Translate

Showing posts with label Democracy at Risk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democracy at Risk. Show all posts

Sunday, May 14, 2023

My Mother's Day Reflection: Pondering Historian Nancy MacLean's Analysis of Democracy & the 88th (2023) session of the Texas State Legislature

by

Angela Valenzuela, Ph.D.

On this day of Mother's Day of 2023, I ponder Nancy MacLean and the 88th session of the Texas State Legislature that will soon come to a close. I reflect on big items on which I have remained relatively current, including voter-suppression, cultural wars, high-stakes testing and accountability, city preemption politics, school privatization through vouchers and education savings accounts (ESAs), as well as anti-diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) bills.

Accordingly, I urge all to view this extraordinary lecture by Duke University, award-winning history of politics  Professor Nancy MacLean. Her talk is titled, "Scholar-to-Scholar Talk: Nancy MacLean, "The Pre-History and Likely Sequels—of the Insurrection at the U.S. Capitol," March 2, 2022. [Youtube]


And what a captivating storyteller she is! 

MacLean provides a gripping, conceptually keen analysis of the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the the U.S. Capitol to help lay out a framework of concentric circles of support and validation of the Trump agenda that is not just intentional but also engineered and historic, putting democracy at risk. 

Expressed differently, according to studies of democracy globally such as studied by the Institute for Democracy in Stockholm, Sweden, our country is slipping if these factors are present: 

Individuals' right to vote through voter suppression policies and practices are curtailed. The following agendas are at play: disinformation campaigns that exploit the ignorance of the casual observer; a rigging of the judiciary or a highjacking of the legislative process; fierce privatization agendas such as with roads, prisons and schools that, as she says, "engorge corporate partners"; an undermining of established norms of governance; and a weaponizing of tensions over race, sexuality (transgender battles), and religion (anti-Islamism) to intentionally divide and fragment the polity. Sound familiar?

We're in fact ranked next to Hungary as a fledgling democracy. MacLean comments that these contrived dynamics put voters in a "constant state of fear, anger and agitation."

Listening to this and having read her prophetic book, Democracy in Chains (2018), I can easily see the power plays of the 88th Texas Legislature through this lens. She cogently explains how this represents a well-orchestrated, decades-long, agenda by a highly extremist radical right to seize power.



She rests this agenda at the feet of the Koch Donor Network that she says consists of close to 700 donors "determined to make the world to their liking." 

Within this network are ostensibly autonomous organizations like the Cato Institute, the Heritage Foundation, the American Legislative Exchange Council, the Federalist Society and others. Big oil is also a large part of this group which helps keep the horrible lie that climate change isn't real alive.

What they collectively seek is unfettered capitalism free of regulations that converts existence to a market where the best education—or other services one can get—is the best one can buy. Say no to vouchers and ESAs!

For this to prevail, consent must get engineered. Here is where citizens' very consciousness comes into play. Hence, we witness the attack on the schools to keep teachers feeling vulnerable and weakened. Book bans and other attacks on curriculum are part of the playbook, as well as a weakening of faculty governance at the higher education level such as through a limiting or ending tenure, DEI, and "woke curriculum" that faculty teach.

A message to all professors: Our silence does not protect us!

For Ethnic Studies advocates in K-12, we've not even been able to get House Bill 45 out of committee for a hearing this legislative session! At least during the last 2021 legislative session, the exact same bill came out of both houses and landed just shy of the governor's desk, but Republicans decided to debate CRT instead of Ethnic Studies. None of this is coincidental, but rather contrived. And what is so unfortunate is how black, brown, and white youth could benefit equally from a curriculum that sheds light on intergroup histories, tensions, and solidarity throughout history. This curriculum is, in fact, a helpful antidote to the white nationalist ideologies that find fertile ground in the legislated ignorance that itself has a long history as I myself have documented in my own work (Valenzuela, 2021). 

It should therefore come as no surprise that some Latinos and other people of color, succumb to such ideologies when they've been deprived of curriculum and pedagogy that speaks to theirs', as well as others' experiences. Someday, by the way, Ethnic Studies will just get called "a good education,."

I am reminded of Herman and Chomsky's (2010) notion of a manufacturing of consent—through whitewashed books and curriculum that are designed to keep our youth in the dark regarding the actual truths of history. Doing so is less easy these days compared to earlier times when folks didn't have access to the Internet. And not just that, but there has been an evolution of consciousness itself—to which so much of the intrigue surrounding Gen Z attests (Twenge, 2023)

Still, right-wing trolls and websites spread all manner of disinformation that, as MacLean expresses, is referred to by some  as the "Outrage Industry." This works to make people feel scared and defensive—especially of the "other"—like they are under siege.

Might we not even link a general sense of malaise to this that manifests in so many ways, including domestic abuse and gun violence—both of which are empirically linked?

If you're in Texas right now, this has been quite the session, so incredibly hostile to our transgender youth, drag queens, immigrants, gun safety advocates, women that seek abortions, and minorities—atop existing campaigns that seek to limit the vote, ban books, curriculum, along with eliminating tenure, diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and initiatives at the higher education level.  

These agendas do not come from the people. Most families are worried about the economy, want greater security and gun safety laws. They are concerned about the grid, desirous of great public schools, concerned about debilitating student debt, and greater access and funding support for their children's pursuit of higher education. 

Simultaneously, and not trivially, we are also all observing the shift to a multiracial/multiethnic democracy. Instead of leading on these changes, including a furthering of diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and initiatives, those in power are seizing not just power, but a white chauvinist, culturally supremacist vision of society where wealth and power are concentrated in the hands of the few.

My, how that is so NOT a winning strategy in a state that is only becoming more, not less, diverse!

It was clear that there were "a thousand fires" that we had to put out this legislative session. We were correct in understanding that the purpose was in part ideological, but also designed to fragment or weaken us as an advocacy community. What MacLean allows us to consider is that fragmentation and polarization under the auspices of the so-called "culture wars," is part of a much larger scheme that attaches to oligarchy where a small group of people hold most of the power.

We should all find it disturbing, as a manifestation of white supremacy, Alabama Congressman Tommy Tuberville's recent statements that white nationalists are as entitled to the military as anybody else when an ethical and moral stance would have been to state instead that they should all be removed. The clear danger in this as MacLean outlines, is the development of factions within the military that could lead to a divided military about which U.S. generals have already openly expressed concerns. I encourage all to see this video on Extremism in the Military.

Solutions? We definitely need to get dark money out of politics. This requires a lot of grassroots mobilizing in order to protect election integrity. To promote democratic processes and democracy itself, we need leaders that are prepared to do the hard work of challenging the well-heeled ecosystem of a right-wing outrage industry, and bringing down the tone and frenetic noise of (un)civil discourse and highly partisan politics, while they're at it.

Let's ourselves remember, as Ghandi once said, that we ourselves need to be the change that we want to see in the world. We shouldn't ourselves be polarizing. Admittedly, when the house is on fire, it's hard to not be a bit upset about that. Yet, if we see this as part of an anti-democratic strategy to concentrate wealth and power in the hands of the few, it becomes important to manifest the opposite of what extremists want to see. After all, chaos, disorder, and division among the masses serve their agenda as MacLean well explains.

I spoke yesterday evening with my soon-to-be 11-year-old grandson and 4-year old granddaughter about guns and violence, news of which they cannot possibly be immune, even as small children. Without a doubt, they not only hear things, but they have their own opinions.

I shared that as opposed to speaking from our fear or anger, how we need to speak from our hearts so that we can be peaceful and still in the storm that surrounds us. The heart reminds us of love, care and compassion, I said. Yes, the storm is all around us and we may sometimes feel small and scared. Maybe what we all have to do, I told them, is to be the calm vessel in the ocean. We cannot control the ocean, but we ourselves be calm. And then our vessel connects with other vessels that also want to be calm. And we do this with our parents, families and communities and we build a new and better world in this way.

My granddaughter was stoked by the conversation and wanted to know more about the heart. She shared that she drew a picture for me, her grandma, to let me know how much she loves me—as well as another for her mother. I told her that the heart is love, caring, kindness, and compassion and that I couldn't be happier and looked forward to getting her drawing. Yep, being a grandma is awesome.

I really do think that most people are good and that we want to live in peace—not just with each other, but also with our Earth mother. I also think, and science has shown, that we are super-collaborators as a species. I see this all the time in the university classroom. Hence, despite the challenges there is much reason to be hopeful.

However we all walk away from this legislative session, we're all entitled to our emotions, but let's not at all succumb to cynicism or despair. If you do, you empower those in power that hold ill will toward you and your community and want to elicit this from you and me as a sign of achieving their aims.

Pathetic, but true and that's what MacLean underscores in her talk.

Those of us who advocated this session on behalf of our children, youth, and  communities—and we were many—enjoyed a sense of solidarity-building, love, and commitment to a more just, caring and inclusive world where all enjoy and deserve a sense of dignity and belonging. 

I am excited about this world that we are building from the ashes of legislative animus. At all cost, we must hold onto that vision. It is abundantly clear to me that we possess all the resources, talent, and wherewithal to prevail such that the solution remains the same: Organize, organize, organize.

I am so proud of our young people. From where I stand, there was a palpable growth in our grassroots organizations and a fresh, post-pandemic energy of a new generation of young, driven activists and leaders. In contrast to Republicans' false, even weird, narrative of DEI initiatives creating divisions, ours is a positive, hopeful—yes, diverse, equitable, and inclusive—vision for the future.

Ours is not at all about division—but rather a coming together as a rich tapestry of intersectional, intergenerational, multi-ethnic, socioeconomic, and racial diversity, enunciating democratic principles like fairness, openness, transparency, due process, academic freedom, as well as the value and hard work of diversity, equity and inclusion. 

It is in this very circumstance and context that we organized just such a group that calls itself Black Brown Dialogues on Policy. We call on Black and Brown unity and coalition building for the expressed purpose of addressing policy concerns and possibilities that we hold in common—and there are many. We use the terms "Black" and "Brown" in order to not lose half of our group by using labels (like "Latinx" or "African American" vs. "Black," etc.) that get in the way of the kinds of things that we need to work on together as similarly-situated communities with histories of coalition building and knowing, always, that there is more that unites than divides us. In the interest of clarity, "black and brown" is for us a large tent inclusive of all genders, socioeconomic classes, racial and ethnic groups, as well as white allies.

Our membership also consists of an aggrieved humanity, most particularly, the Uvalde families advocating for reform. Now we add Allen, Texas, to a growing list of casualties whose deaths should not be in vain. I hope that Gov. Abbott signs into law the bill that will raise the age limit to 21 for any person to be able to purchase a high-powered weapon. I hope vouchers don't pass and that our state leaders open their eyes and see the U.S.-Mexico border as the humanitarian crisis that it is.

It's not easy, but we do win when we hold onto the core of who we are and don't become the polarizing, divisive, or violent force that oligarchs want us to become. 

Do listen to Dr. MacLean. Her analysis not only masterfully connects the dots, but is prophetic. Forewarned is forearmed.

Happy Mother's Day, everybody! 

-Angela Valenzuela

References

ABC News. (2020). Examining Extremism in the Military. Retrieved: 

Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2010). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Random House.


Twenge, J. M. (2023). Generations: The Real Differences Between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents—and What They Mean for America's Future. Simon and Schuster.

Valenzuela, A. (2021). Decolonizing Citizenship: The Movement for Ethnic Studies in Texas. In Pratt, M., Gonzales, P., & Rosaldo, R. (Eds.) Trumpism, Mexican America, and the Struggle for Latinx Citizenship. Santa Fe: University of New Mexico Press.

Saturday, February 25, 2023

How Democracy Can Win: The Right Way to Counter Autocracy by Samantha Power

The gist of this piece by Samantha Power in Foreign Affairs is in this quote: "We must break down the wall that separates democratic advocacy from economic development." Short of this, the rise of autocratic leaders and governments will stand in the policy gap. Such governments may improve living standards albeit at the expense of civil liberties and freedom, particularly "digital authoritarianism" comprised of surveillance and oppressive control over the populace, including what should be a free press and voting rights.

Power recommends forming coalitions that expand beyond the usual cast of characters and policy makers advocating for democracy while also showing through civil society that democracy delivers. 

Thoughtful piece by Powers. Democracy is indeed fragile, but winnable.

-Angela Valenzuela 

How Democracy Can Win

The Right Way to Counter Autocracy

Wednesday, March 10, 2021

Democracy is at Risk, but Stacey Abrams Has a Plan

It should concern is deeply that democracy is at risk with over 100 bills aimed at restricting voting getting filed and making their way through their state legislatures (see CNN report). As we know, the right to vote impacts lawmakers, lawmaking, and everything pertinent to a democracy. 

The formidable voting rights advocate, Stacey Abrams, has a plan and I hope it works.  Thanks to Dr. Bettina Love for sharing.

-Angela Valenzuela 

#votingrights #democracy #DemocracyVision #votingrightsforall #VotingRights #voting


Stacey Abrams Has a Plan to Dismantle the Filibuster and Protect Voting Rights

And she thinks it can get support from reluctant centrist Democrats.

by Ari Berman


Stacey Abrams speaks at campaign event for Rev. Raphael Warnock in Atlanta on November 3.Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP Images

Fight disinformation. Get the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

As Republicans in the Georgia state legislature passed a series of voting restrictions over the past 10 days, Stacey Abrams, the state’s leading voting rights activist, saw an ever more pressing need to reform the filibuster in the US Senate. And she has a plan for how to do it.

The Georgia legislation and the Senate rules might seem unrelated, but to Abrams, the Democratic gubernatorial nominee in 2018 and founder of the voting rights group Fair Fight Action, they’re directly connected. “Republicans are rolling back the clock on voting rights,” she says. “And the only way to head that off is to invoke the elections clause of the Constitution, which allows the Congress—and the Congress alone—to set the time, place and manner of elections at a federal level.”

The problem is that Republicans will surely use the filibuster to set an impossible 60-vote threshold for any such effort—and that two centrist Democratic senators, West Virginia’s Joe Manchin and Arizona’s Kyrsten Sinema, have said they oppose abolishing the filibuster. That’s why Abrams proposes tweaking it to allow major voting rights legislation to pass, and she thinks her plan can get reluctant Democrats on board. 

In the same way that Democrats can pass budget bills and confirm judges and Cabinet members with a simple majority, legislation protecting voting rights should also be exempt from the 60-vote requirement, Abrams says.  

“The judicial appointment exception, the Cabinet appointment exception, the budget reconciliation exception, are all grounded in this idea that these are constitutionally prescribed responsibilities that should not be thwarted by minority imposition,” she says. “And we should add to it the right to protect democracy. It is a foundational principle in our country. And it is an explicit role and responsibility accorded only to Congress in the elections clause in the Constitution.”

PODCAST

 

I spoke to Abrams on Monday, just hours before the Georgia Senate repealed no-excuse absentee voting, part of a series of bills passed in recent days to restrict voting rights that Abrams called “Jim Crow in a suit and tie.”

But neither bill will pass the Senate if Democrats don’t eliminate the filibuster, which Abrams calls “a racist procedural rule that is grounded in this notion that the minority must be protected unless we disagree with what the minority needs.”

Abrams testified before the House in late February in favor of HR 1, the most ambitious democracy reform billsince the Voting Rights Act, which would boost voting access through policies like automatic and Election Day registration, early voting, and expanded voting by mail. “It’s the reform we need that will provide protection, provide a foundational level of access, regardless of your geography,” she says. She also urged passage of another House proposal, the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, which would require states with a history of discrimination to once again get federal approval for any changes to voting laws and procedures, after the Supreme Court struck down this requirement from the 1965 Voting Rights Act in 2013. The measure is needed, she says, “to make certain we don’t watch [voting rights] be butchered or eviscerated.”

I asked Abrams what she would say to Democrats like Manchin and Sinema to persuade them to go along with a “democracy exception” to the filibuster.

“This isn’t about retribution or revenge,” Abrams says. “This is about protection of the fundamentals of our nation, that if we do not protect the participation of voters in our election system, if we do not permit states to do what they must to protect their voters, then we will find ourselves losing our democratic values, losing our democracy. And so I would say to Democrats who are hesitant that short of completely revising the filibuster, we have to make certain that a minority of people cannot be in power in the Senate, and therefore deny the basic principles of citizenship to millions of Americans.”

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) has floated a similar idea, and an increasing number of Democratic senators are now expressing openness to eliminating the filibuster, especially for bills like HR 1. 

“I would get rid of the filibuster,” Amy Klobuchar, the chair of the Senate Rules Committee and a member of the Senate Democratic leadership, told me on March 3, when the House passed HR 1. “I have favored filibuster reform for a long time and now especially for this critical election bill.”

Manchin said on Sunday he’s open to changes to the filibuster, such as forcing Republicans to continuously occupy the Senate floor to block bills. And if Republicans keep passing restrictions on the right to vote, a proposal like Abrams’ could start to find a broader consensus.


Saturday, September 26, 2020

Surveillance in an Era of Pandemic and Protest: Landmark Conversation with Naomi Klein, Shoshana Zuboff & Simone Browne

Friends:

I strongly urge you to listen to this landmark conversation with "Shock Doctrine" author, Naomi Klein, Shoshana Zuboff, author of "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism," and Simone Browne, author of "Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness."
It's chock-full of really good, if startling, information on how our privacy is violated, abetted by our sense of resignation. For instance check out this transcript of much of what Shoshana Zuboff shared:

A novel development now is how with technology, students' homes become the new site for the playing out of the school-to-prison pipeline. Read the write-up below and listen to this very powerful and timely conversation.

-Angela Valenzuela


As this summer of pandemic and racial justice protests draws to a close, Naomi Klein will host a landmark conversation between Shoshana Zuboff, author of "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism," and Simone Browne, author of "Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness." The three authors will discuss how both governments and tech giants are using our moment of overlapping crises to push through discredited surveillance technologies that threaten privacy, democracy, and any hope of equality.
Early in the pandemic, Klein wrote that these forces have aligned to “advance a vision of a future in which our every move, our every word, our every relationship is trackable, traceable, and data-mineable.” For the privileged, “almost everything is home delivered, either virtually via streaming and cloud technology, or physically via driverless vehicle or drone.”
But, Zuboff warns, “We’re not necessarily locked into this deterministic narrative that too many pundits are hawking and the tech companies are salivating over — that post-Covid-19, we’re going to have comprehensive biosurveillance of all of society. ... People are worried. People are asking questions.”
Racial justice movements are also winning major victories against surveillance technologies like facial recognition. And as Browne reminds us, “surveillance is nothing new to Black folks.” In "Dark Matters," Browne traces modern surveillance practices back to the policing of Black lives under slavery, comparing the branding of slaves to present-day methods of tracking, surveilling, and commodifying people.
In this live conversation, Klein, Zuboff, and Browne will unpack the dangers of surveillance capitalism — and how we can rise to this crisis and create a fair and equitable future.
In partnership with Rutgers University–New Brunswick.
Subscribe to our channel:
https://interc.pt/subscribe
#TheMiningOfTheSelf  #DigitalCommons #Unionize

Saturday, September 05, 2020

When We Warn You About Authoritarianism, We’re Not Kidding. Here’s What it’s Really Like by Umair Haque

Umair Haque, originally from Pakistan, warns us about just how precious our democracy is and how a second term for Trump will lead us further down the path of authoritarianism—as many have, of course, warned.  His first-person account  describes in chilling detail what life under authoritarian rule means. 

Forewarned is forearmed.  Let's all vote in November.

If you're in Texas, go to this link in order to Vote By Mail. I also encourage you to go to this Turbovote.org website that verifies your voter registration status and sets you up to get SMS texts to your cell phone related to voting in the next election. 

-Angela Valenzuela

What’s Life Like Under Authoritarianism? Worse Than You Imagine, and Closer Than You Think.


By now, it should be plain to see that America’s at a moment of extreme peril. It is one small step — a stolen election, a thwarted one, shock troops in the streets, militiamen executing people for political reasons in the streets — from full-blown authoritarian collapse that lasts a generation or more.

So what is life like in an authoritarian state like? We survivors keep warning you “real” Americans, who have been lucky enough to have never experienced such a thing. But because “real” Americans have never experienced life under authoritarianism, under fascism, those very warnings seem hard to grasp, difficult to process, strange and alien. I feel we survivors haven’t made our warnings concrete enough. So here is what life is like in an authoritarian-fascist state.

(When I say “real” Americans, by the way, I mean something like the white Americans, who, because their grandparents immigrated a few decades before ours, feel the need to ask, “but where are you really from?” I put it in quotes because, of course, we are all real Americans. Or are we?)

I received my first death threat when I was at the ripe old age of 14 years. It wasn’t like you think — some chubby basement-dwelling dork with fists about as dangerous as pillows says he’ll kill you on Twitter. This one came from seriously violent men in organised groups, wings calling themselves militias, carrying machine`guns, whose only real job it was to kill people who had crossed the line. I was still just a kid — but I’d crossed a line, and now the fascists wanted me dead. I was on their list of people to murder now — and people on that list tended to die gruesome deaths. Yes, really.

It happened like this. There isn’t much to do in authoritarian states — I’ll come back to that — so I became the science writer of a noted paper. Yes, that’s a little strange for a kid, but in authoritarian states, education isn’t valued, and neither is science, much less writing about either. So there I was. My job basically consisted of taking articles from functioning societies, which had a thing called science — we weren’t allowed to, because the fanatics would kill you over it — and publishing them, for what audience we had.

I tried to make it fun — I was a kid, after all. So I came up with weekly science quizzes. I wasn’t totally insufferable — mostly, I was a teenage punk, but we’ll come back to that, too. My science quizzes were a big hit. Because they poked fun at the authoritarians. Who believes dinosaurs never existed? A) the fanatics B) Charles Darwin C) Albert Einstein D) Meteors. Who believes science is more dangerous than an AK-47? Lol. You can see why the fanatics were getting a little hot under the Nazi collar, and sent the Nazis after me.

Now, I took great pride in my little quizzes. I’d go to parties, and all the grown-ups would laugh uproariously, deliriously, at them. I was too young to get: mostly because I was saying what they were afraid to say out loud. But there was a good reason they were afraid, and I was about to learn it.

One day, the office received a hand-written letter addressed to me. Umair, we’re going to kill you, you bastard heathen. And so on. Signed, the Army of the Pure. I laughed. The Army of the Pure? LOL. But nobody was laughing. There was pin drop silence in the office. And so even fourteen year old me knew this was somehow very bad news. They were, I understood, the guys who rode around on motorbikes executing people in broad daylight with machine guns. People like me. People who believed in science and democracy and truth, but not in heaven or hell or brutality or hate — and were foolish enough to say it out loud.

So I got assigned a bodyguard. There I am, a fourteen year old punk with green hair…and a bodyguard. I didn’t even take all that seriously. Until one day, we were driving home, and we came to a roaring surging, shouting crowd on a street. Another thing par for the course in authoritarian societies. Not of peace-makers — of raging fanatics, of fascists. Look at these fools, I said, rolling my eyes. Shush, said my bodyguard. This was serious. Because they were about to notice me. At that instant, they did.

And then all hell broke loose.


Sunday, July 28, 2019

Republican "Commie Lovers" are Selling "American Politics to Dictators and Communists"


Mitch McConnell recently blocked two bipartisan bills in the U.S. Senate that would have helped protect American elections from foreign interference. Joy Reid and MSNBC analyst Malcolm Nance discuss this, plus Robert Mueller’s testimony before Congress during which he said Russia is continuing its elections interference campaign.


Friends,

What is happening in our country in American politics right now puts our democracy at risk.  That's why we all need to vote, every single person in the next presidential election—and in all elections, of course.  We must protect the attack on our democracy.

Link to book
Mitch McConnell—dubbed "Moscow Mitch" by Morning Joe's Joe Scarborough—is demonstrably not interested in stopping Russian interference in our elections.  Why else did he block two bipartisan bills aimed at protecting our election process from foreign interference? 

Posted above is a must-listen to analysis by Malcolm Nance, MSNBC analyst and author of the 2019 book, The Plot to Destroy Democracy: How Putin and His Spies Are Undermining America and Dismantling the West. 

You should listen to this episode but let me highlight this transcribed exchange.

MN: This is not just voter suppression. We may have a circumstance where the electoral process is directly attacked. Where foreign actors, whether it's North Korean intelligence, which has a very robust cyber -warfare capability, and it's in their interest to keep Donald Trump in office, the Chinese, or again, Vladimir Putin and his entire Russian organ. The Republican Party defends them. They do not stand for the Constitution of the United States. And if they attack this election, it may be the last free and fair election that we go into which may come out with a corrupt result, which could fracture this nation.
 JR: Let’s just do a little scaring is caring, as we like to say. Give us, if the next election is intervened in not just by Russia but maybe by North Korea, maybe by China, maybe by many other autocracies that would like to do business with Donald Trump. Number one, give us what that scenario could look like. Give us our worst-case scenario. What does that look like if our elections are no longer just between Americans and other Americans?
 MN: This could be bad. And I don’t say that with any measure of hyperbole. My entire life has been boiled down to, my career goals were, intentions of our enemies and warnings, giving you—and I am not joking when I say this could be the last free and fair election in American history. 
In short, Mitch McConnell wants Russia to interfere again in our elections because it will help Trump, the Republican party, and himself to retain power.  Oh my how power can be a corrupting influence—and to think that in the larger scheme of things, that McConnell would sell the country down the river for so little than his precious incumbency.  But then white nationalist identity is obviously also that compelling...
It's hard to argue against Nance who refers cogently to McConnell and his party as "commie lovers."  Nance calls out appropriately how terribly undemocratic and anti-American it is to sell out American politics to dictators and communists to serve the interests of the "white, male tribe."  
That is why we are supposed to have checks and balances.  At this point, if impeachment proceedings don't take care of matters, the electoral process is our last and only defense—which is precisely that which is under attack.
History will not be kind either to McConnell or his commie-loving party. 

Amy McGrath
Do listen to this close to 15-minute interview and get motivated not just to vote, but to get out the vote in the next election.  Mark your calendars right now for Tuesday, November 3, 2020.
In the meantime, consider lending your support to Democrat Amy McGrath who announced earlier this month that she's running against McConnell for Kentucky’s Senate seat.  And this isn't about supporting a democrat as opposed to a republican.   
What's happening right now on our watch should appall us all.  Rather, this is about saving and preserving our democracy.
Just say "No!"  Neither the American electoral or political system are for sale!

-Angela Valenzuela

#MoscowMitch #CommieLovers

"He is aiding & abetting Putin’s ongoing attempts to subvert U.S. democracy, according to the Republican FBI, CIA, DNI…All Republicans are saying Russia is trying to subvert U.S. democracy & Moscow Mitch won’t even let the Senate take a vote on it. That is un-American.--@JoeNBC

19.1K people are talking about this