Translate

Showing posts with label Tea Party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tea Party. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 12, 2025

"Time for Progressives to Become Active In the Democratic Party," by Thom Hartmann

Friends,

I couldn’t agree more with Diane Ravitch’s post amplifying Thom Hartmann’s urgent message: progressives must learn from the radical Right’s playbook. The pre-MAGA Tea Party didn’t just protest—they took over the GOP by starting at the grassroots, winning local Precinct Committee seats, and reshaping the party from within.

History shows the Democratic Party can deliver transformative change—FDR’s New Deal, LBJ’s Great Society—but only if we organize strategically, from the bottom up. It’s our turn to take on this slow and patient work at the grassroots level. 

In the meantime, we need to support our dems who are out of state so that mid-decade redistricting doesn't come to pass. Here is a link where all can contribute their support: https://poweredxpeople.org/ 

Sí se puede! Yes we can!

-Angela Valenzuela




Read on blog or Reader
 Diane Ravitch's blog

By dianeravitch on August 4, 2025

Thom Hartmann, accomplished author, blogger, and podcaster, urges progressives to learn from the success of the radical Right. The ultra-Right as for many years a fringe group, far from the power center of the Republican Party. Now the extremists control the Republican Party. Hartmann explains how they accomplished this feat and why progressives should do the same.

He writes:

What if, lacking an organized resistance to fascism like we have had in previous eras (the civil rights movement, SDS, BLM, the Wobbly’s) the Democratic Party itself could play the role of producing radical, positive transformation across America?

Sound crazy? It’s actually happened twice.

The first time was in the 1930s, when Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal literally flipped our politics and the American economy upside down, turning us from a raw, harsh capitalist system to a democratic socialist system with Social Security, legalized unions, unemployment insurance, a minimum wage, workplace safety rules, massive infrastructure construction, and millions of Americans being employed directly by the government to end poverty.

It happened again in the 1960s, with Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society, producing Medicare, Medicaid, the civil rights act, the voting rights act, food stamps, low income housing, National Public Radio, a transformation of our educational system for the better, USAID, Job Corps, VISTA, Head Start, a major Social Security expansion, The National Endowment for the Arts, and what was essentially free college.

Sunday, I was on Ali Velshi’s show on MSNBC a conversation about protest movements. I pointed out that back in the 60s, when I was in SDS, there were a number of groups that were quite active, particularly on college campuses, but today most of them have been gutted or banned.

Black Lives Matter has disintegrated, the movement against Israel’s slaughter in Gaza has led to universities rolling over and capitulating, and the #MeToo and abortion rights movements are essentially leaderless.

Which leaves the Democratic Party, as I mentioned on Ali’s show. Billionaires and racists turned the Republican Party into a neofascist protest party over the past decade; progressives and those of us who want to preserve democracy in America need to similarly says control of and radicalize the Democratic Party in the tradition of FDR and LBJ.

There is a vital lesson progressives must learn, which is how the far right took control of the Republican Party over a decade ago and forced the entire Conservative establishment to lurch so far to the Right that they’ve even dumped people like Liz Cheney and George W. Bush.

If progressives hope to have any shot at influencing today’s Democratic Party and kicking out the corporate sellout Democrats and replacing them with real-deal progressives, then we need to get to work right now to do exactly what the Tea Party did a decade and a half ago to take power.

And it starts in our own backyards.

Let me introduce you to the now-defunct Concord Project, a right-wing organization that, a decade ago, was in charge of helping the Tea Party’s Successful effort to take over and radicalize the GOP.

The Concord Project expanded their get-out-the-vote strategy beyond just traditional phone banking, canvassing, and putting up “vote Republican” signs. Instead, they decided to infiltrate local politics by encouraging Tea Partiers and conservatives more generally to become “Precinct Committee Members.”

Here’s their pitch in their own words from one of their Obama-era YouTube training videos:


“What’s the most powerful political office in the world? It is not the President of the United States. It’s Precinct Committeeman.”

So why is a Precinct Committeeman (or person) so important?


“First, because precinct committeemen and only precinct committeemen get to elect the leaders of the political parties; if you want to elect the leadership of one of the two major political parties in this country, then you have to become a precinct committeeman.”

As in the oldest and most basic governing reality in a republic: true and effective political power flows up from the bottom.

It starts with Precinct Committeemen and women — people who are either appointed or win local elections with very few votes at stake, in some cases only 10 or 20 votes — to gain positions that pretty much anyone can hold but which wield enormous power.

It’s Precinct Committee Persons who elect district, county, and state party officials and delegates, who choose primary nominees that then go on to hold elected office, and who help draft a party’s platform.

They’re also generally the first people who elected officials meet with when they come back into the district. And those officials listen carefully to what Precinct Committee persons have to say.

So, the Concord folks told their people, if far right Tea Partiers moved in and took over Precinct Committee seats then they’d also be able to nominate a slew of Tea Partiers to hold higher offices within the Republican Party and for primaries.

And those Tea Party Republican Party primary candidates would then be winnowed down in the primary to one Tea Party Republican to run against the Democrat in the general election. This way, Tea Partiers would end up dominating the GOP.

That was their pitch: take over the party from the inside, from the bottom up. And it worked....

Diane Ravitch's blog © 2025.

Thursday, July 13, 2023

Numbers suggest murky future for Moms for Liberty

Friends:

There is a lot to unpack here and I'll only do a bit. Honestly, we all need to take time to parse out all of this and have conversations about it. At the most general level, who are "Moms for Liberty, also known as "M4L" and "MFL"?" As per this blog by Heath Brown, their information is hidden from view, however, they say that they have 275 chapters in 45 states and more than a hundred thousand members nationwide. Some view them as akin to the Tea Party Movement that formed in 2009.

They say that they're anti-CRT, but they really aren't because they clearly do not understand it. This stance nevertheless serves their purposes as it allows them to conveniently weaponize race that they decry as “woke indoctrination.” They're also anti-LGBTQ and they back a false ideology of Christianity known as "Christian Nationalism" that promotes allegiance to country and their specific definition of Christianity. They also have a penchant for parading Black and Brown people who align with their cause to make it seem that they're more diverse than they really are. 

As you can read from the Southern Poverty Law Center website, the SPLC characterizes M4L as an anti-government, extremist group. 

Medhi Hassan with MSNBC notes that they keep their funding sources secret yet they enjoy close ties with the Heritage Foundation, also noting that they received funding in 2021 from Judy Fancelli who bankrolled the "Stop the Steal" January 6th attack on our nation's capital. The optics are deeply troubling. You can follow them yourselves on Twitter to learn more.  

What's most revealing to me is just how toxic they are from all the various reports I'm reading right now. The things is that "rage tactics," as Williams (2022) observes in her must-read piece in The New Yorker, is actually what they're about.

They do not express a desire to actually transform schools and curriculum, as those of us in the Ethnic Studies Movement seek to accomplish, but rather to promote censureship, dismantle public education and privatize schools by fostering a campaign of disenchantment in hopes that white, suburban mothers, in particular, turn against public schools. Ethnic Studies Movement advocates like myself are diametrically opposite, seeking to mend, not end, public education.

Born out of our long, extended, historical project of democracy as a nation, that at the grassroots level, is truly about living and being in relation to our public schools, and the public sphere, M4L belies the notion that public life should be rewarding—even if in moments contentious—whether occurring at local, city, or state-level politics.

It's almost as if the more unpleasant they are, the more power they think they have. I would hope that instead of praising M4L and giving them a platform as Trump and DeSantis have done, that all people of decency and conscience see them as the enemies of democracy that they are. 

If you have any doubt about this, I urge you to read the Williams (2022) piece. Even if this organization is less ascendant than they portray themselves to be, their access to eye-popping resources from conservative non-profits and wealthy donors is impactful, with power to potentially distort the public imagination of their levels of trust toward public education as connected to the common good that they abhor.

Thanks to Diane Ravitch for sharing this piece by Heath Brown.

-Angela Valenzuela

References

MSNBC News. (2022, Nov. 30). The Far-Right Moms Fighting the School Board Wars, The Mehdi Hassan Show [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLG1LWUN0tY

Williams, P. (2022, Oct. 31). The Right-Wing Mothers Fuelling the School-Board Wars, The New Yorker.


New chapters are forming, but not where it matters most for 2024

by Heath Brown | July 6, 2023


Photo by Gayatri Malhotra on Unsplash

There’s been a lot hay made lately about Moms for Liberty — the group formed in 2021 to oppose school mask mandates and other pandemic precautions. Jennifer Schuessler at the New York Times called them “a force in Republican politics” and Chris Lehmann at The Nation likened the group to the Tea Party.

There are good reasons to take Moms for Liberty seriously.

As Jennifer Berkshire and Jack Schneider explain on their podcast, it’s re-positioned itself over the last 12 months as the voice of anti-teacher vitriol, eager to ban books at the mere mention of race or LGBTQ issues. Classics, like The Color PurpleWater for Elephants, and The Bluest Eye, were challenged by the Indian River County chapter of the organization in Florida last fall.

Candidates for the Republican presidential nomination also have taken the organization up on the offer to speak to its members, most recently at last week’s Moms for Liberty Summit in Philadelphia. At the event, Governor Rick DeSantis called Gender Queer, a memoir by nonbinary writer Maia Kobabe, “hardcore pornography.” The book has been banned by over 50 districts recently, the most of any book in the country, according to Pen America.