Translate

Showing posts with label governmental databases. Show all posts
Showing posts with label governmental databases. Show all posts

Sunday, February 09, 2025

Trump administration’s data deletions set off ‘a mad scramble, by Mike Stobbe & Mike Schneider

Friends: 

The U.S. statistical system—renowned globally for its excellence—is facing a critical threat that could erode public trust and compromise the integrity of essential data. Researchers are expressing grave concerns over recent removals of data, which they rightfully fear may set a dangerous precedent.

Beth Jarosz, a senior program director at the Population Reference Bureau, warns, 

"This sets a really dangerous precedent that any administration can come in and delete whatever they don't like. Regardless of your politics, this should alarm you since this is taxpayer-funded data and it belongs to the public."

We must act now to protect the transparency and reliability of data that serves as the foundation of informed decision-making and public policy. The integrity of this data is a public right, funded by taxpayers and critical to the nation's wellbeing. Let your voice be heard. Reach out to whoever represents you and demand accountability and the safeguarding of our data.

-Angela Valenzuela




By MIKE STOBBE and MIKE SCHNEIDER

February 3, 2025

NEW YORK (AP) — Researchers are in what one described as “a mad scramble” to sort out what public data the Trump administration has deleted from government websites and electronic publications.

Late last week, federal agencies took down scores of government webpages as staffers hurried to comply with President Donald Trump’s order rolling back protections for transgender people, which required the removal of “gender ideology” language from websites, contracts and emails.

Some of the sites were back online Monday, but data analysts say it’s not clear exactly what was removed or changed.

“You go looking for something and it’s just not there,” said Amy O’Hara, a Georgetown University researcher who is president of the Association of Public Data Users.

Social science researchers and other federal data users on Monday described feeling like a five-alarm fire was triggered when they discovered late last week that vital federal datasets were inaccessible.

It sparked “a mad scramble right now” to grab copies of whatever federal data was posted before, O’Hara said.

While the administration’s stated goal was to delete gender and transgender terminology, O’Hara said some researchers worry that other politically charged topics — such as climate change or vaccines — might be removed or altered.

A expert panel affiliated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention demanded a meeting on the deletions.

The committee, chartered by Congress to advise the CDC director, asked the agency’s acting director, Susan Monarez, for an explanation about why it had cut off access to datasets “that allow people across the country to understand the health of their communities.”

The panel had yet to receive a response, said committee member Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, a former federal health official who is now a health policy expert at Johns Hopkins University.

Experts say datasets and summaries were affected, but so too were codebooks that explain different variables. They say they also saw changes to published research that used affected datasets, and even redactions to lists of publications about certain topics.

“The scale of this is quite stunning,” O’Hara said.

Researchers are still stumbling on what was taken down or changed, she added.

“We are finding out about omissions when somebody goes searching for it,” O’Hara said.

On Monday, for instance, when a query was made to access certain data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s most comprehensive survey of American life, users got a response that said the area was “unavailable due to maintenance.”

The CDC’s official public portal for health data, data.cdc.gov, was taken down entirely on Friday but went back up over the weekend, albeit with a yellow ribbon at the top saying: “CDC’s website is being modified to comply with President Trump’s Executive Orders.” The agency’s Youth Risk Behavior Survey data was restored too, but with at least one of the gender columns missing and its data documentation removed.

CDC officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Some researchers took steps to make sure federal information stays available. On Monday, the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association posted federal STD data and treatment guidelines that were hastily downloaded from the CDC website Thursday night.

“Taxpayers paid to collect those data, to analyze those data, and to make them public for people to use,” explained Abigail Norris Turner, an Ohio State University medical researcher who is the association’s president.

“Executive orders don’t change who has STIs or who needs evidence-based care for them,” she added. “We wanted to make sure that rigorous information continued to be available to people to provide the best possible care.”

The U.S. statistical system is considered the best in the world and researchers fear that the removals will undermine trust and put the integrity of the data at risk.

“This sets a really dangerous precedent that any administration can come in and delete whatever they don’t like,” said Beth Jarosz, a senior program director at the Population Reference Bureau. “Regardless of your politics, this should alarm you since this is taxpayer-funded data and it belongs to the public.”

In a joint statement, the presidents of the Population Association of America and the Association of Population Centers called the takedowns “unacceptable” and called on Congress and the Trump administration to restore the datasets.

Paul Schroeder, executive director of the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics, said people looking for data may have to resort to suing for access or submitting Freedom of Information Act requests for the datasets.

“The removal of several public datasets from agency websites goes against everything the statistical agencies stand for and were intended for,” Schroeder said Monday. “Public data users are being left in the dark about what is going on.”

Schneider reported from Orlando, Florida. AP data journalist Kasturi Pananjady contributed to this story.
___


The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Sunday, January 15, 2017

10 Tech Issues that will Impact Social Justice in 2017

This piece by Wilneida Negrón from the Ford Foundation merits a close read.  Some of us often think of the democratizing potential of social media and the Internet, however, as you can see below, free and open expression are grievously at risk here and beyond.

The access to our lives that our own government has should be a matter of grave concern not just to ourselves, but also in terms of social justice causes locally and worldwide.  

It is disturbing to consider how our own government spies on its own citizens, let alone folks in other countries.  On this note, I just saw the movie, Snowden, and strongly recommend it.  It focused, in particular, on the NSA’s PRISM program that Snowden exposed and that Negrón mentions below.

The access that our government already has to our private lives is unsettling.  But let's not be afraid.  Let's organize and let's act.  To that end, Negrón provides very useful suggestions in this piece below.  

Thank you, President Darren Walker, Wilneida Negrón, and the Ford Foundation, for all you do to expand civil and human rights.  Best of wishes in the new year and Happy MLK Day!

Angela Valenzuela, Ph.D.
College of Education, Education Policy and Planning

University of Texas at Austin

Wilneida NegronIn our increasingly complex and interconnected world, innovations in technology and data are inching us closer to a reality driven by automation, prediction, personalization, surveillance, and the merging of our physical and digital lives. This is taking place at the same time that the world is experiencing transformative cultural, demographic, economic, and political shifts. In the face of so much uncertainty and change, the independent watchdog group Freedom House reports that globally, Internet freedom has declined for the sixth consecutive year, “with more governments than ever before targeting social media and communication apps as a means of halting the rapid dissemination of information, particularly during anti-government protests.” At the same time, Civicus has highlighted the many threats facing democracies, representative institutions, and civil society as a whole.
As we begin a new year and a new political administration takes office in the US, let’s take some time to consider some pressing issues that exist at the nexus of technology and social justice—and think about how we as social justice advocates can address them most effectively. Even amid so many unknowns, we can be certain that these issues are among those that will shape 2017 and the years and decades beyond it. And they will be central to the work of building a free, open, and transparent future.
1. Online hate crimes, harassment, and discrimination are increasing
In 2016, we saw an increase in the number of reported online hate crimes and harassment targeting Muslims, immigrants, and LGBTQ people, as well as groups working to protect reproductive rights and strengthen racial justice. At the same time, Internet and other communication technologies are being used to promote the online radicalization and organization of hate groups. 
2. Fake news, campaigns of misinformation, bias, and propaganda proliferate
During the 2016 election, the use of intelligent Twitter bots, targeted advertising, and search engine manipulation affected what Internet users saw on specific platforms and search engines. “Filter bubbles” and algorithms have been blamed for failing to separate real news from fiction, and researchers have noted an escalation in bias, propaganda, and misinformation online. Together, these factors contribute to increased polarization, and hamper the free flow of accurate information that is essential for civil discourse, policymaking, and ultimately democracy.
3. Trolling threatens democracy and free expression
During the 2016 US presidential election, online trolls were credited with influencing political discourse. This kind of trolling is also a global epidemic. Freedom House reports that across the world, state-sponsored trolling operations (aka “troll farms”) attack government critics and independent media often by posting thousands of comments at a time, polluting online dialogue through hate speech and disinformation. Hampering free speech, trolling is often aimed at journalists and activists, along with political protest and other forms of expression.
4. Reduced regulation creates risks for consumers
2017 may see the deregulation of the largest cable and phone companies, and the weakening of hard-won consumer protection laws. These reduced federal regulations could undermine a free, open, and secure Internet
and undercut a variety of hard-won initiatives, protections, and services that benefit low income individuals and households. These include net neutrality wins, federal guidance and regulation of the Internet of Things, Lifeline and broadband subsidies for low-income households, and efforts to regulate prison phone costs.
5. Governmental databases put pressure on minority groups
As technology and data processing power gets more sophisticated, government databases such as the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System, deferred action, or gang databases could be used to discriminate against or target vulnerable groups. At the same time, the expansion of biometric technologies in the immigration system and other areas may raise concerns about government monitoring and data sharing.
6. Increased surveillance puts vulnerable groups under a microscope
The expansion of legislation such as the Patriot Act, along with the use high-tech surveillance tools including drones, facial recognition software, automated license plate readers, stingray tracking devices, and the NSA’s PRISM program can lead to increased surveillance of citizens. This raises particular concerns for vulnerable groups including Muslims, immigrants, and LGBTQ communities.
7. Less attention to issues of algorithmic bias and online discrimination creates opportunities for abuse
The White House’s Big Data Initiative has studied big data’s potential to discriminate, especially when it comes to housing, employment, credit, and consumer issues.  Legislation including the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights Act of 2015 and an amendment to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act were intended to govern the collection, use, and distribution of consumer data, and extend the standard of protection for online and digital content. But under a new administration, the fate of these rules and regulatory attention is unclear.
8. Advocacy groups need digital security protections
In 2017, advocacy groups and social movements may be subject to a greater degree of surveillance and/or harassment. As a result, they will need a strong digital security infrastructure to help protect them against potential threats, as well to support them in developing strategies for responding to attacks as they arise.
9. Technology and data initiatives provide important support for social justice work
Increasingly, technology will play a central role in strengthening a progressive agenda. To achieve this, organizations might focus more on developing strategies for organizing and base-building across different sectors, building strong progressive narratives, and supporting open data initiatives at the state and local level to increase transparency and accountability.
10. Developments in open government and transparency impact advocacy work
Since the 2000s, open government initiatives have sought to identify ways to promote transparency, empower citizens, fight corruption, and harness new technologies to enhance governance. In support of these efforts, the Obama administration developed Data.gov, a central online location for all US government data. This year, we will see whether the new administration will continue to maintain this useful resource, as well as whether the US will remain in the multilateral Open Government Partnership, and how the government will handle the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), including reforms that Congress passed in 2016.
Topics