Translate

Showing posts with label disability. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disability. Show all posts

Saturday, November 20, 2021

Fight the School Culture Wars by Embracing Parents [and Supporting Ethnic Studies]

This piece provides good food for thought. I agree with BloombergQuint columnist, Andrea Gabor, that McAuliffe sent the terribly wrong message that "parents shouldn’t be "telling schools what they should teach.'” Such a terrible message to send in a democracy. We all pay the taxes that fund our schools. We all have a voice. I also agree that parents, school districts, and school boards shouldn't take the bait by people who enter these spaces with the intention of polarizing and weaponizing discourse.

As mentioned herein,  school-family partnerships and partnerships with community-based organizations, in general, can provide excellent vehicles through which to address parents' concerns.

Regrettably, Gabor fails to mention that parents, educators, and community are indeed speaking up throughout the country and they are advocating for Ethnic Studies curricula so as to be more culturally inclusive of children's lived experiences, cultures, and identities. Why is it so hard even for liberals to vocalize this, much less lend their support?

Ethnic Studies is a positive agenda that liberals themselves need to understand so that they can more effectively "talk back" to what really is a contrived agenda that seeks to limit the teaching of the truths of history. 

If we can't name racism, classism, sexism, ableism, or homophobia or their intersectionalities, we'll not only shut down honest conversations and explorations in what it means to be human, we'll be forever condemned to our toxic, polarizing thoughts and emotions. And what a massive disability for our youth, all of whom must be prepared to navigate a multiracial democracy in an increasingly complex, highly diverse, and yes—polarized, world.

-Angela Valenzuela

Fight the School Culture Wars by Embracing Parents 


Andrea Gabor 06:30 PM IST, 13 Nov 2021 01:10 AM IST, 13 Nov 2021

(Bloomberg Opinion) -- When Republican Glenn Youngkin won the gubernatorial election last week in Virginia, the first statewide GOP victory there in more than a decade, it was widely seen as vindication of a political strategy to weaponize the school-board culture wars. In truth, the school-board warriors around the U.S. weren’t as successful as some high-profile Democratic defeats suggest. Even in red states like Missouri and Wisconsin, many candidates who advocated bans on mask mandates and the supposed teaching of what culture warriors tendentiously call “critical race theory” were defeated.

But there’s no denying that Virginia parents were angry at Democrats. That was partly because a former Democratic governor had rebuffed their demands to reopen schools during the pandemic, even as children from neighboring Maryland, and even New York City, returned to classrooms with little ill effect.

Most galling of all, though, was the incendiary and misguided statement by the eventual losing Democratic candidate, Terry McAuliffe,  that parents shouldn’t be “telling schools what they should teach.”

To suggest that parents have no place in school decision-making is to deny the fundamental role of public schools as places for the teaching and practice of democratic values. Schools should want more parental involvement, not less, a matter of equal concern on both sides of the cultural divide. For example, in New Orleans, the nation’s first all-charter-school city, where charter organizations ba

To suggest that parents have no place in school decision-making is to deny the fundamental role of public schools as places for the teaching and practice of democratic values. Schools should want more parental involvement, not less, a matter of equal concern on both sides of the cultural divide. For example, in New Orleans, the nation’s first all-charter-school city, where charter organizations backed by Democrats and Republicans sought to marginalize parent and community engagement in schools, the backlash has been fierce.

Read more at: https://www.bloombergquint.com/gadfly/culture-war-in-the-schools-fight-back-by-embracing-parents
Copyright © BloombergQuint

Sunday, November 12, 2017

Austin Am-Statesman Editorial Board Opinion: Texas needs to help — not pick on — children with disabilities


I fully agree with the Austin American-Statesman editorial review board that we must never hurt children with disabilities, particularly by denying them services.  This piece outlines the tawdry legislative history associated with serving children with disabilities involving the privatization of Medicaid as "part of a multiyear transition into the state-created STAR Kids managed care program, approved by the Legislature in 2013."  

It should concern us deeply that "Between February and May, 12 percent of children with the severest disabilities were denied Medicaid services, triple the overall rate of 2016, according to the Texas Health and Human Services Commission." (A-7, Nov. 11, 2017)  More than 2, 500 registered complaints this year signal that something is woefully wrong.  Other recommendations listed herein:
 The commission should mandate that no child with a disability be denied service or coverage until all necessary fixes to the assessment tool are complete.
Legislators must demand transparency and appoint resources to ensure that, in this case, managed care organizations deliver on contract expectations.
C'mon Statesman board.  You can do better than that.  With the word, "until," your sentence suggests that at some point, under some conditions, some kids can be denied services that they need!?  What the heck is government for if not to take care of our state's most vulnerable?  


It should enrage us that right now in Texas, many "children are being denied coverage and services without explanations."  I would therefore amend the Austin American-Statesman's Editorial Board Opinion by suggesting that no child in Texas that needs disability services ever gets denied these.  

This troubling tale provides yet another example of why privatizing services is the wrong way to go.  Our senators and representatives need to hear from our communities. 

We're not at all helpless as parents or communities.  We are all "constituents" to some legislator that represents us and they need to hear from them or else the status quo prevails.  If you do not know who represents you, visit the Texas Legislature online and plug in your information here, and it'll let you know.  

Disability Rights Texas is an excellent advocacy group to reach out to, by the way.   Follow them on Twitter: @DisRightsTx

Let's also be forward looking and let's get these people who fail to respect democratic principles like the public good out of office. 

Angela Valenzuela 
c/s



Viewpoints: Texas needs to help — not pick on — children with disabilities





Picking on the most vulnerable is not the Texas way. Yet, it is exactly what state lawmakers do each time they take aim at programs that serve children with disabilities. It’s no surprise then that in its quest to change how it handles Medicaid, Texas has hurt more than help hundreds of children with disabilities.
The list of hurt caused by cuts and the privatization of Medicaid is long. Families report less access to much-needed medical services, such as life-altering therapies and critical prescription drugs for children, the American-Statesman’s Julie Chang reported. Less timely access to services has created life-or-death situations for some children and regressed hard-fought progress for others.
The list of hurt caused by cuts and the privatization of Medicaid is long. Families report less access to much-needed medical services, such as life-altering therapies and critical prescription drugs for children, the American-Statesman’s Julie Chang reported. Less timely access to services has created life-or-death situations for some children and regressed hard-fought progress for others.
This can’t continue. The Legislature needs to help Texas find its way back to standing up for these children, not knocking them down.
SPECIAL REPORT: How Texas Medicaid is failing children with disabilities.
Lawmakers can start by reinstating funds for therapy services and to early intervention programs that help improve the quality of life for children with disabilities. State leaders should also demand transparency from organizations managing Medicaid programs and set aside enough resources to properly supervise those contracts.
For years now, a Republican-dominated Legislature has cut programs that serve the state’s poor and vulnerable. That includes the Legislature’s steady course to the privatization of Medicaid, a state and federally funded program that has successfully served children with disabilities from families of all economic statuses. Cuts to such programs, lawmakers say, save us money. Meanwhile, the state’s most vulnerable continue to pay the price.
Consider that in 2011, a tough budget year for the state, lawmakers cut costs by limiting eligibility for Early Childhood Intervention services to children with the severest disabilities. Such services for children up to 3 years old help kids with developmental delays and disabilities prepare for kindergarten while saving the state money on costly special education services down the road.
Since the state’s narrower eligibility requirement, enrollment for Early Childhood Intervention services has dropped 14 percent statewide to 59,000. Funding for services has declined 11 percent to $142 million in 2017, Chang reported.
In 2015, the Texas Legislature lowered Medicaid reimbursement rates to physical, occupational and speech therapists that serve children with disabilities by $350 million. Lawmakers restored a quarter of the cuts this year, but health commission officials made more reductions in September.
FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: Viewpoints delivers the latest perspectives on current events.
Without proper therapy, progress a child has achieved can stall or reverse. Legislators should reinstate those funds.
Then last year, Texas turned over Medicaid services for children with disabilities to private companies and hospitals, called managed care organizations.
The move was part of a multiyear transition into the state-created STAR Kids managed care program approved by the Legislature in 2013. Now, instead of handling the medical services for 164,000 children with disabilities, Texas pays managed care organizations by the patient, not the services delivered. The program is expected to save the state hundreds of millions of dollars.
As many suspected, the move has been anything but smooth.
Between February and May, 12 percent of children with the severest disabilities were denied Medicaid services, triple the overall rate of 2016, according to the Texas Health and Human Services Commission.
Under STAR Kids, surgeries previously approved are now being denied; access to critical medication and medical supplies has become difficult; patients are waiting longer periods between appointments and receiving less time with specialists and therapists; and children are being denied coverage and services without explanations.
It’s not surprising. Less services mean more profits for managed care organizations.
Texas’ least fine hour came when the Legislature chose to continue with a managed care model knowing it would be riddled with problems. State leaders know that health insurers cut corners and can inflate diagnoses to maximize profits. Still, they proceeded.
Shameful.
As expected, grievances have been plentiful. Since last November, more than 2,500 complaints from providers and families have been lodged against STAR Kids, according to the health commission.
LIKE US ON FACEBOOK: Our Lone Star Politics page brings Texas news to your Facebook feed.
The commission is addressing the increase in denials by analyzing whether the STAR Kids assessment tool used by managed care organizations to determine services is accurate. The commission should mandate that no child with a disability be denied service or coverage until all necessary fixes to the assessment tool are complete.
Legislators must demand transparency and appoint resources to ensure that, in this case, managed care organizations deliver on contract expectations.
Texas once placed importance on investments that help our most vulnerable. We need to get back to those values.