For good measure, let's remind ourselves of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."Because of the First Amendment, I'm free to blog and express my views. As you can see from harsh governmental actions taken below, none of us should take this for granted. More pointedly, we should protect it. With this great freedom, we should also all have integrity and to the best of our ability, be impeccable with our language and always tell the truth.
-Angela Valenzuela
Keeping Democracy Healthy during a Pandemic:
A New Newsletter on Protecting Rights during COVID-19
by Nate Schenkkan, Director for Special Research
It’s rough out there. But we’re in this together, to help each other make sense of it. This newsletter is a way for us to share information about the pandemic’s implications for democracy, and ways that all of us can support rights even in a time of crisis. Every week we’ll share information about what we’re watching around the world, and original analysis about key issues in protecting democracy.
We’re sending you this week’s newsletter, but if you want to keep receiving it, please subscribe here.
We start this week with Freedom House’s principles for how to protect civil and political rights in a pandemic. They are grounded in international human rights law. TL;DR—restrictions should be transparent, legitimate, necessary, proportionate, and nondiscriminatory.
You can see similar principles in the statements from the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, a group of international monitors for freedom of expression, and the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law. As our president Mike Abramowitz said, “Democracy should not and need not be sacrificed in the name of public health.”
To understand how the pandemic is already affecting rights around the world, here are three great pieces by my colleagues at Freedom House about its implications for democracy. In the Washington Post, Allie Funk and Isabel Linzer explained how the threat could lead to a global backslide in freedom. They followed this up with a longer piece in the Bulwark.
Lastly, in a new analysis on our website, Sarah Repucci discusses the negative impact of postponing elections, and explains steps democracies can take right now to avoid this last resort.
| |||
| |||
|
No comments:
Post a Comment