This blog on Texas education contains posts on higher education, as well as preK-12 policy accountability, testing, bilingual education, immigration, school finance, race, class, and gender issues at both the state and national level. It also represents my digital footprint, of life and career, as a community-engaged scholar in Texas.
Restrictive abortion policies are a very serious matter. Politicians who speak of the sanctity of life don't care to understand that women both understand this and still merit a right to choose. A woman's body is her own sanctity. Moreover, her body ought to be construed as her personal property against which no politician should legislate. In a country where private property is venerated, why isn't a woman's body similarly regarded? Patriarchy is the short answer. Religion and politics combine, as well, in a toxic mix.
According to the Journal of the American Medical Association, the most authoritative journal of medicine in the U.S., more infants in Texas are dying (Ollstein & Messerly, 2024). The study covered 2021 through 2022 before the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization ruling by the Supreme Court, meaning that the number of infant deaths is likely higher now.
Policies that limit pregnant women's ability to terminate them—especially those with late-diagnosed fetal abnormalities—lurk behind this increase in infant mortality. What saddens me is the blunt force of policy resulting in infant deaths due to birth defects and genetics. This results in acute suffering by parents upon witnessing their infants die.
I have friends who experienced this. She and her husband gave the baby a name and she died shortly after she was born. I witnessed first-hand the profound anguish and suffering they went through watching their baby gasp for her final breaths of life. It was a traumatic experience for them. This all happened years ago and not in the context of Senate Bill 8, Texas' "Heartbeat law" discussed herein. It was nevertheless instructive and ties into the concerns raised here.
Incredibly, SB 8 makes no exceptions for fetal abnormalities, rape, or incest. I can only imagine the anguish today is magnified by the existence of harmful policies and politicians with doctors conveying remorse and sadness out of concern for the precarity so many women face due to policy constraints. Previously, before SB 8, abortion was legal up to 20 weeks of pregnancy. We should return to that and stop using abortion as a political tool.
First, however, we need to vote these folks out of power, period. If we don't, it'll only get worse. While Trump, should he win the presidency, may not call on a total abortion ban, according to this piece in Politico, Trump will likely make it harder to get one. I'm glad that they mention the "Project 2025" blueprint that proposes mandating coverage for natural family planning methods and eliminating the requirement for insurance to cover certain emergency contraception.
I repeat, no one should sit out this election. We all need to vote and get these patriarchs, including patriarchal women, out of power.
June 26, 2024 | Austin American-Statesman | USA TODAY reporter Eduardo Cuevas contributed to this report.
Despite Texas lawmakers' claims that their heartbeat law saves lives, a new study shows the strict abortion ban may have contributed to an increase in infant deaths.
Infant mortality increased after Texas heartbeat law, new study shows
Findings published in the peer-reviewed Journal of the American Medical Association study Monday reveal an increase in infant deaths after the state's Senate Bill 8 took effect. The study was conducted by researchers at Johns Hopkins University and Michigan State University.
What is the heartbeat law in Texas?
The law, also called the "Texas Heartbeat Act," bans abortion after fetal cardiac activity is detected. This usually occurs after about six weeks of pregnancy.
SB 8 became Texas law Sept. 1, 2021, and less than a year later the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, a decision that had protected the constitutional right to abortion. The high court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization prompted more than a dozen states to issue near-total bans on abortion.
Observers speculate that evidence will also show increases in infant deaths in those states, akin to what Texas has seen, the study led by researchers at Johns Hopkins University said. The Texas bill makes no exceptions for rape, incest or fetal abnormalities, though it does allow abortions in certain medical emergencies. Before SB 8, abortion was legal until 20 weeks into pregnancy.
Anti-abortion laws linked to increase in infant deaths
The JAMA Pediatrics study found that, following Texas' passage of SB 8, more babies died before their first birthday. The deaths were likely due to birth defects or genetic problems not compatible with life, the pregnancies of which would typically have been terminated by abortion, according to researchers. Such conditions are not exempted from SB 8's abortion ban; therefore, mothers are legally obligated by state law to carry the pregnancies to birth.
Such restrictions can prove fatal, according to one of the study's lead authors.
“Our results suggest that restrictive abortion policies that limit pregnant people’s ability to terminate pregnancies, particularly those with fetal abnormalities diagnosed later in pregnancy, may lead to increases in infant mortality,” Suzanne Bell said in a release.
Another author of the study referred to the deaths following Texas' heartbeat law as "spillover effects on moms and babies."
“It just points to some of the devastating consequences of abortion bans that maybe people weren't thinking about when they passed these laws,” Alison Gemmill, an assistant professor at Johns Hopkins University’s Bloomberg School of Public Health, told USA TODAY.
In the JAMA Pediatrics study, Gemmill and researchers wrote that the Texas law was linked to "unexpected increases in infant and neonatal deaths" between 2021 and 2022. Prior research drew a correlation between the uptick in infant deaths and anti-abortion laws taking effect. However, no studies until now have attributed the fatalities directly to the laws prohibiting the termination of these pregnancies.
In 2021 and 2022, the average increase in infant deaths in the U.S., excluding Texas, was 1.8%. In the same time period, infant deaths in Texas rose by 12.9%.
"Abortion care is an essential component of comprehensive healthcare, and when it is restricted, the human impacts are devastating," Wendy Davis, a senior adviser for Planned Parenthood Texas Votes, said in a statement.
Davis, who filibustered for abortion rights when she was a Democratic state senator, noted that the study only covered 2022, not the results in 2023 and 2024 in the wake of a more restrictive abortion ban that came with the Dobbs decision. This "likely means the situation on the ground today is even more dire," Davis said.
Anti-abortion advocates respond to study's findings
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's office did not dispute the study's findings but defended the Republican-controlled state's anti-abortion record. This effort included the 2021 heartbeat law "to save the innocent unborn, and now thousands of children have been given a chance at life," Andrew Mahaleris, a spokesperson for Abbott, said in a statement to USA TODAY. He said the governor has taken "significant action to protect the sanctity of life" and offered resources to expectant mothers "so they can choose life for their child."
Anti-abortion advocates also didn't contest the uptick in infant deaths cited in the study. Advocates for the heartbeat law and other legislation to restrict abortions say such bans protect life. They say terminating a fetus with a terminal illness is “choosing to kill that child intentionally.” The overwhelming majority of such abortions happen before the fetus is viable. In Texas, legislation has dramatically reduced the number of abortions performed in the state.
Amy O’Donnell, a spokesperson for Texas Alliance for Life, said the study’s findings didn’t come as a surprise. She said babies born with disabilities and even fatal anomalies deserve a chance at life, even if that means a newborn dies after birth from a condition doctors anticipated would be lethal. The death of a child is not easy, she acknowledged. She noted that her nonprofit offers resources for families grieving from such losses.
“In Texas, we celebrate every unborn child's life saved. We treasure the fact that our laws are protecting women's lives,” she said. “We don't apologize for the fact that we don't support discrimination against children facing disabilities or fatal diagnoses in or out of the womb. And that's the line that we just believe should not be crossed.”
USA TODAY reporter Eduardo Cuevas contributed to this report.
I am so inspired by Texas State Rep. Talarico's sermon that argues for women's full personhood instead of the second-class status that the denial of reproductive rights signifies.
I couldn't agree more Rep. Talarico's mother's perspective that "Women can never be free until they belong to themselves."
So much wisdom and clarity here. Thanks to George Hornedo for sending this video and message appearing below.
-Angela Valenzuela
***
Rep. James Talarico, the Texas Legislature’s youngest member, just posted a video of a sermon he gave at his hometown congregation in Texas. Rep. Talarico, currently in ministerial school, argued that Jesus Christ was a radical feminist and the Bible is a pro-choice document.
opposition to voter suppression legislation when he challenged Fox News host Pete Hegseth’s lies in a primetime interview. Earlier this year, his speech to the Texas State Democratic Party went viral again as he called out national Democrats for "spineless talking points & soulless fundraising emails." Beto O’Rourke recently called him "the best politician working in the Texas Legislature right now."
Rep. Talarico is available to talk about his sermon, fighting for a pro-choice Texas, and his role as the youngest member of the Texas State Legislature. Please reach out if you have interest in connecting with Rep. Talarico.
“This summer, more than half our population became second-class citizens.
Every one of our neighbors with a uterus became the property of the State.
And nothing is more un-Christian.” [...]
“The only way we can allow an embryo’s rights to trump a woman’s rights is if we believe a woman is not a full person—which has been the default belief for most of human history.”
“Being Christian and being pro-choice are absolutely consistent because Christianity is a feminist religion.” [...]
“When a mob of men threatened to stone a woman for adultery, Jesus called out their hypocrisy.
When a bleeding woman begged for help in a bustling crowd, Jesus stopped to heal her.
When a young woman wanted to do theology instead of housework, Jesus honored her choice.” [...]
“Jesus famously summed up his teachings into two commandments: love God and love neighbor.
He gave no preconditions, no qualifications, no exceptions.
Love thy neighbor regardless of race, class, or gender.” [...]
“The story of Mary is my favorite story in all of scripture…
We only have Jesus because a woman consented to creating him.
The story of Jesus begins with a single, simple, extraordinary act of feminism.” [...]
Faith is deeply personal. And your beliefs might not be the same as mine.
That's why we have a separation of church and state—no government can keep you from expressing your religion or force you to express theirs.
But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t talk about our faith. [...]
For too long, pro-choice Christians have allowed anti-choice Christians to take over our faith and our country.
On this Sunday before Election Day, we must speak up.
It makes abundant sense since throughout the span of human history, women have been in charge of reproduction. Read, for example, Midwives In 19th Century America.
On a larger scale—and under the U.S.'s increasingly restrictive abortion policy landscape—it heralds a revolution in how we think about abortion and women's reproductive health. I very much like Mexico's "acompañamiento" model that has received international notoriety and legitimacy.
Texas should welcome this development in women's health and reproductive rights.
With the constitutional right to abortion in the United States eliminated and numerous states moving swiftly to cut off all access, more and more of the calls to Mexican organizations like Cardona AlanÃs’ are coming from places like Texas.
People seeking help are reaching not just over a border but across a cultural divide between two countries following distinct paths in providing reproductive health care. As abortion access is being restricted in the United States, it is expanding in Mexico.
Because abortion-inducing medication can be obtained in Mexico without a prescription, networks like the one Cardona AlanÃs helped found exist alongside the more traditional medical clinics that typify abortion in the United States.
Even before the full effects of Roe v. Wade’s reversal kick in, Texas is being stitched into the Mexican system as the networks build out their models of helping provide safe abortion at home on an international scale. For months, they’ve been helping train volunteers that will prop up new U.S.-based networks. And they have moved thousands of doses of abortion medication into the United States, creating informal stockpiles to more easily distribute the drugs.
Exporting their model likely will not come easily, though, as the legal landscape continues to shift. Abortion-inducing drugs must be discreetly transported into the United States where they’re available only with a prescription.
Those in the United States involved in building an accompaniment system face potential legal risks both criminally and civilly, especially as Republicans in states like Texas seek to choke off any and all possibility of allowing their residents to access abortion.
Adopting the Mexican model would also require a revolution in thinking about abortion in the U.S., removing the procedure from a system of doctors and clinics and shifting it into homes across states like Texas.
A view of Mexico City on June 30, 2022. The country faced a sea change in 2007 when the weight of the growing women’s rights movement helped bring about the legalization of abortion in Mexico City. Credit: Verónica G. Cárdenas for The Texas Tribune
The emergence of acompañamiento
Mexico’s abortion apparatus grew at the edges of the country’s legal and social boundaries when abortion was not only criminalized but widely stigmatized.
In the early 20th century, criminal codes across the country fostered a culture of persecution of women and medical providers that endured for decades.Thousands of people were reported to law enforcement between 2010 and 2020. Hundreds were investigated, and many were criminally convicted. Some were reported by their own doctors or medical staff at hospitals where they sought care.
In response, activists, including many within the feminist movement, worked to build social capital and advance legislative reforms. Meanwhile, the women who would go on to create the acompañamiento model began working to undermine those criminal laws.
Though it translates to “accompaniment,” the model covers a broader support system created by women looking to help each other access safe abortion. Network volunteers distribute pills, give instructions on how to take them and offer medical guidance informed by doctors. They counsel individuals throughout a series of phone calls, video chats or texts. Sometimes they even offer up their own homes as temporary lodging.
The networks are a mix of primarily volunteer organizations and at least one non-governmental organization that rely on donations to function. They are unregulated, though their work does overlap with the medical establishment, which often provides them with donated medication.
“Generally, abortion at home has always been relevant in Mexico,” said Isabel Fulda Graue, the deputy director of the Information Group on Reproductive Choice, a leading abortion rights group in Mexico known as GIRE. “The accompaniment model basically came out of living through those restrictive years.”
The country faced a sea change in 2007 when the weight of the growing women’s rights movement helped bring about the legalization of abortion in Mexico City — a reform that GIRE described as a “social necessity” demonstrated by the more than 7,000 legal abortions it said were provided in public clinics in the first year.
In 2019, the state of Oaxaca became the first to follow Mexico City and legalize abortion, beginning what abortion advocates called a wave of social progress that ushered in reform in several other states even before the Mexican Supreme Court ruled unanimously last year that criminalizing abortion is unconstitutional.
Mexican doctors, government officials and advocates alike credit the accompaniment model with helping open the door to change, citing its role in empowering communities, filling the information void to fight stigma and framing access to abortion medication as fundamental.
Those reforms made way for a still expanding collection of public and private abortion clinics, particularly in Mexico City. That progress did not mark an end for the acompañamiento model, but made it even more crucial, particularly for low-income people and those outside major cities who otherwise still would not have access.
Reproductive rights activists place banners outside the U.S. Embassy in Mexico City on June 29, 2022, in response to the U.S. Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade just days before. Credit: Verónica G. Cárdenas for The Texas Tribune
Alessandra Flores, who was passing by while celebrating her quinceaños, turning 15, stops to pose for a photo holding a green bandana in support of reproductive rights across the U.S. Embassy in response to the court case Roe v. Wade being overturned in Mexico City, Mexico on June 29, 2022. Behind Alessandra a banner that reads in Spanish, “Alive and free in Mexico,” is seen. Credit: Verónica G. Cárdenas for The Texas Tribune
Reproductive rights activists place banners across from the U.S. Embassy in Mexico City after Roe v. Wade was overturned on June 29, 2022. Credit: Verónica G. Cárdenas for The Texas Tribune
What began as an under-the-radar effort that broke state laws eventually became an accepted — and even endorsed — pillar of the broader health care system.
Since its emergence, self-managed abortion with medication has been recognized by the World Health Organization as a “non-invasive and highly acceptable” option and a safeaffordable alternative to traditional in-clinic care.
“This is not a process created solely out of desperation, but rather it’s become highly regarded,” said MarÃa Antonieta Alcalde Castro, head of the Latin America and Carribean division of Ipas, an international organization that works to broaden access to abortion and contraception. “Part of the reason why it’s been endorsed by the World Health Organization is because it’s been practiced in a way that is very safe.”
Although the safety of medication abortion is widely acknowledged, there are some differences in international and U.S. standards. The WHO recommends that individuals in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy can self-administer a two-medication or a single medication regimen without direct supervision of a health care provider. Under the Food and Drug Administration’s rules, the two-medication regimen is allowed only up to 10 weeks of pregnancy and the medication can be prescribed only under the supervision of certified health providers.
Leaders within Mexican accompaniment networks have built deep relationships with abortion providers in Mexico City with whom they consult informally. The result is a system described by those leaders and abortion advocates as the vanguard of abortion care.
“In the U.S., people may fear abortion itself because it is being restricted, but overall I think it’s about the stigma of having abortions at home and beliefs that abortions are only safe if they occur in a clinic,” said Verónica Cruz, a Guanajuato-based activist who founded Las Libres, one of the earliest abortion support networks in the country.
Over the last decade at least, Cruz and others have formalized and replicated the accompaniment model, training new acompañantes to form networks across the country so that women often turn to them without ever considering traveling to an abortion clinic.
“The United States is very late to this advancement,” Cruz said.
Their long days are logged between medication distribution, network meetings, trainings and acompañamiento. Cellphones and computers ping nearly every hour with the people they are helping through an abortion.
Their work is interrupted only by the muffled horn of a nearby train and the shrill sound of the doorbell as people arrive for help. On a recent weekday morning, it rang twice within just a few minutes.
Sandra Cardona AlanÃs hands a delivery person a package on June 27, 2022, that contains abortion medication being mailed to a person who has requested it. Credit: Verónica G. Cárdenas for The Texas Tribune
Medication abortions can be carried out through a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol, or misoprostol alone, though U.S. rules do not approve the use of misoprostol by itself. In Mexico, misoprostol is sold over the counter to treat stomach ulcers. Networks will often receive donations of both drugs, even though mifepristone requires a prescription in Mexico. But that day, the packages contained only misoprostol. The Mexican networks had managed to transport so many doses of mifepristone into the United States that they had run out for the people in Mexico they were accompanying.
The network's mifepristone shortage captured the magnitude — and urgency — of the movement of medication into the United States in recent months.
The distribution chains begin in places like Monterrey and Guanajuato, sourced from local supplies collected by the networks but also with drug donations from Canada. The drugs enter the United States through a dozen volunteers who cross the border with the pills in their luggage, in candy bags or in wrapped gifts. Some of them are elderly women with prescriptions in hand for misoprostol to purportedly treat stomach ulcers.
A health law expert said if and when those carrying the medications might be committing a crime, as well as the legality of the broader movement of abortion-inducing drugs into the United States, are open questions that could soon be tested by prosecutors looking to further clamp down on access.
The cross-border movement of medication has long been a reality in border communities, and even beyond, because medication and other health services are typically more affordable in Mexico. In some instances, federal regulators allow individuals to bring with them up to a three-month supply of certain medications as long as they are not “for further sale or distribution into U.S. commerce.”
But this issue is mired in “legal ambiguities” that could be exacerbated by politics and the potential for disagreement between conservative state leaders or local prosecutors and the federal government, said Nathan Cortez, a law professor at Southern Methodist University who specializes in medical tourism and cross-border health markets.
“Speaking in terms of legal resolutions is difficult because I think different people operating under different circumstances in different jurisdictions are going to have different answers,” Cortez said. “People looking for answers may not be able to find them.”
Even with those legal questions, the Mexican networks say they’ve realized in recent months that awareness of their services has already spread through the United States by word of mouth, similar to how they initially grew their reach within Mexico. When access for millions of people of reproductive age in the United States began to be cut off in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s ruling, they felt it immediately as their inboxes were flooded by people desperate for help.
“Thank you so much for helping me,” one woman from the U.S. said over a voice memo to Cardona AlanÃs in the days following the Supreme Court’s ruling. “I didn’t know what I was going to do.”
The woman explained she been left in the lurch when her appointment for an abortion — initially scheduled for three days after the decision — was canceled.
“Now, it’s the U.S.’s turn to take to the streets for their rights,” Cardona AlanÃs said, noting that may mean taking on work, like acompañamiento, that lies beyond existing norms — and the law. “The objective is for women to have access to their rights so that not a single person is left behind.”
More informal networks or individuals in the United States — the Monterrey network says its strongest ties are to Texas — are clamoring for translated versions of Spanish-language training materials and manuals. But while the accompaniment model is well-known in Mexico, it is rarely openly talked about in the U.S.
Facing state-sanctioned abortion bans and criminal penalties, those taking up the accompaniment-like work are mostly operating under the radar. Asked about emerging U.S. networks, some abortion advocates will acknowledge only that people have long sought abortions outside the health care system and will continue to do so.
El Cerro de la Silla, one of Monterrey’s most recognized landmarks, on June 28, 2022. Credit: Verónica G. Cárdenas for The Texas Tribune
A message that reads in Spanish, “Get your rosaries out of our ovaries” is seen in downtown Monterrey, Mexico on June 28, 2022. Credit: Verónica G. Cárdenas for The Texas Tribune
It’s unclear the extent to which networks have formalized within the United States, and how far their reach may be, though connections to the Mexican networks are serving as potential entry points for people seeking abortions.
Cardona AlanÃs offered a recent example in which she heard from a woman in Ohio seeking help and wanting to travel to Mexico. She mentioned it to a Texas colleague who had abortion-inducing medication on hand and offered to help so the woman wouldn’t have to travel internationally. The Texan ultimately connected the Ohio woman with colleagues in her own state that accompanied her at home.
Within the existing clinical model, a person living in Texas who wants to terminate their pregnancy would have to spend hundreds of dollars to travel out of state — a reality beyond the reach of many Texans, particularly Texans of color who have been most likely to have abortions and who are more likely to be poor or low income.
Acknowledging that disparity, one individual taking on this kind of work in Houston said the need to create abortion access outside of the traditional clinical context became clear early in the pandemic when Gov. Greg Abbott used his executive emergency powers to postpone surgeries that were not “immediately medically necessary.” This led to a near-total ban on abortion when officials said the order extended to abortions.
“Now, it’s a matter of taking care into our own hands in a way that hasn’t been as necessary in this country for decades, but that people all over the world have so much experience doing,” said the individual, who spoke to The Texas Tribune on the condition of anonymity because of the risks involved with doing accompaniment work in the U.S.
Mexican network leaders say there is security within their model because it is decentralized. Medication abortion, they also argue, is dificult to trace.
But beyond questions over the legality of transporting the medication over the border in bulk, Texas laws also target those who help others get abortions. Texas is currently operating under a 1925 law that makes it a crime punishable by up to five years in prison to perform or “furnish the means” for an abortion. Another state law passed in 2021 allows private citizens to sue abortion providers and anyone involved in “aiding or abetting” an abortion as early as six weeks into pregnancy.
Preparations for the individual working in Texas have included crossing into Mexico to purchase the medication, trainings on digital security, readying their home for people who cannot self-manage an abortion at home and tapping into existing networks to learn as much as possible from groups that have long been doing this work.
“We are shifting from decades of relying on state-sanctioned structures,” the individual said.
For people with resources — and the citizenship or immigration status to travel — Mexico could still offer an avenue for those who want to go to a clinic to terminate pregnancies.
Nine of Mexico’s 32 states have so far legalized abortion. Mexico City is home to dozens of established abortion clinics. Some are privately run, offering abortions at a fraction of the cost in the United States. Others operate within the city’s public health system at clinics and hospitals that may be more difficult to navigate but offer abortions free of charge.
For months, Mexico City’s top health official — Secretary of Health Dr. Oliva López Arellano — has said publicly that the system has the capacity to extend its abortion care to serve a potential influx of people from the United States. In an interview with the Tribune, López Arellano emphasized that abortion squarely fits in within the public health system’s mission to “prevent deaths and prevent the suffering of women,” pointing to governmental data showing that there had been zero deaths among the 250,000 abortions administered through the system since abortion was legalized 15 years ago.
“Because once a woman has decided to terminate their pregnancy, they are going to do it in one way or another,” López Arellano said.
Private abortion providers are also expanding their services to potentially help those who might now look to Mexico for abortions. One private clinic in Mexico City will soon extend hours to serve U.S. patients so they can go and fly back in the same day. Other providers are opening up private clinics in the Mexican border states that recently legalized abortion.
Mexican clinics could play a larger role as appointments in states neighboring those with abortion bans in the United States continue to get booked up further and further out.
A sign reading in part “The legal interruption of a pregnancy is your right” at the entrance of Hospital Materno Infantil Inguarán in Mexico City. Credit: Verónica G. Cárdenas for The Texas Tribune
Abortion medication remains under lock at the pharmacy at Hospital Materno Infantil Inguarán in Mexico City on July 1, 2022. Credit: Verónica G. Cárdenas for The Texas Tribune
But similarly to when Mexico City legalized abortion, Cruz, of the Las Libres group, said they’ve so far seen more U.S. demand for self-managed abortions at home, in part because of travel costs.
“If you give someone the option of getting the pills into their hands so they can have an abortion safely in their home — with someone there to accompany them through it — of course that’s what they prefer,” Cruz said. “Additionally, it’s at no cost to them. … I think that helps overcome any sort of fear someone might have about self-managed abortions because everything is so expensive in the U.S.”
Ultimately, Mexican abortion advocates say success will depend on the acompañamiento model being normalized in the United States as much as it’s been in Mexico. That will take time, they argue, but the increasing cost of obtaining an abortion in a clinic could shift the scales.
“This is something we’ve recently reflected on with our colleagues in the United States — though the United States model was for some time framed as the ideal model, it isn’t,” said Alcalde Castro of Ipas. “We need to use this moment to question this highly clinical model that excludes an important number of women, many of them belonging to groups that are already marginalized and excluded. We’re talking about Black women, Latinas, poor women.”
Looking to build on the momentum of their recent victory, anti-abortion conservatives in Texas are already seeking ways to further cut off access. Legislation is being drafted to prohibit companies from helping employees circumvent state abortion laws by covering travel costs or other services.
Some lawmakers are also looking to empower district attorneys from anywhere in the state to prosecute abortion law violations outside their own jurisdiction if a local DA refuses. So far, there have been no prosecutions, but at least five DAs, almost all in large urban areas, have said they won’t pursue them.
But it’s unclear if the reach of the state Legislature will be able to curtail international efforts like those growing out of Mexico and moving discreetly into individual Texas homes.
Cruz isn’t worried about backlash or U.S. government officials intervening with the spread of acompañamiento. The United States, she said, is a country that fights for individual liberties, but this model is rooted in community.
“It will be very difficult for the U.S. to interfere in this movement,” Cruz said. “This acompañamiento model is communal and based on the idea of collective rights, and that is something the U.S. doesn’t know how to do.”
A message reading “We all love someone who’s had an abortion” is projected by Marea Verde onto a Mexico City building on June 29, 2022, after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Marea Verde, or “Green Wave,” is a reproductive rights movement that’s become influential in Latin America. Credit: Verónica G. Cárdenas for The Texas Tribune
