This is actually a very big deal—and not in the routine, bureaucratic sense that Washington often invites us to ignore. The wholesale dismissal of the National Science Board is not just an administrative decision; it is a structural rupture in one of the nation’s most important safeguards for independent scientific judgment.
Since 1950, the National Science Foundation has operated on a carefully designed premise: that knowledge production—especially in education, science, and human development—requires insulation from political volatility. That premise has now been deliberately undermined.
Let’s be clear about what this signals.
Let’s be clear about what this signals.
When an entire board designed for staggered continuity is abruptly removed, it is not governance—it is destabilization. And destabilization is not incidental here; it is instrumental. Chaos and institutional fragility are not unfortunate byproducts—they are the governing logic. What we are witnessing is not simply an attack on a board, but on the very infrastructure that sustains evidence, expertise, and science as both a short- and long-term public good.
Angela Valenzuela, Ph.D. and Member
National Academy of Education
Statement from the NAEd Board of Directors on the Dismissal of National Science Board Members
Wednesday, April 29, 2026 — The National Academy of Education Board of Directors expresses deep concern about the dismissal of all members of the National Science Board (NSB), the independent governing body of the National Science Foundation (NSF).
Since its creation in 1950, the NSF has represented a national commitment to discovery, evidence, and the long-term value of research. NSF investments support knowledge-building across fields, including education, the learning sciences, human development, and the social and behavioral sciences. These investments help to sustain the research infrastructure through which the nation prepares future scholars, strengthens teaching and learning, and addresses complex public problems.
The NSB is indispensable to this mission. Established as part of NSF’s founding structure, the Board provides independent oversight of NSF, helps set the strategic direction for the nation’s investment in scientific research, and advises the President and Congress on policy matters related to science, engineering, and education. The Board’s role is especially important given NSF’s responsibility for stewarding roughly $9 billion in annual federal investment in scientific research and education. The NSB helps to ensure that this public investment is guided by expert judgment and a national, long-term perspective.
The NSB’s structure reflects a deliberate nonpartisan design. It consists of 24 presidentially appointed members plus the NSF Director. The members serve staggered six-year terms, with one-third of the members replaced every two years. Thus, each administration makes appointments while preserving institutional memory and ensuring continuity across changes in political leadership.
The dismissal of all Board members interrupts that structure at a particularly consequential time. First, public confidence in science remains below its early-pandemic levels, and debates over scientific expertise have become increasingly polarized. At such a moment, the nation should be reinforcing, not weakening, the structures that protect independent scientific judgment. Second, NSF has been without a Senate-confirmed director since April 2025. Together, these circumstances leave one of the country’s most important research agencies without the stable, credible, and expert leadership structure it needs.
We urge Congress and the administration to reaffirm the statutory role and preserve the integrity of the National Science Board and to act promptly to restore stable, independent leadership at NSF.Copyright (C) 2026 National Academy of Education.
All rights reserved.
