Translate

Showing posts with label Denisa Gándara. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Denisa Gándara. Show all posts

Thursday, August 01, 2024

Redefining Value in Higher Education: Prioritizing Equitable Access and Economic Mobility Over Selectivity, by Inside Higher Education

Friends,

This promises to be a very important conversation about the image folks have about higher education and whether they should pursue one in light of return on investment, student debt, attacks on diversity, test-optional admissions and the like. I'm pleased to say that my colleague at UT Austin, Dr. Denisa Gándara will be one of the presenters. If you plan on attending, I encourage you to download the Bill and Melinda Gates downloadable manuscript together with the article they recommend we all read posted below. 

You can register here: https://bit.ly/3AeZNni 

Angela Valenzuela


Discover innovative ways key stakeholders are working to ensure postsecondary education remains a powerful driver of both economic and non-economic value.

Inside Higher Ed is pleased to release today, “Redefining Value in Higher Education: Prioritizing Equitable Access and Economic Mobility Over Selectivity,” our latest booklet. Download and explore the free booklet by clicking on the “Download” button above. 

Also, sign up for the free, companion webcast that further examines the booklet’s themes, to be held Wednesday, August 7, 2024, at 2 p.m. E.T.


Doubts About Value Are Deterring College Enrollment

Survey data suggests that prospective learners are being dissuaded from college by skepticism about whether degrees are worth the time and money.

By  Jessica Blake


A student leaving a classroom.

Higher education experts have been concerned about an “exodus” from higher education since long before pandemic-exacerbated enrollment declines.

ferrantraite/Getty Images

Enrollment has been declining in higher education for more than a decade, and the most common explanations in recent years have been lingering effects of the pandemic and a looming demographic cliff expected to shrink the number of traditional-aged college students. But new research suggests that public doubts about the value of a college degree are a key contributor.

The study—conducted by Edge Research, a marketing research firm, and HCM Strategists, a public policy and advocacy consulting firm with funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation—uses focus groups and parallel national surveys of current high school students and of adults who decided to leave college or who didn’t go at all to link the value proposition of a college degree and Americans’ behaviors after high school.

“At the end of the day, higher education has a lot of work to do to convince these audiences of its value,” said Terrell Dunn, an HCM consultant.

But college leaders shouldn’t be without hope, she added: While Americans are skeptical, they’re persuadable.

“[Potential students] are pretty rational in weighing their opportunity costs,” Dunn said. “They’re saying, ‘I can pursue shorter and cheaper options, and still get a good job.’ So higher ed has to figure out how to explain why what they’re offering is better.”

Benefits Remain, Confidence Declines

The new report, based on data collected in 2023, builds on the findings of a similar report released the year before. The most significant addition to the latest study was a survey of about 1,700 high school juniors and seniors, which provided first-time insights into the thoughts of traditional-aged college students. The survey also included more than 3,100 nonenrolled adults ages 18 to 30.

The majority of respondents from both age groups still see the benefits of gaining a two- or four-year college degree. At least two-thirds of respondents characterized the ability to make more money, get a better job, train for a specific career or have increased job security as “somewhat or very important” reasons to get a degree.

But when compared to results from last year, the rates of perceived importance went down across the board—some by as much as six percentage points. Nonenrolled adults were generally about 10 percentage points less likely to have confidence in the benefits of a college degree than high schoolers were.

Just as confidence in the value of two- and four-year degrees dipped, the perceived value of on-the-job training as well as shorter-term licensure or certificate programs rose. While 58 percent of high schoolers and 51 percent of nonenrolled adults in 2023 believed you must have a college degree to earn a “good job,” 69 percent and 65 percent, respectively, believed a certification was enough. 

Public belief in the power of a certification outweighed that of a college degree in 2022 as well, but the gap between the two grew from 9 percentage points in 2022 to 14 percentage points in the new survey.

Consistent Concerns

The biggest concerns that seem to be holding potential students back include the fear of taking on debt, a general lack of interest in schooling, insufficient return on investment, overall stress levels and an uncertainty about the future.

Adam Burns, a principal at Edge Research, said that although the core concerns remain the same regardless of age, they play out differently for high schoolers than for adult nonenrollees.

High schoolers feel most prepared in the “precollege phase,” when they first start to explore the possibility of college and submit applications. He attributes much of this to the cultural norm that college is the next step after high school for many—and the support they have from school counselors. But when it comes to actually paying for and attending college, that’s when students tend to lose confidence and fall off track.

“They are right in the middle of that orbit of college information,” Burns said. “But they're very uncertain that they’re going to be making the right choice … They really are having a difficult time understanding the finances behind that college decision.”

Nonenrollees, on the other hand, don’t have college counselors (or helicopter parents) sharing information with them about their college options and have to weigh their college-going uncertainties alongside other factors.

“They have the greater opportunity cost of taking this step, especially if they currently have a job or other family obligations, making that choice is a bit more perilous.”

Solutions Lie in Changing the Narrative

Patrick Methvin, director of postsecondary success at the Gates Foundation, noted that higher education experts may know empirically that college degrees often contribute to socioeconomic mobility. “But unfortunately, students aren’t getting their information from the same economists we’re listening to,” Methvin said.

High school students’ top two sources of information about college were school counselors and parents, and therefore the things they heard about college are mainly positive. Adults listed Google searches and social media as their top guides, leading to a widely negative perception.

“What they are hearing is things like the Supreme Court decision on race conscious admissions and DEI attacks, deliberation on test optional and legacy admissions, and … crippling student loan debt,” he added. “Those things add up to questions, candidly, from Americans about their faith in higher education.”

The survey data showed that the narrative prospective students hear can greatly influence their likelihood to pursue a college degree, so the researchers suggest it’s time for colleges to step up and give students access to quality advising, rather than social media threads, to base their decisions on.

Four of the report’s top six suggestions for colleges moving forward involved giving prospective and current students expert advising in academic, financial and postgraduate career success. The other two included eliminating the accrual of student debt for anyone attending community college programs and providing more dual-enrollment opportunities to help students save time and money.


Thursday, September 08, 2022

Now Let's Make College Free by Dr. Denisa Gándara, Newsweek #CollegeForAll

So happy to run into my colleague, UT Educational Leadership and Policy Asst. Professor Dr. Denisa Gándara, with whom I had the chance to discuss yesterday's blog post, The Shrinking of Higher Ed, that signals a major crisis in college enrollment that I encourage all to read. She shared with me her just-published, Newsweek article on how we can, as a country, make college free. 

Why not? K-12 is free. College could also be free for all the important reasons that Dr. Gándara lists—not the least of which is saving higher education itself.

In terms of how to fund College for All, here is a proposal: 

H.R.2861 — 117th Congress (2021-2022)

Congrats, Dr. Gándara on getting published in Newsweek, too!

-Angela Valenzuela

#CollegeForAll

Now Let's Make College Free | Opinion 


by DENISA GÁNDARA , ASSISTANT PROFESSOR IN THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND POLICY, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN


ON 9/8/22 AT 8:00 AM EDT





























After much anticipation, the Biden-Harris administration recently announced that college-student borrowers will have up to $20,000 of their student debt forgiven. Student-debt forgiveness is an important first step in addressing societal inequities caused in part by structural barriers to wealth-accumulation, labor-market discrimination, and the predatory practices of many private, for-profit colleges. Now, we have to make sure no one is crushed by student debt in the first place.

We must reinvest in public higher education.

The benefits of higher education are well documented. Higher levels of education lead to better jobs, healthier lives, a stronger economy, and a more civically-engaged society. But we are poised to miss out on many of these benefits, both individually and collectively. In the last few years, we have seen precipitous drops in college enrollment. These declines are especially pronounced at community colleges, which mostly serve low-income students. This is a warning sign that inequities in educational opportunity could grow. Even worse, higher education is about to get more costly, which could further restrict access for students with the greatest financial need. Fitch, a credit ratings agency, projects that tuition is set to increase as inflation strains college budgets. This means even more students will have to choose between skipping out on college or taking on burdensome debt.


In addition to making community college free, we need to increase public support for these institutions. Community colleges have significantly fewer resources than their four-year counterparts. Four-year universities spend considerably more per student than two-year colleges, even when you ignore expenditures related to research and other activities that are less central to the community college mission. This is partly because community colleges have less access to other sources of cash than many four-year universities. Community colleges earn less revenue on average from residence halls, dining halls, bookstores, and other so-called "auxiliaries." Moreover, because community colleges usually have open-access missions, they charge lower tuition and fees, which means they also generate less income from these sources.


These funding inequities across higher education institutions are compounded by the fact that community colleges serve the students with the greatest needs (those who come from lower income and wealth backgrounds and who may not have had access to rigorous K-12 curricula).

We have it exactly backwards.

If we are to fulfill the promises of higher education, we must invest in community colleges. Greater investment in community colleges will enable them to offer student supports that will improve student outcomes, including transportation, access to books, personalized advisement, and emergency financial aid. By making community college free and investing in these institutions, students will have greater access to—and be better served by—them.

Student-debt forgiveness is just the start of the structural changes needed to realize the promise of higher education, including social mobility and enrichment for individuals and economic and civic prosperity for society. We must now tackle the barriers that lie ahead. We are in a critical moment that can define the future of higher education and its ability to fulfill its promises. Powerful forces like pandemic-induced struggles, inflation and rising tuition prices, and growing distrust of higher education, stand to rob opportunities from the students who could benefit the most from higher education, those who are least likely to go to college in the first place. If we fail to act, existing inequities will continue to deepen. Now is the time to reinvest in public higher education.


It is time to make college free. Research shows that free-college programs increase college enrollment, especially among students who have been historically underserved in higher education. To be sure, financial aid that is targeted to those who need it the most seems more economically efficient than making college free for all. But free-college programs have much larger effects on college enrollment than other forms of financial aid or reductions in college tuition alone. This is partly because the simple and straightforward "free college" message is a strong motivator to attend college, especially for those who don't otherwise think they can afford it.


People walk on a university campus.JUSTIN SULLIVAN/GETTY IMAGES

Because of its effectiveness, making college free is a public investment that would pay for itself.

We can start by making community college free, which is less costly than including four-year universities. Free community college would also channel public dollars to institutions that serve all students, regardless of their backgrounds. While there is some concern that free community college could steer students away from four-year colleges, which have better outcomes on average, we have evidence that making community college free can increase not just associate's degree completion but also transfer to a four-year university and bachelor's degree attainment. What's more, increases in these outcomes appear larger for Hispanic and Native American students. This can happen when two-year colleges and four-year universities work together to improve transfer pathways for students who wish to continue their education.

Denisa Gándara is an OpEd Project Fellow at UT Austin. She is an assistant professor in the department of educational leadership and policy at The University of Texas at Austin.

The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.