Translate

Showing posts with label school finance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label school finance. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 12, 2025

The 1968 Walkout That Shook Texas: A Story of Youth, Justice, and Change

Link to Film

Friends,

This film, The Walkout, is phenomenal. It provides a quick, consumable history on inequality and school finance in Texas, while centering the courage of young Mexican American students who refused to accept an unjust status quo. It's just under 32 minutes such that it's great from community conversations and the school and college classroom.

It's awesome to see a good number of friends and familiar faces in the film.

The Walkout shines a light on a pivotal but often overlooked chapter in Texas history: the 1968 student walkout at Edgewood High School in San Antonio’s Westside. Faced with underfunded classrooms, uncertified teachers, and crumbling facilities, these students—many still in their teens—organized alongside their families and community leaders to demand better. 

What they sparked was more than a one-day protest; it became a catalyst for a statewide conversation on school funding and equity that still echoes today. 

Told through the voices of the original students, community elders, and historians, the film blends personal testimony, archival footage, and present-day reflections into a deeply moving narrative. We hear directly from those who lived it—about the indignities they endured, the risks they took, and the pride they felt in standing up for their education. It’s not just a history lesson—it’s a reminder of the transformative power of youth-led resistance and community solidarity.

What makes The Walkout so timely is its unflinching connection between past and present. The funding inequities the Edgewood students fought against remain a pressing issue in Texas today. Watching their story unfold, you can’t help but draw the line between 1968 and our current struggles over fair funding, equitable access, and the right to a quality education for every child. 

This, despite Greg Abbott's recent passage of school vouchers (Senate Bill 2) that will siphon off dollars from public schools that will get directed toward wealthy families to cover their children's private school education. 

It's shocking to learn, for example, that while Texas is the 8th largest economy in the world, it ranks 46th in the nation in per pupil funding. This is our future workforce, my friends. We need to invest in them—especially in this economy and this moment where so many of our institutions and safety nets are getting dismantled. 

If you care about education, justice, or the untold stories of Mexican American activism, The Walkout is essential viewing. It is a testament to how local action can reverberate far beyond its place and time. I do like how it ends on a hopeful note that doubles as a rallying cry to keep on keepin' on in the struggle for equity in our schools—and by extension, the broader society.

Sí se puede! Yes we can! 

In fact, we must!

-Angela Valenzuela


A visual on property redlining that gets to the heart of school funding
inequities.





Dr. Lilliana Saldaña




Dr. David Montejano
Al Kaufmann, Esq.

Thursday, May 16, 2024

A Deepening Manufactured Crisis in Texas public Education: 70% of Texas Teachers Consider Quitting Due to Lack of Funding

Friends,

This is a deepening manufactured crisis in Texas public education. Despite
surpluses in state dollars, our governor refuses to finance our schools. 

His is a classist and racist neoliberal agenda—one of acquisition by dispossession. And all with our hard-earned tax dollars.

-Angela Valenzuela

Wednesday, July 13, 2022

‘I had to get out’: High number of teachers, staffers resigning from Austin schools

This is a painful read. This is a crisis unlike any we've seen—perhaps ever in the history of contemporary public education which is far beyond just an Austin story. 

Tragically for our K-12 Austin Independent School District (AISD) students, their teachers are leaving in droves. This includes my dear friend, and colleague, Mr. Andrew Gonzales who appears in the story below. 

This has been a slow-moving train wreck that is now upon us, screaming for whole-system reform. The legislature must do everything possible to make teachers' careers attractive. This includes their getting treated as professionals, mirrored in high salaries that they more than deserve. 

In today's economy, my view is that none should make anything less than $70,000.00 starting pay if their positions are to be anywhere near competitive for individuals with university degrees—especially when other more attractive job and career possibilities in places like Austin, Texas, are plentiful. Plus, in light of the current context of historically high inflation, a decent base salary is the least we can do lest our system of K-12 education implode.  

To both support teachers and get informed on the politics, consider attending the Texas AFT Summer School: Our Campaign for Respect, taking place on MONDAY, JULY 25, 2022 from 10 AM – 12 PM CST. As per their Facebook page announcement:

"Texas ranks 45th in the country for per-student funding. It’s no wonder our teachers are struggling with overwhelming workloads and low pay—fueling a teacher retention crisis—and that other school employees like paraprofessionals and cafeteria workers are making poverty wages.

This is a crisis, but it can be fixed. Join us in person at Children's Museum Houston OR virtually on Zoom to officially launch our statewide campaign for respect and all that it entails.
REGISTER HERE whether you plan to attend in person or virtually: https://www.texasaft.org/july25/ 
Addressing school finance issues and per-student funding is exactly how to address this crisis as AFT suggests. Working conditions, as well. Teachers need well-paid paraprofessionals and support staff, including school counselors, who survive with poverty wages.  We must also address and bring an end to our "system of testing" if we are to mitigate high-stress environments that many, if not most, teachers, children, and parents face, poisoning the well of what an enriching education can and should be.
To this end, consider attending a hearing related to assessment and accountability, HB 3906 monitoring (redesign of STAAR exam) and the 2016 Commission on Next Generation Assessments and Accountability) taking place on August 9th at 10AM in the Texas State Capitol in hearing room E2.012 where the public can sign up to speak. However, you must let committee clerk, Tamoria Jones know by emailing her at Tamoria.Jones_HC@house.texas.gov by August 5th.
I've blogged about this incessantly throughout the years so I'll come back with updates to the current struggle against high-stakes testing and accountability in the coming weeks and months as we get closer to the next regular legislative session that begins in January, 2023.
Here are a couple of good memories involving former teacher Andrew Gonzales that help illustrate this loss of talent that will be difficult to recover from, particularly in the difficult days and months ahead.
The first was when he took four of his high school students in his Ethnic Studies class at Travis High School to regularly attend a policy class I taught that semester. This was made possible by a connection we had to each other via our Saturday school, Academia Cuauhtli and the Ethnic Studies movement in Texas.
He and the students rushed over together to UT every Tuesday after school was out to make it to my class by 4PM. I liked how our Education Policy and Planning masters students were so happy to have them in our class and to see how welcoming they were of them, especially since they at first seemed intimidated. Mr. Gonzales' students expressed great interest, quickly became vocal and never missed a class. By the end of the semester, I sensed that the college experience was demystified and that they could see themselves in the college classroom. One of the four students made this comment explicitly.
A second, more recent memory involved a presentation on the value of Ethnic Studies at the LBJ school where I—along with him and two of his high school students from his Ethnic Studies class—shared our views. I posted it to my blog in case you'd like to see the treasure of a teacher that AISD just lost. The session was titled, "The Power of Ethnic Studies to Dismantle Institutionalized Oppression in K-12 Public Education."
I am so saddened by these stories and these news, but fully understand not just the gravity of this decision by gifted teachers like Andrew Gonzales who have to make ends meet, but also the magnitude of this crisis—which is fully amenable, as AFT correctly indicates—to policy solutions. 
Most generally, it's unconscionable that our teachers are so terribly stressed and burdened when, as the research shows, they are the most trusted players in our schools (read: "Connected Through Our Schools" [Report] on Strong Public Support for Public Education in Texas").
I am who I am and where I am because I had a few good teachers. We are all indebted to our teachers. There are no shortcuts here. We must advocate for our youth, teachers, and schools.

-Angela Valenzuela


‘I had to get out’: High number of teachers, staffers resigning from Austin schools

Rebecca Johnson

Austin American-Statesman | July 6, 2022



For Andrew Gonzales, resigning from his teaching job at Lively Middle School in South Austin was a difficult decision. A third-generation teacher, he envisioned himself as a lifelong educator and fondly remembers helping his mom set up her classroom during her 36 years on the job.

But after seven years in the profession — including five at Travis High School, also in the Austin district — Gonzales, 30, said the “abysmally low” pay and ever-expanding responsibilities became unsustainable. So he left in Octoberto work at a medical device company, earning a $1,000 per month pay raise and a quick promotion.

“It makes such a big impact on how I feel when I go to work,” he said.

Gonzales isn’t alone. According to data provided by the district’s Office of Human Capital, more than 1,700 staff members resigned from Austin schools from July 2021 to June — more than in any of the past three school years.That includes 875 teachers resigning — a nearly 30% increase from the 2020-21 school year. 

The school board approved pay increases and bonuses for the upcoming school year, but some teachers and education advocates worry that the pay boosts are too small and are coming too late to improve staff retention and alleviate a shortage that's being felt nationwide.  

Bronwyn Merritt, 35, decided to leave teaching in December after 15 years in the profession. She said she resigned from her job at Brentwood Elementary School, where she had worked for four years, because she felt a lack of support and understanding from the administration, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

“Public education wasn't serving me as a person anymore,” she said. “It wasn't fulfilling, and it was taking away from my personal well-being and my family's well-being, so I had to get out.”

There are multiple problems in the field, Merritt said, including low pay, long hours and “endless to-dos.” But she said it’s the way teachers are treated by administrators and state and federal officials — with a lack of respect, lack of trust and increasing oversight — that pushed her to leave the profession. 

“It seems to me like our administrators, locally at the school level, at the district level and also at the state and federal level, just really want to micromanage everything that's done in the classroom right now,” she said. “And it's taking away the autonomy from teachers.”

In a 2021 survey conducted by the district, about 17% of respondents who reported that they planned to leave their campus said their salary expectations not being met factored into their decision. About 24% cited an unsatisfactory workload and 36% cited a poor work environment. 

The district’s budget, which was adopted June 23, includes a 2% midpoint raise plus a $1,000 base pay increase for teachers and librarians. It also has a $2,000 retention stipend for full-time employees and a $1,000 stipend for part-time employees, along with a $21 per hour starting rate for bus drivers.

To remain competitive with neighboring districts and adjust to Austin's high cost of living, Eduardo Ramos, the district's chief financial officer, said the district's goal is to be the highest paying district for teachers in Central Texas within the next two years. District officials also said the upcoming bond proposal might include investments in affordable teacher housing.

“Austin ISD is working hard to have a compensation package that is reflective of our hardworking staff while also managing budgetary constraints,” said Jason Stanford, a district spokesperson.

At the last board meeting, Trustee Arati Singh thanked the administration for investing in the staff, calling the pay raises and stipends "fantastic."

However, Merritt doesn’t believe these pay increases are sufficient, even going so far as to label them “offensive” because she said higher pay raises are needed to afford living in Austin.  

“I think that paying off teachers at this point without any actual structural changes ... is just meaningless,” she said.

Retention rates better in Austin

Stanford noted that Austin retained more teachers than schools overall in Central Texas and in the state. During the 2020-21 school year, the most recent for which data are available, Austin schools saw a teacher retention rate of 86.9%, compared with 85.2% for the region and 85.7% for the state, according to Texas Academic Performance Reports. 

Ken Zarifis, the president of Education Austin, a union for Austin school employees, said this messaging “deflects away from the reality that this is really bad.” 

“I've been in the district and around the district for 25 years, and it's never been this bad,” Zarifis said. “I think one of the disappointing things I'm hearing from the messaging from the district is, ‘Oh, it's not as bad as other districts.’

“I just wish that they would own the fact that it's bad, and what are we going to do to correct it?” he said. 

More:Austin ISD to redesign elementary music, art classes to boost PE, teacher planning time

Zarifis said higher wages, more respect and more support from the district are needed to help alleviate the shortage. 

“We choose a profession that we want to go into, but let's not make the mistake that we're just doing it for the sake of the kids. We have to live; we have to survive,” he said. “Whenever people use that as a narrative, it dismisses the economic realities of human beings that are working so hard 60, 70, 80 hours a week for a starting pay of $51,000 in this city. It's absolutely unacceptable, and it is an insult to our labor and our hard work.” 

On top of that, Gonzales said he believes teachers need more time to plan, but not in a way that disrupts other parts of the classroom. He thinks the district’s current plan, which will redesign elementary art and music classes to increase PE and teacher planning time, will cause too many disruptions to the classroom. 

Part of a national trend

Ultimately, Gonzales said he believes the district needs to be a leader in solving the teacher shortage, referencing comments from Anthony Mays, who started as the district’s interim superintendent on Friday. Mays said last week that the high number of teachers and staffers leaving the profession should not be framed as an Austin schools issue, but one that is affecting multiple industries. 

“It's not just an isolated issue for Austin ISD, but one of the ways that we plan on attacking that challenge is focusing on taking care of our teachers, taking care of our leaders and trying to make sure that we're focused on the mental health of those leaders that we have here within the district,” he told the American-Statesman.

“It just kind of felt like a sidestep of the issue,” Gonzales said. “If we are in the city of Austin, which is a global edge leading city … and the fact that we cannot think critically about this issue and put it as part of this national trend is sad, and it’s disappointing to me.”


Saturday, March 19, 2022

"‘Robin Hood’ not the villain in Texas schools," by Chandra Villanueva

School finance in Texas is not well understood, particularly the history of what we know either as "recapture" or "Robin Hood" in Texas. Chandra Villanueva explains the importance of recapture to equity very well in this Dallas Morning News piece. I also encourage you to read Trinity University Professor Enrique Alemán's piece titled,

"Is Robin Hood the "Prince of Thieves" or a Pathway to Equity? Applying Critical Race Theory to School Finance Political Discourse."


Drawing on Critical Race Theory, he encourages us to see Texas' system of school finance as institutionalized racism. CRT, by the way, should be less understood as a "theory," than as a fact of our highly stratified society—with race/ethnicity, along with gender, class, sexual orientation, documented status, being major, intersectional axes of differentiation.


-Angela Valenzuela



Legislature refuses to fully fund districts, leaving them to squabble over recapture
By Chandra Villanueva | Dallas Morning News

For years, the Texas Legislature has underfunded the basic allotment, failing to base what it pays for education on actual costs. (Smiley N. Pool/Staff Photographer)


When school budgets get tight, property-wealthy districts are often quick to blame the primary equity tool of the school finance system, recapture.

However, recapture, also known as “Robin Hood,” is not the villain in this story. The real problem is the basic allotment, the base level of funding the Texas Legislature funds per student. The Legislature does not base what it pays for education on actual costs.

The basic allotment, the foundational building block for the whole school finance system, is an arbitrary number. It’s not connected to the cost of providing a quality education. In fact, it’s not based on anything at all.

The Legislature underfunded the recommended amount in 1984 — pre-pandemic and pre-modern workforce. Since then, the Legislature has made random changes in irregular intervals. This arbitrary basic allotment also determines if a district is considered “property-wealthy” or “property-poor.”

In simple terms, the school finance formulas start with the basic allotment and then adjust it based on student characteristics of a district, such as how many students are economically disadvantaged, emergent bilingual or another recognized special population. The formula rightfully recognizes that some students require more expensive educational resources. The basic allotment with these adjustments determines the amount of funding the state allows each school to have for its operating budget.

Once the funding amount is determined, school districts tax local property to raise the necessary funds. If the local tax base is unable to meet the allowed funding amount, the district receives state aid. If local property tax revenue is greater than the allowed amount, the state “recaptures” the excess revenue to help fund education statewide.

Those who villainize recapture claim it doesn’t take a wealthy district’s low-income student population into account. We know that’s not true because the formula takes all low-income students into consideration.

But here’s the rub –– in addition to the basic allotment being arbitrary, the amount of additional funding for low-income, emergent bilingual and other special student populations is also arbitrary and was set in 1984 with few changes since. This is why districts are unable to meet the needs of students, because the funding they receive doesn’t reflect their actual costs.

Our state education laws dedicate recaptured dollars to education, just not exclusively to property-poor districts. The amount of recapture revenue collected is roughly the same amount needed to support the network of charter schools across the state. Charter schools are non-taxing entities, yet they are fully funded by the state. Regardless of your opinion on charter schools, the revenue must come from somewhere.

Rapid expansion of charter schools is another reason recapture is growing across the state. Recapture is triggered when a district collects more property tax revenue per student than the state allows it to have. When a student leaves a traditional ISD for a charter school, the amount of property tax revenue that district collects per student increases. That means the district is more likely to collect excess property taxes than allowed by the state because the district has fewer students to support. School districts that have many charter schools within their boundaries, such as Houston ISD, end up paying recapture revenue due to the large number of students lost to charter schools.

Recapture is not the villain. The Legislature has never provided an adequate level of funding for our schools and refuses to make annual adjustments for inflation. As property values rise across the state and additional students move to charter schools, more districts will appear wealthy but, in reality, everyone is underfunded.

Recapture is not the school finance villain — the Texas Legislature is the villain when it neglects our greatest public good and keeps schools underfunded.

Chandra Villanueva oversees Every Texan’s work on education, workforce development and job quality. She wrote this column for The Dallas Morning News.

Sunday, February 10, 2019

Gov. Greg Abbott names school finance, property tax reform emergency items



School finance reform, teacher pay, and making our schools safer are among the governor's priorities this legislative session.  

“Our mission begins with our students,” Abbott said as he began to lay out his legislative priorities. To improve lackluster student outcomes — only 40 percent of third-graders are reading at grade level by the end of their third-grade year, he said, and less than 40 percent of students who take the ACT or SAT are prepared for college — “we must target education funding.”

Universal pre-K and addressing the increasing costs of teachers’ health care, as mentioned below, are massively important, too.  

A report appearing today in the Austin American Statesman titled, "This time they mean it: Austin district trustees move closer to school closures," is deeply concerning locally that a respectable school finance bill could fix.

The devil is always in the details.  It's nevertheless encouraging to see that hot-button issues like "sanctuary cities" and "bathroom bills" are off the table.

-Angela Valenzuela

Gov. Greg Abbott names school finance, property tax reform emergency items

The governor focused on bread-and-butter policy in a forum that has often featured a lot of red meat.
 

Gov. Greg Abbott, in his biennial State of the State address Tuesday, stayed on message about schools and taxes, continuing state leaders’ so far unified focus on bread-and-butter policy reforms in a forum where he has in the past served up red meat.
Speaking in the Texas House to both chambers of the Legislature, Abbott named as emergency items the consensus priorities of school finance reform, teacher pay raises and property tax relief, the issues he and the state’s other top two Republican leaders have trumpeted almost single-mindedly in the months since the midterm elections. In doing so, he carefully avoided controversial social issues like the ones that headlined last session’s speech.
Also topping the governor’s priority list: school safety, disaster response and mental health programs. Abbott’s designation of those priorities allows lawmakers to take up such measures sooner, lifting the usual constitutional limitation that prevents the Legislature from passing bills within the first 60 days of the session.
“Our mission begins with our students,” Abbott said as he began to lay out his legislative priorities. To improve lackluster student outcomes — only 40 percent of third-graders are reading at grade level by the end of their third-grade year, he said, and less than 40 percent of students who take the ACT or SAT are prepared for college — “we must target education funding.”
“That starts with teachers in the classroom. … This session, we must pay our teachers more,” Abbott said, winning his first standing ovation of the speech.
“Rarely has Texas witnessed such a bipartisan and bicameral support for an issue this substantial this early in a session. … To keep this momentum going, I am declaring school finance reform and increasing teacher pay as emergency items,” the governor said to another standing ovation.
Abbott expressed support for a merit-based teacher pay system, praising Dallas ISD’s program as exemplary and asserting that “we must provide incentives to put effective teachers in the schools and classrooms where they are needed the most.”
The highest-profile teacher pay bill so far came out of the Texas Senate, whose leader has championed an across-the-board pay raise of $5,000 for all Texas teachers. The House’s initial budget proposal would put billions more into school funding but leave districts more flexibility on how to spend it.
Abbott pledged, as he did in his inaugural address last month, that this is the year lawmakers will finally unknot the entangled policy issues of school finance and property tax reform. Last week, Abbott, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and House Speaker Dennis Bonnen, along with leaders on the issue from both chambers, laid outidentical property tax reform bills that they said would help lift the burden of skyrocketing property taxes.
Abbott praised House and Senate leaders for “working together in unprecedented fashion.”
“We can no longer sit idly by while property owners are reduced to tenants of their own property with taxing authorities playing the role of landlord,” the governor said.
In the wake of tragedy last May at Santa Fe High School outside Houston, Abbott said, “We must do all we can to make our schools safer.” He praised a proposal from Sen. Jane Nelson, R-Flower Mound — filed as a priority bill Tuesday morning — that would create a broad-based mental health consortium. He made no mention of gun control measures.
Abbott also called for two new anti-gang centers in Waco and Tyler, as well as additional funding to create six human trafficking squads and eliminate the backlog of thousands of untested rape kits. Two years ago, the Legislature passed a law to crowdfund money for rape kit testing by asking for donations during driver’s license renewals.
Unlike in his first two State of the State addresses, Abbott did not deem ethics reform an emergency item. He tagged that issue with top priority status in 2015 and 2017, but didn’t mention it this year. Nor did he raise any proposals related to abortion. And there was hardly any other mention of health care, an expense that takes up nearly as large a share of the state’s budget as does education.
House and Senate Democrats called it “disappointing” that the governor didn’t propose expanding access to pre-K or lowering the costs of teachers’ health care.
And state Rep. Toni Rose, D-Dallas, who serves as the caucus’ second vice-chair, said that Abbott, for all his bragging on the state of Texas during his speech, failed to mention the state’s high uninsured rate for health care.
“Texas needs to expand Medicaid,” Rose said during the conference, “and we need to expand it today.”
Still, Democrats were optimistic about some of the notable absences. Two years ago, Abbott’s address was headlined by his call for an anti-“sanctuary cities” bill that Democrats would staunchly oppose. This year, the governor mostly stayed away from hot-button social issues.
“It certainly was a different speech than we heard two years ago,” state Rep. Chris Turner, the Democrat who heads his party’s caucus in the House, said after the speech. “It seems as though election results have consequences.”
Another conspicuous absence from the speech was the voter rolls debacle that has dogged state leaders in recent weeks. Last month, Texas Secretary of State David Whitley flagged for citizenship review nearly 100,000 Texas voters; in the weeks since, the list has been revealed to be deeply flawed, and civil rights groups have sued the state three times.
Abbott was vocal about the list when it was first released, and at a press conference last week, he stood behind the list as a “work [in progress,]” even as local officials reported that, in some cases, all the names on counties' portions of the list were erroneously included. But he made no mention of the list or of election security in the high-profile address Tuesday.
And the governor of the nation’s largest border state made little mention of immigration reform beyond a promise to continue to “step up and fully fund our border security program” since “the federal government still has not fulfilled its responsibility.” In their initial budget proposals, both the Texas House and Texas Senate proposed continuing to spend about $800 million on border security over the next biennium.
In a fitting end to the conciliatory, unity-themed speech, Abbott pledged to work with a lawmaker he’s had harsh words for in the past.
In last year’s elections, Abbott backed a primary challenger to state Rep. Lyle Larson, a San Antonio Republican who won the seat anyway. On Tuesday, Abbott said he would work with Larson to tackle a top state priority: reinstating the rivalry football game between the University of Texas at Austin and Texas A&M University.
"I am inspired by the camaraderie and the collaboration that has already infused this session. It seems unprecedented, and I've got to tell you, I'm feeling it myself," Abbott said near the end of his remarks. "I'm feeling moved. And I want to set the example.”
Disclosure: The University of Texas at Austin and Texas A&M University have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.