Translate

Showing posts with label #FreeOurFamilies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #FreeOurFamilies. Show all posts

Sunday, August 23, 2020

Trump Cabinet officials voted in 2018 White House meeting to separate migrant children, say officials

 The essence of evil. Listen to Jacob Soboroff who draws on the the United Nations' definition and describes what our government did to these parents and families seeking asylum in the U.S.—to ultimately, over 5,400 children—as "torture." Based on a show of hands of numerous people that met at the white house that included Mike Pompeo, Alex Azar, the American Academy of Pediatrics referred to this as "government-sanctioned child abuse," with serious, "irreversible" consequences, as noted by the American College of Physicians.

Though Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen did not raise her hand to Miller's request for a vote, we must note that

"No one in the meeting made the case that separating families would be inhumane or immoral, the officials said. Any moral argument about immigration "fell on deaf ears" inside the White House, one of the officials said."

Such appalling cruelty. Yet where is the justice?

Let's vote this brutal, fascist regime out of office, my friends.

-Angela Valenzuela


Trump Cabinet officials voted in 2018 White House meeting to separate migrant children, say officials

"If we don't enforce this, it is the end of our country as we kno
White House policy adviser Stephen Miller at the Ohio Republican 
Party State Dinner in Columbus in 2018.Leah Millis / Reuters file
 2:15 PM CDT

By Julia Ainsley and Jacob Soboroff


WASHINGTON — In early May 2018, after weeks of phone calls and private meetings, 11 of the president's most senior advisers were called to the White House Situation Room, where they were asked, by a show-of-hands vote, to decide the fate of thousands of migrant parents and their children, according to two officials who were there.


President Donald Trump's senior adviser Stephen Miller led the meeting, and, according to the two officials, he was angry at what he saw as defiance by Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.


It had been nearly a month since Jeff Sessions, then the attorney general, had launched the Trump administration's "zero tolerance" policy, announcing that every immigrant who crossed the U.S. border illegally would be prosecuted, including parents with small children. But so far, U.S. border agents had not begun separating parents from their children to put the plan into action, and Miller, the architect of the administration's crackdown on undocumented immigrants, was furious about the delay.


Those invited included Sessions, Nielsen, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar and newly installed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, according to documents obtained by NBC News.



Trump cabinet officials voted in 2018 meeting to separate migrant children, say officials

AUG. 20, 202003:55

Nielsen told those at the meeting that there were simply not enough resources at DHS, nor at the other agencies that would be involved, to be able to separate parents, prosecute them for crossing the border and return them to their children in a timely manner, according to the two officials who were present. Without a swift process, the children would enter into the custody of Health and Human Services, which was already operating at near capacity.


Two officials involved in the planning of "zero tolerance" said the Justice Department acknowledged on multiple occasions that U.S. attorneys would not be able to prosecute all parents expeditiously, so sending children to HHS was the most likely outcome.


As Nielsen had said repeatedly to other officials in the weeks leading up to the meeting, according to two former officials, the process could get messy and children could get lost in an already clogged system.


Two years later: Family separations at the border

JULY 12, 202004:43

Miller saw the separation of families not as an unfortunate byproduct but as a tool to deter more immigration. According to three former officials, he had devised plans that would have separated even more children. Miller, with the support of Sessions, advocated for separating all immigrant families, even those going through civil court proceedings, the former officials said.


While zero tolerance ultimately separated nearly 3,000 children from their parents, what Miller proposed would have separated 25,000 more, including those who legally presented themselves at ports of entry seeking asylum, according to Customs and Border Protection data from May and June 2018.


That plan never came to fruition, in large part because DHS officials had argued it would grind the immigration process to a halt. But after Sessions' announcement that all families entering illegally would be prosecuted, the onus had fallen on DHS to act.


Nielsen claims 'there was no policy to separate families' of migrants

JULY 23, 202002:38

At the meeting, Miller accused anyone opposing zero tolerance of being a lawbreaker and un-American, according to the two officials present.


"If we don't enforce this, it is the end of our country as we know it," Miller said, according to the two officials. It was not unusual for Miller to make claims like that, but this time he was adamant that the policy move forward, regardless of arguments about resources and logistics.


No one in the meeting made the case that separating families would be inhumane or immoral, the officials said. Any moral argument about immigration "fell on deaf ears" inside the White House, one of the officials said.


"Miller was tired of hearing about logistical problems," one of the officials said. "It was just 'Let's move forward and staff will figure this out.'"


Frustrated, Miller accused Nielsen of stalling and demanded a show of hands. Who was in favor of moving forward? he asked.


A sea of hands went up. Nielsen kept hers down. It was clear she had been outvoted, according to the officials.


In the days immediately following the meeting, Nielsen had a conversation with Kevin McAleenan, then the Customs and Border Patrol commissioner, in her office at the Ronald Reagan Building and then signed a memo instructing DHS personnel to prosecute all migrants crossing the border illegally, including parents arriving with their children.


Nielsen did so despite her stated reservations in the Situation Room and her having been warned in a legal memo by DHS General Counsel John Mitnick — which was also sent to her chief of staff at the time, Chad Wolf, who is now the acting secretary of DHS — that the decision would result in separation of families. Of the practice, Mitnick wrote, "a court could conclude that the separations are violative of the INA, Administrative Procedure Act, or the Fifth Amendment Due Process clause."

Less than two months later, Trump signed an executive order halting family separations and a federal judge in California ordered family reunifications on the grounds that the separated families' due process rights were violated.


At the time, no plan was in place to track the children who had been separated or to create a system to reunite thousands of separated families, according to the two former officials.


According to an invitation list obtained by NBC News, those expected to be in attendance at the meeting included: Sessions, Nielsen, Miller, Pompeo, Azar, Undersecretary of Defense John Rood, then-White House chief of staff John Kelly, White House deputy chief of staff Chris Liddell, then-White House counsel Don McGahn and Marc Short, who was then director of legislative affairs and is now chief of staff to Vice President Mike Pence.


November: Emails show how Stephen Miller promoted anti-immigrant views

NOV. 14, 201903:44

Asked about the show-of-hands vote, Judd Deere, a White House spokesman, said, "This is absolutely not true and did not happen."


In response to a request for a comment about the meeting and the show of hands, HHS spokesman Michael Caputo said, "This never happened."


The State Department and DHS referred NBC News to the White House. Sessions, Nielsen, Kelly and John Bolton did not respond to requests for comment. McGahn and Rood could not be reached for comment.


Before Trump ended zero tolerance by executive order on June 20, 2018, over 2,800 children had been separated from their parents. When a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to begin reuniting the families it had separated, it became clear that there was no method to track both parent and child as they moved through the system. As a result, some took months to reunite, and, in hundreds of cases, parents were deported from the U.S. without their children.


On May 4, Gary Tomasulo, who was then the senior director for border and transportation security on the National Security Council, sent an email to the deputies and lower-level staffers tasked with carrying out immigration policy, telling them that their bosses had agreed to the new zero tolerance prosecution and separation policy and that they needed to develop plans to support it.


At the time, some of the subordinates to the Cabinet secretaries who were responsible for carrying out zero tolerance had raised moral objections, according to a source familiar with the discussions.


In the email, obtained by NBC News, Tomasulo told the deputies and other subordinates that their bosses "acknowledged that there are no easy solutions, but remained committed to collectively do everything possible to develop innovative solutions that leverage the full resources, capabilities, and authorities of the U.S. government."


He went on to say, "I ask that if you are unable to participate in these meetings, the message of commitment and resolve expressed by our principals is communicated and internalized by those that represent your departments and agencies."



Julia Ainsley

Julia Ainsley is a correspondent covering the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice for the NBC News Investigative Unit.



Jacob Soboroff

Jacob Soboroff is a correspondent for NBC News and MSNBC and author of the New York Times bestseller "Separated: Inside an American Tragedy."


 

Tuesday, October 01, 2019

A rational solution to the border catastrophe

Check out this not only rational, but a simple and radical solution.  I'm reminded of a recent CNN Interview of Former Attorney General Eric Holder by David Axelrod where he was asked about working class white resentment.  He said that they would share a lot in common with many people of color, generally, and that they should join forces with them against the "fat cats" who do not need support.  That's the spirit of this piece.  Why not join forces on this one?

-Angela Valenzuela


A rational solution to the border catastrophe





Despite massive public outrage, Trump announced he was going ahead with his intention of rounding up thousands of immigrants in cities around the U.S. starting on July 14. At this writing, this specific plan seems to have foundered — perhaps due partly to advocates who mobilized to spread information to immigrants around the country about their rights.
But raids and deportations are daily events, and they will continue in one form or another. Moreover, the administration is now moving to end asylum protections for most Central American migrants.
Trump is absurdly claiming “problem solved” as more people are tossed into the criminally overfilled prisons called detention centers. Photos of refugees packed into cages and children callously separated from their families show the devastation behind his sound bites.
Meanwhile, Democratic and Republican politicians bicker over exactly how deplorable the concentration camps are as both parties vote for billions of taxpayer dollars to the Border Patrol and ICE.
The refugees at the U.S.-Mexico border were forced there due to war, corruption, famine, drought, physical abuse and economic devastation. And they will keep coming until conditions change. In the meantime, U.S. businesses — in particular agriculture, the service industry and construction — desperately need these workers. (See “The case for open borders”.)
Lockdown at the border and raids in cities are used to terrorize undocumented workers and stop them from pressing for higher pay and decent working conditions.
Business owners don’t want immigrant laborers joining unions or organizing side by side with U.S.-born workers. The profit system relies on an underclass of workers who are low-paid, jobless, or underemployed, and have no protection to challenge inequality and misery. The threat of deporting these often militant workers is essential to the bottom line.
That’s why opening the borders is in the interest of every working and poor person. That means the raids stop and those who have been incarcerated are released. It means ending the militarization of the border and providing asylum for refugees.
The money spent warehousing human beings could be used to build much-needed infrastructure like low-income housing, schools, roads, medical centers, and mass transportation. The cash is there. In 2012, for example, the U.S. allocated $18 billion for border “security.”
And of course the damage created by current policies needs to be reversed. Families must be reunified. Children who were adopted out by predatory agencies or “lost” in custody must be found and returned.
Since the U.S. government has zero credibility in regard to caring for those it detains, independent international observers must be allowed to monitor and intervene as needed. Doctors Without Borders could assess what medical care is required.
This is a disaster created by capitalism that must be treated like the humanitarian crisis it is. Emergency relief now!

Friday, March 01, 2019

Incarcerating babies is beyond barbaric! Please join me in signing this petition. This must END!!!!!

https://tinyurl.com/y53tnm3c

More Than Two Dozen Babies and Toddlers Detained at Karnes Detention Center
RAICES has seen more than two dozen clients held at the Karnes Detention Center in Texas in the last five months who are less than three years old; the majority are less than 18 months old, and two are just a year old.
Sign our petition to demand that ICE and DHS stop incarcerating babies.
This is the youngest population we have ever documented in immigrant detention, and our staff members have seen children even younger.
The majority of the families we have met document medical issues. Mothers and fathers have had their medical treatment delayed, been prescribed pills with little information about what they are getting, and been stripped of medicine after certain diagnoses. Many families arrive from the hieleras and perreras with fever. Others emphasize to us that they are afraid their children will die in detention given the lack of medical care.
Detained children do not understand their situation. They are given arbitrary rules by detention staff that they cannot comprehend, like being told not to play on the carpet; they are punished if they break these rules. At Karnes, there was a ban on crayons, a practice our lawyers did not understand and could not explain to families.
This is completely unconscionable. Babies and toddlers should not be in prison.
There is ample evidence that children cannot adequately develop when detained at such a young age. Medical experts have condemned the practice. Congress Members have, for years, called for an end to family detention.Whistleblowers have even come forward, citing the "high risk of harm" to children held in detention.
This comes a day after the American Immigrant Council, the American Immigration Lawyers Association, and the Catholic Legal Immigration Network filed a complaint stating nine children less than one year old were being held by Immigration and Customs Enforcement at Dilley Detention Center in Texas.
Our numbers show that the detention of babies and toddlers is alive and well at Karnes too. There is likely widespread detention of young children in our immigration system.
We call on the Department of Homeland Security to stop this practice and abide by the Flores settlement. Children cannot be allowed to languish in prison, and no baby belongs in a cage. We also call on DHS to end family detention. Families should not be held in prison while undergoing the asylum process.
Stand with us and sign our petition.
Thank you,
RAICES

FACEBOOK | TWITTER | INSTAGRAM

www.raicestexas.org
RAICES
1305 N. Flores
San Antonio, TX 78212
United States

Wednesday, September 26, 2018

As of May, 2018, 10,773 Children in U.S. Detention Centers

Hold your breath.  According to this piece in the Washington Post cited in this snopes.com piece below, a staggering number of 10,773 migrant children are in U.S. custody, representing an increase from 8,886 in April  despite Trump's "zero-tolerance" policy.

This means that other factors like the economic crises and lack of security in specific places within sending countries like Guatemala, El Salvador, Brazil, Mexico, and other countries are more at play in parental decision making than U.S. policy about which all are certainly aware from news they receive on the matter in their own countries.


One can only imagine what it's like for parents from these countries to opt for this clearly horrific option, but which at least guarantees survival—or at least nearly so. After all, even if we already know that these children will be inescapably scarred and traumatized for life, we as a society do not yet fully know the long-term implications of detention for these 10,000-plus children on our society.

Unless we address these root problems of violence, poverty, and failed economies, this number will continue to grow. Is there no imagination? Is there no political will?

Border policy is therefore more theater than genuinely invested in arriving at solutions. Moreover, it's cruel and unsustainable. And remember, my friends, these are our tax dollars at work.
Get woke, everybody!

-Angela Valenzuela


Are More Than 10,000 Children in U.S. Detention Centers?

The Department of Health and Human Services announced that 10,773 unaccompanied immigrant children were indeed in detention facilities as of May 2018.


chatiyanon / Shutterstock

CLAIM

As of May 2018, there were more than 10,000 unaccompanied children in United States government immigration detention centers.

RATING


On 29 May 2018 the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced a significant increase in the number of unaccompanied children held in U.S. government detention centers compared to the prior month, as reported by the Washington Post:
The number of migrant children held in U.S. government custody without their parents has surged 21 percent in the past month, according to the latest figures, an increase driven by the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” crackdown on families who cross the border illegally.
Although the government has not disclosed how many children have been separated from their parents as a result of the new measures, the Department of Health and Human Services said Tuesday that it had 10,773 migrant children in its custody, up from 8,886 on April 29.
This increase in detentions follows a 6 April 2018 Department of Justice announcement that the Trump administration would be taking a new “zero tolerance policy” regarding border crossings that explicitly include child separation. This policy has been controversial both for the child separation issue as well as its assertion that it requires the Department of Justice to prosecute “100 percent” of border crossing cases, which would deny a person’s right to request asylum. Standing next to a segment the border called Friendship Park on 8 May 2018, Sessions said:

People are not going to caravan or otherwise stampede our border. We need legality and integrity in the system. That’s why the Department of Homeland Security is now referring 100 percent of illegal Southwest Border crossings to the Department of Justice for prosecution.  And the Department of Justice will take up those cases.
I have put in place a “zero tolerance” policy for illegal entry on our Southwest border.  If you cross this border unlawfully, then we will prosecute you.  It’s that simple. If you smuggle illegal aliens across our border, then we will prosecute you. If you are smuggling a child, then we will prosecute you and that child will be separated from you as required by law.