Translate

Showing posts with label Senate republicans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Senate republicans. Show all posts

Friday, March 29, 2024

After Texas’s DEI Ban, College Students Are Reconsidering State Schools—BUT READ THIS FIRST!

This story in The Nation on how Senate Bill 17 is impacting youth represents a sad state of affairs. Our youth here in Texas are clearly impacted. And negatively so. All I can say is that policy is made by people and not Jesus. Plus, Jesus, I am confident, would never author or support policies that hurt people. What can you do?

Remain informed and get involved. You do have a legislator that represents you. If you don't know who they are, you can find out here. 

After doing so, reach out to them or their staff to express your sentiments to them. The more that legislators hear from their constituencies that they're supposed to represent, the greater the chance that you will get heard. After all, they want to get re-elected and your vote counts. 

Without a doubt, these are scary and concerning times. However, more than ever, young people impacted need to let these sentiments motivate them. I love how Harvard University pollster John Della Volpe uplifts youth with hard facts in his recently published book titled, Fight: How Gen Z Is Channeling Their Fear and Passion to Save America. 

From his book, I just learned that Genz and Millennials account for two-fifths of the electorate and they trend progressive. Within that, women more than men are progressive. Now that's electoral power! 

Della Volpe goes into these trends in enormous detail. I encourage all to read this inspiring text. There is a growing literature in this regard, as well. I have, for example, cited Twenge (2023) on this blog before. Also, read this piece by Brownstein (2020) from four years ago in The Atlantic titled, "The GOP’s Demographic Doom: Millennials and Gen Z are only a few years away from dominating the electorate." Oh, my! I think we're "a few years away" now.

All told, the future is yours for the taking, but this can't be an abstraction. It must and can very much be a lived reality. You gotta' have stamina and listen closely and stay attuned to that "generational call" to your generation's "higher purpose" as John Della Volpe terms it. Sí se puede! Yes we can! And we're all the better for it!

In the meantime, consider attending the upcoming May 3, 2024 hearing on SB 17, the very bill in question: Senator Brandon Creighton Announces Oversight on Senate Bill 17 Implementation. You have a voice so use it. There is also power in presence. And always be kind to yourselves, too, and to those around you. Love yourselves. 

As a wise, caring friend once told me when I was your age, a college student, experiencing the gathering clouds of emotion and despair as I contemplated the possibility of dropping out, he said, "Every way in which you are different is every way that you are strong." His perfectly timed uplifting words have been of enduring consequence to me.

Talk to your teachers, professors, ministers, rabbis, parents, community leaders, and trusted elders. Write letters to your local newspapers. Organize with like-minded youth, both in-person and online. Avoid negative, hateful groups and people. Listen to that faint whisper in the ear, that ancestral call to action to make a better world.

My Good Friday energy tells me to tell you that where two or three are gathered, Providence always manifests if done with a good and honorable intention. Struggles like these are not for the faint of heart. And they are always optimally carried out in and with community. It's the only way we can survive this manufactured crisis and organized malaise via the weaponization of policy.

Be well. Be encouraged. Be inspired. 

Love, not hate, is the most powerful force of all. 

Sí se puede! Yes we can! 

-Angela Valenzuela

#GoodFridayEnergy

References

Brownstein, R. (2020, Oct. 23). The GOP’s Demographic Doom: Millennials and Gen Z are only a few years away from dominating the electorate, The Atlantic.

Della Volpe, J. (2022). Fight: How Gen Z is channeling their fear and passion to save America. St. Martin's Press.

Twenge, J. M. (2023). Generations: The Real Differences Between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents—and What They Mean for America's Future. Simon and Schuster.

After Texas’s DEI Ban, College Students Are Reconsidering State Schools

In June, Governor Greg Abbott signed a law banning diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in the state university system—including multicultural centers and campus identity groups.

by Aina Marzia | The Nation |  March 26, 2024








A student student sits in a lecture hall while class is being dismissed at the University of Texas at Austin. (Brandon Bell / Getty)


In 2023, the Texas Legislature proposed SB 16, banning the teaching of critical race theory at Texas universities. Among the right, CRT has become a scapegoat, with legislators railing against public schools’ teaching the history and legacy of racial injustice in the United States. 

Now, Texas politicians have gone even further, targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs in state colleges.

SB 17, which went into effect January 1, has been a ticking time bomb since it was signed by Governor Greg Abbott in June. The bill bans DEI and its programs, clubs, and organizations within the University of Texas college system, the largest university system in the state with more than 250,000 enrolled students and 21,000 faculty.

During the months-long transition period, UT schools had to close down multicultural centers and realign their practices to comply with SB 17, remove specialized inclusion programs, and defund campus identity groups. Two months after the law went into effect, prospective students are reconsidering what these universities can do for them.

In an e-mail to students on January 23, the director of the Multicultural Engagement Center, Brandelyn Flunder, said that “our doors remain open (for now at least), our programs do not.” The e-mail also shared the loss of several special campus activities like New Black Student Weekend, Adelante, CultivAsian, and graduation ceremonies for Black, Latinx, and Asian students.

“The MEC, an office where many students of color would go to meet with friends, study, talk to their advisers, and where many of the organizations that garnered safe spaces for students of color would meet and stash their things is now closed,” said Katherine Ospina, a senior at the university studying International Relations, and the director of Latinx Community Affairs. “This was the one place I would go to get work done every day, and there was a collective sentiment of relaxation past those doors. My experience at UT has changed drastically as a result of this bill.”

“It seems as though we are taking a step back in reforming an ideal, equitable society,” says Samantha Alvarez, a freshman at UT Austin studying Public Relations. “Coming from a family of immigrants, knowing UT eliminated a scholarship program for undocumented students is both frustrating and saddening.”

In a joint statement on February 2, five community organizations at UT Austin shared how shutting down the engagement center was “part of a larger pattern of over-compliance of SB 17 at the hands of UT Administration.” According to the statement, the center, which was originally supposed to remain open and to restructure, was “wrongfully” shut down.

“These acts push the idea that our spaces are invalid, that our communities are illegal, and that the people in these organizations exclude anyone,” says Xochimilo Vazquez, a junior at UT studying psychology and government and the community engagement chair of the Native American & Indigenous Collective. “This also endangers my friends, family, and peers. Why should I have to take into consideration my safety when applying to a higher academic institution that boasts about being an intellectually pioneering institution? What intellectually pioneering institution ever led with racism?”

Following the bill’s passage, these organizations were informed that they would no longer be allowed to continue operating as sponsored student organizations. Former UT clubs, which were once reliant on annual funding from the university, have started seeking donations to continue operating.

At UT Dallas, one of the largest UT schools, the bill eliminated the Office of Diversity Equity, and Inclusion and created a new Office of Campus Resources and Support. The ODRS “is entirely separate and will lead activities that are SB 17 compliant,” according to their website. “As a new entity, the entire scope of OCRS is still being determined.”

“These clubs provided a sense of community where I could connect with others who shared similar experiences and cultural backgrounds,” says Sahil Lalani, a freshman studying business administration. “The closure of these vital spaces would have influenced my decision-making when considering Texas colleges.”

“I would not have worked in admissions if the metrics in place were the same two years back,” says Ospina, who also works as a student recruiter. In high school, she says, she would have been reluctant to apply to the university if these bills had been passed. “The idea of staying here postgraduation is extremely narrow.”

For current high school seniors in the state who are considering attending colleges within the UT system, this legislation has clouded their decisions. “I anticipate SB17 definitely affecting the decisions some students make regarding post–secondary education options, especially POC university enrollment in the state, specifically those who seek a more inclusive environment to attain their education,” said Nancy Sutherland, a high school counselor in Texas.

“Eliminating DEI offices as a whole strips away many potential students’ motivation to attend higher education,” says Haala Tariq, a high school senior in Houston. “One of my goals was to explore the cross-sections between marginalized communities and the conventional healthcare system. Senate Bill 17 will make it harder for the university to receive research funding from organizations that consider commitments to diversity when awarding grants.”

“The elimination of DEI on college campuses may lead to less cultural awareness and political participation as well as a decline in resources for people of different backgrounds,” said Sutherland. “Without DEI resources, this could potentially result in a decline in student success, and ability to perform in a global environment, particularly for minority populations.”

“I wanted to send my child and my nephews to the University of Texas, but now I don’t know,” says Dr. LaShawn Washington, who got her master’s and bachelor’s degrees at UT Austin and worked at the Division of Diversity and Community Engagement as a student. “SB 17 is based on the argument that DEI doesn’t work, but a lot of these people are white conservatives, or it is conservative political think tanks making arguments about something that wasn’t made to serve them,” said Washington.

“I fear Texas has taken a big step away from the celebration of equality,” says Alyssa Perez, a high school senior who was recently accepted into UT Austin and UT El Paso. “And I fear what other freedoms they can take away.”

While Perez is choosing to attend a school in-state because of financial constraints, other high school seniors are willing to take the hit economically for a more fulfilling college experience outside of Texas. “I feel unsafe with our political climate, so much so that I’ve essentially resigned myself to debt and student loan stress,” says Greg Rico, a transgender high school senior from Texas. “I applied to two Texas public schools, but I don’t plan on attending either of them.”

Sunday, December 03, 2017

Leaked Analysis : Republican Tax Cut Plan Will Drive Up Deficit and Debt

If this tax plan comes out of conference committee, Americans, regular working folks, are in for big surprises if it goes through.  Check out the 10-year projection that provides non-partisan authoritative figures herein.

In addition, the boost in the budget deficit will drive up the U.S. national debt to an eye-popping, $3 trillion just through 2010 alone, weakening our government’s national security and financial stability.

Despite this, now they have their eyes aimed at Medicaid and social security...

As importantly, ending these safety nets and enriching the already wealthy constitute a clear setback for most Americans. 

Let's work hard, my friends, state by state, to get these guys out of office even as we
register our concerns with their draconian proposals.

Angela Valenzuela
c/s


Thirty-eight percent of the country won’t get a noticeable tax break when the cuts kick in.
This post originally appeared at Mother Jones.


On Wednesday, a leaked analysis from Congress’ nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation showed that 38 percent of Americans would not get a significant tax cut in 2019 under the Senate tax bill. After the tax bill’s individual cuts expire in 2025, 84 percent of Americans would see their tax bills go up or change by less than $100.




The JCT analysis was obtained by The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, but has not been officially released. The estimate reinforces multiple studies showing that the wealthiest Americans would be the biggest winners under the House and Senate tax bills, despite Republicans’ repeated claims to the contrary. The Senate is currently debating the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and could pass the bill as soon as this week.


In selling their tax bill, Republicans have focused on the bill’s effects before the individual tax cuts expire at the end of 2025. Their justification is that Congress won’t actually let the individual cuts go away — essentially conceding that the $1.4 trillion tax bill relies on accounting gimmicks to mask its true cost. But there are no guarantees that future members of Congress will go along with the plan, especially when confronted with deficits exacerbated by the tax cut.




Either way, the new JCT numbers, which are generally considered authoritative by both Republicans and Democrats, show that the Senate tax bill creates millions of losers even before the individual cuts expire. In 2025, when the bill is in full effect, 57 percent of middle-class taxpayers would get a tax cut worth more than $500, while 12 percent would see their taxes stay roughly the same and 15 percent would pay higher taxes than they would under current law.

The numbers are much starker after almost all the individual cuts end. There is, however, one exception that doesn’t expire. The bill would permanently switch to a new inflation measure that would gradually raise taxes by bumping Americans into higher tax brackets. That provision alone would raise taxes by $134 billion over the next 10 years, and at least $400 billion in the following decade.

In 2027, 26 percent of taxpayers that make between $50,000 and $75,000 would face higher tax bills, while another 59 percent would see their tax bills stay about the same. Only 5 percent of those families would get more than $500, but 56 percent of taxpayers who make more than $1 million per year would get at least a $500 tax cut.



The new analysis further debunks President Donald Trump’s promises that wealthy people would not benefit from his tax plan. At a rally in Missouri on Wednesday, Trump said the tax cut is “going to cost me a fortune, this thing—believe me.” As Mother Jones has written, Trump and his heirs are likely to pocket hundreds of millions of dollars, though it’s impossible to know without seeing the president’s tax returns.

At the rally, Trump said he was willing to pay more taxes out of a sense duty. “Me? I don’t care,” Trump said. “This is a higher calling.”




Noah Lanard is a Ben Bagdikian editorial fellow in Mother Jones' Washington, DC, bureau. Before joining Mother Jones, he was an editorial fellow at Washingtonian magazine. While living in Mexico City, his work appeared in The Guardian, Fusion and Vice. Follow him on Twitter: @nlanard.

Also see:
Republican Tax Cut Plan Will Drive Up Deficit and Debt By Simon Johnson | November 1, 2017