U.S. and El Salvador was similar.
Termed the "mano duro" (firm hand) approach of rounding up and imprisoning thousands of gang members both in the U.S. and El Salvador may have been symbolically good for "tough-on-crime" politicians, but it had the collateral impact of not only bringing gang members into contact with others who had been previously imprisoned, but it also hardened gang members' attitudes toward police.
Another excellent article to read in order to get a more complete picture is this piece— also from "The Conversation" and authored by Jose Miguel Cruz—from May 8, 2017 is titled, "Central American gangs like MS-13 were born out of failed anti-crime policies."
It's unfortunate that our country failed to properly address gang violence to begin with by addressing the underlying conditions like poverty, subtractive schooling, segregation, low wages, and so on that marginalize and alienate youth in schools and in society. The punitive response that ignored such factors only increased their levels of marginalization and in the long run, their power in the streets of many Central American cities that account for increased migration to the U.S. from these places in recent years.International Editor, The Conversation US
Editor’s note: This is a roundup of material from The Conversation archive.
The Department of Homeland Security has confirmed that it will eliminate the Temporary Protected Status that gave provisional U.S. residency to Salvadoran migrants after a 2001 earthquake. Some 200,000 Salvadorans now have until Sept. 9, 2019, to leave the United States, obtain a green card or be deported.
According to a Jan. 8 DHS statement, the decision was made “after a review of the disaster-related conditions upon which the country’s original designation was based,” which determined that they “no longer exist.”
Immigration advocates have condemned the move, saying it overlooks El Salvador’s extreme violence, which has surged since the Bush administration first offered Salvadorans protective status. With 81.2 murders per 100,000 people in 2016, El Salvador is the deadliest place in the world that’s not a war zone. More than 5,200 people were killed there in 2016.
How did El Salvador become so violent? These four articles shed some light on the country’s complex crime problem. Spoiler: It’s not just about the gangs.
1. It all started in the U.S.
President Donald Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions often claim that lax immigration policies allowed fearsome Central American gangs like MS-13 to spread from El Salvador into the U.S.
The truth is quite the opposite, writes Florida International University professor José Miguel Cruz.
“The street gang Mara Salvatrucha 13, commonly known as MS-13, was born in the United States,” he explains.
Formed in Los Angeles in the early 1980s by the children of Salvadoran immigrants who’d fled that country’s civil war, MS-13 was at first just “kids who met hanging out on street corners,” writes Cruz.
It wasn’t until the early 2000s that the group spread into Central America. There, it has brutally deployed extortion, human smuggling and drug trafficking, terrorizing neighborhoods and helping to turn the so-called Northern Triangle – El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras – into the world’s deadliest place.
2. It’s not just El Salvador
El Salvador may be particularly dangerous, but it isn’t the only Latin American country facing a homicide epidemic, writes Robert Muggah, a Brazilian crime researcher.
As a whole, “Latin America is where the most murders in the world happen,” Muggah writes. Home to just 8 percent of the world’s population, the region sees over 38 percent of global homicides. Every day some 400 Latin Americans are killed.
Many factors contribute to this homicide epidemic, according to Muggah, including “the war on drugs, abundant unlicensed firearms, persistently unequal gender relations and, in Mexico and Central America, thousands of marginalized, uprooted, and sometimes convicted U.S. deportees.”
Governments have responded to rising violence by sinking money into police forces, prosecutors and prisons. It hasn’t worked, Muggah writes. Only 20 percent of murders in Latin America results in conviction. And in San Salvador, El Salvador – last year the seventh-deadliest city in the world – just 10 percent do.
3. Women can be targets
“Criminal violence, while potent, is just part of a dangerous cocktail” of crime in Central America, writes Ariadna Estévez of Mexico’s National Autonomous University.
For example, in 2015, Honduras had the highest rate of feminicide – or female murder – in the world. Environmental advocates who stand up to illegal mining and other kinds of resource exploitation in Central America are also frequent targets of violence.
Those two facts are not unrelated, Estévez warns. “It’s a common mistake to consider violence against women a private, non-political act. But women are often on the front lines of activism” she writes, because they tend to fight against activities that are “harmful to their children, homes and communities.”

4. El Salvador’s government isn’t helping
José Miguel Cruz agrees that gangs like MS-13 are not the sole cause of crime in Central America. Rather, he contends, they are “largely a symptom of a far more critical issue plaguing the region – namely, corruption.”
According to Cruz, groups like MS-13 have grown and thrived in El Salvador because the political class protects them. In August, prosecutors there showed that the country’s two main political parties had colluded with MS-13 and other gangs, paying more than US$300,000 for help winning the 2014 presidential election.
The same nexus between government and organized crime has been exposed across Central America, where political institutions routinely shield gangs in exchange for economic support and political backing in the barrios they control. Few are ever prosecuted for this crime, Cruz says.
That erodes Central Americans’ belief in the rule of law, which, in turn, makes it harder to fight violence. “Root out corruption in the Central American ruling class,” he wagers, “and the gangs and crooks will go down with it.”
Thursday, May 21, 2020
10 Years Old, Tearful and Confused After a Sudden Deportation
It just breaks your heart. 💔
-Angela Valenzuela

The 10-year-old nodded, giving his mother one last squinty smile. Tears caught in his dimples, she recalled, as he climbed into a raft and pushed out across the Rio Grande toward Texas from Mexico, guided by a stranger who was also trying to reach the United States.
Ms. Rodríguez expected that Gerson would be held by the Border Patrol for a few days and then transferred to a government shelter for migrant children, from which her brother in Houston would eventually be able to claim him. But Gerson seemed to disappear on the other side of the river. For six frantic days, she heard nothing about her son — no word that he had been taken into custody, no contact with the uncle in Houston.
Sunday, July 28, 2019
Asylum, Terror, and the Future #5 from military officer to drug lord Based on case stories of Jennifer Harbury
She interviews renowned lawyer and human rights activist, Jennifer Harbury, provides a credible analysis of how we've gotten to where we are that has resulted in the migration of so many from Central America to our southern U.S.-Mexico border.
![]() |
| Jennifer Harbury | See video here. |
Asylum, Terror, and the Future #5 from military officer to drug lord Based on case stories of Jennifer Harbury
- Read and watch the videos of the stories in this series here.
![]() |
| Harbury's and her late husband who was kidnapped, tortured, and killed by military officials who were mostly trained at the School of the Americas |
Instead we could look towards solutions like the priest from Columbia during the Medellín cartel era who proposed legalizing narcotics, all narcotics; or efforts to transform trade deals like CAFTA into something that benefits agricultural workers in their home countries by setting international wage, benefit, and environmental standards; or support for international labor unions; or support for indigenous movements towards liberation and worker control; or even a true pledge that the U.S. military will not be involved in any capacity providing guns and money and training torturers and murderers — shut down the School of the Americas/WHINSEC this November in honor of the 30th Anniversary of the Central American University massacre.
- Read more by and about Anne Lewis on The Rag Blog.
Friday, July 27, 2018
Detained Mother with 9-year-old Son: “He wonders when we will get to the United States. I do not tell him that we are already here. He wouldn’t believe that the United States would treat us this way.”
I just read a story in the Austin American-Statesman this morning of a Lockhart man getting sentenced for cruelty to animals titled, "Lockhart man convicted of animal cruelty and neglect to be sentenced on Thursday." Not to imply in the least that animals do not have rights, but rather that it doesn't square with our values—and nor should it—that animals in our country have more rights than human beings.
Who, if anyone, will go to prison for this cruelty in treatment to human beings?
This is such an evil and ugly spirit that guides this administration. And it's massively problematic that the U.S. itself holds great responsibility for today's mass migration. (Note: Read my earlier post which shows that country has a long history of profiting from Honduras' misery. "US policy in Honduras set the stage for today's mass migration.")
It’s not until we center the experiences of the world’s dispossessed as a central moral, ethical, and political calling and commitment that any of us ourselves can claim to serve humanity. It’s sad and disgusting to see our administration ready and willing to obscure its own sordid history while adhering to irrational myths about Central American immigrants and migration that justify violence and dehumanization toward these parents and children.
Declaration of Justin (page 21): Unaccompanied 13-year-old boy
Declaration of Mayra (page 30): Mother with 9- and 2-year-old children
Declaration of Ruth (page 34): Mother with 7-year-old son
Declaration of Bridis (page 38): Mother with 4-year-old son
Declaration of Blanca (page 45): Mother traveling with 4-year-old daughter
Declaration of Brandon (page 50): 14-year-old boy with mother and two brothers
Declaration of Fatima (page 53): Mother with 8-year-old daughter
Declaration of Karen (page 64): Mother with 5- and 4-year old children
Declaration of Daise (page 73): Mother of 16-year-old daughter
Declaration of Alejandra (page 77): Mother of 2 ½-, 11-, 12-, and 14-year-old children
Declaration of Dinora (page 81): Mother of 1-year-old child
Declaration of Leydi (page 86): Mother of 9-year-old daughter





