Translate

Showing posts with label Kamala Harris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kamala Harris. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 27, 2024

My Feminist Awakening: Beyonce’s Political Declaration by Janet Mock

Friends,

On the topic of feminism and Beyoncé's personal evolution, read this brilliant piece by Janet Mock in defense of her feminism when she received the MTv Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award in 2014 where the word, "feminist" appeared unapologetically in the background.  Mock refers to Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie 2012 Ted Talk titled, "We should all be feminists," as something that perhaps Beyoncé viewed in her own exploration of it when exploring whether she was a "feminist," a term that for some, is inconsistent with "girly" representations of gender that could structure Beyoncé out of being one.

This brought to mind the words of Chicana feminist poet and friend, Vangie Vigil, who said that during the feminist movement of the early 1970s, she was criticized for wearing makeup. She responded critically to that view by insisting on her Indigenous ancestry as legitimating her choice to apply "war paint" as protection with the act of putting on makeup being a ceremonial act to prepare for yet another day of battle. That has forever stayed with me as I think of my own morning rituals and the importance of "me time" and my own daily and lifelong preparation for the day, together with my ongoing pursuit of the sacred harmony.

The best quote for me from Mock's essay that grapples with Beyoncé's own brand of feminism is the following:
"Among my duties as a feminist will be to protect our freedom to self-identify.  Our duty is not to police feminists, our duty is to use feminism as a tool to check systems that uphold racism and slut shaming and sex worker erasure and anti-trans woman bias and general policing of other people’s choices."

I'll interject here that It was fascinating in Kamala Harris' speech last week, that she never mentioned that when elected on November 5—I do anticipate that she'll win—that she'd be the first female U.S. president. Perhaps this is beyond obvious and is something that everybody knows. 

At least to me, what's cool is that it doesn't feel like the "elephant in the room" that must be expressed quietly in the kitchen or a private living area even if in some American homes, this is a source of strife. Most positively, I see this as a long-awaited and hard-fought cultural shift made possible by decades of activism, feminist knowledge production, and the persistent efforts of those who have challenged the patriarchal status quo. 

Did y'all see the movie, "Barbie," by the way? I highly recommend it. I'm hoping that the word, "patriarchy," is now etched into the American psyche as a major problem of society with notions of femininity and masculinity that impede progress and freedom. Treat yourselves to America Ferrera's iconic Barbie speech that sums up the central points of the movie.

What is also possible is that Kamala Harris has deliberately opted to not make this a campaign focus and in so doing, reshaping feminism in politics. Who cares about her clothes and wardrobe style beyond acknowledging that she is a very attractive woman and candidate for office atop being a lovely human being who speaks of, and manifests, joy? Geez, how refreshing!

As Mock and Adichie note, it's what we do to challenge systems of oppression that matter most, beginning with letting people be who they are. So yes, as Tim Walz says, "Mind your own damn business," but let's also continue to work toward a more just and caring world that respects and honors our differences, beginning in and with our own families and community. 

As we are all increasingly interconnected within the vast web of humanity on this planet called "Earth," we need each other now more than ever. And Mother Earth wants for this healing to be so, as well. A fresh reconciliation that brings redemptive ways of knowing and being in the world is good for the planet. 

And yes, we should all be feminists. Period.

-Angela Valenzuela



I have a reluctant relationship to labels, especially when I feel forced to clothe myself in them to signify my identity. James Baldwin created this beautiful line about identity that I included in my book which speaks closely to how I feel about labels: “Identity would seem to be the garment with which one covers the nakedness of the self, in which case, it is best that the garment be loose, a little like the robes of the desert, through which one’s nakedness can always be felt, and, sometimes, discerned.”

Trepidation is a solid word to describe my feelings surrounding terms like activist, spokesperson and feminist. I remember bell hooks, one of the most widely read black feminist thinkers, reading an interview I gave to Bitch magazine, in which I boldly state that I don’t personally identify as a feminist. Immediately, she called me for a longer explanation.

Was that a misquote? she asked. No, I said. Why aren’t you a feminist? she pushed. I told her that I felt I wanted to push past labels. Labels were given to me without my consent ever since birth. She asked me why I embraced trans to qualify my womanhood. I told her I believe it’s a political statement for me to declare that nothing is wrong with being a woman who is trans, and I chose trans because it was mine. She then pushed, “To say you’re a feminist is a political statement. So why not feminist?” Simply, I said, I never felt like feminist was mine as I felt that black and trans and writer and woman belonged to me, and as a black trans woman writer I never felt like I was centered by feminism. I never felt it was created for or by me.

“Well, I say it’s for you. It’s yours so claim it!” bell said before ending the call.

That conversation served as a catalyst for my own excavation as to why I was reluctant to embrace the term. And as every pop culture-soaked headline has claimed recently I am not alone in my reluctance. Many women of my generation are on similar journeys with the term feminist, from Lady Gaga to Shailene Woodley and Taylor Swift (who actually has since experienced her own feminist awakening, thanks to pal Lena Dunham). And even my own teen idol Beyonce Knowles had qualms about the label when British Vogue asked her if she was a feminist in spring 2013.

“I don’t know,” Beyonce said. “That word can be very extreme. But I guess I am a modern-day feminist. I do believe in equality. I do believe in equality and that we have a ways to go and it’s something that’s pushed aside and something that we have been conditioned to accept. But I’m happily married. I love my husband.”

Often, I wonder if it was the sound-biting of that interview (specifically her use of “very extreme” and the myth that marriage is something feminists rally against) that led Beyonce to research the term feminist, and I wonder if her research led her to Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie‘s TED Talk, “We Should All Be Feminists” and if Adichie’s reciting of the dictionary’s definition of feminist (a person who believes in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes) enabled the singer to say, yes, I can be a happily-married, bootylicious mama who believes in equality, yearns to be successful and sexy and calls herself a feminist — and this is flawless and I am going to sample Adichie’s words in my new song.

Since her self-titled album was released in December, I have seen the totality of that album as Beyonce’s feminist awakening, in which she boldly defines herself for herself — and for us all — a task which Audre Lorde reminds us is vital.

Last Sunday, I watched the MTV Video Music Awards solely because Beyonce was performing and would receive the Michael Jackson Video Vanguard Award (MTVs version of a lifetime achievement award). I was one of the fans live-tweeting, re-centering Beyonce with the hashtag #BeyMAs. But what I did not expect was for Beyonce to center herself, literally, as a feminist during her 16-minute performance. In a culture in which young women seem more and more apprehensive about the image, meaning and importance of feminism, Beyonce provided a mainstream audience and millennials everywhere with a clear definition of feminist, provided by Adichie whose words flashed behind an assembly line of women before FEMINIST overtook the background as Beyonce took her foreground.

To say I was emboldened by this image would be an understatement. It became the crescendo in my own feminist soundtrack, sparked by my conversation with bell months earlier. As a fan who grew up in front of the television with pop stars, VJs, and sitcom characters serving as my playmates, Beyonce was my No. 1 friend-in-my-head. On that VMAs Sunday, I watched Beyonce journey from Destiny’s Child to solo star, from Single Lady to wife and mother, from Independent Woman to feminist cultural icon. I cherished my relationship with Beyonce so much that I dedicated Chapter 14 of Redefining Realness to relay what Destiny’s Child and Beyonce meant to my coming-of-age and search for identity as a teenager.

Pop culture may be dismissed as lowbrow, but to me it is the culture that matters most. Popular culture helped raise me.

Beyonce Knowles and bell hooks and Barbara Smith and Audre Lorde carried me towards claiming feminist as my own, as one garment in which I drape my body to navigate this world. Feminist speaks to me because those women and their work have always spoken to me, and these are women who choose to wear this label and claim it as theirs.

But bell and Barbara and Audre have feminist cred, their work and commitment to feminism stands on solid ground, but Beyonce’s feminist awakening and stance has been widely questioned. Partly, it’s because she appears to be at the beginning of her journey. Partly it’s because her intentions are framed as a marketing ploy. Largely, it’s because her work is not viewed as “serious” work. Pop culture is never framed as a matter that matters. She’s often dismissed because her work exists outside the bounds of academia, outside the gravitas of letters, and solidly based in entertainment, media and music. I am in my 30s and was emboldened by Beyonce’s feminist stance on that stage, and can’t help but believe that that image will be equally as powerful to young people who witness that moment, whose first engagement with feminism will be that moment. Maybe, just maybe, Beyonce will serve as the bridge between pop culture and feminists like bell and Barbara and Audre, maybe some young woman bobbing her head to “Blow” or “Partition” or “Flawless” will do so while reading Ain’t I A Woman? or Homegirls or Sister Outsider.

So I applaud Beyonce and her feminist stance, a declaration of her own independence as a leotard-wearing, butt cheek-baring, Blue Ivy-toting, equal pay-advocating, Independent Woman-saluting, imperfect flawless feminist. And I thank her and our feminist foremothers for fortifying my own declaration as a feminist. Among my duties as a feminist will be to protect our freedom to self-identify. I believe we waste much of our efforts policing one another — one of the many workings of patriarchy is to busy us with policing each other’s choices rather than protecting them. Our duty is not to police feminists, our duty is to use feminism as a tool to check systems that uphold racism and slut shaming and sex worker erasure and anti-trans woman bias and general policing of other people’s choices.

Because of Beyonce, because of Audre, because of bell, because of Barbara and their feminist stances I no longer feel as if feminism is not for me. I will wear my feminism proudly as a crop top-wearing, curly hair-teasing, pop culture-obsessed, sex worker-embracing, LGBTQ-championing black feminist woman writer.

ps: I am not here for folks saying that a feminist owning her sexuality and adorning her body in clothes she chooses, makes her less of a feminist. The clip below is from AM Tonight, but I point you to Beyonce’s own defense: “[Being empowered] is exactly why I can [wear those outfits]!

Friday, August 09, 2024

Latino Civil Rights Group Gives First-Ever Presidential Endorsement to Harris, Rolling Stone, Aug. 9, 2024

So glad to see this endorsement of Vice-President Kamala Harris for U.S. President. This was a great move by former President Domingo Garcia and LULAC, our nation's leading Latino/x/a civil rights organization of which I have been a longtime member. 

As we reflect on the 5th anniversary of the August 3rd Walmart shooting in El Paso where a white supremacist gunman rationalized his actions with Replacement Theory before taking the lives of 23 people and injuring 22 others, I agree that it is an urgent matter that the scapegoating of Mexicans, Latinas/os, and immigrants stop. 

Irresponsible, reckless words lead some people to commit unspeakable crimes and harm innocent people who might have thought otherwise had these broader, Trumpian anti-immigrant discourses and campaigns not been given any oxygen to begin with. Our governor, sadly, is also deeply implicated in this regard.

Sí se puede!

-Angela Valenzuela


LULAC

Latino Civil Rights Group Gives First-Ever Presidential Endorsement to Harris

In endorsing Kamala Harris, LULAC’s former president says “hate-mongering and scapegoating Latinos and immigrants must be stopped”

By 
Nikki McCann Ramirez August 9, 2024 | Rolling Stone

The nation’s oldest Latin-American civil rights advocacy group has endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris’ bid for the White House — the first endorsement of its kind for the organization. 

In a statement to NBC News, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), a civil rights group established in 1929, wrote that they are “proud to endorse Kamala Harris and Tim Walz because of the real issues facing Latino communities and all Americans across the nation; we can trust them to do what is right for our community and the country.”

Former LULAC President and LULAC Adelante PAC Chairman Domingo Garcia — the author of the statement — added, “The politics of hate-mongering and scapegoating Latinos and immigrants must be stopped.” 

“Latinos understand how much is at stake in this election, for not only our community but our democracy,” he added. 

LULAC has historically shied away from explicit presidential endorsements, a reflection of the wide array of political leanings throughout the various Latin-American diasporic communities within the United States. The organization was founded in the early 20th century as a coalition of smaller advocacy groups that sought to challenge discriminatory laws and policies targeting Mexican-Americans. 

With immigration and border security serving as driving narratives in the 2024 election, LULAC’s break with electoral impartiality to endorse Harris will be a boon to the fledgling campaign. 

“They’ve never backed away from the fight for the communities they represent, and Vice President Harris has never stopped fighting to create opportunities for Latino families,” Campaign Manager Julie Chavez Rodriguez told NBC News. 

Despite the Harris campaign only being in its first weeks of operation, immigration has already become a central focus. On Friday the campaign released an ad touting Harris as a capable prosecutor who will crack down on organized crime and drug trafficking at the border. 

“Fixing the border is tough, so is Kamala Harris,” the ad says. 

Monday, September 07, 2020

Protesters Flood Streets in Belarus but Lukashenko Refuses to Bend

Friends,

This is what authoritarianism looks like—which is exactly the direction that we are headed, putting our democracy at great risk with the current president. 

Let's all make sure to vote in November.  And don't vote twice, as Trump suggested that Northern Carolinians could do this week (read: Ignoring warnings from election officials, Trump again suggests supporters should try to vote twice). Doing so is to commit voter fraud. 

Let's avoid what's happening right now in Belarus by making this election a landslide victory for the Biden Harris ticket and getting this fascist, would-be dictator out of power.

-Angela Valenzuela

#SayNoToFascism #Vote #Vote2020 #SayNoToWhiteSupremacy #Fascism #fascismo #VoteTexas #VoteHimOut #VoteOutTheGOP #VoteBlue #DictatorTrump

The authorities sealed off streets in the capital to clamp down on demonstrations but mostly refrained from the heavy-handed violence.

MOSCOW — Protesters on Sunday again flooded into the capital of Belarus and towns across the country, signaling the depth of popular anger at President Aleksandr G. Lukashenko, an iron-fisted leader who, fortified by strong support from Russia, has shown no sign of bending.


The Belarus protests have mobilized large numbers of people for nearly a month, since a disputed presidential election, and have been dominated by calls for Mr. Lukashenko to resign. They have struggled, though, to bend the will of an authoritarian leader who has rejected all compromise and scorned his critics as “rats,” “tricksters” and “traitors.”


The crowd on Sunday in Minsk, the Belarusian capital, appeared to be as large as those on three previous Sundays, when more than 100,000 people gathered to protest what they believe was a blatantly rigged presidential election on Aug. 9 and to demand that the declared victor, Mr. Lukashenko, cede power.


Defying government warnings, protesters in Minsk paraded up to lines of riot police officers blocking major avenues, shouting, “Shame!” and “Go away.” They waved red and white flags, which served as the national flag until Mr. Lukashenko replaced it 25 years ago — a year after he took office — with a more Soviet-looking standard.


Smaller protests were reported in Brest, a city in the west on the border with Poland; Grodno, a hotbed of opposition sentiment in the northwest; Gomel, a town in the southeast near Russia where Mr. Lukashenko has staged a number of pro-government rallies, and several other towns.


In an effort to reduce the size of the protests in Minsk, the authorities sealed off streets in the city’s center, shut down metro stations and deployed large groups of riot police officers. They arrested scores of people but mostly refrained from the heavy-handed violence that was seen when the protests began last month.


Continue reading here.



Wednesday, August 19, 2020

The Hoopla Over the Kamala Harris VP Selection Obscures the Many Young People of Color Who Are Winning Offices Nationally

This is a really encouraging piece on how the party is changing to look more like America. The Democratic National Convention that's continuing for a couple of more days has been very intentional about demonstrating that, as well (see schedule here).

We should definitely not see the forest for the trees. The forest itself is a force that will change—I trust for the better—the social, economic, cultural, and political and policy landscape of this country.

Vote on November 3rd, everybody. Not only is our country in need of great leadership, but Trump's fascist, neoliberal, agenda must be upended as it is an anathema to democracy.

-Angela Valenzuela


The Hoopla Over the Kamala Harris VP Selection Obscures the Many Young People of Color Who Are Winning Offices Nationally

The debate over Biden’s running mate obscures a far more exciting development in American politics: that young people of color with clearly progressive values are running for office and winning.

By Sonali Kolhatkar


Joe Biden’s pick of Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA) as his running mate for the 2020 Democratic presidential ticket has generated strong responses. While many Democrats are elated at the idea of seeing a brown-skinned woman of Indian and Jamaican heritage in such a position, progressives are debating one another about Harris’ mixed record on bread-and-butter issues such as criminal justice reform, foreign policy, and health care. In many ways, Harris is not unlike Barack Obama: charismatic, intellectually brilliant, telegenic, and with just the kind of racially diverse background that symbolizes an America that most liberal-minded people want to live in. But far more hopeful than Harris’ achievement is the new crop of staunchly progressive young people of color that is chipping away at the Democratic Party establishment through electoral politics. 


In Harris and Obama we find the sort of “blank slate” figures on whom liberals can project their hopes and dreams. Both figures are adept politicians who are willing to be swayed on issues—a critical aspect of the executive branch—and who have a strong veneer of progressivism about them. The reason why there is a robust debate about whether or not Harris is truly progressive is because she has been tough to pin down. 


As California’s attorney general, Harris was hardly the “progressive prosecutor” she claimed to be later on. But when she ran for president, her platform included “ending mass incarceration,” including ending the “war on drugs.” In fact, the New York Times pointed out that, “Ms. Harris sometimes struggled to clearly define her stances during her unsuccessful presidential campaign. But in recent months, she has emerged as a leading voice on racial justice and inequality.” It is more than likely that Harris’ evolution is based on the changing tide in American attitudes toward race and policing. And while that is indeed what we want in a politician, it is apparent that Harris has been a cautious player. 


On the one hand it shows that she—and by extension Biden too—is willing to grow and evolve with the times. On the other hand, a Biden-Harris administration is likely to be to the right of their own campaign platform once in office. But framed against the prospect of four more years of Donald Trump’s administration, such conundrums are quite welcome. While Biden did not choose a strong progressive such as Representative Karen Bass (D-CA) or Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), he could have easily picked a running mate much more to the right than Harris, such as Susan Rice. And a Biden-Rice ticket would have still been far more preferable to the horror show that Trump unleashes on a daily basis. Judging by the unimaginably low bar that Trump has created for the White House, nearly anybody would be preferable to the incumbent. While a return to the Obama years (which is essentially what Biden promises) would be a massive step up from Trump, progressives can and should aspire for even more. 


While many supporters of Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) were stung by his 2016 and 2020 losses in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, there is reason to be very optimistic. In fact, there are many reasons, and some of their names are Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Jamaal Bowman, and Cori Bush. The so-called “ squad” of four progressive young women of color who first emerged into electoral politics in 2018 beating Republicans and centrist Democrats have all easily beaten their primary challengers this year and are sailing toward reelection in November. 


Ocasio-Cortez, whose eloquence and strong progressive principles have earned her national admiration, remarked on Twitter that the primary challenges that she, Omar, and Tlaib faced from their own party cost, “Tens of millions in big money… to unseat 3 of us as ‘safe’ Dems - almost unheard of.” She explained that, “This is what happens [when] you deeply challenge systems of power and corruption.” Ultimately, “the people triumphed.” 


Most importantly, the squad is growing. Bowman and Bush, who are part of the latest crop of young progressives of color to oust powerful Democrats in primary challenges, are likely to win their seats in November in their strongly Democratic districts. Together with veteran progressives of color in Congress such as Maxine Waters, Barbara Lee, Karen Bass, and newer stalwarts like Pramila Jayapal and Ro Khanna, a powerful coalition is set to emerge and change American politics under a potential Biden-Harris presidency. Like Harris, these elected officials look like the diverse America that Trump and his supporters despise. Unlike Harris, they have a clear progressive agenda that is not debatable. 


As an Indian woman, I am expected to rejoice in Harris’ political stardom. And while there is a modicum of excitement in seeing a woman whose mother could have been one of my own relatives, it is the sort of limited pride one feels at seeing Indian-origin actors Mindy Kaling or Aziz Ansari on-screen playing roles that are palatable to white audiences. While I may share Harris’ heritage, I identify far more strongly with the politics of the “squad” and their ilk. 


For years, the corporate media have defined the vague notion of “electability,” claiming that in order to win over a broad swath of the American electorate, political candidates need to appease conservatives and cautiously liberal-minded independents. After Biden’s announcement, CNN gushed, “The Kamala Harris pick isn’t about 2020. It’s about the future.” Media outlets like CNN and the New York Times who would like Harris to represent America’s future rather than figures like Ocasio-Cortez have unabashedly put their thumb on the scale of presidential races. They have shaped our national discourse to ensure there are no serious challenges to the prevailing established order. In politicians like Biden, Harris, and Obama, they have found satisfaction and stability. But in local races where the corporate media either lack the resources to set the agenda or have been caught unaware after failing to notice an upset-in-the-making, there has been real, small-d democratic progress. 


No longer do progressives have to accept older white progressives as their only representation in the halls of power. The nation is getting younger, more diverse, and more keen on transformative politics. A new crop of elected officials is rising who don’t look or sound like traditional politicians. They look and sound like America. And in the long term, that’s even more exciting than Biden-Harris 2020. 


Sonali Kolhatkar is the founder, host and executive producer of “Rising Up With Sonali,” a television and radio show that airs on Free Speech TV and Pacifica stations.

Supporting independent media is essential to keeping the promise of democracy alive.

Please donate now.