Translate

Showing posts with label MAGA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MAGA. Show all posts

Monday, September 08, 2025

The MAGA kids are not all White: Tokenizing Black Conservatism

Friends:

The Washington Post’s profile of CJ Pearson’s “Cruel Kids Summer” party shows how Trumpism is being rebranded: young, multiracial, and “fun.” Designer suits, corporate sponsorships, and celebrity cameos make MAGA look like the new cool—and, as Jesús Rodríguez reports, even Meta footed the bill for at least one of these lavish spectacles.

One can’t help but wonder if any of these young conservatives ever sat through a serious course on African American history. Because behind the velvet blazers and Soulja Boy performances is an administration dismantling DEI, gutting civil rights enforcement, deporting immigrants, and rewriting history to soften slavery. The paradox is glaring: MAGA demonizes diversity while using Black conservatives as cultural cover for White nationalist policies.

This isn’t representation—it’s tokenization. And it plays out the same with Black or Latino conservatives, many of whom are derided for aligning with a party that has inflicted such harshness on their communities.

The dynamic is clear: powerful actors are weaponizing culture to normalize injustice. Educators, activists, and communities must call this out and create spaces where justice—not spectacle—defines the future.

-Angela Valenzuela


The MAGA kids are not all White

A new generation of young, Black conservatives is trying to gain sway within Trump’s GOP. They have some ideas for how to keep the party going.


Pro-Trump politico CJ Pearson, center, poses with attendees of his “Cruel Kids Summer” party in July.
(Photos by Maxine Wallace/The Washington Post)



CJ Pearson was perched atop a set of stairs, overlooking a crowd of hundreds, in a massive lofted apartment near H Street NE on a sweltering July afternoon. He wore a bone-colored suit from Suitsupply, looking like he was aboard a Biscayne Bay cruise. He yelled into a microphone as the guests — a collage of congressional staffers, conservative content creators and assorted Washington arrivistes, all dressed in white — erupted in cheers.

Pearson was throwing this party, called “Cruel Kids Summer,” as a burlesque of a New York magazine cover story from January that had included a photo from Pearson’s inauguration weekend party with the headline “THE CRUEL KIDS’ TABLE.” Six months later, Pearson was still miffed about the fact that the reporter had said that “almost everyone” in the new young conservative scene was White, that the cover photo from his party depicted a nearly all-White tableau — and that he, a Black man, had not been interviewed. “The media accused me of throwing an all-White party,” he told his guests at another point, later in the afternoon, exaggerating. “So we threw an ALL. WHITE. PARTY.”

President Donald Trump’s Washington faces a problem right now, in his opinion: too many receptions, not enough parties.

Pearson, 23, is a party guy; at the University of Alabama, he pledged Theta Chi and left with a firm grasp of how a bad gender ratio can mess up the vibe. Of Republican events, he says, “it’s always like, 70 percent men, 30 percent women, which is not even fun for the girls at that point.” He can often be spotted at social gatherings around town sporting a red velvet blazer.

He’s a new presence in the capital, but also a very old one: an ambitious young scenester who seems to be counting down the years before he is eligible to run for Congress. Formally, he’s a consultant. He is also a prolific poster, with social feeds calling diversity, equity and inclusion efforts a “disease” and arguing that Trump’s recent deployment of federal troops in D.C. will “save countless black lives.” And he is one of several Black MAGA figures vying for status and influence in the aftermath of an election in which Trump, long seen as an avatar of the White working class, returned to power on the strength of a more diverse coalition. This has inspired a new and hopeful belief on the right: that Trumpism is now youthful, sexy, multiracial. And fun.

The Cruel Kids Summer party was being sponsored by Meta, Pearson said, and held at a brick-walled loft apartment building owned by child-actor-turned-crypto-entrepreneur Brock Pierce, who rented the space to Pearson. (The event will end up costing $80,000, though Pearson didn’t say how much of that Meta covered, and the company did not respond to requests for comment.) Soulja Boy was scheduled to perform. Pearson said he expected Kash Patel, the FBI director, to stop by. Before entering the loft, guests were offered cans of fruit-punch-flavored hard seltzer, which were chilled but somehow went down warm. Inside, there were issues of Foreign Affairs magazine, a box labeled “horse medicine supply,” a shelf with books about Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and whatappeared to be a taxidermied bison wearing a white “Make America Party Again” hat — one of 375 Pearson had made for the occasion.

On a wall of a sitting room, there was a painting of Pierce wearing an orange fedora. Real-life Pierce was also there, wearing a real-life orange fedora. He described the apartment’s decor as a mix of Americana and “steampunk.” He gestured at a giant chandelier. “From the Waldorf Astoria in New York,” he said over blaring Euroclub music. “Mr. Saxobeat” blended, somehow, into “Billie Jean.” Upstairs, past a security guard checking wristbands, there was a lofted area, where Pearson’s friends, such as Xaviaer DuRousseau, an on-camera personality for PragerU, and Janiyah Thomas, the Trump 2024 campaign’s Black media director, were lounging.

Janiyah Thomas, left, at Pearson’s party, where the dress code called for all-white attire.

Janiyah Thomas, left, at Pearson’s party, where the dress code called for all-white attire.

What appeared to be a taxidermied bison at Pearson’s party sports a “Make America Party Again” hat.

DuRousseau is 28 and would love to become “the right-wing Oprah” or “a conservative combination of Dr. Phil and Wendy Williams.” Born in Chicago and raised in rural Illinois, he now lives the upscale cosmopolitan life of a modern content creator in Los Angeles, sipping Erewhon smoothies and posting videos to his more than 500,000 Instagram followers on topics such as Juneteenth (“There is no such thing as a Black Independence Day, but if that’s what you wanna call Juneteenth, then I don’t wanna see y’all twerking on a boat on July Fourth”) and the recent American Eagle ad campaign with actor Sydney Sweeney (“Hot White people, this is your sign to stop being ashamed of your Caucasian excellence”). At the party, he was wearing a cream camp-collar knit shirt and rectangular shades, carrying a miniature electric fan. “There’s so much opportunity for me here to get involved more in consulting,” DuRousseau said a few days later, pondering his future over an iced almond matcha latte. (Maybe he’ll go to business school? He’s not sure.) He was setting up networking coffees with people here in D.C. so he can get more into policy work.

Thomas was sitting at a sofa in the VIP section, under a skylight, in a strapless white top and white boot-cut pants. She is also a consultant, and she says she is working with a criminal justice reform group, a company in the sports-betting world and a celebrity. (She doesn’t say which.) Thomas, 27, also recently competed in the Miss District of Columbia pageant as Miss Penn Quarter and is planning to start apodcast on politics and culture soon. She’s not a big poster or party person, but she does see the value in trying to influence politics through culture. One thing the GOP needs, in her view: more Black surrogates making the case for their party anywhere a camera is pointing, the way Symone Sanders or Al Sharpton frequently appear on MSNBC. “They don’t shut up. And they never go away. And Republicans need to be doing that,” she told us later.

Thomas grew up in what she describes as a liberal family in Fort Mill,South Carolina, but her views shifted as she read up on Black political thought at the University of South Carolina. She was struck by Malcolm X’s admonitions about two-faced White liberals — that they can pretend to be allies to Black people but at the end of the day are seeking power just like conservatives.

“At least with Republicans,” Thomas said, “you know what you’re getting.”

Like Pearson, Thomas and DuRousseau see Trump’s gains with Black voters — 15 percent in 2024, up from 8 percent in 2020, according to a study by the Pew Research Center — as a potential turning point for Republicans. DuRousseau says he believes that people in the Black community have been “brainwashed” to think that they must support the left. Barack Obama, Thomas says, “made the chokehold even tighter.” But with rappers like Soulja Boy coming out and performing at conservative events, DuRousseau thinks more like-minded Black people will feel encouraged to join the party, so to speak. “It’s simply a domino effect,” he says.

In this version of the story of the Trump 2.0 coalition, Pearson and his pals are not just savvy young politicos partying on the dime of a tech company. They are the vanguard of a new GOP — a party that managed, at least this past November, to pull out of its demographic death spiral by appealing to a younger, less monochromatic generation of Americans.

Right-wing political commentator Dom Lucre attends the “Cruel Kids Summer” party.
A partygoer and his eyewear.

Thomas, left, with conservative content creators Jasmine Woodson and Xaviaer DuRousseau at Pearson’s party.

“They’re showing people that being a young conservative doesn’t just mean you’re out in the middle of the country, like, working on a cornfield,” says Annemarie Wiley, a former cast member on “The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” who now makes conservative content.

“We’ve got to build a tent,” Pearson says several days before the party, over lemonade at Ned’s Club, a swank downtown spot where he is a member, “because there are no more White voters for us to get.” Before MAGA came along, he explained, “it was a faux pas” to identify as Republican. “It was cheugy. It wasn’t fun. And I think that we’re doing all we can to rework that narrative and rebrand it.” (Did we mention he’s a consultant?)

“It was cool to vote for Obama in 2008. It was really cool to vote for that guy,” says Harry Sisson, a Democratic content creator who frequently spars with Pearson online. “It was cool to vote for Biden in 2020, and Republicans have, unfortunately, I think, swung that back to them.”

Raven Schwam-Curtis, a Chicago-based creator who was part of a cadre of influencers attending the Democratic National Convention last year, sees figures like DuRousseau and Pearson as using the subversiveness of being Black and Republican to position themselves as the new cool kids. “What they’re doing is the equivalent of ‘We’re not like the other girls,’” she says, making it clear she’s opposed to their message. “It’s essentially a rebranding of the hipster thing: ‘Most Black people vote for Democrats, but I’m voting for Republicans, and here’s why you should listen to my deviation from the norm, because, actually, you’ve been duped.’”

At 4:12 p.m., Soulja Boy, wearing a white Polo Ralph Lauren jacket, emerged to his 2008 hit “Turn My Swag On.” Other Pearson bashes have featured Waka Flocka Flame, who posted in support of Trump for president during the campaign, and Kodak Black, whose nearly four-year prison sentence Trump commuted in 2021. Soulja Boy was wearing sunglasses and holding what looked like a thick blunt between his fingers. It was not his first rodeo in Trump’s Washington. The rapper, now in his mid-30s, performed at the Crypto Ball over inauguration weekend. Afterward, he explained that the organizers paid him “a bag” and remarked that Trump, unlike Obama or Kamala Harris, put money in his pockets.


Soulja Boy didn’t make any political statements, and he didn’t respond to a shouted question about his feelings on MAGA. What he did do was perform “Crank That (Soulja Boy)” while Thomas, DuRousseau and Pearson (who was 4 years old when the song came out) danced along with their other friends. (Most of the other guests did not Crank That.)Later, having done his job and presumably gotten his bag — Pearson wouldn’t share Soulja Boy’s fee, citing a nondisclosure agreement — the rapper departed the gig wearing a white “Make America Party Again” hat.

In national politics, Black conservatives have “the hardest line to walk,” says Jennifer DeCasper, executive director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee. A former longtime aide to Sen. Tim Scott (R-South Carolina), DeCasper hired Thomas to Scott’s short-lived 2024 presidential campaign and became a mentor. DeCasper hasn’t been to one of Pearson’s parties — “I probably have never been invited because I’m too old, frankly, and not cool enough,” she said in an interview — but she does seem to understand the need to undo the stigma of belonging to a supposedly White party. “No Black person wants to lose their Black card, right?” she said. “When we get pushback from our brothers and sisters, it hurts. Even if we think the policy that we are advocating for is correct, we don’t want to lose our Black cards.”

Thomas remembers being “in tears” after Trump, speaking at a conference of Black journalists during the campaign, suggested that Harris was using her racial identity in an opportunistic way — that his Democratic opponent suddenly “made a turn” and “became a Black person” after she spent years promoting her Indian heritage, in his words. “And you know what?” Thomas said, “I went on TV the next morning and I defended it, because he didn’t say nothing that Black Twitter ain’t been saying. … He gets the culture.”

Donald Trump defeated Kamala Harris with stronger-than-usual support from non-White voters. (Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post)

What kind of culture is Trump promoting with his policies, now that he’s back in office? While Trump has signed executive orders supporting HBCUs and establishing a White House initiative on those institutions, his Education Department has targeted colleges that engage in diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. The administration has sought to wipe those initiatives from every other corner of the federal government, too, and it has ended temporary legal protections for immigrants from Haiti and Cameroon. At the Justice Department, the civil rights division has shifted from combating racial discrimination against minorities to combating “woke ideology.” The White House has ordered a sweeping review of eight museums, including the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and last month the president criticized the Smithsonian for focusing too much on “how bad Slavery was.”

DuRousseau has some notes for his fellow conservatives. “Calling everything DEI: That needs to go,” he said. He pointed to an episode earlier this year, when an article about Jackie Robinson’s military service briefly disappeared from a Defense Department website amid a purge of content promoting DEI. Questioning the success of every hardworking Black person, he said, “just feels racist at that point.”

The “Cruel Kids Summer” party was named as an ironic allusion to a magazine headline from earlier this year.

A week after the party, Pearson, DuRousseau and Thomas all spoke at a conference for Black conservatives — which Thomas helped organize — at a Hilton in Alexandria, Virginia. There were fewer people in the ballroom than there had been at the loft, but enthusiasm for the Trump presidency was high. Various panelists cheered the administration’s willingness to consider reclassifying marijuana as less dangerous than other drugs at the federal level. Some warned about the danger of contraband vapes from China proliferating among Black youths. A formerly incarcerated man spoke with gratitude for the “opportunity” to be confined at a private prison owned by one of the conference’s sponsors.

Pearson came onstage for a “fireside chat” about “Gen Z and the age of influencers.” He had good news for his fellow Black conservatives.

“I’ve never seen so many celebrities who are so vocal about being pro-Trump and being Republican. You know, folks like Waka Flocka, Kodak Black, Soulja Boy,” he said, name-checking rappers that have performed at his own parties. (Soulja Boy’s publicist told us that the rapper supports Trump as he would support any president but is not a political person.) “… And so I think we’ve got to embrace culture. We got to reach America’s young people where they are, because our message is a winning message, but the only way that we’re actually going to get that message in front of them is if we actually send it their way.”

He thinks he’s helping with that. In August, Pearson launched Right Influence, a company that will work with conservative content creators. He says his group is working with MAGA-world clients such as the Heritage Foundation, the American Conservation Coalition and Rep. John James (R), a Michigan gubernatorial candidate. As for his own political future, Pearson may end up seeking a more traditional path of influence in Washington. “In three years, I’ll be 26,” he told us. “So that would be 20 — that’s 2028. So that’s a presidential election year. That’s also the earliest I could run for Congress.”

By his count, more than 450 people came to the “Cruel Kids Summer” party — even if Patel, the FBI director, did not end up showing. Pearson would like to host more of them in the future — his dream musical guest is Drake — but the only thing the event really reinforced, he said, is that he wants his future wife to plan their whole wedding. “I just want input on the guest list,” he said. “That’s all I need.” (He is single.)

All the Republicans need is for their newest guests to keep showing up to the party. And maybe also to bring a plus-one.

Jay Harold, 25, attends the July party.

A partygoer enjoys some McDonald’s.

From February to August, Pew clocked a small downturn in Trump’s support among Black Americans, and the future of the Trump coalition without Trump remains a question. But Pearson’s July bash had at least one person who was considering her feelings about MAGA, sitting near the exit.

Jaylen Isaac, a 27-year-old teacher in D.C., found out about Pearson’s party through her friends. She’s a liberal — the Democrats were all she knew growing up, she said — but she doesn’t want to base her political choices just on old traditions. Parties like Pearson’s were more realistic about whom they were catering to, she said. On a table in the kitchen, spilled-over french fries surrounded a mound of leftover McDonald’s burgers sitting in their wrappers. “They know that we like McDonald’s,” Isaac said. “They know that we like beer. They know that we like Drake.”

Republicans knew how to have fun without making people feel like misfits, she said.

“When you’re seeing people that you usually don’t see at certain parties,” she said, “it’s like, maybe things aren’t so bad, and maybe we are being blinded, and we need to actually come out and see what’s really going on.”

Dylan Wells contributed to this report.

CORRECTION. A previous version of this article incorrectly said that political consultant and conservative influencer CJ Pearson graduated from the University of Alabama. He left before graduating.



By Jesús RodríguezJesús Rodríguez is a political reporter in The Washington Post's Style section, with a focus on features and profiles.follow on Xjesusrodriguezb







Saturday, September 21, 2024

A GOP Gov’s Harsh Takedown of Trump and Vance Exposes MAGA’s Ugly Core

Friends:

Excellent response to Gov. Mike DeWine's New York Times piece that seeks to correct the record on the value that Haitian immigrants add to Springfield, Ohio. MAGA's "ugly core" is what is spotlighted here by Greg Sargent in The New Republic.

Sargent is on point when he expresses,
"The picture Trump is seizing on Springfield to invoke—that of a largely white, innocent heartland town getting ravaged by dark, alien hordes who basically constitute a subhuman species—simply cannot be a distraction from the immigration debate. To Trump, it is the immigration debate."
It's important to remember, as Sargent notes, that even if MAGA agree with Trump's and Vance's toxic, racist claims that for them are a political strategy, most Americans see this differently. A conversation we're having in Texas is that Gov. Abbott needs to prioritize education by funding our schools and stop sending Texans' hard-earned tax dollars to the border for political grandstanding. They're all cut from the same racist cloth that manifests as the dehumanization and disenfranchisement of Black and Brown people. 

As Gov. DeWine makes crystal clear, there is nothing to fear and everything to gain from the hard, honest contributions that Haitians and all immigrants contribute to our society.

-Angela Valenzuela

A GOP Gov’s Harsh Takedown of Trump and Vance Exposes MAGA’s Ugly Core

Finally, a top Republican calls on Trump to stop attacking Haitians, arguing that it’s politically backfiring. But Trump wants this debate to be as charged with hate and rage as possible.


Former President Donald Trump and Senator J.D. Vance in New York City on September 11

By 

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine has written a remarkable piece in The New York Times taking Donald Trump and J.D. Vance to task for their demagoguery about the Haitian influx into Springfield, a small city in the western part of the state. This is striking—it’s rare for a governor to criticize the top of his party’s ticket quite this publicly.
But DeWine’s piece is worth dwelling on for another reason: It lays bare an essential truth about the Springfield controversy, and why the MAGA movement has seized on it so fervently. For Trump and key elements of MAGA, Springfield is not really about border security, or the proper pace of legal immigration, or how best to assimilate new arrivals. Rather, it’s a stand-in for a subterranean argument about the desirable ethnoracial makeup of the American population.
In his piece, DeWine, a Republican, defends the decision to allow thousands of Haitians to move to this city of 60,000 people. He recaps arguments you’ve heard: The city badly needed workers, and Haitians are there legally to work. Many residents have welcomed the newcomers. Haitians have revitalized another Rust Belt city coping with postindustrial population decline.

DeWine also indicts Trump and Vance in surprisingly harsh terms for a Republican. “I am saddened by how they and others continue to repeat claims that lack evidence and disparage the legal migrants living in Springfield,” he writes, noting that their behavior “hurts the city and its people.” But another passage from DeWine merits attention:

The Biden administration’s failure to control the southern border is a very important issue that Mr. Trump and Mr. Vance are talking about and one that the American people are rightfully deeply concerned about. But their verbal attacks against these Haitians—who are legally present in the United States—dilute and cloud what should be a winning argument about the border.

There’s something quaint in DeWine’s assumption that this might move Trump and Vance. They may be right to draw attention to the Biden administration’s border mismanagement, DeWine suggests, but in attacking Haitians so viciously, they are allowing that argument to be tainted by intimations of cruelty and racism, alienating swing voters. Surely Trump and Vance will see the political error of their ways!

Yet this misses how Trump—and perhaps Vance, though this is murkier—really understands this issue. Trump actively wants the argument over immigration to be as charged with hate and rage as possible. He doesn’t think that will alienate swing voters. He thinks it will activate their latent MAGA tendencies. The picture Trump is seizing on Springfield to invoke—that of a largely white, innocent heartland town getting ravaged by dark, alien hordes who basically constitute a subhuman species—simply cannot be a distraction from the immigration debate. To Trump, it is the immigration debate.

An underappreciated difference between Trump and Vance is that Trump is explicit on that point, while Vance is not. Trump says that migrants are “poisoning the blood of our country,” that we should not let in people from “shithole countries” like Haiti, and that other countries are sending millions of people “from prisons, from insane asylums, from mental institutions.” Those and other statements constitute quasi-open declarations that the problem with immigration is racial contamination. They drain migrants of any trace of basic humanity that might make claims on our sense of justice. When Trump says Haitians are “eating the dogs” and “eating the cats,” it’s more of that dehumanization game.

So what exactly does Vance believe about all this?

After Vance got caught out spreading falsehoods about Haitians eating house pets, he angrily insisted there’s no racial component to his assertions about their impact on Springfield. He declared that he objects to the scale and speed of their influx and their effect on housing costs and public health.

Local leaders and business owners have said that social tensions are real but manageable, that Haitians are filling real labor shortages, and that Haitians are hardworking, upstanding people who carry out jobs that locals won’t do. But Vance has an answer here too. He has suggested that when local employers hail Haitians’ willingness to work, employers are using them as tools to drive down wages, and that native-born Americans are the real victims of that.

A charitable interpretation of all this was offered by Ross Douthat on the Times’ Matter of Opinion podcast. As Douthat put it, Vance wants to “stand up for the interests” of working-class Americans “against an economy that would prefer to employ people” like Haitians, who are here of desperation and will take lower wages, “rather than them.”

When Vance is on his best behavior, as he also was during a separate interview with Douthat, he does center his arguments around immigration’s material impact on American workers. Vance’s broader economic argument—that more immigration dilutes workers’ bargaining power, driving down wages—is wrong on the substance, as Eric Levitz details. In Springfield, Haitian arrivals helped boost the local economy and drive wage growth. But that aside, it’s hard to square any innocent construction of Vance’s intentions—that he piously hopes to prompt debate—with how deeply debased his public performance has become.

For instance, Vance’s staff was told early on that the pet-eating claim was false; he escalated it. Vance urged supporters to keep the memes coming after the debunkings became more conclusive. Vance keeps insisting that due to Haitians, communicable diseases have “skyrocketed,” even though this is just false and he is surely aware of this particular trope’s dark and despicable history. And Vance has vowed to keep calling Haitians “illegal,” which he dresses up as mere questioning of the validity of their legal status but is actually meant to excite the base with the specter of their mass expulsions.

Douthat did admit on that podcast that Vance is wrong for employing demagoguery to steer the public argument. But this doesn’t go far enough. What needs to be asked is this: Is it even true that Vance is purely out to inspire public deliberation over immigration’s impact on American heartlanders? Isn’t Vance also plainly trying to energize the very same sentiments in the MAGA base that Trump is stirring up with his more explicit appeals? Vance’s public conduct is much more compatible with this latter explanation.

DeWine’s piece tried to address all these surging sentiments. He appealed to Americans’ sense of fairness and solidarity toward immigrants. He depicted them as hardworking people who have struggled against great adversity and deserve our admiration and respect. He noted that Haitians are assimilating.

But here again, this just shows how diametrically at odds with such arguments Trump and large swaths of MAGA truly are. It’s obvious from Trump’s own rhetoric, and from the eager amplification of all these lies about Haitians in MAGA-aligned media, that to Trump and much of MAGA, the idea that the Haitians might be assimilating successfully is a cause for fear and loathing, not something to feel good about.

Recent polling by the Public Religion Research Institute finds that 67 percent of respondents with a positive view of Trump agree that undocumented immigrants “are poisoning the blood of our country.” Sixty-three percent agree that “immigrants are invading our country and replacing our cultural and ethnic background.” Among overall Americans, large majorities disagree with both claims.

It’s hard to know how deeply felt or significant those sentiments among Trump supporters truly are. We do know, however, that Vance is perfectly happy to exacerbate them.

But Vance can’t have it both ways. He wants to exist in a place where respectable columnists will nod along as he furrows his brow about the effects of immigration flows on local labor markets—even as he simultaneously feeds vile and hateful sentiments toward immigrants that have nothing whatsoever to do with inspiring polite policy discourse.

In his piece, DeWine writes that the Springfield horrors that Trump is describing are unrecognizable to him. But that’s because for Trump, the argument over Springfield has nothing to do with what’s actually happening in Springfield. It’s about fomenting violent hatreds in order to seize power. What must be asked of Vance is why this gives him no discernible qualms whatsoever. He knows what Trump is up to perfectly well—and he’s absolutely willing to go along with every bit of it.
Greg Sargent @GregTSargent


Greg Sargent is a staff writer at The New Republic and the host of the podcast The Daily Blast. A seasoned political commentator with over two decades of experience, he was a prominent columnist and blogger at The Washington Post from 2010 to 2023 and has worked at Talking Points Memo, New York magazine, and the New York Observer. Greg is also the author of the critically acclaimed book An Uncivil War: Taking Back Our Democracy in an Age of Disinformation and Thunderdome Politics.