Translate

Tuesday, June 09, 2015

Academia Cuauhtli / Cuauhtli Academy: Important Links - June 9, 2015




Cuauhtli Graduation Ceremony
May 2, 2015

Professional development - Academia Cuahutli curriculum June 5, 2015


June 9, 2015

Through appropriate links to news items, videos, blog links, and websites, I am happy to share with you some important work of which I and many others have been a part in Austin, Texas.  This involves working in a community-based organization named Nuestro Grupo (meaning "Our Group") that consists of highly-respected advocates, elders, university faculty (representing 5 area universities), and students with both the City of Austin and the Austin Independent School District in establishing a Saturday school that we call "Academia Cuauhtli" (Cuauhtli Academy) on he beautiful grounds of the Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Cultural Center, an Austin cultural arts community institution located on 600 River St. 

UT History professor 

This is NOT a charter school, but rather a legal, three-way partnership effort to develop curriculum in the context of our Saturday academy—as succinctly expressed in the KLRU/PBS video below.
We have worked collectively together to co-construct curricula in the area of civil rights, immigration/migration, and local history and are in the process of developing curricula in the areas of indigenous heritage, women, and the cultural arts.  The cultural arts focus is currently on Danza Mexica (Aztec dance) and will soon incorporate Tejano (Texas Mexican) music.  


In addition to the participation of AISD teachers, a lot of hard work by lots of committed volunteers has gone into this effort and we will continue as planned for the 2015-16 school year when we enroll our next cohort of AISD fourth graders attending Metz, Sanchez, and Zavala Elementary Schools located in East Austin.

Worthy of note is that while our academy focus is only on these three schools as per our formal partnership agreement, our curriculum is otherwise already available to all AISD teachers in grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 11 district wide.  Hence, what we have developed in this small nucleus of a Saturday school is having district-wide impacts.  We hear anecdotally that it is primarily ur bilingual/dual language teachers that are implementing the curriculum in our district.  We hope to secure a grant that will allow us to research the impact of this curriculum on teachers, children, parents, and community.  Will keep everybody posted as things progress.

Angela Valenzuela, Convener
Nuestro Grupo





       


Local Television Video

Local Newspaper 



AISD Video



 Websites



 
 Academia Cuauhtli Blog Posts



 


Congress Incorporated | Politics & Government | The Investigative Fund

By Lee Fang
The Nation
February 11, 2015

A wave of lobbyists has arrived on Capitol Hill. But this time, they're occupying top staff positions in the new Congress.

Until a few weeks ago, Joel Leftwich was a
senior lobbyist for the largest food and beverage company in the United
States. During his tenure at PepsiCo — maker of Cheetos, Lay's potato
chips and, of course, Pepsi-Cola — the company had played a leading role
in efforts to beat back local soda taxes and ensure that junk food
remained available in schools. But PepsiCo also faced new challenges at
the federal level. The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act, championed by
Michelle Obama, had placed new nutrition standards on school lunches.
PepsiCo sent teams of lobbyists to Capitol Hill, deluged political
candidates with donations, and fired off letters to regulators asking
them to weaken the new rules. One such PepsiCo letter requested the
redefinition of a "school day" so the company could continue to sell its
sugary sports drinks at "early morning sports practices." Leftwich, a
former congressional liaison for the Department of Agriculture, was well
positioned to help PepsiCo shore up its allies in the House and Senate.


Last April, Leftwich paid a visit to one such friend, Democratic
Senator Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, then chairwoman of the Senate
Agriculture Committee, to thank her for opposing nutrition guidelines
for food stamp purchases.


Continue reading here.

Friday, June 05, 2015

Racism and the Charter School Movement: Unveiling the Myths by Dr. Antonia Darder




Truthout | Op-Ed
 increase font size
Student erases(Image: Student erases via Shutterstock) Rather than an oppressive and manipulative engine for capitalist accumulation, schools should function as centers of creativity and imagination where an ethos of democratic life is grounded upon cultural inclusiveness, social justice and economic democracy.
For almost three decades now, the charter school movement has sought to create the illusion that it is a better alternative to public education. Steeped in a narrow language of choice and student success, charter schools have also begun to quickly populate the terrain of educational justice, despite the conservative roots from which this movement sprang. Despite what was once a central commitment to public schooling in the United States, radical education advocates cannot afford to turn a blind eye to the struggles against racism that exist and persist within charter school environments, despite the rhetoric of equality and justice. This is particularly necessary because many of the most vulnerable students, with the greatest needs, have generally remained within now even more poorly funded and resourced public schools, while more and more public dollars, under private control, are redirected to serve the privileged few.
Common Myths
Given the growing number of teachers of color and children of color whose lives are directly affected by the consolidation of public-private resources, educators committed to a critical ethics of social justice in education must contend with the myths associated with the racialization process at work within charter schools today. One way to better understand this phenomenon is to consider the many myths at work in the charter school movement.  Continue reading here.

#TxLege #edpolicy #politics #LatinoEdu #TxEd #Latino 

Wednesday, June 03, 2015

The George P. Bush Award Debacle: Rescuing Our Image and Reputation in Mexican American Studies at UT-Austin

The George P. Bush Award Debacle: Rescuing Our Image and Reputation in Mexican American Studies at UT-Austin

June 3, 2015

Dear Educational Equity, Politics & Policy in Texas Blog Readers:

Those of you who follow this blog and my work/our work standing up to injustice, particularly at the Texas State Legislature where the struggles are legion, intense, and exhausting might be wondering why I have been silent on the debacle involving the secretive selection to honor George P. Bush—Jeb Bush's son and our current, newly-elected, Texas Land Commissioner—a Latino Leadership Award on Tuesday, March 31, 2015 at the University of Texas at Austin (Davila, March 31, 2015).

The short answer is that I count myself among the many—our faculty, students, and community included—that have waited patiently for a formal, official explanation and apology for this decision that has brought great harm to our image and reputation as a university.  This requested explanation isn't simply about the decision to give George P. Bush this award, but also why this decision reflects a pattern of governance and administration that has excluded us as faculty, students, and community in this and other areas related to the development of the newly-created Department of Mexican American and Latino Studies at the University of Texas at Austin.

Here is what our students at UT have explicitly demanded—posted  in full on this website—that also directs you to a petition signed by alumni, scholars and leaders throughout the country that have also registered their concerns:


Public Statement on Latino Leadership Award. As requested during the Student Conversation Meeting called by CMAS/MALS on April 23rd, we ask that the CMAS/MALS decision makers involved in the selection of George P. Bush as the recipient of the inaugural Latino Leadership Award issue a public statement that should include, first and foremost, a formal apology for excluding faculty, community members, and students from the selection process. Additionally, it should detail the selection criteria and the names and affiliations of all decision makers involved. We insist on this formal public statement because we feel that the current CMAS/MALS leadership has an obligation to clear affiliated faculty and students on a decision that was made in a secretive and unilateral fashion. We ask that the current CMAS/MALS leadership acknowledge that the vast majority of students have spoken up in objection to both the choice for the awardee and the way the decision was carried out, and voice a firm commitment to establishing criteria with students and faculty that reflect the values of CMAS/MALS and the wider Latina/o community in future endeavors (you may continue reading here, scrolling down to Dr. Maria Cotera's post).

Not only have we as faculty and students waited in vain for an official public statement (since an emergency faculty meeting held at 8AM on April 8, 2015), but here is yesterday's June 1st Huffington Post piece by Roque Planas that is the latest in a series of published pieces (see below) related to this decision:

  UT Austin Rethinks Awards Process After Latino Award To George P. Bush Sparks Uproar
I am far from alone in the sentiment that this is a significant philosophical and moral setback for one of our country's first Center for Mexican American Studies (CMAS) centers/programs established in 1970 at the height of the Mexican American Civil Rights Movement. The newly created department called the Department of Mexican American and Latino Studies (MALS), exists institutionally alongside CMAS and was officially established in September, 2014.

In the interest of full disclosure, I am not a MALS faculty member but belong instead to the Department of Educational Administration in the Education Policy and Planning Program at UT—and with a courtesy appointment in Cultural Studies in Education within the Department of Curriculum and Instruction.  I also direct the Texas Center for Education Policy.  I nevertheless used to be a member of the teaching faculty within CMAS when I was first hired and continue today as I have since the beginning of my days at UT as an affiliate.  Currently, I am also a member of the CMAS/MALS Executive Committee and can attest, as well, to the fact that none of us on the EC knew anything about this until we received an invitation to this award ceremony from President Bill Powers who literally just stepped down from his post.

Because so many of us have deep and defining commitments to the decades-long, hard-earned, civil and human rights, progressive agenda that Mexican American Studies represents, I share links to the universe of published pieces to date so that the casual reader cannot reduce the outrage that this decision has sparked either to a personal attack or reckless hyperbole.  Far from it.  We all deeply regret that this crisis has befallen us and we are working toward a resolution that will repair our image and reputation as a Center and Department.

I'll begin first, however, with a succinct list of all the things that George P. Bush OPPOSES that a keyword search on Google would reveal (otherwise, simply read the Texas Republican Party Platform [pdf]):
  • In-state tuition for undocumented students, DACA, DAPA (for detention for misdemeanors), healthcare or citizenship ever

  • Public education/schools/teachers/board; supports vouchers and using the public's taxpayer dollars for private schools

  • Women's right to choose on reproductive health issues

  • Eliminating global warming; in fact, he's in that marginal percent that doesn't even think that humans are impacting global change

  • Communities' freedom to ban fracking—yes, their very freedom to pass ordinances to do so; this guy's family is in energy and he's now the Texas Land Commissioner and so this is a very big deal.

  • Medicaid for the poor and vulnerable.

  • Marriage equality—forget it; in fact, he supports "reparative therapy" for gays.

  • Affordable Care Act—same deal; supports all efforts to deny this to the public.

  • Civil Rights/Social and Economic Justice—no minimum wage increases; gun control, affirmative action (YES to increasing sales taxes, privatize pensions, restrictions in voting, and the United States leaving the United Nations!)

  • Last but not least, do consider that the Bush family is moving from oil to water—the new frontier in the energy wars—purchasing thousands of acres of land with pristine reservoirs of water in Paraguay.  

George P. Bush awarded first inaugural Latino Leadership Award




Texas land commissioner George P. Bush speaks Monday evening at the awards ceremony for the inaugural Latin Leadership Award.
Photo Credit: Carlo Nasisse | Daily Texan Staff



UT President Bill Powers presented land commissioner George P. Bush the inaugural Latino Leadership Award on Monday evening.
The president’s office worked in conjunction with the Center of Mexican American Studies and the Department of Mexican American and Latina/o Studies to select Bush as the first awardee, said Dr. Nicole Guidotti-Hernández, associate director of the Center for Mexican American Studies.
“We went through a series of 15 nominees, and we evaluated them for leadership, public service and areas like that,” Guidotti-Hernández said. “With him as the first Latino land commissioner, I think in its [179-year] history of the office, we thought it was an appropriate acknowledgement of what it means to be a trailblazer in Latino leadership today.”
As a son of a Mexican-American mother and as a Hispanic man who grew up in the U.S., Bush said he was honored to receive the award.
“Going to this University, being honored for the first time, it’s truly a honor and privilege,” Bush said. “It’s truly a challenge to take things to the next level, to give a hand to the next generation of students looking at opportunities whether its public service or grad school or finding opportunities that can improve their life. [There is] a lot of work ahead.”
Bush said he wants his agency to help both the center and the department.
“They’re doing research that I think is going to benefit our agency,” Bush said. “In terms of projecting the big needs facing the community, they mentioned health care, immigration, voter ID and so forth, which is helpful to our agency.”
While Bush accepted the award, approximately 15 protesters in the West Mall came to express their dissatisfaction at Bush receiving this award, as well as with his political track record.

Feminist activist Martha Cotera speaks in front of the tower in protest of the decision to grant Land Commissioner George P. Bush the inaugural Latino Leadership Award Monday evening. Cotera and other protestors cited Bush's political record on issues ranging from immigration to fracking and environmental concerns as reasons why he should not have been selected for the award. Carlo Nasisse | Daily Texan Staff
According to Daniel Yanez, an Austin community organizer, Bush appears to care about issues facing the Latino community, but he hasn’t done anything actually benefitting that group.
“As a politician, he has never come out for Hispanic or Latino or Mexican-American issues,” Yanez said. “To give him an award, particularly of this type — I have to laugh.”
Protesters addressed several of the issues Bush said he wishes to improve. Students gathered around to listen to feminist activist Martha Cutera, who took a strong stance against most of Bush’s political policies, ranging from immigration to fracking and environmental concerns.
“It’s difficult for students and faculty and staff to get involved in actions like this,” Cutera said. “We do not know how this honor came about. We are concerned that the values that this person has publicly talked about and in the Republican platform that he supports are anti-civil rights, anti-poor, anti-women.”

Additional published articles to date listed chronologically:
  • An Interview with Dr. Domino Perez, by Alfredo Santos in La Voz de Austin (May 2015)
By Elaine Ayala

May 24, 2015 Updated: May 24, 2015 6:40pm
 
When Texas Land Commissioner George P. Bush was awarded the first-ever Latino Leadership Award by the University of Texas in March — three months into his first term in statewide office — Chicano activists and scholars in the state capital criticized how and why he was chosen.
They said politics was at work in honoring a newcomer who, frankly, had yet to show an affinity or inclination for Latino issues. They said it was premature, at the very least, to honor Bush.
They weren’t alone.
Protesters were equally critical of the process and lack of transparency by which UT officials arrived at the selection, and they specifically criticized outgoing President Bill Powers and two academics who head the UT Center for Mexican American Studies and the newer Department of Mexican American and Latina/o Studies. The award was presented within the auspices of those two UT entities.
Though little has surfaced from UT since then — and no mention of the award seems to exist on the Texas Land Office site, nor the center and department sites — the episode has reverberated in national discussions, academic resolutions and an online petition by UT grads.
None of it is pretty.
The National Association for Chicana and Chicano Studies adopted a scathing resolution by Texas Chicano scholars that charges Domino Pérez, director of UT’s Center for Mexican American Studies, and Nicole Guidotti-Hernández, chairwoman of the Mexican American and Latino Studies Department, of violating the group’s core values of “democratic participation, transparency, accountability, and faculty, student and community engagement.”
The resolution points to the “negative national attention” that the Bush award brought to the field and called Pérez and Guidotti-Hernández’s decision “capricious and arbitrary” in failing to involve any faculty advisory committees.
In between every “whereas,” the resolution laments what’s seen as a major fall from grace for UT’s center, where scholars such as beloved folkorist Américo Paredes helped birth this important area of study, one that the academy sorely lacked and which has since produced so many outstanding scholars and scholarship.
Together, they filled voids in the academy and diversified the American library, documenting the histories of Mexican Americans and Chicanos in the Southwest. Five hundred years of history moved into the light, and the marginalized moved to the center of the page.
The flagship university in the UT system helped make all that happen.
Some UT grads have posted a petition online, circulated nationally, that has received more than 300 signatures.
“We have long considered being alumni of UT and CMAS to be a badge of honor,” it says. “We now feel deeply betrayed by the decisions and process pertaining to this leadership award, which seems no more than an attempt to sell our reputation as a leading center for knowledge production on Latina/o communities to the highest bidder. The awarding of this honor to Mr. Bush has diminished the prestige of MALS (Department of Mexican American Latino/a Studies), CMAS (Center for Mexican American Studies), and the production of Latina/o scholarship at UT, and it taints the institution as a whole.”
The nation’s MAS scholars are actually calling for Guidotti-Hernández and Pérez to be removed. They want national searches. They want tenured professors. They want community and faculty advisory committees to be reconstituted and reinstated.
Activist and scholar Martha Cotera, one of the original protesters back in March, sounds a little sorry for the two professors in question. They were vulnerable to top-down micro-management she blames on the embattled, outgoing Powers.
“This is not a new thing,” she said.
She and a few other scholars and citizens will meet with new UT President Gregory L. Fenves on June 10. She’s hoping that the new president will be as concerned as they are about how a flagship university handles Mexican-American studies going forward.
In the meantime, there is an opportunity for George P. Bush here. Get the best revenge possible: Do work deserving of the Latino Leadership Award.
eayala@express-news.net
Elaine Ayala

Elaine Ayala

Minority Affairs Reporter, Latino Life Blogger, Metro Columnist | San Antonio Express-News

 
I hope this post lends both clarity and legitimacy to the outrage that this unfortunate decision has sparked, as well as illuminated George P. Bush's politics that are harmful not only to the Latino community writ large, but also to the planet. 


Lest the casual reader insist that our beef is that George P. is a republican, I offer in response that it's pretty pathetic when our republican Latino friends and colleagues are equally outraged by this decision because he has NEVER done anything for our community.  

Finally and most importantly for CMAS/MALS...if we are to rescue our image and reputation from this de facto, neo-conservative agenda that made its way into that precious intellectual, radical, and interdisciplinary space that many of us used to call "home," we not only need a national search for a chair that is also a leading scholar in MAS, but also a new administration with a track record regarding transparency, accountability, and an open democratic process.

 Thanks, everybody, for your attention to this important matter.

Dr. Angela Valenzuela
CMAS Affiliate and CMAS EC Member


Dr. Nancy Carlsson-Paige Commencement Address - Temple University - College of Education Philadelphia

Actor Matt Damon's mom, Dr. Carlsson-Paige  is one of my sheroes.  Here is her recent 2015 commencement address at Temple University, speaking on the art of good teaching and a quote from within:
We have to keep our eyes on an expansive vision of education. So wherever we are, we find ways to move toward it. When I look around I see so many teachers, parents, administrators, and students—even a couple of politicians– taking steps toward a more holistic and human vision of education. And I feel sure that we—individually and together—are going to move that big needle.
 We moved the needle on assessment this session in the state of Texas, but more needs to be done.  In any case, Carlsson-Paige's address is uplifting, particularly for teachers.

-Angela

Monday, June 01, 2015

Dr. Nancy Carlsson-Paige is a child development expert and author, and professor emerita in the Graduate School of Education. She delivered the following keynote address at the 2015 commencement for the Temple University College of Education in Philadelphia.

Good Evening, Everyone!

I am truly honored to have this opportunity to speak to you today. This is a big day for you, graduates, and for your families. It’s a celebration of your accomplishments, all your hard work—I know it wasn’t always easy getting here. And this is a day also to appreciate those many people who have helped you, supported you, and loved you on your path to this graduation.


Nancy Carlsson-Paige
Nancy Carlsson-Paige addresses Temple
University graduates.

I’m so glad that education is the field you have chosen! It is a rewarding and meaningful profession. It is through education that our minds expand, we get wiser, and better able to improve the human condition. Nelson Mandela said, “Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.”

This moment in time that you have chosen to enter education is a rocky and uncertain one. In recent years, the meaning and purpose of education has narrowed. In the eyes of many today, education is seen as a delivery system to transmit units of knowledge and specific skills to our young people that are then tested to ensure they’ve been learned. It’s a one-dimensional, restrictive view of education that has led increasingly to the disappearance of engaging, holistic curriculum, the arts, recess, teacher innovation, teacher collaboration, and education for citizenship.

Classrooms for our young children have seen a dramatic disappearance of play. But we know play is the way young kids learn. And it is also how they build inner security and resilience. I learned this lesson when my own two sons, who are now grown, were very young.

It was a winter day, after my teaching and the boys’ day at school. The three of us were together in the living room of our rented apartment. An accidental fire started from the fireplace—accidental in the sense that I wasn’t trying to burn down the house, but tired after work, I’d made a sloppy fire. I do wonder as I look back now how overwhelmed I might have been as a young, single working mom. So the flames were leaping out of the fireplace, lapping the wooden mantle. I began trying to suffocate them with a heavy blanket. My older son Kyle was trying to help. But my younger son Matt, who was then five years old, ran out of the room.

I started having success suppressing the flames but then I was wondering: Where is Matt? And then after some moments, he ran into the room. He was dressed in his red corduroy bathrobe, his fire fighter’s hat, his black galoshes and a sea divers mask. He had a little piece of rubber tubing in his hand, it wasn’t connected to anything, but he was spraying it in the direction of the fireplace.

The outfit Matt had on was the one he wore for his rescue hero play.
–He had it on now because wearing it was what he could do to put out the fire.

A young child in a rescue hero outfit IS a hero in that moment—and he can fully believe that by wearing firefighter clothes and with his rubber tube, he can put out a fire.

When kids pretend to be Superheroes and other Rescue fantasy characters, it helps them feel safe and in control. Life presents so many challenges to young children, this kind of play helps them develop a sense of security and inner resilience.

Studies are now showing that play is rapidly disappearing from classrooms for young children, increasingly replaced by more teacher-directed instruction.

This test-driven education climate we have today, reinforced with accountability measures and high stakes, has made teachers fearful and discouraged. Currently 40 to 50 percent of teachers leave the profession within their first five years. I don’t want you to be included in that percentage of educators who become too demoralized to continue.

It is ironic that at this very moment in history when we need an expanded vision of education, the blinders come on. We are teaching as if we think that what our youth will need to know in the future is already known.

Our young people are going to have to exceed our limitations. They’ll need to develop wide-ranging competencies to be able to live well in the world they are inheriting. They’ll need to think in new ways, initiate, create, explore and solve problems, collaborate with others, make ethical decisions. They will have to grapple with all the problems we are handing them–climate change, income inequality, mass incarceration, nuclear weapons, war and terrorism.

These critical competencies that our young people will need are not quantifiable. How could you test for creativity on a computer-based exam? Or measure original thinking on a fill in the bubbles standardized test? (Let’s hope no one tries.) What passes for education today—all the facts and skills that can be defined, pinned down and tested– is a very small part of what education truly is and should be.

When I was a new teacher about forty years ago, I came across a letter that a principal had written to the teachers in his school. The words had a profound impact on me, and they have stayed with me all these years—as a reminder of the true purpose of education.

This is the letter:

         Dear Teacher,

         I am a survivor of a concentration camp. My eyes saw what no man should witness:

         Gas chambers built by learned engineers.

         Children poisoned by educated physicians.

         Infants killed by trained nurses.

         Women and babies shot and burned by high school and college graduates.

         So I am suspicious of education.

         My request is: Help your students become human.

This letter was written in 1971. And it is so relevant for us now.

It calls on us to understand education as a human and moral endeavor. In school we learn knowledge and skills and the moral and ethical awareness to choose how we use them. We educate whole people—their minds and hearts—so they will become citizens who can think for themselves and make choices for the good of others as well as themselves.

John Dewey believed that the aim of education was democracy and citizenship.

And that each generation had to learn citizenship anew– learn it by living it. Ideally from their first days in school.

I was in a kindergarten classroom one day early in the school year when the teacher was sitting with the children in a circle. She was asking them, “How do we want to be with each other in this class?” The children were raising their hands and saying things like: “We should share! No hitting! If you hurt someone, say you’re sorry.” The teacher was writing down the children’s words on chart paper. She told me that each morning she reads this list with the children. As the children have more experience with each other, they add more ideas to their list. Soon they start coming into the classroom and reading the list by themselves. The words are their words and the children want to learn how to read them.

In another kindergarten I visited more recently– during this era of high stakes testing—all of the children were sitting silently at tables. The teacher was testing one little boy at a computer. The other children were copying words from the chalk board. The words were: “No talking. Sit in your seat. Hands to Yourself.” These were the teacher’s rules.

Most of the children looked scared or disengaged, and one little boy was crying. For them, learning to write was something required; someone else’s words–disconnected from their ideas and passions.

This teacher was required to complete mandated testing of each child in her class—one by one at the computer– 3 times a year. She had no classroom aid. The program’s funding depended on the test scores. It would have been hard for any teacher in this situation to give children engaging, play-based curriculum, and community building experiences.

In the narrowed education climate of today, some people think of teachers as technicians. But good teaching can’t be pinned down to a recipe. Good teaching is a form of art.

Of course our work is grounded in science. But it isn’t enough to know only the science. In education, the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. Being a good teacher means knowing how to apply what we know, when and how to use it, and how to innovate upon it—and that takes talent.

There was an incident that happened in a high school in East Harlem, that taught me a lot about the art of good teaching. It was at a time when there’d been two incidents in NY City—within a couple of weeks, two teens had been shot and their coats stolen. In this school in East Harlem, there was a conflict resolution program, and the teacher had been talking with her students about these shooting incidents, and the kids were practicing ways to deescalate conflict.

Raymond went to this high school and he had recently bought a new coat.

On this day, Raymond arrived at school without his coat and profoundly upset. At the subway stop near school, he’d been surrounded by three guys who demanded he give up his new jacket.

The teacher called a class meeting immediately, with Raymond’s permission, so he could share his story and express his rage.

Teacher: Raymond I know you are very upset. Could you tell us what happened?

Raymond: I was getting off the subway stop right here in East Harlem and all of a sudden I was surrounded by three guys who told me that I better give them my coat. One of the guys had his hand in his pocket and I thought maybe he had a knife.

Teacher: Go on Raymond. We’re right here listening to you and all of us care a lot about you and what happened.

Raymond: Well, before I could even think, I started to unzip my coat, and I said to the guy who I thought had the knife, “This is incredible. I was just getting ready to give you my coat.” I said, “Who should I give it to?” One of the guys snatched the coat and all of them started to run off as fast as they could. Then, of course, I wanted to pick up some rocks and throw them at them, but I didn’t.

Maria said: I can’t believe you did that, Raymond. I think you saved your life. How come you didn’t try to say “no” or fight back? I think that’s what I would have done.

Raymond: I don’t know. It just came to me, but now I feel so angry and humiliated and I can’t believe I don’t have my coat. It’s 20 degrees out there today and I walked three blocks without a coat.

Teacher: Raymond, how do you think you were able to respond in this way and–I would agree with Maria–probably save your life? Remember just last week this same thing happened in Queens and the young man didn’t give up his coat and was shot to death.

Raymond: Well, I was actually thinking of what we were talking about last week of what makes violence even worse and that’s more violence. I also remember when we were talking about what happened to the kid in Queens, you said, “Remember, you are not your coat”. So I guess I decided to do something that would de-escalate the conflict and not give back more violence, and that’s what I did.

Manuel: Raymond, I think it was more courageous to not fight back and use your skills, but I don’t know if I would have been able to do that.

Teacher: So Raymond, it looks as though you really put your skills to use in a horrible situation. And when you asked who you should give the jacket to you were also de-escalating the conflict by staying neutral.

Anthony: How much was that jacket?

Raymond: Well, it was $119.00.

Tanya: There are 92 seniors in this school—that is a little over a dollar each.

Teacher: What are you thinking here, Tanya?

Tanya: I’m thinking that if I had help I would be willing to collect this money for Raymond to buy another jacket.

James: I would be willing to help. I can’t believe you were able to do what you did Raymond.

Teacher: Well, this sounds like a wonderful plan. Do we need to do anything else to make it happen? How do you feel about that Raymond?

Raymond: Wow. I can’t believe you would all do that. But I know my mother wouldn’t be able to buy another coat. Maybe don’t ask everybody or say, “Only if you can afford the dollar.” That would make me feel better.


This high school teacher had the skill, compassion, and the artful ability to respond to her students in the moment and to build community from their experiences and ideas. And she had enough autonomy as a teacher to be able to create a teaching moment from what happened to Raymond.

Too many external requirements stifle a teacher’s ability to practice her craft.

Teaching is so much more than transmissin of information, test prep, and data collection. It’s why you can’t be replaced by a computer. Or by someone who had a 5-week summer program in how to teach.

But teaching like the teacher in East Harlem is a lot harder today. Many teachers say there isn’t room anymore for conflict resolution programs, community building, and student-centered projects when so many mandates fill the day. But teachers also know what good education looks like–and they hear its beating heart. They keep on finding creative ways to teach even in this climate.

The singer/songwriter Leonard Cohen wrote: “There is a crack, a crack in everything, that’s how the light gets in.”

You are holding that light now. You, with all of your energy, your fresh ideas, your idealism (I hope you have it and hold onto it), your knowledge and talent. You’ll shine that light where you can—in whatever situations you find yourselves.

We have to keep our eyes on an expansive vision of education. So wherever we are, we find ways to move toward it. When I look around I see so many teachers, parents, administrators, and students—even a couple of politicians– taking steps toward a more holistic and human vision of education. And I feel sure that we—individually and together—are going to move that big needle.

Margaret Mead’s words, uttered decades ago, are timeless and history has proven them over and over to be true: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”

#teacherquality #putkidsfirst #edleadership #eduleaders #edpolicy

National Portrait Gallery Focuses on Dolores Huerta, Leader in the Farm Workers’ Movement | Newsdesk

National Portrait Gallery Focuses on Dolores Huerta, Leader in the Farm Workers’ Movement | Newsdesk





Dolores Huerta--a legacy and national treasure!



-Angela

Sunday, May 31, 2015

My reflection on "Tea party bills targeting immigrant tuition, sanctuary cities die" by Tom Benning

It's clear that Texas Tea Partiers and the Republican Party Platform notwithstanding, the Republican Party in Texas wants to grand stand against "illegal immigration" but not actually do anything about it.  As we all know, anti-immigrant rhetoric makes for good pablum for those running for elective office.  It also allows them to reconcile their politics with the inescapable reality of a massive Mexican/Mexican American/Latino demographic.

I do want to give credit though to both our great legislative leadership and very well organized and powerful statewide movement against these proposals.  The vast majority of those involved of course are the constituency that was created out of HB1403 out-of-state tuition waiver bill itself passed in 2001 session when Rick Perry, a republican, was governor.

To wit, here is a list of pertinent Twitter handles and hashtags:
Handles:
@TexasDreamers
@UnitedWeDream
@TX_Legislature
@TexasHB1403
@KeepHB1403

Hashtags:
#TxDREAMers
#KeepHB1403
#DREAMerAlumni
I often think that these legislative proposals are intended to harm and disparage us as a Mexican/Mexican American/Latin@ community in Texas as a subtle or not-so-subtle form of psychological warfare.  These proposals foster an enormous amount of anxiety, anger, and frustration among so many of us that have to face up to the vitriol.  

However, I increasingly sense that they are also intended to keep us as a community in a defensive, and thusly, a reactive posture.  While our youth and community would certainly not possess the organizing skills that they have as a result of their having to perpetually defend themselves against these proposals, I suspect that they may be a strategy for political containment—that is, they absorb the attention and therefore contain the activism of our community within a specific policy arena to the neglect of other vital policy arenas.

I dream for the day—that I trust shall come—when we can shift our attention and sophisticated movement tools, know-how, and energy to other arenas of public policy like public education, higher education, criminal justice, energy resources, environmental regulation, human service, etc. that are sorely in need of voice, presence, and action for a community that is simultaneously profoundly affected by the work of these committees and largely not present—indeed relatively voiceless on matters of such great importance, or at least so in any way that comes close to their participation in all the anti-immigration battles.  This is not a criticism, just an observation and a hypothesis.

All told, we need to see these other arenas of policy similarly as part and parcel to the broader agenda of disenfranchising Latin@s, African Americans, and the already underprivileged, in general.  After all, undereducated people do not vote to the same degree as educated ones do. 

What is encouraging though are the strategic alliances and networks that we have formed over time and the passion for justice that they inspire.

-Angela


Tea party bills targeting immigrant tuition, sanctuary cities die

Follow @tombenning tbenning@dallasnews.com




AUSTIN — Bills offered by tea party Republicans to target illegal immigration appear to have died quietly, after stirring up some of the most emotional and intense debate of the 140-day legislative session.
Barring some last-ditch maneuvering, a proposal to repeal a law that allows some students who are in the country illegally to pay in-state college tuition is done. The same goes for an effort to crack down on “sanctuary city” policies.
Also going nowhere is a measure to create an interstate border security compact that would seek ways for Texas to enforce federal immigration laws.
None of the measures even got as much as a hearing in the House State Affairs Committee, led by Rep. Byron Cook, R-Corsicana. And in the Senate, only the border compact was debated; it passed, but died in the House at a key deadline late Tuesday.
Republicans are poised to succeed in providing a major border security boost — spending $800 million on it over the next two years. But the Legislature’s more conservative members couldn’t get enough traction to force the issue on more contentious policy.
“We just don’t have the time in 140 days to deal with the big-ticket issues and also pander to a small percentage of movement conservatives,” Rep. Jason Villalba, a Dallas Republican who opposes such proposals, said last month.
The Senate gave final approval Tuesday to a border security bill that helps solidify the state police’s presence at the Texas-Mexico border. If the House accepts the Senate’s changes, it will head to GOP Gov. Greg Abbott, who has indicated he’ll sign it.
Many Republicans view the other immigration measures as unnecessary and harmful to their efforts to win over Hispanic voters. Others, having heard from the GOP base, say the state needs to cut off “magnets” to illegal immigration as a key part of border security.
“It’s just bad policy that rewards illegal immigration in perpetuity,” Sen. Donna Campbell, R-New Braunfels, said last month, explaining why she wrote the bill to repeal the in-state tuition program.
It appears that divide will linger unresolved for at least two more years.
On Twitter:
 @tombenning

Thursday, May 28, 2015

Crunch Time Near for Major Education Bills

The Texas Legislative Session is grinding down to a close. -Angela

Crunch Time Near for Major Education Bills

The opening weeks of the legislative session saw ambitious plans for education reform — expanding pre-kindergarten, overhauling teacher evaluations, creating a private school voucher program and updating the state’s accountability system, to name just a few.
With just over a week left in the 84th Legislature, it’s make-or-break time for bills. Ahead of another big deadline Saturday — when Senate bills must make it out of House committees — here's where the big education measures stand.
  • Pre-kindergarten: Efforts to expand state-funded early education to a full day have failed this session. The Gov. Greg Abbott-backed House Bill 4, which creates a grant program for school districts that choose to implement certain quality standards, has passed both chambers. It now either heads to the governor’s desk or conference committee — depending on whether the House approves amendments added in the Senate. 
  • Accountability: Priority legislation from Senate Education Chairman Larry Taylor enacting A-F grades for schools became part of HB 2804, which passed the House last week and awaits Senate approval. That bill makes broader changes to how the state evaluates schools, including bringing in factors like community engagement, Advanced Placement course enrollment, attendance and dropout rates.
  • School Turnarounds: Controversial proposals to allow parents to petition for new management at struggling public school campuses as well as to create a special state-managed district for underperforming schools have both passed the Senate. Those bills — Senate Bill 14 and SB 669, respectively — await approval of the House Public Education Committee, which must vote them out by Saturday’s deadline if they are to have a shot at passing.
  • Virtual Education: A bill from Taylor — SB 895 — that would lift existing limits on the number of online courses students can take has passed his panel but has yet to make it to the Senate floor. This one is likely out of time.
  • Private School Scholarships/Vouchers: As the session has progressed, lawmakers have narrowed down proposals that would give parents financial support to send their children to private schools. What’s left on the table is a plan to allow businesses to contribute to a scholarship fund for low-income students in exchange for a state tax break. The measure, SB 4, has passed the Senate and awaits a hearing in the House Ways and Means Committee, which it must clear by Saturday.
  • Teacher Evaluation: The prospects of what has been a multi-session push to overhaul the state’s teacher evaluation system succeeding this time around appear to be grim. The two big measures — state Sen. Kel Seliger’s SB 893 and SB 892 — must both be heard in House committee by Saturday to have a chance to make it to the governor’s desk.
  • School Finance: The clock ran out on House Public Education Chairman Jimmie Don Aycock’s effort to tackle the state’s outdated school finance system last Thursday, which was the deadline for the House to pass its own bills out of the chamber.

Thursday, May 21, 2015

California Can Hit Accountability Snooze Button

California Can Hit Accountability Snooze Button



Rather than a "snooze button," we need a national moratorium on high-stakes testing.

-Angela

KLRU/PBS Story- "Academia Cuauhtli Works to Bridge History with Language"

KLRU/PBS Story- "Academia Cuauhtli Works to Bridge History with Language"

 

Thanks  to videographer Blair Waltman-Alexin with KLRU for doing such a wonderful job covering Academia Cuauhtli in this May 1, 2015 video (posted).   Thanks to everyone in Nuestro Grupo, our community-based organization, , as well as our partners—the Austin Independent School District—especially Chief Academic Officer Dr. Pauline Dow and her excellent staff, and the City of Austin, Parks and Recreation Emma S. Barrientos Mexican American Culture Project (ESB-MACC) where Academia Cuauhtli is physically located. Laura Esparza, Herlinda Zamora, Tiffany Moreno, the ESB-MACC board, and all the staff, you have been such great partners.

Thanks, as well, to maestra/teacher Rosa Tupina Yaontonalcuauhtli and Grupo Danza Xochipilli for inspiring us with song and danza.  And thanks to the Sanchez, Metz, and Zavala Elementary fourth- now fifth-grade children—and their parents and grandparents—for honoring us with their presence and participation at Academia Cuauhtli.  We begin with a new group of fourth graders in the fall.

Muchísimas gracias también a los maestros bilingue del distrito escolar—to the participating AISD bilingual education teachers, as well, for giving so generously of their time, intellect, and motivating energy.  Our ancestors surely want us to not only feed the mind but also to feed the spirit through song, dance, edifying values, and love of community.  And so we are grateful to them, too!

Like us on Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/AcademiaCuauhtli

AISD Website: http://www.austinisd.org/academics/cuauhtli


-Angela Valenzuela