Translate

Showing posts with label Critical Policy Analysis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Critical Policy Analysis. Show all posts

Saturday, January 07, 2023

Happy New Year! Check out Dr. Angela Valenzuela's Policy Analysis Course Readings in anticipation of the 88th (2023) Texas Legislative Session

Happy New Year, my dear friends and colleagues:

The holidays are always a good time to catch up on readings, social media, news, and videos earmarked for viewing. As a university professor, I am always thinking of my students and my classroom. 

For my master's-level, Policy Analysis class this semester—that conveniently coincides with the 88th Session of the Texas State Legislature—I have my students develop policy briefs and portfolios on the bill (or bills) of their choice that they'll be following throughout the semester. Though not required, invariably, there is always a subset of students that ends up testifying on legislation in House or Senate hearings. All students do a mock presentation based on their policy briefs at the end of the semester so that they can at least simulate the act of giving testimony before a legislative body.

To be specific, my master's students this semester are in the Education Policy and Planning (EPP) program within the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy (ELP). From here, many of them go on to careers in policy think tanks, to work in policy-focused non-profits, external relations for school districts, including assuming positions in the Texas State Legislature, the Texas Education Agency, Washington, D.C. and the like. 

A number have even become heads and leaders of coalitions or legislators themselves. So what our graduate students really appreciate is the opportunity to experience the Texas Legislative Session that meets biennially, or every other year.

This course doesn't always line up with the legislative session so when it does, that's a bonus. We also have a parallel Policy Analysis course for our EPP doctoral students taught by EPP faculty member and colleague, Dr. Christopher Brown whose approach will similarly have his unique signature.

Selecting required readings is never an easy or simply task, yet happy to share these below in case any of this interests you and you'd like to follow along.






 

Required Readings

Bérubé, M., & Ruth, J. (2022). It's not free speech: Race, democracy, and the future of academic freedom. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

Cullen, D. (2019). Parkland: Birth of a movement. London: Hachette UK.

Garcia, D. R. (2022). Teach truth to power: How to engage in education policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Krochmal, M., & Moye, T. (Eds.). (2021). Civil rights in black and brown: Histories of resistance and struggle in Texas. Austin, Tx: University of Texas Press.

Lopez, F. & Sleeter, C. (2022). Critical Race Theory and its critics: Implications for research and teaching. NY: Teachers College Press.*

Phillips, S. (2022). How We Win the Civil War: Securing a Multiracial Democracy and Ending White Supremacy for Good. NY: The New Press.

 *This book will be available for purchase soon.

In combination with articles that I am also assigning, these are recently-published texts that speak both to the art of policy making together with policy agendas and movements themselves, including, as you might infer from the readings, on today's "culture wars." By the way, for what it's worth, not a single "pinko-Marxist" text in the bunch!

The act of choosing some texts is inescapably the act of not choosing others. That said, the fact that I have had all of these students previously, I can pretty well anticipate what will be the pulse of the classroom and what will serve them well both for the class, but also for their chosen careers in policy. And they, of course, are taking other classes with other faculty in our program, department, college, and university who are making similar judgements like mine.

I'm excited about the semester and feel honored to cap off the entering EPP 2021 master's cohort with what I trust will be a very engaging experience this Spring. I've already informed them that session begins next Tuesday and so it's time to "buckle up" for the ride.

As a personal aside, I always say that those of us in policy have the most fun!

Happy New Year to all.  Feliz año nuevo!

Wednesday, August 25, 2021

Texas Education Review. SPECIAL ISSUE: TEXAS 87TH LEGISLATURE on High-Stakes Testing

I am so very proud of our University of Texas College of Education doctoral and masters students for this important special issue of the Texas Education Review (TER) that just came out. Congrats, as well, to the TER editorial board members, Alex Armonda, Lebon James, and Will Davies for their hard work on this special issue (see TER editorial board) focused on important work done by the Texas Center for Education Policy that weighed in on high-stakes testing during the 2021 87th session of the Texas State Legislature (TSL).

I, too, have some bragging rights here because three of the four pieces highlighted below reflects work done in my doctoral-level Ethnography Course that I taught in Fall 2020 that resulted in policy briefs and portfolios, making them actionable during the regular session that commenced in January, 2021.

The assignment was on what we in the assessment world term, "authentic assessment." This means that instead of high-stakes, standardized tests, students take on real-world tasks that are of concern to them. Authentic assessment gets them to do research and apply what they have learned in real-world contexts where they can impact the direction that policy takes. 

Once the legislative session began in January, 2021, these, as well as other students taking my Spring, 2021, Policy Analysis Class, had varied opportunities like working in legislative offices, conducting bill analyses, drafting legislation, or assisting in the work of the Texas Education Legislative Equity Coalition. Several also got the chance to testify in legislative hearings. All of this fills my heart. 💗

Back to the Fall class. When I first asked them what problem we should take on as a class project, I suggested school re-opening policy as this was and continues to be a hot issue in the context of the coronavirus pandemic. 

Several students who were working in the schools at the time expressed
their preference instead for us to focus on high-stakes testing, particularly for bilingual learners.

Given the Texas Education Agency Commissioner Mike Morath decision to go through with Spring testing despite the pandemic, the political-economy of this neoliberal agenda was also centered as a concern. Who profits from this testing system and to what end or ends?

"Okay," I said. "Let's do that," forcing me to change gears in the moment. In retrospect, I celebrate such beautiful alignment in focusing conceptually on high-stakes testing and its alternative, authentic assessment, in a class where this humanistic, social justice, intellectual approach could simultaneously get demonstrated, experienced in the flesh.

It was great observing all the students' work, from this semester and last, contributing in their own ways while generating the materials they needed for their policy briefs and portfolios on a range of policy topics in education. 

What you see below are only the published policy briefs generated from the Fall ethnography class. The ethnographic component consisted of what students observed throughout the semester together with the data that they collected, combined with in-depth readings and discussions of books on ethnographic methods. Students' observations and ethnographic memos (or thematic summaries) from the many public meetings they attended found their way into their portfolios that they submitted at the end of the semester. 

Paradoxically, because everything was remote due to the pandemic, our class concluded that we had significant access to policy discussions that in more normal times would have been more limited due to complicated schedules and travel costs associated with getting to and from places on time. Austin is not the easiest city to navigate and getting to San Antonio, Houston, or Dallas meetings can be a hike.

The students shared how working remotely expedited a sense of community and belonging that proved vital to their well-being, particularly for those living alone in their apartments throughout the pandemic. Zoom fatigue and the lack of human touch notwithstanding, there were clear benefits in this isolating context to working remotely. 

The Fall class defended their policy briefs toward the end of the semester before a statewide committee of advocates representing different organizations, including Texas AFT, Texas LULAC, Every Texan, Texans Advocating for Meaningful Student Assessment (TAMSA), and member-affiliates of the Texas Education Legislative Equity Coalition. 

I must confess that in the moment, it was a bit nerve-wracking as one cannot get more high-stakes than having to defend one's work before an expert audience. Of course, the students' performed excellently. From an authentic assessment perspective, they pretty much had to... I'm so proud of them.

And that is the point about authentic assessment. 

It's a process. It's formative. It's holistic. It's a relationship that a teacher has with their students.

We seriously need to hit the pause button on mental testing and re-think the idea of what high-stakes assessment (not "testing") can and should be. I hope I've convinced you on just how awesome it could be if this is what school were about, period. 

After all, it's what motivates our youth who, like ourselves, see a world spinning out of control. They become part of the solution in that very instance when they are called upon to put their own learning at the service of social justice. In fact, this motivates and inspires. Instead of racist, intimidating, high-stress, high-stakes standardized testing, let's give them meaningful, real-world tasks that they have to defend before a stakeholder audience. 

There's a growing body of literature on this that you yourself can learn about and read, beginning with the New York Performance Standards Consortium Schools.

Did we in this class make a difference? 

Absolutely. Bills were written, testimonies delivered, the work of a coalition was strengthened, a beautiful sense of community, both inside and outside of class, was established. Some students even secured meaningful jobs or internships in the process. 

Further, as the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, "The the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice."  It's an honor and a privilege to be part of that bending of the arc such that standing up to injustice—with the full weight of our intellect and integrity as members of a righteous community—is triumphal in itself.

Thanks to my teaching assistant Lauren Shook, for her much-needed and highly valued assistance throughout. Thanks to all our students for their hard work, guts, and intellect. Your love, caring, and compassion for Texas' children and youth was palpable and restorative.

Finally, many thanks to the advocacy community for embracing our students. Experiences like these leave indelible marks on their psyches and souls that last a lifetime. These are indeed the hallmarks of a just and virtuous education.  

As William Butler Yeats once said, "Education is not the filling of a pail but the lighting of a fire."

Do read their well-conceived and well-written pieces.

-Angela Valenzuela, Ph.D.


*Thanks to the Texas Education Review for publishing my comments in this special issue, as well! 😊


SPRING 2021: VOLUME 9, ISSUE 2

FULL ISSUE

ARTICLES

Out of the Classroom and Less Likely to Graduate: The Relationship Between Exclusionary Discipline and Four-Year Graduation Rates in Texas

KRISTIAN LENDERMAN, University of Houston

JACQUELINE HAWKINS, University of Houston


SPECIAL ISSUE: TEXAS 87TH LEGISLATURE

Establishing Equity: Aligning Dual Language Bilingual Education to HB3 Sec. 11.185 Texas Early Childhood Literacy & Mathematics Proficiency Plans

PATRICIA NÚÑEZ PORRAS, The University of Texas at Austin

JULIA HERNÁNDEZ , The University of Texas at Austin

The Testing Industrial Complex: Texas and Beyond

MARÍA DEL CARMEN UNDA, The University of Texas at Austin

LIZETH LIZÁRRAGA-DUEÑAS, The University of Texas at Austin

Shooting for the STAAR: An Authentic Assessment Pilot Proposal to Replace Inequitable High-Stakes Accountability

ALEJANDRO MADRIGAL III, The University of Texas at Austin

ELIZA EPSTEIN, The University of Texas at Austin