Translate

Showing posts with label Critical Race Theory (CRT). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Critical Race Theory (CRT). Show all posts

Wednesday, May 21, 2025

Texas attorney general investigates Austin ISD for allegedly teaching ‘critical race theory’ By Becky Fogel, May 6, from KUT News

 Friends:

While Texas Atty. General Ken Paxton wages war against so-called “woke ideology,” Texas public schools are grappling with real and urgent crises—crippling teacher shortages, chronic underfunding, unmet special education needs, and per-student funding levels that haven’t budged since 2019. Rather than confronting these systemic failures, state leaders are squandering public resources chasing phantom violations and vilifying educators for doing the hard work of truth-telling.

This is not just legal overreach—it’s an ideological witch hunt similar to McCarthyism and Red Scare and a willful abandonment of the state’s constitutional obligation to ensure a quality public education for every child.

-Angela Valenzuela

Texas attorney general investigates Austin ISD for allegedly teaching ‘critical race theory’

His office plans to depose the superintendent and others as part of an investigation into whether the district is using teaching materials linked to the “1619 Project,” which was banned in Texas public schools 2021.


Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, seen here in 2018, is investigating whether Austin ISD is using teaching materials linked to the "1619 Project," which the state banned in 2021. Jorge Sanhueza Lyon / KUT News


By Becky Fogel, KUT NewsMay 6, 2025 3:34 pm

From KUT News:

This story has been updated.

Attorney General Ken Paxton is seeking to depose Austin ISD’s superintendent and school board members as part of an investigation into whether the district is teaching critical race theory.

The AG’s office alleges the district is using curricula related to the “The 1619 Project,” which recenters U.S. history around the impact of slavery and the contributions of Black Americans. It was created by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones.

Gov. Greg Abbott signed a bill in 2021 that banned the use of “The 1619 Project” in Texas public schools and sought to restrict how educators talk about race and racism in the classroom. Abbott and other Republicans said they wanted to prevent schools from teaching critical race theory, which was developed in the 1970s and 1980s to examine the ongoing effects of racism on U.S. institutions.

In a news release Monday, the AG’s office said it was “made aware of an Austin ISD official making statements implying that they were using curricula and teaching material linked to the 1619 Project.”

“My office has begun the legal process to depose Austin ISD leaders, and we will fully investigate the district’s policies involving the teaching of illegal CRT curriculum to make sure state law is enforced,” Paxton said in a statement. “I will continue to work tirelessly to ensure that Texas school officials are focused on helping students receive a world-class education, not subject them to liberal, anti-American ideology.”

The petition from the AG’s office pointed to two “undercover interviews” Accuracy in Media, a conservative group, conducted with two different Austin ISD employees in 2021 and 2022. The AG’s office claims both interviews indicate the district may have an “unwritten policy” to get around the state’s ban on teaching critical race theory.

One of the interviews was with Stephanie Hawley, the former chief officer of organizational transformation, who announced her retirement last month. The AG’s office alleges in the petition that Hawley, who was Austin ISD’s equity officer at the time, said the district used the instructional platform Newsela to “introduce different viewpoints into the classroom” and that it lets the district “stay out of trouble with the Legislature.”

Newsela gives teachers access to news-based articles and videos. The AG’s office said some of the content available through the platform is linked to “The 1619 Project.”

“Dr. Hawley’s subsequent promotion to the District’s Chief Officer for Organizational Transformation from November 2023 through March 2025, combined with her long history of promoting ‘equity’ in the District, raise an even greater concern that her influence in reshaping the district may have entrenched an attitude of promoting Critical Race Theory while ‘staying out of trouble with the Legislature’ throughout the District’s policies and culture,” the petition states.

A spokesperson for Austin ISD said the district does not comment on pending litigation.

Daphne Hoffacker, the advocacy chair for the Austin Council of PTAs, criticized the investigation. She said Paxton, who is running against incumbent John Cornyn in a Republican primary for the U.S. Senate, is going after the district to win political points.

“Ken Paxton is running for Senate and both CRT — this nebulous term he uses to describe any anti-bigotry efforts — and his attacks on public schools are red meat to his ever-dwindling base,” she said. “This is nothing but a distraction and a waste of public resources.”

Hoffacker added the district has complied with requirements from the state.

“His investigation will find Austin has some of the most dedicated educators in the country,” she said.

David DeMatthews, a professor in UT Austin’s College of Education, said critical race theory is not taught in K-12 schools, but rather at the graduate level. He added that Republican officials have not been able to clearly define what it is.

“There has been this attack on CRT in schools without really any evidence from any politicians that CRT is actually being taught,” he said. “This just looks like one more unwarranted attack, not based on any evidence, that’s just a public spectacle that will undermine public education even further.”

DeMatthews said Texas has more pressing problems to solve when it comes to education — from the teacher shortage to improving academic achievement and providing special education services.

“I think this is just one of a long line of embarrassing moves by the state of Texas to undermine its constitutional duty to provide a quality public education to every student,” he said. “It’s unimaginable that this is where we’re at.”

DeMatthews said elected officials should be focused on increasing state funding for public schools, which have not seen an increase in the base level of per-student funding since 2019.

Austin ISD is not the only district Paxton has accused of teaching critical race theory. In March, his office sued Coppell ISD, outside Dallas. A video cited in that lawsuit also came from Accuracy in Media.

The school district filed a counterclaim on April 1 seeking sanctions against the AG’s office. Lawyers for the district argued the suit was “frivolous, unreasonable, and without foundation.” They said the video was “heavily edited and manipulated” and took comments a Coppell ISD administrator made out of context, making them “grossly misleading.”

The district asserted Paxton’s lawsuit was meant to harass public school officials and was filed to coincide with the current legislative session, during which school funding is at stake.

The AG’s office and Coppell ISD jointly filed a request this month to dismiss the original lawsuit and counterclaim. A judge has yet to sign off on the proposed order.

Paxton, however, issued a statement Tuesday to announce that the case had been resolved.

“Every school district must follow the law, and Coppell ISD is no exception,” he said. “The District made the right decision by working with my office to ensure that anti-American critical race theory is not taught in classrooms. I call on all school districts to voluntarily act to stop woke ideology from being forced on Texas kids, and if they don’t then I’ll see them in court.”

KUT News reached out to the AG’s office for more details on the allegations against Austin ISD and when school officials could be deposed.

Correction: This story previously stated Paxton sued Coppell ISD last month, but the lawsuit was filed in March.


If you found the reporting above valuable, please consider making a donation to support it here. Your gift helps pay for everything you find on texasstandard.org and KUT.org. Thanks for donating today.

Wednesday, June 19, 2024

WHY IS THE TEXAS LEGISLATURE PUSHING TO REMOVE DEI AND CRT? by NAACP President & Civil Rights Attorney Gary Bledsoe

Friends,

I encourage all to view this short video featuring NAACP President GaryBledsoe from a talk he delivered at UT during the 2023 Texas legislative session. He explains why the Texas State Legislature planned to remove Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI) offices and initiatives from higher education and how this aligns with the earlier legislation against Critical Race Theory (CRT) in Texas K-12 classrooms. Put simply, legislators are responding to the fact that Texas is 59 percent minority and 41 percent white and they shudder at the thought that their own children—together, of course, with children of color—might actually learn the truths of history and inequality in our country.
NAACP Pres. Gary Bledsoe, Esq.

Their "solution" is to make sure as much as possible that every student that comes through our K-12 schools and our state's higher education institutions emerges from them as politically conservative.

I don't see that happening whatever they do, even if a number falls prey. Our state has always been conservative and has always met resistance. That is not going to go away no matter what.

Plus, our youth are so smart and have access to greater knowledge and information than has ever been available in the history of our country.  Admittedly, it can be hit and miss, but the fact that our Gen Z youth trend progressive is what's lighting up conservatives. This isn't random, by the way. We birthed this generation and taught them well.

Great job, Gary! What a treat to listen to this today.

-Angela Valenzuela



Saturday, April 20, 2024

Podcast Interview with Dr. Angela Valenzuela on Ethnic Studies, CRT, and Where we Should be Headed in Education

 

Friends,

Happy to share this podcast Interview that took place during the pandemic on Ethnic Studies, CRT, and where we should be headed in education with Dr. Abdín Noboa-Rios and Dr. Tony Baez. You can link directly to this interview below or view it here on Youtube.

I listened to it recently and happened to like my responses to Drs. Noboa-Rios and Baez' questions. 

As I think about Ethnic Studies and Critical Race Theory (CRT), my biggest concern is not solely with the mischaracterizations but also with the anti-intellectual agenda of not wanting to know minoritized or subaltern voices, histories, cultures, languages, identities, ways of knowing and so on when so much of what they're about is redemptive, intellectually expansive, and fully enhancing of everybody's lived experience.  I speak of these kinds of things in the podcast. 

Someday, Ethnic Studies will simply be called "a good education." Check out the Educa K-16 Podcast sponsored by the The DoMas Group and the various interesting interviews they've gathered over the years.

-Angela Valenzuela



Friday, February 02, 2024

Christopher Rufo Exposé: "Activist who led ouster of Harvard president linked to ‘scientific racism’ journal"

Interesting. Not at all surprised that Christopher Rufo is ideologically allied with a long, discredited history of "scientific racism." It gives me pause to think that my university—specifically, the business school—heartily welcomed him to make a presentation last fall despite his not being a scholar (see Laying Siege to the Institutions), but rather for his political views. You can learn about his position against Critical Race Theory (CRT) in K-12 here which morphed into an attack on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) offices and initiatives in higher education.

I did attend his lecture, by the way. My short row of seats combined with another was the only color in the room. I also noticed the overwhelming presence of a whole bunch of elder white males—hopefully, mostly not UT faculty—even if a number were certainly present.

Regardless, I'm glad that Rufo's ties to eugenics and his clear belief in the superiority of the white race finally came out. Old beliefs nevertheless die hard, especially those that give folks a sense of entitlement, however false and misguided, at best. At worst, they take their false, discredited white supremacist notions to purposely propel hateful, divisive, and anti-democratic policy agendas and campaigns.

-Angela Valenzuela 

Activist who led ouster of Harvard president linked to ‘scientific racism’ journal

Christopher Rufo recommends a newsletter to his readers that has published several supporters of discredited genetics theory


by Jason Wilson | January 31, 2024 | The Guardian
Christopher Rufo in Sarasota, Florida, on 25 January 2023. Photograph: Dirk/ZUMA Press via Alamy


The rightwing activist Christopher Rufo has links to a self-styled “sociobiology magazine” that is focused on the supposed relationships between race, intelligence and criminality, and which experts have characterized as an outlet for scientific racism.

At the time of reporting, Aporia was one of 19 Substack newsletters Rufo links to in the “recommended” section on his own newsletter, which according to Substack has more than 50,000 subscribers. Rufo also appeared on Aporia’s podcast, which has published flattering interviews with proponents of scientific racism and eugenics.

Rufo, a close ally of Florida’s governor, Ron DeSantis, and one of America’s most prominent activists fighting so-called “wokeism”, has repeatedly described his goal as “colorblind equality”, but his links to Aporia raises questions about Rufo’s proximity to extremists.

Most recently Rufo has been credited in conservative media and beyond with playing a central role in the ouster of former Harvard University president Claudine Gay, who is Black.

The Guardian emailed Rufo with questions on his apparent endorsement of Aporia, and how he reconciled that with his professed “colorblindness”. He did not respond directly to any questions put to him but instead made a crude sexual insult to a Guardian reporter.

Heidi Beirich, co-founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, said: “Rufo is hanging around with some seriously nasty people,” adding: “He can’t claim that this is a casual relationship.”

According to the newsletter’s own archives, Aporia was a March 2023 rebrand of Ideas Sleep Furiously, hitherto the personal newsletter of Briton Matthew Archer, now styled “editor in chief” of Aporia.

At that time, Aporia’s newly appointed “executive editor”, Bo Winegard, commenced his tenure with an article, titled Human Biodiversity: A Moderate’s Manifesto, in which he discussed purported “evidence that human populations vary in intelligence, as measured by IQ tests, partially because of genes”.

“Human biodiversity” gives its name to both a movement and a research paradigm that the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) describes as the “latest iteration of a long tradition of scientific racism”.

Kevin Bird, a geneticist and a postdoctoral research fellow at UC Davis, said “‘human biodiversity’ is their euphemism for race science”, and added that “scientifically, Winegard has never done anything of note in this area”.

Winegard, a psychologist, was by his own account fired by Ohio’s Marietta College in March 2020 after a seminar he gave to a research group at the University of Alabama attracted protests and coverage in student media.

In that speech an audience member reportedly said that Winegard told his listeners that “people in colder climates, because of differences in brain size, have more propensity for cooperation”.

Winegard has continued to write in this vein on Aporia up to the present. In a 3 January article on the site titled “Yes, we should talk about race differences”, he wrote: “Thus, we must be honest about race. And that means we begin by noting that in the United States (and elsewhere in the world), different races have different average levels of intelligence as measured by IQ tests (and other measures of cognitive ability).”

As proof of this claim, Winegard cites researchers including the late Richard Lynn – a white nationalist, according to the SPLC – and the late Arthur Jensen, whom the SPLC calls “arguably the father of modern academic racism”.

The Guardian emailed Winegard questions about Aporia, his role there and aspects of his previous controversies. He replied with one line: “Is Charles Darwin’s ‘The Descent of Man’ scientific racism?”

Another Aporia editor, Noah Carl, has also been the subject of previous academic controversy.

Carl is a sociologist who in 2018 was stripped of a postdoctoral fellowship at Cambridge University after the college that appointed him discovered that alongside his more legitimate work in sociology, he had simultaneously been publishing scientific-racist articles in outlets notorious for peddling scientific racism.

One of the outlets Carl published in, Mankind Quarterly, was founded “to make scientific racism respectable again”, according to the writer Angela Saini. It was for decades funded by the white nationalist Pioneer Fund, and the journal has been described as a “cornerstone of the scientific racism establishment”.

Another venue, OpenPsych, is a platform established by Emil OW Kirkegaard, a self-described eugenicist who explicitly advocates “race science”, and who serves as a senior fellow at the Ulster Institute for Social Research (UISR), an organization once headed by Richard Lynn – the same researcher whose data led to Winegard’s retraction.

For OpenPsych, where Carl has been a prolific contributor, he wrote in a 2016 paper that racial stereotypes are “reasonably accurate”.

Carl attended the eugenicist London Conference on Intelligence (LCI) at least twice, according to leaked programs from 2015 and 2016. The 2016 program quotes the 20th-century American psychologist Edward Thorndike on its cover: “Selective breeding can alter man’s capacity to learn, to keep sane, to cherish justice or to be happy.”

Carl has continued to write on the same themes at Aporia. In a November 2023 article titled “Surely liberals should support white nationalism?”, he concluded: “Is it odious to advocate ‘voluntary separation’ of the races? It’s odd, certainly, and doesn’t reflect my own view. But I wouldn’t call it odious.”

As well as publishing their own work, Aporia editors provide a platform for others’ articulations of scientific racism.

This month, for example, Aporia published an article by Peter Frost, “The Goldilocks zone between inbreeding and outbreeding”, which argues that “outbreeding” between humans who are too genetically distant from one another creates an increased risk of abnormal embryos.

The argument rests in part on data collected in a 1929 study, “Race crossing in Jamaica”, published by Charles Davenport, which it introduces blandly as “a Jamaican study”, and treats as neutral and reliable.

Davenport, however, was a prominent American eugenicist at the time when eugenics was informing public policy in the United States and beyond, leading to the passage of the restrictive Immigration Act of 1924, and contributing to programs of forced sterilization in 30 states, some of which persisted into the 1960s.

Davenport wrote that “race intermingling” – including the “mixing of European races” – was a danger to American society, and also that “a hybridized people are a badly put together people and a dissatisfied, restless, ineffective people”.

Of Frost’s article, Bird, the geneticist, said it was “old school race science”.

For Andrew Winston, a professor emeritus of psychology at Canada’s University of Guelph and a longtime critic of the encroachment of scientific racism in the field, such nods to eugenics reflect a historical pattern.

“This kind of race science keeps coming back into the mainstream, gets criticized heavily, and then diminishes it for a bit, perhaps, and then returns in some new form, depending on the general social context,” he said.

Beirich, the extremism expert, said: “All of these ideas have been debunked over and over again. The danger here is that eugenics and scientific racism have been historically used to justify terrible acts including genocide.”

Other recent articles on Aporia include Winegard’s “The case for race realism”, which reasserts that “underlying race differences in measured cognitive ability and violent crime … make large outcome disparities inevitable”; an article by Gregory Conner, a retired professor of finance, which argues for innate racial differences in intelligence; and two articles arguing high IQ among Jews has a basis in their genetics.

Aporia also publishes a podcast, which featured Rufo as a guest on 4 August, during which he took the opportunity to discuss his newly published book.

Like the journal, the podcast has otherwise featured proponents of eugenics and scientific racism.

Its 1 January episode, for example, featured a debate between Charles Murray and Helmuth Nyborg on the topic “are multicultural societies doomed?”

Charles Murray – a white nationalist according to the the SPLC – has been the center of repeated controversy since 1994, when his book The Bell Curve argued that class differences in the United States are determined by IQ. Critics at the time pointed out that Murray and his co-author, Richard J Herrnstein, had drawn extensively on Richard Lynn and other authors at Mankind Quarterly.

Helmuth Nyborg is a Danish psychologist who was suspended and reinstated in 2006 as a professor at the University of Aarhus over his research linking gender and intelligence, and in 2017 he spoke to the white nationalist American Renaissance conference.

In the Aporia podcast, Nyborg claimed to adduce scientific arguments against immigration and multiculturalism, saying at one point that “the more genetically inhomogeneous a population is, the more critical it becomes in terms of social unrule, or what you’ll call that social disturbance, criminality and so on”.

In the episode published immediately after Rufo’s interview, Winegard interviewed Steve Sailer, a blogger and founder of the Human Biodiversity Institute who has been described as a white supremacist.

On Rufo’s recommending the site to his readers, Bird said: “There’s nothing legitimate on biology or evolution or genetics that’s really been published by anyone at Aporia,” adding: “Pointing people towards that is pointing them toward unambiguous white supremacist propaganda and nonsense.

“There’s nothing of value there. There’s nothing that resembles real mainstream science. There’s nothing that resembles real discussions happening in the field. It can’t be anything other than racist propaganda.”

Beirich said of Rufo’s links that “it’s not surprising to find that a person who is playing footsie with eugenicists is also happy to attack diversity, equity and inclusion in higher education or a Black president of Harvard”.

By linking to Aporia and appearing on its podcast, she said: “Rufo is helping to bring back this despicable material and mainstreaming it.”

 This article was amended on 31 January 2024. Marietta College is in Ohio, not Georgia.