Translate

Showing posts with label humanitarian crisis on the border. Show all posts
Showing posts with label humanitarian crisis on the border. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 10, 2019

'Can't Feel My Heart': Caged Migrant Children Face PTSD Report Warns

For Trump to actually endorse the caging up of children on the U.S.-Mexico border is beyond reprehensible.  In what universe is this cruel practice anywhere near acceptable?  And then to deny children of the nutrition and medical services they need after they've been locked up is not only terribly inhumane, but risks rendering as permanent the injury of family separation that many, if not most, of these kids are experiencing as family abandonment together with psychological anguish and torture that yes, has physical manifestations, including that of a broken heart. 

As child psychiatrist, Dr. Gilbert Kliman aptly states about child imprisonment, this is a “vast, cruel experiment on the backs of children."

I would hope that we all feel a deep sense of urgency regarding this need to abolish institutionalized sadism toward children.  Everybody, please register to vote.  If you've not registered to vote, go HERE  to do so. 

And be sure to vote on Tuesday, November 3, 2020 and let's get this walking nightmare of a president and his barbaric policies and party out of office.


-Angela Valenzuela
#NoToConcentrationCampsForKids
#familiestornapart
#FamiliesBelongTogether
@Raices



'Can't Feel My Heart': Caged Migrant Children Face PTSD Report Warns




September 4, 2019
Migrant children separated from their parents and caged as part of the United States government's “zero-tolerance policy” in the U.S.-Mexico border are victims of post-traumatic stress and other serious mental health problems, according to a report released Wednesday by the inspector general's office for the Department of Health and Human Services.
According to program directors and mental health clinicians, children exhibited more fear, feelings of abandonment, heightened feelings of anxiety and loss as a result of their unexpected separation from their parents after their arrival in the U.S. in contrast to those who were not separated. 
The findings are based on interviews conducted in August and September of 2018 with roughly 100 mental health clinicians and directors at dozens of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) facilities. During the interviews, there were almost 9,000 children in shelters; nearly 85 percent were 13-17 in age, 13 percent were 6-12 and two percent were infants to age five.
And although experiences of "intense trauma" were common for those children in care even before their arrival to the U.S., such as being a victim of abuse or witnessing a murder, the report noted, those separated from their parents by U.S. authorities went on to experience greater emotional and mental pain.
The report explains that some children expressed acute grief that caused them to cry inconsolably, others didn't grasp the situation of why they were separated from their parents and suffered elevated levels of mental distress.
Their psychological anguish sometimes manifested physically. "You get a lot of 'my chest hurts,' even though everything is fine [medically]," said one medical director quoted in the report, adding that  "children describe symptoms of emotional pain such as 'every heartbeat hurts’ or I can't feel my heart’.”
Program directors and mental health clinicians reported that children who believed their parents had abandoned them were angry and confused, which caused them to inflict harm on others and themselves. 
Other children expressed feelings of fear or guilt and became concerned for their parents' and own welfare, as in one case a seven-year-old boy thought his father was killed and he would be next, the report detailed.
Child psychiatrist Gilbert Kliman, who interviewed dozens of migrant children in shelters after zero-tolerance took effect, told Frontline and AP that the kids can move on with their lives after reunifying with parents but may never get over it.
As children, they have night terrors, separation anxiety, trouble concentrating. As they become adults, they face greater risks of mental and physical challenges, from depression to cancer.
The watchdog also said the longer children were in custody, the more their mental health deteriorated, and it recommended minimizing that time. It also suggested creating better mental health care options and hiring more trained staff. 
The average number of days for children in the custody of ORR hit a high of 93 in November 2018 and dropped to 43 by April 2019. 
However, the Trump administration presented on Aug. 21 a new rule that allows officials to detain migrant families indefinitely while a court considers whether to grant them asylum, abolishing a previous 20-day limit in the long-standing Flores Settlement agreement.
The Congressional Hispanic Caucus warned the rule if implemented, will have devastating long-term consequences for children and their families.
"Flores protect migrant children from indefinite detention and inhumane conditions," tweeted the Caucus. "Now, the Trump admin is trying to tear it up and indefinitely imprison families. This will cause irreparable harm to children."

The Facilities Are Also Culprits for Their Mental and Physical Deterioration

In June, a legal team from the University of California's, Davis Immigration Law Clinic visited a Border Patrol center in Texas near the city of El Paso where more than 250 migrant children, including teens, infants, and toddlers, were locked up in "horrendous" conditions.
“In my 22 years of doing visits with children in detention, I have never heard of this level of inhumanity,” said Holly Cooper, who co-directs the Davis Immigration Law Clinic.
The experts were left aghast when faced with scenes of children enduring traumatic and dangerous situations, lacking basic human needs including adequate food and water as well as medical care.
“When the children walked into the conference room, we couldn’t believe what we were seeing. They were sick. They were coughing. They had runny noses. They were dirty, and they immediately started to describe the level of hunger that they were experiencing,” she stated, explaining that "children told us they were being fed nothing but the same meals three times a day, and they weren’t really meals."
All of the children detained in the facility come from Central American countries, mainly from El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Honduras. They came to the U.S. with a relative from whom they have been separated, and half of them have their parents in the U.S.
The report came the same week the Trump administration claimed in federal court that the government is not required to provide toothbrushes, soap or beds to children detained at the border and others reports found similar conditions at several migration jails.
For Andrea Pitzer, author and international expert on the history of concentration camps, Donald Trump’s administration has revived the concentration camp system in the U.S. and the situation is a “vast, cruel experiment on the backs of children,” Kliman warned.

by teleSUR / MP 

Friday, May 03, 2019

Don't deport Venezuelans. Grant them temporary U.S. visas by Lourdes Gouveia and Rogelio Saenz

I agree that the political crisis in Venezuela with asylum requests soaring from "5,600 in 2015 to nearly 28,000 in 2017," deporting them will only aggravate the situation there and contribute further to hemispheric instability, deepening an already severe humanitarian crisis along the U.S.-Mexico border.

-Angela Valenzuela

Don't deport Venezuelans. Grant them temporary U.S. visas. | Opinion
Deporting Venezuelans will only aggravate the humanitarian crisis the U.S. government says it’s trying to solve. Absent more stable alternative solutions, Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelans makes sense and is urgently needed,. writes the op-ed author. (Wayne K. Roustan / Sun Sentinel)

| April 30, 2019 | South Florida Sun Sentinal 

The number of Venezuelans coming to the United States to escape the festering political and economic crises in their country is soaring. As Venezuela falls into deeper chaos and the Trump administration steps up its hostility toward immigrants, their future in the U.S. is uncertain.
Today, approximately 11 percent of Venezuelans are living abroad and the United Nations projects that the percentage will continue to rise.
Today, approximately 11 percent of Venezuelans are living abroad and the United Nations projects that the percentage will continue to rise.
The number of Venezuelan arrivals in the U.S. has grown dramatically over the last decade. According to the American Community Survey, the volume of Venezuelan migrants arriving here soared from 4,700 in 2007 to 49,000 in 2017, more than a 10-fold increase and the highest level of growth among all Latino nationality groups.
Life is increasingly dire for Venezuelans in the U.S., a message that we heard repeatedly from many of the Florida-based Venezuelans we have surveyed since 2012.
This is particularly true of the last wave of Venezuelan arrivals, whom we call “precarious migrants.” They left after the 2013 oil crisis and Nicolás Maduro’s ascendance to power. Prior arrivals reported investing substantial sums of money in legal fees hoping to avoid “illegality.” Typically, they’d hop from one status to another, negotiating a complex assortment of visas, all lacking a path to permanent residency. Inevitably, many have fallen into undocumented status. Today, among all visitors entering the U.S. from Latin America, Venezuelans have the highest overstay rates and most lack resources to invest in prolonged legality.
The bulk of these precarious migrants are faced with few options. They either become undocumented immigrants or apply for asylum at the risk of swift deportation if unsuccessful. Asylum requests from Venezuelans soared five-fold from 5,600 in 2015 to nearly 28,000 in 2017. By 2016 Venezuela surpassed China as the country with the most asylum applications.
President Trump has proposed to cap refugee admissions for Venezuelans at 3,000 (about 10 percent of all refugee admissions) for fiscal year 2019 and has bad mouthed asylum seekers as “con jobs.”
The protracted crises forcing Venezuelans to flee to the U.S. are often deemed “too general” to meet the narrow “fear of persecution” threshold required for refugee admission and, thus, at least half of their applications are denied.
Until now, Venezuelans have largely flown under the radar and escaped Trump’s racialized wrath targeting migrants from Muslim and Central American countries. Venezuelans have typically thought of themselves, and been viewed, as White, professional, legal, and self-sufficient migrants. As their presence increases here, that image may no longer shield Venezuelans from the anti-immigrant venom fueling Trump’s restrictionist policies.
Geopolitical considerations also have historically played a major role in U.S. decisions concerning who deserves asylum (think Cubans and Nicaraguan contras versus Salvadorans). Venezuelans were counting on that time-honored bias given Trump’s fierce opposition to the current Venezuelan government and Nation Security Advisor John Bolton summoning the Monroe Doctrine to warn Russia to stay out of Venezuela. Unfortunately, Venezuelans’ timing is poor, as today’s fear of immigrants trumps fear of Putin.
A glimmer of hope opened up recently with renewed calls to offer Venezuelans Temporary Protected Status (TPS). HR 549, the Venezuela Temporary Protected Status Act of 2019, has already cleared the House. However, the bill comes on the heels of Trump’s executive orders to rescind and stop issuing new TPS for everyone. Indeed, the White House has not yet made an official pronouncement of how it plans to deal with a growing backlog of undocumented and asylum-seeking Venezuelans and there is notable right-wing Republican opposition to TPS for Venezuelans.
Even if TPS were to be granted, it is limited to 18 months of temporary protection. Even if the political crisis ended today in Venezuela, it will take years to bring about stabilization and safety.
In the end, deporting Venezuelans will only aggravate the humanitarian crisis the U.S. government says it’s trying to solve. In the absence of more stable alternative solutions, TPS for Venezuelans makes sense and is urgently needed.
Lourdes Gouveia is Professor Emerita of Sociology and was the founding Director of Latino/Latin American Studies at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. Rogelio Sáenz is Professor of Demography at the University of Texas at San Antonio.