Translate

Showing posts with label Liberal Arts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal Arts. Show all posts

Monday, December 22, 2025

'Two years since conservatives took over a liberal arts college, what’s been lost—and gained': And Why This is Important to Texas and the U.S.

'Two years since conservatives took over a liberal arts college, what’s been lost — and gained': And Why This is Important to Texas and the U.S.

by

Angela Valenzuela
December 22, 2025

Let’s dispense with the euphemisms. What has happened at New College of Florida is not a “diversification of viewpoints,” a “restoration of balance,” or a principled defense of free speech. It is an ideologically driven takeover—imposed from above, funded lavishly by taxpayers, and justified through a cynical distortion of democratic language.

The hypocrisy is staggering.

Administrators and political operatives insist they are rescuing New College from a so-called “progressive echo chamber,” even as students report syllabi dominated almost exclusively by Hillsdale College and Claremont Institute ideologues. They proclaim devotion to the “marketplace of ideas,” while systematically abolishing entire fields of inquiry—gender studies, race-centered scholarship, critical social analysis—that have long been integral to a liberal arts education. They rail against indoctrination while installing their own.

This is not pluralism. It is replacement. Nor is it supplemental, but supplanting.

Even more galling is the claim that critics are “weaponizing data” when the very metrics that once made New College a nationally respected institution—academic peer reputation, student outcomes, scholarly trajectories—are now collapsing. A nearly 60-spot drop in rankings (also see Moody, 2025). A four-year graduation rate below 50%. Declining faculty resources. These are not abstractions; they are the cumulative effects of governance by fiat rather than by faculty expertise, student need, or institutional mission.

And yet, in the midst of this academic decline, spending per student has exploded—far exceeding that of comparable public institutions in Florida. Taxpayer money has not been invested in teaching, research, or student support, but funneled into rushed athletic expansion, failed modular housing projects, hotel contracts, and symbolic spectacles designed to please political patrons rather than serve students. If this is stewardship, it is stewardship for donors and governors, not for the public.

The rhetoric of democracy rings especially hollow here. Decisions of monumental consequence were made without faculty consent, without student buy-in, and without meaningful public deliberation. Trustees were installed. Presidents were imposed. Programs were eliminated. Mascots were replaced. Statues were proposed. A “compact” drafted by a presidential administration hostile to higher education itself was embraced—not because the campus demanded it, but because ideological loyalty was rewarded with preferential access to power and money.

This is not democratic governance. It is authoritarian management with a populist accent.

The irony, of course, is that the very people accused of silencing dissent—faculty teaching about race, gender, inequality, and power—are the ones now demonstrating what academic courage looks like. Professors who stay. Students who speak. Faculty who refuse to abandon their courses or their commitments. They expose the lie at the heart of this project: that freedom is being expanded when, in fact, it is being selectively granted.

Free speech, it turns out, is protected when it flatters power—and constrained when it challenges it.

New College has become a warning, not a model. A case study in how quickly a public institution can be hollowed out when ideology replaces expertise, when greed replaces care, and when democracy is invoked only to justify its own dismantling.

The tragedy is not merely what has been lost—programs, faculty, trust, academic standing—but what is being normalized: the idea that universities exist to serve political agendas rather than the public good.

That should alarm anyone who believes higher education belongs to students, scholars, and society—not to governors, donors, or culture-war opportunists.

Reference

Moody, J. (2025, Oct. 1). Spending soars, rankings fall at New College of Florida: Student outcomes and rankings are slipping at the liberal arts college while spending is up. Critics believe the college is at risk of implosion, and some are calling for privatization, Inside Higher Educationhttps://www.insidehighered.com/news/governance/state-oversight/2025/10/01/spending-soars-rankings-fall-new-college-florida


Dec. 11, 2025


New College of Florida student Alexandra Levy is concerned about the changes at her school. She poses for a portrait on the campus on Nov. 12. (Thomas Simonetti for MassLive)

By Juliet Schulman-Hall | JSchulman-Hall@masslive.com | MassLive | 
Dec. 11, 2025

This is the second article in a two-part series by Shulman-Hall examining higher education under the Trump administration. Read the first here.


A wave of anger hit Alexandra Levy by the third class in one of her political science courses. As she flipped through the syllabus readings, she began searching the authors online — one after another, after another.

Every reading was from Hillsdale College, a private Christian school, or The Claremont Institute, a conservative think tank.

Wearing a bright pink scarf and a sweater on a “cold” 60-degree November day in Sarasota, Florida, Levy described the class as one of multiple she has encountered at New College where newly-hired conservative professors have shaped what she is taught.

“I just never experienced only showing one opinion or disguising that opinion as fact,” she said.

Levy began at New College of Florida in 2023, the year Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis transformed the Honors College into an increasingly politically conservative institution through leadership and programmatic changes. The changes were modeled after Hillsdale College’s conservative education.

Read more: How a small Florida college became Trump’s blueprint to threaten higher ed in Mass.

For many higher education leaders, the overhaul of New College has been seen as a blueprint for the Trump administration’s pressure campaign on higher education, including threats and demands toward Harvard University.

They worry that the changes at New College could be coming to their own schools.

Since 2023, New College has dropped nearly 60 spots in national liberal arts rankings, and a recently released report shows that spending per student at the college is more than triple most other publicly-supported colleges in Florida.

A view of the campus of New College of Florida in Sarasota, Fla. on Nov. 12. (Thomas Simonetti for MassLive)

The college has also experienced a declining four-year graduation rate, dropping to 47.4% for the class of 2024.

However, to Richard Corcoran, president of New College of Florida, the transformation of the institution embodies more than what some datasets reveal. He argues the college is going in a positive direction despite data that has been “weaponized” by critics without context.

“The old New College is gone. The new New College is rising. The people trying hardest to tear it down are the ones who understand that we are succeeding,” Corcoran wrote in an op-ed last month.

Corcoran said New College hasn’t become a conservative college, but a place with a diversity of perspectives.

“If colleges and universities are not the marketplace of ideas, if they’re not the place to have have every possible debate, idea, discussion, then we fail as a country. And that’s all we’re trying to create here. If we do that, and we do it well, we’ll be the best liberal arts college in the country, Just like we were in the ’70s,” Corcoran told MassLive.

A drop in academic stature at New College

Mimi Fuller, a marine biology student who works as a teacher’s assistant, said she has noticed more students struggling in introductory classes.

“The amount of people that are failing Foundations of Biology is ridiculous. This is the easiest biology class you can take,” Fuller said. “It’s rare that I grade an exam that has an A. It’s so rare.”

But that wasn’t what New College used to be like, according to Benjamin Brown.

Brown, who graduated in 2009, remembers New College as a place where students once went on to earn advanced degrees, many of whom became Fulbright scholars.

Mimi Fuller, second from left, and her friends hang out between classes at New College of Florida on Nov. 12. (Thomas Simonetti for MassLive)

New College was on a positive path between 2021 and 2023, under its first female president. The college’s four-year graduation rate and the number of students with a high school GPA of 4.0 or higher were increasing. And yet, the college had continued to grapple with enrollment declines for several years.

Brown was critical of the previous New College presidencies and excited for a fresh set of eyes and values during the overhaul of the New College administration in 2023. He became the college’s alumni association chair that year.

His positivity quickly waned as he watched his alma mater become a “disaster,” he said.

“We’re not achieving anymore,” Brown said. “We’ve fallen by 59 places in the relevant U.S. News ranking that we look to. We used to have a lot of students on track to go into Ph.D. programs, get Fulbright scholarships and also some Goldwater scholarships. You’re not really doing that anymore. There are still some who entered the program before Corcoran came in who were achieving that, but it’s clearly coming to an end.”



The nearly 60-spot drop in New College’s rankings over the past two years is largely due to the academic peer assessment score. The score measures the perception of institutional quality among presidents, provosts and deans at peer liberal arts colleges, according to Eric Brooks, U.S. News’ director of education data analysis. The faculty resource measures also declined, he said.

What’s being taught at New College — and what isn’t


The academic achievement of New College students is one metric, but Mary Churchill, an associate dean at Boston University Wheelock College of Education & Human Development, has a separate concern about what is being taught.

Churchill has heard from New College faculty who are worried about being punished or caught teaching material that the administration might disagree with.

“If the goal in your classroom is dialogue across difference — to debate ideas, to debate pros and cons of any subject — and you are constrained in only being able to present one side, your ability to support your students in their growth of thinking critically and having critical discourse is really limited,” Churchill said.

There has been a censorship issue not only at New College, but across many institutions in predominantly red states, such as Texas or Georgia, that are abolishing gender studies or conversations about race, she said. Academics as far away as France have approached her with concerns about the changes at New College, she said.

“I think you can be academically rigorous within an environment where you have multiple viewpoints, conservative and progressive. But in either situation, when you’re trying to silence the opposite point of view, I do think you are impacting academic excellence,” Churchill said.

While some programs, like gender studies, were abolished under Corcoran’s leadership, others have been emphasized. For instance, New College has focused on the classical liberal arts by requiring all first-year students to take a class on Homer’s The Odyssey.

This year, David Harvey, the dean of the Center for the Study of Western Civilization, signed up to teach an introductory class on The Odyssey, in part to see how freshmen were doing academically. While he saw some concerning statistics about the academic performance of students in 2023, he said the college has bounced back — and is paving a brighter future forward.

“By and large, I’ve been pleased at how they’re doing. Most of the students are engaged; they’re learning what I want them to learn,” Harvey said.
David Harvey, dean of the Center for the Study of Western Civilization, poses for a portrait on
the campus of New College of Florida. (Thomas Simonetti for MassLive)

Harvey believed New College was becoming a “progressive echochamber” before 2023 and was academically declining, despite its prowess in prior years. The Corcoran administration has been dedicated to restoring political balance on the campus, Harvey said.

“The common refrain, which I actually strongly agree with, is that we want to teach students how to think, not what to think. And by and large, I found that to be true. If you look across our campus, we’ve got a range of courses, programs, a range of opinions. Nobody’s being disciplined for their political views or told what they can and can’t teach,” said Harvey, who has taught at the college for 25 years.

Sarah Hernandez, an associate professor of Sociology and Caribbean and Latin American Studies, has weathered the changes at New College as others left or transferred.

Despite disagreeing with many of the priorities of Corcoran’s administration, Hernandez didn’t want to leave her students, especially those who couldn’t uproot their lives to transfer to places like Hampshire College in Western Massachusetts.

She had left her home once before, moving away from her family in Mexico to study in the U.S., and didn’t want to repeat the experience.

“At some point, one gets done with running,” Hernandez said.

Sarah Hernandez is a professor of Sociology and Caribbean nd Latin American
Studies at the New College of Florida. (Juliet Schulman-Hall/MassLive)


Covering an entire wall of Hernandez’s office is a raised relief map of Mexico. It was a gift from Mary Elmendorf, an anthropologist who studied Mayan women in Mexico, who was also the wife of a former New College president.

The map isn’t just decoration; Hernandez said her attachment to it reflects a broader commitment she has to bringing diverse cultural perspectives to the classroom.

Hernandez has continued to teach courses such as the Sociology of Race and Ethnicity amid the changes at New College.

This differs from approaches taken by some professors at Harvard, who have stopped teaching courses focused on race and gender in the wake of pressures from the Trump administration.

“I’m not afraid. It’s like, if you want to fire me, let’s have it and see. Because you claim that you are for freedom of academia, freedom of speech,” Hernandez said.

Receiving — and spending — more taxpayer money

Brown, a former alumni association chair, watched in frustration as his dreams for New College’s academic revival fizzled out and DeSantis and New College administrators went on to “take Florida taxpayer money and light it on fire.”

“The impression they were giving is this is going to be a serious college with a more conservative flavor, better matching the public attitudes about this in Florida. But what’s been delivered is a financial disaster,” said Brown, who resigned from his alumni chair position in March over financial concerns.

After years of underfunding, New College faced significant issues of deferred maintenance, such as mold, water leaks and structural issues in buildings. The college received nearly double the amount of state appropriations — jumping from $35.5 million in 2021 to $66.5 million in 2023, according to Suncoast Searchlight.

Some of the school’s funding has gone toward demolishing old buildings. Still, remnants of deteriorating structures remain on campus, with bright green algae or mold coating the windows of old dormitories, obstructing the view of the twin beds and bedframes still inside.

Brown felt like funding was being prioritized for uses that weren’t immediately necessary, such as the beautification of campus or building sizable athletic teams quickly.

A recent report from the Florida State University System shows that New College of Florida has been struggling compared to other Florida institutions. That includes the percentage of students graduating in any year, the cost to produce a degree and operating expenses per student at the college in 2024.

Corcoran refutes a lot of that data.

Some of New College’s issues were inherited from previous administrations, such as the millions of dollars in deferred maintenance that needed to be addressed and graduation and employment metrics, Corcoran said in his op-ed.

He also said the Florida State University System report is simplistic, making graphs look outrageous because of how small New College is compared to large Florida institutions.

Corcoran argued that because New College is required to be a residential college, its costs are higher than other Florida institutions that don’t have as many students living on campus. Expanding the college requires investment, he said.

“Less than three years ago (January 2023), New College wasn’t struggling; it was in a death spiral,” Corcoran wrote in his op-ed.

However, many campus community members have complained about overspending at the college, citing a drastic increase in athlete recruitment without adequate housing.

Corcoran has been in hot water for using $3 million to buy modular housing that was plagued by mold and destroyed by a hurricane and nearly $4 million for hotel contracts between 2024 and 2025 due to a lack of housing on campus, according to the Herald-Tribune. Hotels are still being used.

Are New College athletics to blame?

Part of what has changed the culture — but improved the enrollment — at New College was the creation of collegiate athletic teams.

Athletes have been blamed for disturbing the artsy, alternative culture at New College. In the words of one board of trustees member, recruiting athletes would begin to “rebalance the hormones and the politics on campus.”

Critics also claim New College has overspent on athletics and accepted student athletes without as much regard to their academic merit — to boost enrollment.




On the campus on a November morning, different languages could be heard as groups of athletes shouted at each other across walkways and blasted music out of a portable speaker.

Pickup games of soccer across a green lawn and beach volleyball between a few friends permeated the sunny, palm-tree-heavy campus.

In the afternoon, athletic teams congregated across the campus, from the women’s beach volleyball team warming up on sand courts next to the Sarasota Bay to the baseball and softball teams tightly sharing a field. (Many athletic facilities have been built since 2023, including a million-dollar baseball field, which has been in the works.)

For many of the New College athletes MassLive spoke with, it wasn’t until they arrived that they learned of the college’s contentious overhaul.


The New College of Florida softball team practices on campus. (Thomas Simonetti for MassLive)

Sweaty from an evening of a pickup basketball game, Alexis Monero, a New College baseball recruit, said the college was a unique opportunity for him to get playing time, even if the college has a large baseball team.

Student athletes make up around 30% of the college’s population, but additional students come to New College interested in joining the teams, according to the school.

Since arriving at New College, Monero has noticed a clear divide, in the cafeteria or at parties, between those who are athletes and those he calls “narps” or non-athletic regular people. 

Part of that happens naturally from taking part in time-intensive sports, but he has also seen it as a result of non-athletes unfairly blaming athletes for changes at their school.

“We really didn’t want to ruin their school or anything,” Monero said. “We really just came to play college sports. Because right now, college sports is so saturated. Any opportunity you can get, you’re going to take it as an athlete.”



Both Hernandez and Fuller said some athletes at New College have needed more academic support than their non-athlete peers.

Data from 2023 shows that incoming student-athletes had lower high school GPAs and average SAT scores compared to non-athletes accepted at the college as freshmen, according to a records request obtained by MassLive.

The average GPA for admitted first-time-in-college athletes in 2023 was 3.64, compared to 4.05 for non-athletes. Meanwhile, the average SAT score for admitted students was more than 100 points higher for non-athletes, regardless of whether they were freshmen or transfer students.

The college has been improving its SAT scores for freshman students. That upward trend may be in part because New College changed the academic threshold athletes must meet to be recruited, according to one coach. 

‘A political spotlight’

Jackson Dawson, a basketball recruit, said there is a misconception about athletes’ academics. He defies it with his 4.0 high school GPA.

However, he has contributed to the newly visible conservative culture on campus.

Sitting in a white lawn chair eyeing the pelicans diving into the water, Dawson crossed his arms over a baby blue quarter zip sweater that read “Trump International Golf Club.”

Weeks earlier, he was standing in a similar spot on campus with about 80 New College community members for a vigil honoring conservative activist Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated in September. It was an event run by the Turning Point USA chapter at New College, where Dawson is the founder and president.

“We just shared what Charlie meant to us and his impact that he had on the world. I was fortunate to meet Charlie five times, I believe. So I always tell people other than my parents, he probably had the biggest impact on my life so far,” Dawson said.

Part of the way Dawson was able to interact with Kirk was through Dawson’s work at the White House and during President Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. Dawson took on a variety of roles in several agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security. He went on trips with Vice President J.D. Vance to Boston, hikes in Montana and attended the NATO Summit in the Netherlands.

He did that work while taking classes at New College. Dawson spoke with his professors through email, Zoom or phone to discuss what was covered in class. And, he wrote essays and completed assignments from afar.

“I was lucky enough to be able to go to New College and have the opportunity to do that because at most schools you’re not allowed to dismiss basically a semester of school. But I was able to do school and work nonstop,” Dawson said.


New College student athlete Jackson Dawson founded the school's Turning Point USA chapter and interned at Donald Trump's White House. (Thomas Simonetti for MassLive)

In the three years Dawson has attended New College, the Turning Point chapter has grown from about a dozen students to 106 — more than 10% of the student body. He said their work isn’t trying to tell people what to think but rather trying to create a community that values free speech and limited government.

That message echoes what the New College administration has claimed the institution is like: a place that doesn’t indoctrinate students, but exposes students to all viewpoints. However, the college has contradicted that mission through some politically conservative moves, according to some college community members.

For instance, New College announced it was planning to erect a statue of Kirk and volunteered to be the first college to sign the Trump administration’s “compact.”

The compact requires institutions to adopt definitions of biological sex, cap international undergraduate student populations to 15% and abolish departments that “purposefully punish, belittle and even spark violence against conservative ideas,” among other standards.

If signed, the school would receive preference for funding from the federal government.

Over 14% of New College’s undergraduate population were international students in 2024, with the most coming from Brazil. Athletic recruiting has helped bring more of that diversity to campus.

Spectators watch a scrimmage by the New College of Florida softball team on campus in Sarasota, Fla. on Nov. 12. (Thomas Simonetti for MassLive)


In opposition to the compact, New College’s faculty passed a resolution in November asking Corcoran to decline the Trump administration’s compact for preferential federal funding.

In a large auditorium with dozens of faculty members seated on folding chairs on a November afternoon, some faculty expressed concern about not being consulted by the New College administration and whether the Trump administration could restrict their ability to speak openly about certain topics. Only one faculty member spoke in opposition to the faculty’s resolution.

New College administrators wanted to sign up for the compact because the school has already implemented many of the principles laid out in the compact, they said.

However, many of those principles were what drew over a hundred educators and students away in 2023, including Matthew Lepinski, a former faculty member of New College who abruptly resigned from the Board of Trustees that April.

He saw the campus “thrust into the middle of this education culture wars” under politically conservative leadership, ultimately not benefiting students. Those changes were part of DeSantis trying to build his brand for his presidential campaign, Lepinski said.

“[New College] used to be kind of a secluded, out-of-the-way campus, and now it’s gotten a political spotlight shown on it. And I don’t think that benefits students who are just there to learn,” Lepinski said.

Levy, a New College student, has seen a conservative switch on campus firsthand as a student.

She has felt like other student groups, like Turning Point USA, are favored and treated differently than, for instance, the chapter of the League of Women Voters, where she is president.

Levy has heard of some students being invited to events that she wasn’t, and has felt like there has been a difference in what kinds of free speech are protected, such as signing people up for voting versus talking about gun rights.

“You get rewarded for being the kind of student they want,” Levy said.

Levy’s frustration with New College’s campus culture is one shared by Harvey, the chair of the faculty, though he comes to it from a different point of view.

He believes in the direction the New College administration has taken to restore political balance on campus. At the same time, he said the Kirk statue and the compact could be wrapped up in “conservative virtue signaling,” where the college’s administration has attempted to show the state or potential donors that it is going in the right direction.

“One of the things that has been frustrating to me is that a lot of the traditional supporters of the college, a lot of the alumni have been alienated by some of the rhetoric and the virtue signaling that’s taken place,” Harvey said. “Whereas, from my point of view, the things that they loved about the old New College are all still here.”

A metaphor in New College’s mascot

As the sunset cast red and purple hues across the Sarasota Bay on an abnormally cold November evening, Hernandez, a faculty member at New College, clenched her dark blue water bottle in one hand. She walked toward the rose-colored marble mansion, a former home of circus mogul Charles Ringling.

Hernandez’s office was previously in the building, but Corcoran’s arrival forced her and other academics into the more modest facility next door.

A banyan tree cast its shadow across the top of the mansion as the faint resort-style music echoed from neighboring electric fire pits and sand volleyball courts, formerly home to dozens of trees.

In 2023, as the overhaul of New College took shape, the college removed its mascot, the Null Set — once a placeholder that had been reenvisioned into a mathematical sign representing its academic focus.

Corcoran’s administration changed the mascot to the Mighty Banyans. It was chosen because of how big they are and their ability to live for centuries.
The Mighty Banyans logo hangs from a necklace on the dugout of the New College of Florida softball team. (Thomas Simonetti for MassLive)

Banyan trees, also known as “strangler figs,” begin to grow when birds or other animals spread seeds onto other trees. As the seeds grow, the banyan tree sends down roots, strangling the host tree until only the banyan tree, with its networks of trunks, can survive and spread. 

To Hernandez, the mascot is an apt metaphor for the overhaul that has taken place over the past two years — a representation of authoritarian decisions without community buy-in.

DeSantis’s installation of Corcoran and other conservative leadership was the seed that ultimately grew to kill what the college once was, according to some students.

What is left is the “Mighty Banyan” of New College, an utterly changed version of the school they loved.

A banyan tree in front of College Hall on the campus of New College of Florida. (Thomas Simonetti for MassLive)

Walking past the tree, Hernandez stood under a covered passageway lined with arches connecting her new and old office buildings.

Looking toward Corcoran’s office, Hernandez expressed hope that other institutions now being politically pressured to make changes would stand up for their principles more than New College was able to, pointing to Harvard’s federal lawsuits against the Trump administration.

“You’re not alone,” she said.



LEARN MORE
About the Authors

Juliet Schulman-Hall is MassLive's Higher Education Reporter. You can reach her at jschulman-hall@masslive.com or on X at @JSchulmanHall.


Thursday, October 30, 2025

The Courage to Imagine Anew: Milton's 'Paradise Lost' and the Defense of Higher Learning, by Angela Valenzuela, Ph.D.

The Courage to Imagine Anew: Milton's 'Paradise Lost' and the Defense of Higher Learning

by 

Angela Valenzuela, Ph.D.

October 29, 2025

In these uncertain times, I find myself returning to the classics—not for comfort, but for clarity. They remind me that turmoil is not new, that every age must wrestle with its own angels and demons. As an English literature major and Spanish minor, I learned to live among these voices of the past and to listen for the echoes of our present in their words.

John Milton’s Paradise Lost (1968) is one such companion. Written in the wake of England’s failed republican experiment—after the execution of King Charles I, through the brief, flickering hope of the Commonwealth and Protectorate, and on the threshold of the restoration of the Stuart monarchy—it speaks to the ache of disillusionment and the stubborn endurance of faith. An anguished Milton wrote in the ruins of a republic that had promised liberty but delivered repression.

The poem’s power lies not just in its Biblical scope but in its political imagination: a meditation on what happens when institutions of knowledge, justice, and conscience are corrupted by ambition and fear. Satan’s rebellion against Heaven becomes a haunting allegory for power unmoored from morality—a warning about how even noble ideals can be twisted into tyranny when pride replaces principle.

We are living through a similar unraveling. Across the United States, and acutely here in Texas, the assault on higher education feels like a slow-motion reenactment of Milton’s epic fall. Legislation like Senate Bill 17 and Senate Bill 37 strip universities of their moral and intellectual autonomy—erasing diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and eliminating faculty governance under the guise of “neutrality.” In truth, these policies are not about neutrality at all; they are about control. They mirror Satan’s own delusion in Paradise Lost: the belief that power justifies itself, that domination can masquerade as Divine order.

The recent waves of faculty dismissals in Texas, the silencing of critical inquiry, censorship campaigns, and the hollow rhetoric of “viewpoint diversity”—about which I have blogged (Valenzuela, 2025)—all echo Milton’s vision of a paradise undone by deceit. Yet Milton also reminds us that knowledge cannot be banished, nor truth extinguished; even in exile, the spirit of inquiry endures. It is in that spirit that we must resist—not with despair, but with the steadfast conviction that education itself is an act of freedom.

Our universities—once sanctuaries, however imperfect—for the free exchange of ideas are being recast as instruments of ideological conformity. Project 2025, with its blueprint for dismantling public institutions, bears the same logic as Milton’s fallen angels—an architecture of chaos disguised as reform, where destruction is framed as renewal and submission is sold as freedom.

And yet Paradise Lost does not end in despair, but in a quiet, hard-won grace—one that I encourage us to lean into. When Adam and Eve are expelled from Eden, they do not turn against one another or the world that has cast them out; instead, they walk hand in hand, “through Eden took their solitary way.” Their loss is real and profound, but so is their potential. Exile becomes not an ending, but the beginning of a new human story:

“Some natural tears they dropp’d, but wip’d them soon;
The world was all before them, where to choose
Their place of rest, and Providence their guide:
They hand in hand with wand’ring steps and slow,
Through Eden took their solitary way.”
 — Paradise Lost, Book XII

In that moment, Milton reminds us that exile can also be the beginning of resistance—that even as institutions crumble, new communities of conscience can rise. We, too, walk that road now. As scholars, educators, and citizens, our task is not only to lament the loss of paradise but to rebuild it—to reclaim the moral and intellectual commons that sustain democracy itself.

What is at stake in this moment is more than academic freedom—it is the survival of an educated democracy. Across states and systems, educators are rising to defend the university as a public good, not a partisan instrument. The broader defense of education is, at its heart, a defense of truth, inquiry, and the capacity for moral imagination. Like Milton, we must see beyond the ruins toward the possibility of renewal, for if paradise is lost through arrogance and deceit, it is restored through wisdom, solidarity, and an expansive vision of what a good and virtuous education can be.

In doing so, we walk in the footsteps of Milton—across centuries of struggle and renewal—and honor his enduring question: not whether paradise can be restored, but whether we have the courage to imagine it anew. For the record, whoever said a Humanities or Liberal Arts degree is esoteric—or that our Western literary canon is worthless? Hardly so, even as its exclusivity has remained an issue. It has always been about survival—about learning to think, to write, to question, and to dream our way through the darkness of despair toward the light of freedom.

In times such as these, when truth itself is politicized and education reduced to utility, the humanistic tradition reminds us that freedom begins in the mind—and that imagination, not ideology, is the truest measure of a free and open society.

References

Milton, J. (1968). Paradise lost & paradise regained, Signet.

Valenzuela, A. (2025, Aug. 26). The fight for higher education: A minority perspective on both the liberal University and President Michael Roth. Educational Equity, Politics & Policy in Texas.

Friday, October 17, 2025

Faculty at Texas university fear entire liberal arts departments will be slashed, Alice Speri | Friday, 17 October 2025 | The Guardian

Friends:

News from the University of Texas at Austin this week is deeply alarming. 

Faculty have learned that a committee has been quietly appointed to study the “restructuring” of liberal arts programs, with particular focus rumored to fall onAfrican and African Diaspora StudiesMexican American and Latina/o Studies, and Women’s and Gender Studies. These are precisely the disciplines that give students the tools to think critically about race, identity, and democracy—areas of study already under sustained political attack in Texas.

That the university has provided no public explanation only compounds faculty and student fears. The timing of this move—just weeks after the state eliminated faculty senates and centralized power in administrators’ hands—suggests a larger pattern of institutional unraveling of higher education.

I fear this is not restructuring at all, but rather a purge of vital fields—like Mexican American Studies—that were born from historic grassroots and civil rights struggles to ensure that the histories, experiences, and contributions of our communities are researched, taught, and valued. Far from “political correctness,” these programs embody the very mission of a public university: to expand knowledge, deepen understanding, and prepare students to engage critically and compassionately in a diverse democracy. 

Like Dr. Julie Minich quoted in the piece below, she represents all of us when she expresses just how offensive an allegation this is when the reality is one of our administrations seeking to censure precious knowledge and our teaching of it.

Moreover, if these programs do not promote the kind of workforce readiness that SB 37 insists upon, I don’t know what does. The capacity to think critically, navigate complexity, communicate across difference, and lead with empathy—these are precisely the skills our state and nation need to thrive. To dismantle the very programs that cultivate them is not only short-sighted policy but a profound disservice to the students and communities that public education was created to serve.

-Angela Valenzuela

Faculty at Texas university fear entire liberal arts departments will be slashed

University of Texas at Austin faculty fear changes from new taskforce that could restructure humanities programs

 The first day of classes at the University of Texas at Austin on 25 August 2025. Photograph: Jay Janner/

The Austin American-Statesman via Getty Images.

Alice Speri | Friday, 17 October 2025 | The Guardian

Faculty at the University of Texas at Austin fear entire academic departments may be on the chopping block after the university quietly appointed a committee charged with studying the restructuring of its liberal arts programs.

The university – the largest in the public University of Texas system – has not made any announcements about cuts or restructuring, but faculty there have learned the committee was established earlier this semester and tasked with a review that they believe is focused on ethnic and regional disciplines such as African and African diaspora studies, Mexican American and Latina/o studies, as well as women’s and gender studies.

The university did not respond to the Guardian’s request for comment and faculty who asked administrators about the committee said they have received no clear answers. On Thursday, UT Austin also announced a taskforce to conduct a “thorough review” of the university’s core curriculum – a set of required courses taken by all students – “to better fulfill the purpose of this curriculum and identify gaps in quality, rigor, or intellectual cohesion”, the university’s president wrote in an email.

The taskforce is made up of 18 professors – none from the departments where cuts are feared. Students have circulated an image in private emails and chats mocking the fact that almost all faculty on it are white.



An image circulated by students at the University of Texas at Austin. Photograph: Obtained by The Guardian.

“We’re hearing bits and pieces,” said Julie Minich, a professor in the English and Mexican American and Latina/o studies departments at UT Austin. “We’re hearing that the dean appointed a restructuring committee. We’re hearing rumors about who’s on it. And then we’re trying to read the tea leaves.”

Concerns escalated after a new state law went into effect on 1 September, disbanding the public university system’s long-established faculty senates and giving university administrators near-absolute control over university governance matters. While university senates hold advisory roles at most schools, they are generally a primary outlet for faculty to engage in decisions concerning the university.

As the law kicked in, UT Austin’s new president – the first to be appointed without faculty input – announced the establishment of a 12-person faculty advisory board entirely selected by him and “charged with advising on institutional matters and focusing on the best interests of the entire University”.

While UT Austin leaders have said little about their plans for the university’s future, the new provost, William Inboden, recently outlined his vision in a 7,000-word manifesto published in National Affairs, a rightwing magazine. In the essay, he laments the crisis of “legitimacy and trust” in US higher education and universities’ “ideological imbalance”, in part blaming the “identity-studies framework” for them.

“Too many American history courses present the American past as a litany of oppressions and hypocrisies, leaving students with an imbalanced view of the United States,” he wrote, repeating a position often invoked by conservatives, including Donald Trump, who have railed against universities as bastions of woke liberalism.

Inboden’s manifesto “really outlines his sense that the humanities and liberal arts are full of pathology and rot”, said Craig Campbell, an anthropology professor at UT Austin. “That’s what they’re going after.”

He added that the uncertainty had been a major distraction this semester. “It’s a horrible, horrible climate right now.”

“We really took this article as an indication of hostility for our field,” echoed Minich, referring to Inboden’s essay. “The combination of the formation of this committee without any communication with the faculty and then this article published by the provost has really put a lot of people on edge.”

Earlier this year, the Trump-aligned America First Policy Institute also took aim at UT Austin. In a report titled “Are the ‘Studies’ Worth Studying?”, the conservative thinktank appears to foreshadow the targeting of the same departments faculty now fear are under threat.

“The ‘Studies’ – e.g., ‘Women’s Studies,’ ‘Asian American Studies,’ ‘Critical Disability Studies,’ etc. – are activist rather than scholarly disciplines,” the report concludes, claiming that they are rife with “grade inflation”. “‘Low hanging-fruit’ remedies to grade inflation include eliminating low-rigor disciplines (such as the Studies).”

Minich flatly rejected the report’s conclusions.

“I would vigorously dispute any characterization of area studies or ethnic studies as ideologically engaged in the indoctrination of students,” she said. “My goal in the classroom is never to tell students what to think. It’s to give them tools for how to think about a complicated world, and the fact that I feel I'm being prevented from doing that seems to me to be a real problem."

UT Austin leaders have not yet responded to the president’s offer. Earlier this week, about 200 students made their opposition to it clear as they chanted “do not sign” in front of the administration’s main building.

Friday, August 08, 2014

Revenge of the Liberal Arts Major

Pay attention to this hard logic for soft skills:

"The No. 1 skill that employers are looking for are communication skills and liberal arts students who take classes in writing and speaking," said Dan Schawbel, founder of Millennial Branding and an expert on Generation Y. "They need to become good communicators in order to graduate with a liberal arts degree. Companies are looking for soft skills over hard skills now because hard skills can be learned, while soft skills need to be developed."

Read on.

-Angela

May 14, 2012, 2:58pm EDT

Revenge of the Liberal Arts Major

Enlarge Image » Millennial hiring
Millennial Branding and Experience Inc.
J. Jennings Moss
If you're in college, or happen to be about to graduate, and you've been mocked for getting a liberal arts degree, here's a piece of welcome news: You're actually in more demand than those who are getting finance and accounting degrees. That's one of the findings of a new survey of 225 employers issued today by Millennial Branding and Experience Inc.

The main takeaway of the survey, at least according to the press release that went out with it, was that there's a disconnect taking place with regard to internships. While 91 percent of employers think students should have one or two of the temporary, professionally focused positions before they graduate, 50 percent haven't actually hired any interns in the last six months. Somehow, we don't think this is going to change either the crush of students looking for internships or the stated desire of employers to hire those who have internships under their belts.

More interesting, at least for those of us who got some parental grief over our college choice, was the apparent love being shown for liberal arts majors. Thirty percent of surveyed employers said they were recruiting liberal arts types, second only to the 34 percent who said they were going after engineering and computer information systems majors. Trailing were finance and accounting majors, as only 18 percent of employers said they were recruiting targets.

"The No. 1 skill that employers are looking for are communication skills and liberal arts students who take classes in writing and speaking," said Dan Schawbel, founder of Millennial Branding and an expert on Generation Y. "They need to become good communicators in order to graduate with a liberal arts degree. Companies are looking for soft skills over hard skills now because hard skills can be learned, while soft skills need to be developed."

One other finding from the survey to emphasize: 29 percent of employers said they were looking for graduates with entrepreneurial experience. That's far behind the 69 percent who think relevant courses are an important factor to someone's candidacy, or the 65 percent who say a referral from a boss or professor is significant, or the 50 percent who like to see a leadership position in a campus organization.

But at least it's a recognition that an entrepreneurial spirit or go-getter attitude can be a clear plus.
"Employers are looking for entrepreneurship experience now because they have more pressure to innovate from within," Schawbel said in an email exchange with Portfolio.com, predicting this number would rise. "Entrepreneurship, in my opinion, is defined as 'personal accountability.' You don't need to own a company to be an entrepreneur. The entrepreneurial attitude is cherished because they are goal-oriented, have sales skills, and have good business sense."

For more on the survey, click here for the press release or click here for a infographic detailing all the employers' attitudes.