Translate

Saturday, April 19, 2025

Ethnic Studies Hearing this Tuesday in the Texas Legislature: See Supporter Guide from the Office of State Rep. Christina Morales

ETHNIC STUDIES GETS HEARD THIS TUESDAY IN THE LEGISLATURE!


PLEASE LET OTHERS KNOW AND FOLLOW THIS GUIDE TO LEND YOUR SUPPORT! 

-ANGELA VALENZUELA
 

HB 178 Supporter Guide—Office of State Rep. Christina Morales


Thank you for supporting HB 178 and ethnic studies courses in Texas public schools!


Find information about HB 178 here.


Social media toolkit coming soon.




To Support from Outside the Capitol


Submit a public comment electronically before the hearing adjourns on Tuesday


Watch the live stream during or after the hearing here


To Support in Person


If you plan to testify, please contact Chief of Staff Hannah Horick. We are very grateful for the widespread support this bill continues to receive, but want to be mindful of the time we take in front of the committee and how extended testimony may impact the response of the committee membership. We welcome everyone to attend in support of the bill and visit the offices of committee members to express your support!


Itinerary: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 


7:30 AM - Arrive at the State Capitol


8:00 AM - House Committee on Public Education Convenes

John H. Reagan Building, Room 140

Capitol Complex Map


HB 178 is likely to be heard first in Tuesday’s public hearing.

Find the full hearing notice here.


Submit a public comment electronically before the hearing adjourns.






Friday, April 18, 2025

Texas DREAM ACT (in-state tuition) is coming up for a hearing next Tuesday, April 22, 2025. Check out this Senate Bill 1798 Advocacy Toolkit

Friends:

When we are talking about Texas DREAMers—the progeny of former Rep. Rick Noriega and former Rep. Domingo Garcia's HB 1403 that became law in 2001—we are often talking about students who have been in the U.S. longer than they've been in Mexico, Latin America, or anywhere else. They strongly identify with Texas and the U.S. This IS their country and with some exceptions, it's all they really know. 

House Bill 1403 recognized—as I have in my own work—that many immigrant students often outperform their U.S.-born peers. Moreover, this is a common finding with other immigrant groups, newcomers to the U.S. I document this in my award-winning book, Subtractive Schooling: U.S. Youth and the Politics of Caring, a three-year study of immigrant and non-immigrant U.S.-born Mexican American Houston inner-city high school youth. 

Succinctly, I found differences in school engagement and academic achievement between immigrant Mexican and U.S.-born Mexican American students. I drew on this research when testifying in support of House Bill 1403 back in 2001. I noted that many immigrant students, who had spent three or more years in the U.S., often excelled academically and identified deeply with Texas and the U.S.

HB 1403 simply waived out-of-state tuition for these students, provided they signed an affidavit affirming their intent to regularize their status and seek citizenship which they all did.

Though this was a step forward, because legalization takes at least 15 years, even the first graduates under this policy in 2005 remain undocumented. They, along with myself, continue to advocate for the passage of the DREAM Act and by 2012, for DACA, or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, which allows certain undocumented individuals who were brought to the U.S. as children to apply for work permits and protection from deportation. DACA, too, faces an uncertain future, regrettably (Gonzales, et al., 2019).

Back to House Bill 1403. Former Governor Rick Perry supported this as a workforce development issue. I remember support also being linked to the importance of averting "wastefulness" by not allowing talented high school youth, including valedictorians and salutatorians, into higher education institutions.

Great tips, by the way below, compliments of Krystal Gomez with the Texas Immigration Law Council on how to frame your testimony and what to expect next week. There is much to celebrate about sound policy that truly invests in our youth and by doing so, in the future of our state. Let's do this again now.

-Angela Valenzuela

Advocacy Toolkit on S.B. 1798 

Background



S.B. 1798 is a bill moving through the Texas Legislature that seeks to eliminate access to in-state tuition for undocumented students in Texas. This policy change would directly impact thousands of immigrant youth and weaken Texas’s long-standing investment in education for all its residents.

This bill is scheduled for a hearing before the Senate Committee on Education (K-16) on:

Tuesday, April 22

11:00 AM

Room E1.028, Texas Capitol Extension
        
Ways to Take Action

1. Testify in Person at the Hearing- Your voice matters.

Where to Go:

Parking: Capitol Visitors Parking Garage – 1201 San Jacinto Blvd, Austin, TX

Capitol Entry: Use any public entrance. North entrance is handicap accessible.

Hearing Room: E1.028 in the Capitol Extension – Take stairs or elevator down to Level E1

How to Register to Testify:

• Connect to Capitol Wi-Fi and visit: https://swrs.senate.texas.gov/

or use a registration kiosk in the Capitol Extension.

• Register before 11 AM on April 22 to testify on S.B. 1798.

• Be prepared to wait—bills may be called out of order.

• You will be called up individually or in small groups to testify

 

2. Submit Written Testimony

If you can’t attend in person but still want your voice heard on Tuesday, you can submit written testimony opposing S.B. 1798. Written testimony can be a powerful way to share your perspective and show committee members the widespread opposition to this harmful bill.
How to Submit Written Testimony:

You must have someone deliver it in person at the Capitol on your behalf.

Prepare 13 printed copies of your testimony.

Have your representative register in person at a Capitol kiosk or online (connected to Capitol Wi-Fi) using: https://swrs.senate.texas.gov/

Your representative must deliver all 13 copies to the Committee Clerk in the hearing room:

📍 Room E1.028, Texas Capitol Extension

Tips for Written Testimony:

Include your full name, city, and any relevant affiliations (e.g., educator, student, advocate).

Make your testimony personal, clear, and concise—ideally 1–2 pages.

Start by stating: “I am writing in opposition to S.B. 1798…”

Explain how this bill would affect students, families, or your community.

✉️ If you need help finding someone to deliver your written testimony, contact Krystal Gomez at kgomez@txilc.org.

3. Call Senate Education Committee Members

Let them know you strongly oppose S.B. 1798 and support access to higher education for all Texans.

Sample Call Script:

Hello, my name is [NAME] and I am calling to urge Senator [LAST NAME] to oppose S.B. 1798. This is an incredibly harmful bill that attempts to repeal the Texas Dream Act, which grants immigrant students in Texas access to in-state tuition.

Non-resident tuition rates can be upwards of tens of thousands of dollars more than in-state tuition rates. Repealing the Texas Dream Act will undermine immigrant students' ability to afford and obtain a higher education. Immigrant students should not be denied the same opportunities as others simply because of their immigration or citizenship status.

Undocumented students across the state contribute millions to our state upon graduation and placing barriers on their access to college will only hurt our workforce, economy, and the contributions made to our local communities.

All Texas students deserve an opportunity to pursue a higher education, and we urge you to vote NO on SB 1798.

4. Send an Email

Use the sample email below or write your own!

Sample Email:

Subject: Vote NO on S.B. 1798 – Protect Texas Students

Dear Senator [Last Name],

I am writing to express my strong opposition to S.B. 1798, which seeks to repeal the Texas Dream Act and remove in-state tuition for undocumented students in Texas.

Texas was the first in the country to pass the Dream Act, and as a result we have a stronger workforce, taxbase, and economy. Each year, students who benefit from the Dream Act graduate and enter the workforce, contributing more than $461 million annually to Texas communities. By placing barriers to obtaining a higher education for students who live in our state, have graduated from Texas high schools, and are trying to access the same opportunities as their peers, our state and our communities will suffer.

No student should face additional barriers to attend college simply because of their immigration or citizenship status, especially when a majority have lived in Texas for their whole lives. Moreover, the contributions of Texas Dream Act students in school vastly surpass the amount they receive from financial aid. In 2021, students paid nearly $82 million in tuition and fees while receiving only $10.6 million in financial aid.

Our state benefits when we uplift all students and set them up for success. We encourage you to support Texas students and urge you to vote NO on S.B. 1798.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

[City, TX]

[Optional: Title/Organization]


Learn More

Bill Overview + Impact Analysis:

Review this helpful explainer by CDF-Texas: ​​ CDF-TX_In-State Tuition for TX Dream Act Students_Mar 13, 2025.pdf

Explainer on the Texas Dream Act: https://everytexan.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Texas-Dream-Act-fact-sheet-May2023.pdf

Blog post about economic impacts: https://immigrationimpact.com/2025/03/04/texas-dream-act-undocumented-students-higher-education/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Tips for Advocates

• Be respectful, clear, and personal in your messages.

• Share your connection to education, Texas, or immigrant communities.

• Use social media to spread the word! Hashtags like #TxLege, #InState4All, and #SB1798 can help amplify the message.

• Coordinate Testimony Here: SB 1798 Testimony Coordination


Sample Talking Points

Humanitarian Focus:

A Texas that hinders a child’s access to education turns its back on its values of perseverance, self-determination, and opportunity for all.

Education is a stabilizing force that keeps families together and communities strong. Stripping children of their right to learn forces families into hardship, weakens local economies, and disrupts social cohesion.

Economic Impact:

Undocumented students contribute significantly to the state’s economy. In 2021 alone, they paid $81.6 million in tuition and fees, directly supporting Texas educational institutions.

Restricting students' access to instate tuition limits their access to higher education, thus limiting their future economic opportunities and lifelong earnings.

Many industries in Texas rely on a skilled labor force. Educating undocumented students ensures they can fill crucial roles in healthcare, education, tech, and other sectors.

Educational Equity

Every child in Texas deserves the opportunity to learn, grow, and contribute to our state—regardless of where they were born. The Texas Dream Act is not just a policy; it is a promise and priority we make to Texas children and to the future of Texas.

Texas Values

Education is a shared Texas value. When we invest in all kids, we strengthen Texas for generations.

When every child gets an education, Texas wins. More educated workers mean a stronger economy, a more skilled workforce, and greater prosperity for all.

Legal Concerns

Lawful presence is a legal term of art and does not mean the same thing as lawful status.

Legal status is non-linear and ever-shifting.

Thursday, April 17, 2025

Texas House Approves Multi-Billion-Dollar Discriminatory Voucher Scam—IDRA Statement on the Passage of Senate Bill 2

Today is a sad day for public education in Texas.

After 12 hours of intense debate, the Texas House granted preliminary approval to two of the most scrutinized bills of the legislative session: a $7.7 billion public school funding initiative and a contentious proposal to establish a pathway for families to utilize state tax dollars for private school tuition.

The Texas House's decision on the latter, Senate Bill 2, represents a significant triumph for prominent Texas Republicans, including Gov. Greg Abbott, who have been trying to pass vouchers for so many years now. He even primaried anti-voucher republicans from last session, putting up candidates to take their place who of course were in the count in support of vouchers. 

It's noteworthy that an amendment that recommended that this decision be put to the voters got voted down. This is unfortunate since voters would surely have voted against this. Texas voters have a long history of opposing vouchers. Their only way was to railroad it, and they did. Ultimately, this is a billionaire-class agenda against everybody else, "come hell or high water."

Due to discrepancies between the Senate and House versions of the bill, it must return to the Senate for another vote, leaving Lt. Gov. Patrick and the Senate with a critical decision. If he decides to make any changes to the just-approved version, it'll have to go back to the House for further deliberation.

Alternatively, Patrick and the Senate may accept all changes made to the bill by the House in which case it will go directly to Gov. Greg Abbott for final approval.

The governor is clearly happy about this, but this is terrible news for public education. And ultimately, it's so sad that they are undermining our democracy. I think of all the many small Texas towns that are already stretched for funds but whose communities' lives circle around that of the school and how they will be adversely impacted by this decision. 

This is a betrayal of theirs, and everybody's, trust.  IDRA provides guidance on next steps for the advocacy community below. Remember, we do have a vote, and it's not a good thing to vote to undermine public education, our "laboratories for democracy," as the late John Dewey once eloquently phrased it. 

-Angela Valenzuela

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Vouchers are Getting Heard by the Texas House Today. "Red for Ed" Day—Tune in here

 Friends:

Today is the day that vouchers get heard in the Texas House of Representatives, otherwise known as "Red for Ed" day, so I'm wearing red. They're just getting going, but here is the link so that you can watch it live: https://house.texas.gov/videos/21734


In the meantime, what can you do? Kaci Wright of the formidable Texas Legislative Education Equity Coalition (TLEEC) headed by Dr. Chloe Sikes that is the oldest and largest education coalition in the state of Texas offers these resources so that you can from the comfort of wherever you are viewing this (if you're watching online), take action:

School Vouchers (SB 2) and HB 2 will go to the House Floor, Wednesday, 4/16!


It's not too late to act - please see the call to action below:


SB 2 Policy Resouces: 

I applaud TLEEC, Texas AFT, the Texas Freedom network and all the coalition member organizations that have done an excellent job in fighting school vouchers this legislative session. By all means tune in. It's going to be a long day.

-Angela Valenzuela



Tuesday, April 15, 2025

Harvard takes a $2B hit after defying Trump administration—Today is a Proud Day in Our Nation's History

Friends:

I wish there were more universities standing up to this bald, partisan agenda, and ever so glad to see Harvard University taking a stand and willing to take a hit for it by the Trump administration. And indeed, it has to the tune of $2 Billion, no less. What is the cost of freedom—the freedom to teach, learn, and conduct research—a question that Harvard's leadership is implicitly answering?

The Trump administration is holding universities responsible for broader cultural shifts that extend far beyond the scope of any single institution, including Harvard. These shifts challenge the outdated notion that identities—whether racial, ethnic, or gender-based—as fixed. In truth, identity is inherently fluid, continually shaped by both political and apolitical forces, by tradition and the evolving demands of the modern world. Attempting to confine such complexity within neatly labeled boxes to appease those in power is not only misguided—it’s ultimately a futile endeavor. 

As Chicana feminists, beginning with the late Gloria Anzaldúa, have long argued, the future of culture is hybridity. Its power extends far beyond the walls of the academy into the streets of Calcutta, the highways of the Americas, the songs of the diaspora, and the quiet rebellions of everyday life. It moves like water—resisting containment, carving new paths, refusing to be still. To reduce it to something static is to deny its essence, for culture lives not in boxes, but in motion, in memory, and in the ever-shifting dance of who we are becoming.

Our colleges and universities are those sanctuaries within which these processes are researched and discussed—spaces where the fluidity of culture is not only acknowledged but actively engaged. In a world increasingly polarized by rigid ideologies and political agendas, universities provide the intellectual freedom and critical distance necessary to explore the complexities of identity, belonging, and transformation. They are among the few places where competing truths can be interrogated, where the past is held up to the light of the present, and where visions for more inclusive futures can be imagined and debated.

As Chicana feminists have long reminded us, hybridity is not a flaw in culture but its future—an ever-expanding, layered process of becoming that defies singular definitions. Universities play a crucial role in cultivating this vision by nurturing curiosity, protecting dissent, and making room for voices that have historically been silenced or ignored. To weaken these institutions under the guise of control or conformity is to endanger one of the last bastions where knowledge is pursued both for its own sake and in pursuit of a more just, humane, and dynamic world. 

The university’s lawyers argued that the Trump administration's demands encroach on long-established university freedoms upheld by the Supreme Court. In their response, they emphasized that the university would not compromise its independence or forfeit its constitutional rights, asserting that neither Harvard nor any other private institution should permit itself to be overtaken by the federal government.

Today is a proud day for Harvard University and our nation's history. What is the price of freedom? It's priceless. Harvard is letting us know.

-Angela Valenzuela


Harvard’s response represents a rare show of resistance to efforts by President Donald Trump’s administration to punish major institutions and law firms he views as hostile. | Scott Eisen/Getty Images


The university said it would not comply with the list of demands that included changes to code of student and faculty conduct.

By Ali Bianco

04/14/2025 03:09 PM EDT

Updated: 04/14/2025 09:33 PM EDT

A Trump administration task force announced Monday that it would block Harvard University from receiving $2.2 billion in federal grants and $60 million in contracts after the Ivy League school defied demands to adopt new policies on student and faculty conduct and admissions.

The Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism said it was taking the measure because Harvard and other universities had not taken adequate steps to address the harassment of Jewish students in recent years.

“It is time for elite universities to take the problem seriously and commit to meaningful change if they wish to continue receiving taxpayer support,” it said in a statement that came hours after Harvard had defiantly said it would not bow to administration pressure.

Harvard President Alan M. Garber said the unprecedented demands, which include requirements to change disciplinary policies to address antisemitic acts during last year’s protests over the Israel-Hamas war, are unnecessary and infringe on free speech rights.

“No government — regardless of which party is in power — should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue,” Garber wrote in the message to the campus community.

Harvard’s response, in the face of a threat of losing billions in federal grants, represented a rare show of resistance to efforts by President Donald Trump’s administration to punish major institutions and law firms he views as hostile.

The loss of federal funding is a significant blow to Harvard and affiliated institutions, such as Mass General Brigham and Boston Children’s Hospital. Other schools, including Columbia University, have opted to accept administration demands to avoid the cuts.

Institutions across the country are facing probes focusing on diversity initiatives and allegations of antisemitism on campus. Trump has particularly singled out Ivy League schools that he has denounced as left-leaning and elitist. The administration has said it is also either reviewing or pausing grants to Brown, Princeton, Cornell and the University of Pennsylvania.

Princeton President Chris Eisgruber, like the leader of Harvard, has said he would resist administration demands.

Former Harvard President Larry Summers told a group of students and alumni last week that the school is positioned to resist because of its nearly $52 billion endowment. “With all of those assets — If Harvard can’t resist, who can?” he said.

The administration sent an updated list of demands Friday to Harvard that would require the university to restructure its governance, eliminate diversity as a consideration in admissions, institute new disciplinary measures for student protesters, and decertify pro-Palestinian student groups. Garber said the school had already adopted measures to address antisemitism and other misconduct that occurred during raucous protests over the war in Gaza.

“The administration’s prescription goes beyond the power of the federal government,” he said. “It violates Harvard’s First Amendment rights and exceeds the statutory limits of the government’s authority under Title VI. And it threatens our values as a private institution devoted to the pursuit, production, and dissemination of knowledge.”

White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement that the administration was seeking to end “unchecked” antisemitism and that Harvard’s response puts its federal funding in jeopardy.

“Harvard or any institution that wishes to violate Title VI is, by law, not eligible for federal funding,” Fields said.

The letter the administration sent Friday — from the Department of Education, the Department of Health and Human Services and General Services Administration — accused Harvard of failing to “live up to both the intellectual and civil rights conditions that justify federal investment.”

Harvard’s response to the administration defended the university’s commitment to fighting antisemitism on campus, and said the administration disregards” the changes already made by the university. The university’s lawyers said the demands “invade university freedoms” long recognized by the Supreme Court.

“The university will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights,” the lawyers wrote in response. “Neither Harvard nor any other private university can allow itself to be taken over by the federal government.”

Bianca Quilantan contributed to this report.


Monday, April 14, 2025

Celebrating 10 Years of the Mexican American Studies Teachers' Academy! San Antonio, Tejas

🎉 Celebrating 10 Years of the Mexican American Studies Teachers' Academy! 🎉

We’re thrilled to announce the 10th anniversary of the Mexican American Studies Teachers' Academy—a powerful, community-driven program that has thrived thanks to the unwavering dedication of Dr. Lilliana Saldaña, Dr. Gloria Vasquez Gonzalez, and Christina Soliz. These amazing leaders continue to do the essential work of preparing and empowering public school teachers to bring Mexican American Studies into their classrooms—just as they’ve done for nearly a decade.

🌱 What began in 2015 with just four educators under the visionary leadership of Dr. Keta Miranda, who was a member at the time of the NACCS Tejas Foco that labored since 2014 with the Texas State Board of Education to get these courses into the schools, it has since blossomed into a dynamic and inspiring summer workshop that now welcomes around 80 teachers each year. To date, nearly 600 educators have been part of this transformative experience.

📚 If you're currently teaching Mexican American Studies—or even considering integrating MAS lessons into your curriculum—this is the place to be. You’ll join a passionate community committed to uplifting our histories, voices, and contributions in classrooms across Texas and beyond. I'll deliver a closing keynote address on the topic of creative resistance on July 11th that may be in person (details TBA).

What amazes me year after year is how this incredible work is carried out beyond the walls of academia—powered by the community, for the community. In fact, that’s been our hidden blessing: a space of learning, resilience, and liberation that stands strong, untouched by anti-DEI efforts, because its roots are deep in the community itself.

Come be part of this legacy. So proud of our colleagues in San Antonio whom I deeply admire. Let’s keep building.

Con corazón,

-Angela Valenzuela