Translate

Showing posts with label Betsy DeVos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Betsy DeVos. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 18, 2020

Biden’s Education Department Will Move Fast to Reverse Betsy DeVos’s Policies

It's so hopeful to see that the new administration will prioritize public education, expanding federal education laws, civil rights,  providing relief to our schools struggling through the pandemic, including more cautious reopening plans relative to the current, chaotic administration. I'm very excited about the incoming administration and it's clear willingness to readily redirect DeVos's policies and pro-charter school priorities, beginning with cutting the funding to for-profit charters that have robbed public education of much-needed dollars.

If our communities prefer such schools, it's often because they are not given good options or much actual choice, particularly in light of the neoliberal push to shame and blame schools through ratings that justify their closures, handing them over to education management organizations (EMOs), as districts work to balance their budgets. Public education, that involves elective boards and democratic governance need to become those places of choice for parents and children. After all, they are the bedrock of our democracy and are the best use of our hard-earned tax dollars.

-Angela Valenzuela


Mr. Biden this summer reshaped the Democratic platform to embrace a ban on federal funding for for-profit charters, and to call for cutting funding to underperforming charters run by nonprofit organizations.

President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. has presented an education agenda that is starkly different from the Trump era, beginning with a far more cautious approach to school reopenings.

Credit...Matt York/Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Like most federal agencies, the Education Department followed President Trump’s lead in seeking to undo the legacy of his predecessor, and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos diligently tore into President Barack Obama’s policies.

[Read More: What Biden’s election could mean for your student loans.]

President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr’s administration is planning to return the favor.

The contrasts in Trump-era education policy and the incoming Biden administration’s agenda are stark. Ms. DeVos, a lifelong booster of private schools and longtime opponent of the teachers’ unions, set out to reduce the Education Department’s footprint by proposing cuts to public school funding and narrowing the department’s enforcement role of federal education laws and civil rights.

The incoming first lady, Jill Biden, is a community college professor and member of the National Education Association, the nation’s largest teachers union. The Biden administration has promised to drastically increase resources for public schools, expand its civil rights advocacy for marginalized students and reassert the department’s leadership in policymaking.


And on the most pressing issue facing education, reopening schools during the pandemic, the Biden administration has signaled an about-face.

The Trump administration has demanded that schools reopen, despite severe budget constraints and confusing public health guidelines, while the Education Department has all but absolved itself of tracking the virus’s impact and offering solutions. The Biden campaign has promised deep federal involvement to help schools secure more relief funding and navigate the effects of the pandemic, which has devastated the academic trajectory of the most vulnerable students.

But the president-elect’s closeness with the powerful teachers’ unions has raised concerns. Unions have come under fire from parents and school leaders who say their opposition to in-person instruction conflicts with science and students’ well-being. Ms. DeVos has seized on the tension, posting a series of articles on Twitter that have questioned the unions’ roles.

“When unions win, kids lose,” she said this week.

With a likely Republican Senate and a narrow Democratic majority in the House, Mr. Biden will struggle to muster the support he needs in Congress to accomplish some of his loftiest policy goals. He has promised to bolster funding for special education, institute universal prekindergarten and triple funding for a federal program that helps schools serving high concentrations of students from low-income families, devoting some of that funding to increasing teacher salaries. In higher education, he has promised free public college, expanding the amount of federal financial aid grants for low-income students and canceling some student debt.

Stef Feldman, the Biden campaign’s policy director, told reporters last month that the administration was “confident” Mr. Biden would “be able to get some big, bold education legislation passed and certainly immediate relief for our schools and our educators, but that doesn’t mean that we’re not also going to take executive action within existing authority.”


Those actions could come quickly.

Sunday, September 13, 2020

Betsy DeVos Tells States Not to Expect Waivers From Annual Tests—and prefers to test kids in the middle of a Pandemic

Testing children in a pandemic is not only wrong-headed given that it'll just measure how vast inequality is in our country right now, but also tantamount to child abuse, particularly for those most affected by our current state of affairs. N.B. By all credible accounts, even if we get a vaccine before the new year, we'll still be experiencing this pandemic next spring.

All this will do is buoy DeVos' privatization agenda by showing how terrible everything in public education is right now despite our teachers' and administrators' heroic efforts to keep schools open.  Why is school funding in places like Texas tied to school re-opening, by the way, if this isn't the actual motive? We all know that demonizing schools expedites charterization, privatization, and corporatization and much to the detriment of our communities that are not only, in effect, punished by these tests, but pay the price with the loss of democracy with the neoliberal push to de-democratize public education by selling them to the highest corporate bidder—and all with our precious tax dollars.

Let's not continue paying for our own oppression here, my friends.

If you read the entire piece, there still is wiggle room, but that's not the point.  The point is about this neoliberal leadership that actually doesn't believe in public education. Let's all say no to high-stakes, standardized testing and let's vote this president and administration out of power on November 3rd. 

-Angela Valenzuela

Betsy DeVos Tells States Not to Expect Waivers From Annual Tests

Thursday, August 27, 2020

Trump Targets History Class as Well as School Choice in Bid for Second Term

Friends,

This is a good piece for learning about a new direction that Trump may be opening up, exacerbating the cultural war, namely, history, especially targeting as per this piece, the hugely successful 1619 Project, a Pulitzer Prize-winning essay initiative of the New York Times Magazine. Though the bill hasn't gotten very far, One Senator has introduced legislation that seeks to eliminate its use in schools. 

Charter school funding is also another agenda, but according to this piece, doesn't fully represent what advocates seek, while additionally noting that these two agendas could conflict.  How can you support school choice and what Betsy DeVos calls "education freedom" and then want to control curriculum?

Regardless, forewarned is forearmed.

-Angela Valenzuela

#EthnicStudiesNow

Trump Targets History Class as Well as School Choice in Bid for Second Term


President Donald Trump listens as Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos speaks during a roundtable discussion on the Federal Commission on School Safety Report at the White House in December 2018. —Evan Vucci/AP

 | Updated: August 27, 2020

President Donald Trump was elected in 2016 having dealt with education almost exclusively in sound bites. While that’s no longer true nearly four years later as he accepts the Republican Party’s nomination for a second term, perhaps nothing stands out about Trump’s position on education like his rhetoric pressuring classrooms to reopen as the nation struggles with the coronavirus pandemic.

Although the way the administration has addressed schools’ response to the virus might end up being Trump’s most prominent education legacy, his reelection bid is also showcasing his ongoing support for his signature K-12 policy issue of school choice.

And if his rhetoric in recent months and messaging at the party’s national convention are any indication, he might be interested in opening up a new political battle over education, or at least reinvigorating one: what students are taught about American history.

The President’s Four-Year Track Record

In the past four years, Trump and his education team have galvanized many choice supporters and helped deliver a few small-scale wins that are in large part the work of Congress. Separately, U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos has repealed high-profile K-12 initiatives from the Obama administration that involve difficult debates about civil rights, safety, and race. And Trump has approved significant federal laws governing career-technical education and school safety.

School choice got its own turn in the spotlight on the third night of the Republicans' convention, when Tera Myers of Ohio spoke about her struggles to find an appropriate education for her special-needs son Samuel, and how she fought for the state to fund scholarships to private schools to support students like her son.

Myers thanked the Trump administration for supporting "education freedom" and said of her son, "He said: ‘School choice helped my dreams come true. My school taught me the way I learn best.’"

Yet the Trump administration has repeatedly failed to coax a sweeping expansion of vouchers, tuition tax credits, or similar forms of school choice out of Congress. In 2016, the president pledged $20 billion to expand choice, but hasn’t come anywhere close to that number, as national partisan divisions alter the political landscape for school choice advocates, perhaps permanently.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Education’s annual budget has grown on Trump’s watch by nearly $5 billion to about $73 billion, despite his pledge four years ago to shrink or even eliminate it.

And the controversy Trump touched off in education politics when he nominated DeVos for education secretary has never fully abated; it might have grown during the pandemic due to his pressure for in-person classes to resume. If his interest extends to instruction in classrooms, it might intensify.

A New Front: Teaching 'American Exceptionalism'

In late August, Trump unveiled a series of priorities for his second term that featured just two bullet points for education. One was a pledge to expand school choice. But the other was a call to “Teach American Exceptionalism.”

In his speech commemorating the Fourth of July this year, for example, Trump said the nation’s schools teach children to “hate their own country” through exposing them to a distorted and overwhelmingly negative view of American history. The Republican National Convention this month has also showcased concerns that today’s students are not taught to respect the nation’s founders like they should.

It’s unlikely the president would be raising this issue now without the presence (and criticism) of the 1619 Project, a Pulitzer Prize-winning essay collection published in the New York Times last year that puts slavery at the heart of American history, politics, and economics, said Andy Smarick, a senior fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute.

Smarick noted that the project’s quick path into classrooms was “worrisome” to many people. But he added that Trump is also channeling long-standing conservative concerns expressed in places like the 2016 GOP platform, which said education should in part be focused on the “handing over of a cultural identity.”

“It’s a proxy war,” Smarick said of Trump’s recent rhetoric. “It’s really about: How do people think about America, and how is that translated into our schools?”

Sunday, August 11, 2019

Migrant Children Are Being Given To An Adoption Agency Linked To Betsy DeVos

My last atrocious thing to report for the day. Here we have "Christian adoption trafficking mills" happening in our country to which U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos is directly implicated. To match the slavery, exploitation, and parent-child separations that are currently going on right now—as just posted.
So shameful. Thought I'd share.

-Angela Valenzuela

Migrant Children Are Being Given To An Adoption Agency Linked To Betsy DeVos


U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos  /
Gage Skidmore/CC BY-SA 2.0/Flick

Mar 6| The Intellectualist

Migrant children have gone to Bethany Christian Services, an adoption organization with deep ties to the DeVos family.
The Trump administration argued in court earlier this week that reuniting migrant children separated from their parents at the border would require too much effort and “would present grave child welfare concerns”, as the children would be traumatized by leaving their current sponsors’ homes.
Though concerns for the psychological well-being of the children are specious at best, considering the original trauma was inflicted by the administration, the situation has a second nefarious element: many of these children are being sent to a Christian adoption agency with ties to Education Secretary Betsy DeVos.
As for the fate of the thousands of children the Trump administration does not want to reunite with their parents, Progressive Secular Humanist previously reported that many of the migrant children ruthlessly separated from their family by the Trump administration are being shipped to Bethany Christian Services, a Christian adoption agency with ties to the family of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos.
Rewire News reported last year that the agency was handling migrant children who suffered separation from their families under President Trump’s “zero-tolerance” immigration policy.
Migrant children in Michigan who have been separated from their parents by the Trump administration are attending “a special school” run by Bethany Christian Services, an anti-choice organization with a record of coercive adoption practices that has yet to receive instructions about how to reunify these children with their detained parents.
Progressive Secular Humanist notes that DeVos’ ties to the organization were confirmed by Snopes, which found several members of the DeVos family have provided financial support to Bethany Christian Services.
The links between the extended DeVos family and Bethany are undeniable. Tax filings archived by ProPublica show that between 2001 and 2015, the Dick and Betsy DeVos Foundation (the philanthropic organization run by DeVos and her husband) gave $343,000 in grants to Bethany Christian Services.
Between 2012 and 2015, Bethany received $750,000 in grants from the Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation, which is run by the Education Secretary’s father-in-law, the billionaire founder of Amway Richard DeVos, and his wife Helen.
Furthermore, Brian DeVos — a cousin of Betsy DeVos’s husband Dick — was the Senior Vice President for Child and Family Services at Bethany as recently as 2015, and Maria DeVos — who is married to Dick DeVos’s brother Doug — has served on the board of Bethany.
Kathryn Joyce noted last year in a piece for The Intercept that news of migrant children heading to Bethany Christian Services caused alarm that the children could end up as "social orphans."
To adoption reform advocates, who monitor unethical and abusive practices in child welfare, it looked like any number of adoption crises in the past, like the airlifts out of Haiti in the wake of its cataclysmic 2010 earthquake. Then, masses of unaccompanied children were suddenly labeled orphans and became the focus of a deafening campaign in the U.S. to rescue them through inter-country adoption, even as Haitian adults were being warned not to try to come themselves.
Fears of a new adoption rush in today’s border crisis weren’t groundless. There was reason to be concerned. The former head of U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement under President Barack Obama warned that some of the children who’d recently been separated would remain separated “permanently” and potentially be adopted. Reports surfaced of mothers who were told that their children would be adopted as an incentive to “behave.” On Tuesday night, the Daily Beast reported that the threat of adoption has become weaponized, as a Guatemalan mother detained by Customs and Border Protection earlier this month was allegedly presented with the ultimatum that if she didn’t abandon her asylum appeal, she would be jailed for a year and her daughter put up for adoption.
Bethany’s director of refugee and foster care programs, Dona Abbott, said last year that it was too early “to say whether these children will be available for adoption at all.”

But Progressive Secular Humanist noted that Joyce and others worry that Bethany, which allegedly uses coercive and misleading practices with birth parents in its domestic adoption program, would view the migrant children as a new supply source.
In fact, there is already in place a huge and thriving business in the trafficking of children via Christian adoption agencies like the DeVos connected Bethany. In her 2013 book, The Child Catchers: Rescue, Trafficking, and the New Gospel of Adoption, Kathryn Joyce documents this alarming trend of conservative Christians adopting children removed from their natural parents via nefarious means to feed the business of Christian adoption and serve the agenda of Christian theocracy.
Bottom line: The Trump administration says it can’t reunite missing migrant children with their families; instead, many of the children are being funneled through Christian adoption trafficking mills like the DeVos connected Bethany Christian Services.

Saturday, April 13, 2019

Betsy DeVos and her No Good, Very Bad Record on Public Education: Here's What She's Done

This is a must-read piece by President Lily Eskelsen of the National Education Association. U.S. Department of Betsy DeVos is part of the neoliberal agenda to destroy public education and in its stead, have a market-based, privatized system, where your education amounts to the best education you can buy while the for-profit, Educate Management Organizations (EMOs) reap massive profits on the taxpayer's dime.

Yes, your/our tax dollars at work to destroy public education.  Sadly, this is the "McDonaldization" or "WalMartization of public education," the big-box, predatory, corporate enterprise that represents an about-face both from public education, and the notion of public schools' role in the preservation of a democracy.  I refer here to the promise of public education not always as it is, but certainly as it should be and the promise that it holds for a more equitable, values-based, education.

If you want to learn about the roots of neoliberal thinking, a good place to start is with Nancy MacLean's book, DEMOCRACY IN CHAINS.  This privatization agenda that works in tandem with gentrification and the displacement of poor people is at best indifferent, and at worst, hostile to community, as a whole.

If this were otherwise, the charter school leaders and community would stand shoulder-to-shoulder with us in the legislature and community advocating for children's rights to bilingual education, immigrant children's rights, Ethnic Studies, equitable school funding, growing our own educators, and so on.  They are never within view on such matters at the legislature. Not a single champion to find among them.  They must be all busy administering....

For the gentrifiers of our cities and the gentrifiers of our schools, "community" often amounts to an inconvenience.  How patronizing and how unfortunate a stance.  But then, it makes sense when you consider that the kids and their parents become "clients."  

How disempowering.  No governance to speak of in this scenario.  No local control.  No elected school board.  Only a market.  That's why large class sizes actually make sense because it's profitable for the EMOs.

Not that individual charter schools aren't good, doing the great work.  However, when one is in policy, as I myself am, one knows the perils of passing laws that are premised on exceptions rather than the rule. Just because one hypothetical revolutionary, progressive, civil rights charter school in Houston, Texas, is doing wonders with its children, this doesn't justify a blunt policy doctrine where the EMOs rake in the public's hard-earned money while public education is shamed, blamed, and deprived of resources in order to turn off folks to the public schools.

As a rule—at least in Texas—you're child is mostly not better off in a charter school.  See the evidence for yourself in this important analysis conducted by the Intercultural Development Research Association (IDRA) titled, "Charter School Expansion in Texas is "Troubling."  Think twice before you put your child in a charter school.  And once your child is in, if you still opt for this, stay very much on top as an involved parent so that you can see not only how well your child is doing, but are they hiring certified teachers?  Are they paying them well and do they get benefits?  

We need to be sure and get out to vote, my friends—and also to educate ourselves on the neoliberal agenda of which charter schools are a core part.  Together with this, do not support charter-friendly candidates—who you can sometimes identify as the ones having slick, glossy mail-outs and war chests chock full of cash just to win a local race that shouldn't cost millions of dollars to win in the first place.  

Dr. MacLean's book is a very good place to start getting educated on the neoliberal agenda. DeVos' budget is another good place to learn about it.  Consider, for example, and earlier posted on the matter.  Here's another really good, if profoundly-concerning, piece on the school privatization agenda that you can also read.

Do click on the Betsy DeVos' timeline constructed by the NEA to see how it's gone.
This charterization and privatization agenda is very harmful to public education.  But then how can it be when it primarily benefits the top 1 percent.  

Get woke, folks!  And get involved not just in your child's education, but education policy, in general.


-Angela Valenzuela

#GetWoke #StayWoke




Subscriber,

Betsy DeVos had a bad week. First, she defended her budget that calls for the elimination of federal funding for the Special Olympics.

As if that wasn't bad enough, she also had the audacity to claim that—and this is a direct quote—“Students may be better served by being in larger classes.”

Anyone who has ever been in a classroom knows this is cluelessly wrong.

But, this was not the first or only time Betsy DeVos tried to roll back funding for students who need it most.

In fact, she has spent her entire time as education secretary trying to eliminate funding and protections for public school students.

We should know. We put together a timeline of Betsy DeVos’ tenure as education secretary. Check it out here.

Line by line, month by month, you can see in real-time how she’s promoted the privatization of public schools through vouchers, called for deep cuts to federal funding, rolled back protections for vulnerable children, and shilled for the for-profit college industry that has defrauded countless students.

We will continue to hold Betsy DeVos accountable for her actions, and come November 2020, we’ll send her and her allies a powerful message: Our students deserve better.

In solidarity,

Lily Eskelsen García
President
National Education Association 

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Trump's Proposed 10 Percent Budget Cut To USDOE Is Less About "Freedom" and More About "Accumulation By Dispossession"


Trump's education budget proposal should concern us deeply. This is bald-faced educational charterization and privatization agenda that masquerades as "freedom," but which is ultimately about what scholar David Harvey terms, "accumulation by dispossession," which is core to the neoliberal agenda.
-Angela Valenzuela

Trump Seeks 10 Percent Cut to Education Department Aid, $5 Billion for Tax-Credit Scholarships

UPDATED
President Donald Trump is seeking a 10 percent cut to the U.S. Department of Education's budget in his fiscal 2020 budget proposal, which would cut the department's spending by $7.1 billion down to $64 billion starting in October.
Funding for teacher development under Title II, totaling $2.1 billion, would be eliminated, as would $1.2 billion in Title IV funding for academic supports and enrichment and $1.1 billion for 21st Century Community Learning Centers that support after-school programs. In total, funding for 29 programs would be eliminated in the federal budget. 
On the other side of the ledger, Trump's budget blueprint calls for $500 million for federal charter school grants, a $60 million increase from current funding levels. The president also wants $200 million for the School Safety National Activities program, which would more than double the program's $95 million in current funding—of that amount, $100 million would be used to fund a new School Safety State Formula Grant program. There are no requirements for the grant program related to firearms, according to the Education Department. And the office for civil rights would get $125 million, the same as current funding.
On the school choice front, the department says its main proposal has already been introduced: a federal tax-credit scholarship program from Republicans. The Treasury Department's budget proposal includes $5 billion for the cost of such a program. 
Meanwhile, the Education Innovation and Research fund would be funded at $300 million, a $170 million increase from fiscal 2019. Of that amount, $200 million would "test the impact of teacher professional development vouchers," according to a presentation from the Education Department, while $100 million would go toward innovative STEM grants. In addition, the Trump budget would provide $50 million for a pilot program under Title I to help districts create and use weighted student-funding formulas—this pilot program was created under the Every Student Succeeds Act in order to help schools focus money directly on disadvantaged students and those with special needs. Funding for the District of Columbia Opportunity Scholarships Program, which provides vouchers to students in the nation's capital, would increase to $30 million. 
Title I funding for disadvantaged students, the single-largest federal funding program for public schools, remains flat at $15.9 billion in Trump's budget pitch. Special education grants to states would also be level-funded at $13.2 billion. Also flat-funded are the English Language Acquisition formula grants at $737.4 million. 
"This budget at its core is about education freedom—freedom for America's students to pursue their life-long learning journeys in the ways and places that work best for them, freedom for teachers to develop their talents and pursue their passions, and freedom from the top-down 'Washington knows best' approach that has proven ineffective and even harmful to students," said U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos in a statement about the budget proposal.
On a Monday conference call with reporters, Jim Blew, the assistant secretary for planning, evaluation, and policy development, acknowledged that Congress and the Trump administration have not been synced up in terms of education spending priorities. 
"The administration believes that we need to reduce the amount of discretionary funding for the education," Blew said. "That is based on the desire to have some fiscal discipline and address some higher-priority needs."
Blew indicated that the priorities should be the disadvantaged children and students with disabilities. 
For more details on Trump's fiscal 2020 proposal for the Education Department, click here. And check out our chart below to see the effects Trump's budget request would have on different programs.
How the Trump 2020 Budget Request Affects Education ProgramsFor the third straight year, President Donald Trump has proposed cutting the U.S. Department of Education's budget. For fiscal 2020, the president is seeking a $7 billion cut, or roughly 10 percent, for the department, down to $64 billion. His total federal budget request is about $4.8 trillion. Trump wants to create a new school safety grant program and increase funding for charter schools and District of Columbia vouchers. At the same time, he wants to eliminate $2.1 billion in teacher training, and $1.2 billion for after-school programs. Other big programs like Title I and special education would receive the same funding that they currently receive in fiscal 2019. See how funding would change for various programs below.

Past Failures to Shrink the Department
Trump's total federal budget request is about $4.8 trillion. 
The U.S. Department of Education's current budget is about $71.5 billion. That's the largest nominal spending figure (not adjusted for inflation) in the department's history. 
The basic outlines of the 2020 budget proposal mark the third fiscal cycle in which Trump and Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos have sought to cut the Education Department's budget. In many key respects, as we wrote Sunday. Trump's first two education spending plans fell flat in Congress. In fact, Congress increased education spending for both fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2019 by small amounts. And Congress has also criticized the budgetary process at the department under DeVos. 
Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., the chairman of the Senate appropriations committee, issued a brief response to the request, saying only that, "I look forward to reviewing additional details of the President's budget proposal in the coming week."
But Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., the top Democrat on the Senate education committee, blasted the proposal, saying that the budget request "proposes that middle class families pay the price with massive cuts to education" as well as health care and other programs. Murray later added that, "Secretary DeVos is proposing gutting investments in students, teachers, public schools, and even school safety--all to make room for her extreme privatization proposal that no one asked for. This is not a serious budget proposal, and I am going to once again work with Republicans in Congress to ensure every student has access to a quality public education in their neighborhood."
Advocates for after-school programs were quick to rebuke Trump's proposal to eliminate 21st Century Community Learning Centers. If Congress goes along with it, "Young children will be left without supervision. Working families will face untenable choices about how to ensure the safety of their children in the afternoon hours and over the summer. Learning opportunities will be squandered. Children, families and our economy will lose out," said Jodi Grant, the executive director of the Afterschool Alliance, in a statement. 
The most dramatic changes Trump has sought for the department's budget probably came in his first year, when he proposed a cut of more than 13 percent for fiscal 2018, the end of long-standing federal programs dealing with teachers' professional development and after-school activities, and a big shot in the arm for school choice. 
He followed up for fiscal 2019 with a smaller proposed cut to the Education Department of 5 percent. However, he once again sought to eliminate teacher training money under Title II and after-school spending, as well as the Title IV grant program designed to create safer schools and academic enrichment for students. In a particularly robust sign of its disdain for this plan—and in response to the Parkland, Fla., school shooting in February 2018—Congress boosted Title IV spending from $400 million to $1.1 billion.
The Trump administration later praised this spending increase as a boon for school safety, despite its previous attempts to eliminate Title IV as redundant—the block grant program is designed to cover a variety of programs, not just school safety. So it's notable that the administration is seeking to eliminate it once again. 
The one school choice victory for Trump on this front so far is a growing federal investment in charter schools. Spending on federal charter grants has grown from $333 million to $440 million during Trump's presidency. 
DeVos has already thrown her support behind a federal tax-credit scholarship proposal in Congress released at the end of last month. She's backing a $5 billion bill from Rep. Bradley Byrne, R-Ala. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has a similar proposal that seeks $10 billion in appropriations for the scholarships. 
Photo: President Donald Trump speaks to business leaders in 2017. (Evan Vucci/AP)

Don't miss another Politics K-12 post. Sign up here to get news alerts in your email inbox.
Follow us on Twitter at @PoliticsK12. And follow the Andrew Ujifusa half of Politics K-12 @AndrewUjifusa.