Translate

Showing posts with label discrimination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label discrimination. Show all posts

Monday, June 02, 2025

Silencing the Truth: UC Irvine’s Unjust Removal of Dean Frances Contreras, Ph.D.

Friends,

Please share this far and wide.

I count myself among the many admirers of the prolific and highly respected scholar Dr. Frances Contreras, who was unjustly removed from her position as first Latina Dean of the School of Education at the University of California Irvine. Her removal appears to be a clear act of retaliation for speaking out against serious misconduct—a deeply troubling breach of university policy and fundamental principles of fairness.

What happened to Dr. Contreras is both outrageous and heartbreakingly familiar to so many women of color in academia who dare to lead with integrity, speak truth to power, and advance justice even when it challenges entrenched interests.

As a nationally recognized advocate for educational justice, Frances was removed without warning, without a mandated five-year review, and with no transparency. Her whistleblower complaint outlines a disturbing pattern of retaliation, intimidation, and institutional neglect after she raised urgent concerns, including threats to safety, financial mismanagement, and abuse of power.

Rather than address these issues, university leaders appear to have punished the messenger—hoping perhaps to silence her, and anyone else who might follow. But Frances refuses to be silenced. Her courage in standing up not only for herself, but for the ethical treatment of students, faculty, and staff, is powerful and deeply inspiring. 

I am appalled to learn about what is happening to Dr. Contreras and proud to stand beside her in this fight for justice.

I also want to thank Orange County Register reporter Allyson Vergara for bringing this story to light with care and clarity. Journalism like this is essential to holding institutions accountable.

We are watching. We are outraged. And we are standing with Frances.

—Angela Valenzuela

UC Irvine professor files complaint over removal as dean

Frances Contreras, who was hired in 2022 to lead the UCI School of Education, says she was denied a proper review and calls for an investigation


Frances Contreras, former dean of the UC Irvine School of Education and the college’s first Latina dean, was removed from her position suddenly in March, without a formal review process. Contreras and a number of civil rights organizations, are calling for a formal review of the decision. She is pictured at the university on Wednesday, April 23, 2025. (Photo by Mindy Schauer, Orange County Register/SCNG)

By ALLYSON VERGARA | avergara@scng.com | Orange County Register

UPDATED: May 23, 2025 at 7:05 AM PDT

A prominent educator at UC Irvine is speaking up against what she calls

retaliation by school officials.


Frances Contreras was ousted from her position as the former dean of the

UCI School of Education. Contreras said that she received the notice March 31

without warning, preventing her from engaging in a five-year review - a

process she said is afforded to her peers under University of California policy

- and is calling for a formal investigation.


Contreras, who began her role in 2022, became _the _University of California's

first Latina/Chicana dean to head a school of education in the UC system.


During her three-year tenure, Contreras claims she went through incidents of

defamation, intimidation, bullying, "retaliation and outright discrimination"

from UCI Provost Hal Stern and leaders across his units - including the former

School of Education dean, the former assistant dean, and various faculty

members within the Office of Academic Personnel, including the Vice Provost.


On April 29, Contreras filed a formal grievance complaint through UCI's

Whistleblower Office.


"I was repeatedly met with inaction, retaliation and resistance, ultimately

leading to my unjustified removal from the deanship," Contreras said in an

interview. She called the move a "further attempt to silence" and harm her

reputation.


Contreras said she raised "legitimate concerns about serious misconduct and

potential violations of law and policy," referring to "deeply troubling incidents"

at UCI that caused her to request immediate action from university

leadership - incidents she said were then further enabled and ignored.


In her formal complaint, Contreras alleges that UCI retaliated against her for

reporting "numerous violations of law, university policy and ethics" by School

of Education personnel and former faculty . She alleged specific incidents,

such as in late 2023, when she learned that a faculty member experiencing a

mental health crisis reportedly "purchased and housed firearms on the UCI

campus," stayed on campus, and "behaved erratically" following news that

she would be terminated. Contreras - then the education dean - said this was

"in reckless disregard" of school safety.


The complaint also alleged the school's reported failure to conduct an audit of

a $3 million donor gift, after Contreras said she discovered that $225,000 of

the grant was allocated to an outside organization "for administrative

support." Repeated requests for an audit were, she said, "flatly refused."


Another alleged incident was experiencing abusive conduct and intimidation

from a fellow professor/former School of Education dean, which Contreras

reported but "the university failed to fully investigate, and refused to

interview witnesses ." That alleged faculty member, whom she named an

abuser, had "publicly declared he would destroy Contreras," the complaint

said.


She also alleged threats to her personal safety and that of other school

members, computer fraud and abuse, misuse of university funds, differential

treatment and "clear diminution of power and authority" as School of

Education dean compared with her predecessor.


She claimed conflicts of interest within the Office of Academic Personnel,

where she was reporting her concerns - all of which, her complaint said, were

ignored or "met with open hostility." One former faculty member allegedly

blocked Contreras' access to the School of Education's electronic folders, and

instructed staff to restrict her from accessing the school's listservs.


Frances Contreras, former dean of the UC Irvine School of Education and the college's first Latina dean, was removed from her position suddenly in March, without a formal review process. Contreras and a number of civil rights organizations, are calling for a formal review of the decision. She is pictured at the
university on Wednesday, April 23, 2025. (Photo by Mindy Schauer, Orange County Register/SCNG)


Contreras called it "a culture of retaliation and silencing" those like herself

who spoke out "about serious misconduct" and violations of UC, state and

federal policies. She said that there was a "complete refusal" to investigate

her alleged concerns by campus management who, rather than "taking

accountability and appropriate corrective measures," instead "enabled

misconduct by shielding unethical actors, ignoring potential violations of law

and policy."


Contreras was "abruptly" terminated from her deanship on March 31, denied

a five-year review process, and experienced a substantial salary decrease, the

complaint said.


"The timing of her removal, which came shortly after she called for a

thorough and impartial investigation into her complaints, illustrates the

retaliatory nature of her removal," the complaint said. "The individuals who

made the decision to remove Dr. Contreras from her deanship were the same

individuals whose improper conduct Dr. Contreras reported.''


In a statement, UCI officials said they "would not comment on individual

personnel matters," but "takes all concerns seriously."


UC Irvine is "committed to providing a respectful and inclusive environment,

free from discrimination, intimidation, or retaliation," the statement

continued. "Allegations involving university policy or state and federal law are

reviewed through established procedures and addressed in accordance with

applicable policies and legal requirements.''


Internal formal reviews are part of the UC employee dismissal process,

According to UC policy, and employees may file a complaint.


According to UC_policy, deans are appointed for a normal five-year period and

are subject to reappointment, made on a five-year basis. The UC chancellor

may also consider a salary increase after a five-year review results in a

recommendation to reappoint the dean, identifying "significant achievements

and/or sustained excellent administrative performance.''


Contreras, a first-generation Latina college student from Norwalk, said that

equity for underrepresented communities was the crux of her work in

education. Being a leader in education carries with it a responsibility "to speak

out (and) stand up against bullying and intimidation.''


"Being a leader fearful of speaking truth to power is not leadership," she said.

Prior to her post as dean, Contreras served as the associate vice chancellor

for equity, diversity and inclusion, and as a professor of education studies at

UC San Diego, where she has more than 15 years of administrative leadership

experience. She helped to launch a Latinx academic experience program and

spearheaded UCSD's efforts to become a Hispanic-Serving Institution. She

Outside of the UC, Conteras worked at the University of Washington's College

of Education, where she led higher education programs and researched

learning opportunities for Latino students.


At the time of her appointment in 2021, UCI officials - including Stern and

Chancellor Howard Gillman - called Contreras "perfectly aligned with the

strengths and far-reaching impact of the school," and "an accomplished

administrator with a record of driving equity and diversity."


In late December, the school honored her on its social media pages for "her

unwavering advocacy for equity and diversity, making an impact that inspires

communities near and far."


"I saw this role as an opportunity to utilize my background and skills to

support the faculty and students as well as to serve as a leader and mentor in

a field where Latina academics and leaders remain dramatically

underrepresented," Contreras, who remains a faculty member at UCI, said.


A number of Latino civil rights organizations, UCI faculty and alumni backed

Contreras in her quest for an internal review under UC_ policy.


Tonia Reyes Uranga, president of the League of United Latin American

Citizens (LULAC) Council #3309, wrote in a letter of support that she was

"concerned that speaking out about violations is not seen as an exercise in

free speech by UC Irvine."


Latinx faculty and alumni groups within the UC system also demanded swift

answers from management.


In a March 31 group letter, a group of Latinx professors - hailing from UC

Santa Cruz, UCLA, UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UC Merced and UC San Diego -

agreed that "without prejudging the merits of the case, we think there are

enough red flags to require an immediate formal independent investigation."


Neptaly Taty Aguilera, co-chair of the UC Chicanx Latinx Alumni Association,

recommended that Latinx representation be part of any formal review

process. She recognized Contreras for her leadership and academic

excellence, especially in uplifting the Latino community.


"We want to ensure that the UC system is transparent regarding how Latino

Jose F. Moreno, president of Los Amigos of Orange County, which has many

active UCI alumni, said he was "proud and thrilled" when Contreras was

named the dean of the School of Education. He called for a full, independent

investigation so that Contreras' "willingness to raise her voice to bring

attention to these disturbing acts will not be cause for retaliation or isolation

against her."

Moving forward, as she awaits a response from the UC, Contreras is confident

in her quest for justice that "the truth will come to light.''


But she also worried about the "broader efforts of this injustice on other

women and leaders of color who choose to stand up when confronted with

wrongdoing ... I fear that UCI's retaliation may have a chilling effect.''


She connected her experience with the Trump administration's ongoing

campaign to end "DEI" initiatives in public schools, saying she was

"disheartened" by the "vigorous attacks on DEI and concerted efforts to roll

back progress for underrepresented groups.'' She said these actions will have

"devastating reverberations in all corners of society.''


Women of color in academia have been "targets of some of the most

egregious attacks" - especially women leaders seen as a threat to

"longstanding power imbalances and structural inequalities," Contreras said.

"We see pervasive attacks against women who write about structural

oppression, who challenge systemic power dynamics, and who battle against

having their identities and contributions erased from history," she continued.

"The next generation of women and scholars of color are watching with hope

and anticipation that we use our voices to advocate for their rights and a

place in the academy and positions of leadership.''

Originally Published: May 23, 2025 at 7:00 AM PDT

Monday, May 05, 2025

'Deport yourself': Humble ISD candidate reports alleged home vandalism—"Latinos have to unite, because our students are our priority right now"

Friends:

This vandalism and harassment is so despicable on so many levels. The concept of "racialized voter suppression" and associated candidate intimidation should no longer be abstractions if they were to begin with. And please, telling a U.S. citizen to “deport yourself” based on her ethnicity and culture is racist to the core. 

It's also misogynistic, designed to push Latinas and women, generally, out of their pursuit of public office. This aligns with the regular defaming and misrepresenting of AOC, Jasmine Crockett, Ilhan Omar, Ayanna Pressley, Cori Bush, and others is a way to discredit their policy positions and to manufacture disfavor with those they represent.

Castillo’s past advocacy for bilingual, community-engaged students earning graduation sashes should be uplifted rather than put down, considering her wonderful sense of civic duty and helping marginalized students. At the base of this civic harm to where she feels unsafe in her own home is trying to impact broader publics from ever considering running for office. I hope she wins her school board race in Humble ISD.

Great quote by Castillo. 

"This is the time where we Latinos have to unite, because our students are our priority right now. Our students deserve to have an equal education like anyone else."

I hope they have a LULAC Chapter in Humble or that they form one. I hear that Houston LULAC is on top of this. 

-Angela Valenzuela

"They're mocking my incident as if I'm doing this to get more votes instead of actually seeing it as a threat to a candidate."

By ,Trending News Reporter

"Deport yourself" was written on a Humble ISD school board candidate's home. (Judy Castillo) 

By ,Trending News Reporter

The Harris County Sheriff's Office is investigating an alleged incident of vandalism at the home of a candidate for the Humble ISD school board, where the words "deport yourself" were found on her door on Friday. 

Judith Castillo, who is running for a trustee position in Humble, said she's been targeted and harassed since her campaign began. In addition to the messages telling her to "deport herself," she said she's received harassing messages with name-calling and sexual content. She also said she's been followed to work and her social media accounts have been hacked.  

Although Castillo’s campaign centers on anti-bullying, she says she has been the target of similar hostility throughout the election. Much of the backlash, she says, has focused on her race—driven by the false belief that her platform only supports Hispanic students.  

"It's been an ongoing issue where people are saying I'm just running to represent Hispanic students. I'm not running just to represent Hispanic students, I'm running to represent all students," Castillo told Chron.  "I am running to have a voice for my community." 


Humble, Texas is 56.2 percent Hispanic or Latino, according to data from the U.S. Census. 


Some parents have criticized Castillo over an incident a few years ago, when Castillo, then a teacher, stood up for her students after the superintendent removed their graduation sashes. The sashes had previously been approved by the administration to commend the students for their volunteer work every week through mentorship programs aimed at improving bilingual literacy at the local elementary school. 

"A lot of parents thought I was trying to promote only my race and help only my people," Castillo said. 

Following the incident, Castillo raised the issue with the school board. But some parents have continued to lambaste her for her advocacy at the time, sending her messages saying "the clown wants to continue her show."


"People are stating, 'well, English is the official language now, you shouldn't worry about any Spanish students now," Castillo said. 

Since she reported the alleged act of vandalism, the hate hasn't let up. 

"They're mocking my incident as if I'm doing this to get more votes instead of actually seeing it as a threat to a candidate, actually seeing it as violence," Castillo said. 

The hateful messages have come at the expense of her mental health, Castillo said. 


She has begun having anxiety attacks. She can't sleep at night. 

"I wake up and I'm just shaking," Castillo said. 

Her family feels unsafe to the point where they might consider moving if she doesn't win the election, Castillo said.

"It just reminds me of the little girl riding on the bus. Little Judy riding on the bus, eight years old, and being called a wetback," Castillo said. The term "wetback" is a derogatory term used for a Mexican citizen living in the U.S. 


"This is the time where we Latinos have to unite, because our students are our priority right now. Our students deserve to have an equal education like anyone else," Castillo added. 

For now, Castillo said she's showing up and talking to the community as election day approaches on May 3. 

"I'm just eagerly waiting for election day. I'm still going to go out to the polling places. I'm still going to greet people." 

Friday, October 11, 2024

"Corruption of My Mexican Identity," by Dan Acosta, Ph.D.

There is a lot to appreciate from this story by a former member of the University of Texas at Austin faculty, Dr. Dan Acosta, who also previously served as Dean Emeritus of Pharmacy at the University of Cincinnati. He offers a powerful narrative that resonates deeply with struggles faced by Mexican Americans. In my own research, I describe the systemic erasure of our identities as "subtractive schooling," a deliberate process that undermines our cultural heritage, as well as individual and community power.

Dan Acosta, Ph.D.

In Dr. Acosta’s story, I sense profound pain and frustration rooted in a long history of prejudice and discrimination. The inability to speak Spanish, or not speaking it “correctly,” reflects the success of assimilationist policies designed to strip away cultural ties. The stakes are high for those in power—especially as manifest throughout ongoing battles within the State Board of Education over culturally relevant curriculum and Ethnic Studies programs.

The irony here is striking. Current anti-diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies seek to suppress initiatives that promote these very principles. Albeit with a few exceptions, the tragedy here is that DEI efforts have rarely been abundant in any meaningful way, as Dr. Acosta’s experiences illustrate. On the contrary, his story reveals a history of exclusion to which I can relate as one who has fought for her own place in higher education despite my Stanford Ph.D. and credentials.

Anti-affirmative action and DEI opposition appear to be preemptive strikes in an environment where people of color might otherwise gain access to higher education and subsequently assume their rightful places at the table in culture and society. These policies send a clear message: These opportunities are reserved primarily for white people. So wrong-headed. So sad.

So much talent has been wasted. It is truly a shame. Thanks, Dr. Acosta, for your story. We need more of these so folks out there don't believe the lies about the academy getting overtaken by "woke" students and faculty of color. Rather a more sinister agenda is at play.

—Angela Valenzuela


Corruption of My Mexican Identity

By Dan Acosta | Summer/Autumn 2024 | Rise Up Review, Resistance is Fertile


Now that I am retired one of my weekly tasks is to read what is happening at the Society of Toxicology, the largest professional group for toxicologists of all types--academic, government, and industrial- in the world. As the first elected Hispanic president of the organization, I like to keep up to date with issues facing the society. One current topic is to increase membership and to bring in more diverse scientists into the discipline, especially non-toxicologists who want to learn more about toxicology. Without getting too much into the weeds about the issue, I was struck by a comment made by a past president who strongly objected to the possibility that standards would be lowered to allow more people of diversity (i.e. people of color) become members of SOT. He did not want a "dumbing down of the society with unqualified individuals". He was alluding to affirmative action and "DEI" issues that have become hot political topics in America. It got me thinking about my life and qualifications as one of those people of diversity that SOT wants to have as some of its members.


As a first-generation Mexican American, my mother and grandparents emigrated to El Paso from Mexico; her parents wanted to create a new life for themselves by escaping the discord and troubled times in Mexico during its revolution in the early 1900s. Nana Cuca often told me stories of what it was like to live in Mexico and recounted her vivid memories of some of the revolutionaries like Pancho Villa. My paternal grandfather also came from Mexico; he later married his wife who was born in Presidio, Texas. My father was born in Valentine, Texas. He stopped going to school after the sixth grade so he could work with his father who was a hired hand on a ranch near Marfa. My parents never completed high school.   


When I was very young especially before I started grade school in 1951, my mother was often asked about my heritage. I later learned that they really wanted to know if I was white and not a Mexican. Nana Cuca used to brag that our family tree had strong Portuguese ties and that the lighter skin colors of her ancestors were passed on to her daughters--my mother and her sister, Babe. Although as a young boy I looked like a chubby white kid with fat cheeks, my Mexican heritage became more apparent as I grew older. My light brown hair started to become darker and by the time I began high school my hair had turned black, and my facial features were more Mexican-like.


I refused to speak Spanish at home and at school; my parents and family spoke to me in Spanish and did not force me to respond in Spanish. Many of my teachers wanted to help me because of my eagerness to learn and my desire to become the best student in their classes. I wanted to acquire at all costs those American traits or characteristics of my white classmates who were most successful in the classroom. Because of my skin tone and hair color when I started grade school, I did not experience the discrimination and hatred that my brown-colored friends and classmates often encountered. This Americanization process corrupted my Mexican identity at a very young age, and it has taken me a lifetime to confront my mistake. As I progressed through college, the army, graduate school, and my academic career, I was no longer that smart little Mexican boy. I now faced subtle discriminations and at times overt racist remarks from highly educated individuals.


I eventually graduated as one of the top students in my high school class, and later on I graduated top of my pharmacy class at the University of Texas in 1968. I received one of the few highly competitive national fellowships awarded to graduate students to attend a school of their own choosing. I earned a doctorate in toxicology at the University of Kansas and accepted a position as an assistant professor at the University of Texas in 1974.


However, I was rudely introduced to the role of DEI and affirmative action in hiring more people of color at Texas. Pointedly, I was told several times by my supervisors that the only reason I was hired was because the college needed to hire more Hispanics and Blacks. During my 22 years at Texas, I helped develop one of the first graduate programs in toxicology in the state and mentored over 50 undergraduate, graduate, and postdoctoral fellows in my research program. I later became dean of pharmacy at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center, where I established one of the first councils on diversity at the university. In the final phase of my career, I accepted a position as Deputy Director for Research at FDA's major research center--The National Center for Toxicological Research. Although I had what many called "a successful career", I paid the price of never becoming fluent in Spanish and having to live with the shame and embarrassment of not being able to converse in Spanish with my family and many of my former classmates and friends.


I also experienced many times during my career what are now known as "microaggressions" or thinly veiled putdowns of my accomplishments and successes. For example, when I was elected president of the Society of Toxicology, some of my colleagues suggested that I won the election because I was a person of diversity. I grew up in Texas where this attitude was quite common; it did not really bother me. I just laughed it off.  


In the past, it was all right to ask where you were born or what was your family ancestry. It was out of curiosity because many Americans have relatives who were not born in the US. People were interested in knowing more about you, especially if you recently moved into the neighborhood, were a new employee, or a new customer in a local store. But in today's America asking that question is fraught with anxiety and possibly danger for a person of color who is asked that question. As a Mexican American who has lived in one of those states that border Mexico, I have observed the tension when one is accused of being an undocumented immigrant and not an American citizen. And as America has become more polarized, there are many reports of violence against people of color because it is thought that they are not truly American or to be more blunt-not white enough.   


Today, affirmative action and DEI policies that were supposedly lauded and supported by institutions of higher education, corporate America, and local, state, and federal agencies and departments have come under attack by many white Americans who believe that they are the ones who have suffered from discrimination. State legislators, especially in red states like Texas, Florida, and several others, have passed laws to abolish or limit the use of offices that help students and employees of diversity navigate organizational obstacles. White students and employees are not denied assistance as some of them like to suggest. 


Where are those colleges that thought that it was right to limit the admission of students of color to keep their classes filled with mostly white students? Where are those corporations and institutions that thought it was right to employ mostly white men and restrict the hiring of women and people of color in the workplace? The answer is that they never left and are ready to go back to the pre-affirmative action era. 


When I left the UT College of Pharmacy in 1996, there were two Mexican American Ph.D. professors on the faculty. When I returned to Austin for my retirement years, there was only one full-time professor; no progress has been made in the 50 years since I joined the faculty as one of those two Mexican American professors in 1974. There has been some improvement for people of color and women in the classroom and workplace, but the Supreme Court has now declared that it has seen enough of this intrusion into the lives of white men. American universities must turn a blind eye to matters of race and gender in student admissions. It will happen very soon in the workplace, but that does not mean that we should stop trying to admit more students of color and to hire more faculty of diversity. My biggest regret was that I did not speak up sooner about what I faced as a student and professor during my career in Texas and elsewhere. 


It took me a lifetime to realize that my generation has failed in maintaining America's faith in our inalienable rights of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. I write this story to reach out to the young people of the country with the hope that they will restore and secure those rights for all. If they don't, who will?


***

Dan Acosta is a first-generation Mexican American, whose mother and grandparents emigrated from Mexico. He is a former professor, research scientist, and administrator, who retired in 2019 at age 74. He writes about his experiences as a Mexican boy trying to succeed in white America. His stories have appeared in The Acentos Review, Sky Island Journal, Somos en Escrito, The Rush, Toasted Cheese, Latin@Literatures, Midway Journal, and The Manifest Station.

Monday, October 23, 2023

Good Example of an Armchair Theorist Working as Handmaiden to the Race-Evasive, Privatizing, Far Right

This person who works with the Cato Institute doesn't know the first thing about discrimination. His argument of "healthy," as opposed to "unhealthy" discrimination is not anchored in any actual history or context of either race or class relations, but rather, hypotheticals.

For the record, there is no such thing as healthy or unhealthy discrimination. There should be NO discrimination against people, period.

Tests, to which the author alludes, are a somewhat different matter. They are SUPPOSED to discriminate—that is, between a correct and incorrect answer to a question. INSTEAD, however, they systematically discriminate by race and class. This is well established in the research literature. However, the author is positing a form of "choice making" that is not sustainable as an argument in light of a prevalence of dog whistle politics that seek to engineer individuals' choices via processes of "othering" and boundary maintenance.

The author could have really benefited from the Ethnic Studies classroom in order to make a compelling, well-reasoned argument. It all sounds so patronizing and ultimately deceptive. Minimally, it doesn't pass the sniff test. In this vein, on X or Twitter, I sided with @NILSHeadley on this one:







What about community values? Where do school boards that reflect communities' values come in? Oh yeah, the Koch Foundation, Wilks and Dunn, and Moms for Liberty and other organizations got that covered. Or at least they think they do with all the fiery political conflagrations they're setting off in school boards across the country. Not being cynical. Just real.

In sum, this piece is a good example of pseudo-scholars making pseudo arguments, getting paid to work as handmaiden to the power- and race-evasive, privatizing agenda of the extremist right dressed up as "school choice."

-Angela Valenzuela


Legalizing Discrimination Would Improve the Education System

Policy makers should realize that there are types of discrimination that are actually beneficial for teachers, students, and the rest of society.

School choice programs around the world prohibit discrimination in hiring employees and enrolling students. While discrimination policies aim to protect employees and children, the result is the opposite. Discrimination in hiring employees increases the likelihood that children are educated by teachers that are aligned with their interests and abilities. Discrimination in enrolling students increases the probability that all students are in a successful, specialized learning environment.

Unhealthy Discrimination Hurts Producers

We can all agree that the intentions behind this policy are well-meaning. We don’t want public funding to go to schools that are run by malevolent people. For simplicity, let’s assume that people running private schools are indeed racist, sexist, evil individuals. Even if we allow all types of discrimination, the evil individuals in charge of the private schools will financially pay for the act.

For example, let’s assume that the people in charge of school X are racist. They can choose to hire a teacher of race 1 or race 2. If they are racist against race 2, they will likely choose to hire race 1, regardless of the actual quality of the teacher. If an alternative school, Y, does not practice the same discrimination, they will benefit by having a larger pool of teacher candidates. Ultimately, this would lead to a competitive advantage for school Y for not being racist! Families would recognize this advantage, choose school Y, and force school X to face a shutdown condition. Allowing families to choose their schools will only work to eliminate unhealthy discrimination such as racism in hiring.

Healthy Discrimination

Some types of discrimination are actually beneficial to teachers, students, and the rest of society. When a school has a specialized mission and focus, it needs to be able to hire specialized individuals. Protecting candidates that would not help achieve the specialized mission of the organization harms the other teachers and students in the school.

Imagine a given school that has a mission of academic success for various types of athletes. Forcing the school to hire teachers and enroll students that do not have a sports-related background will work against the overall mission. Since the students are interested in academics and sports, it may be desirable to relate class lessons to different sports activities. For example, a physics teacher could incorporate exercises that are based on the movement and force of a football or softball over time. If a candidate is unable to demonstrate sufficient background knowledge on sports, they will not be able to make classes engaging for the students. Protecting candidates from this type of discrimination will only hurt the students.

Additionally, the school would need to be able to discriminate based on the ability levels and learning styles of the incoming students. If we forced the school to accept all athletes, the academic mission would be sure to fail. Protecting the students with low academic abilities will hurt the advanced students and make the teacher’s job extremely difficult. Perhaps even more importantly, protecting these students may actually result in hurting them the most. Placing these low-performing students in this environment would not likely be suitable for their individual academic needs. Being exposed to this highly-competitive academic environment could actually hurt their confidence levels and prevent them from learning.

Although there are certain types of unhealthy discrimination, it is not optimal for bureaucrats to determine which types are permissible for the rest of society. Instead, we should allow families in society to choose the schools that do not partake in the discriminatory practices that they deem to be non-permissible. Additionally, policymakers should realize that there are types of discrimination that are actually beneficial for teachers, students, and the rest of society.

Corey DeAngelis

Corey A. DeAngelis is the Director of School Choice at Reason Foundation and an adjunct scholar at Cato Institute.

Sunday, October 08, 2023

Newsom vetoes bill banning caste discrimination in California, by Lauren Sforza | The Hill

Legislation banning caste discrimination shouldn't surprise us and reflects the growing presence of South Asian Americans in the U.S. "South Asians" emanate from such nation states as India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives. I learned recently from an Indian friend who lives in Austin that caste-based prejudice and discrimination often follows South Asians even after they've migrated to other countries despite efforts within their own to promote social equality. 

"It's very painful," she said. "People here will actually ask you what your caste is and this, of course, has implications for how you're seen, whether someone will marry you after they know about this." I could see and feel the pain in her expression and sensed her disappointment in how migration to the U.S. doesn't solve this, but rather, in her case, followed her family into the U.S. It saddened me to think that someone in the U.S. would even ask another that question to begin with. Yet like race, it's understandable that these ways of knowing reinforced by British colonialism and white supremacist ideologies die hard.

Caste-based prejudice and discrimination is clearly an existing social problem within these South Asian cultures that overlaps significantly with—even as it is distinct from—racial discrimination. For a comparison to the U.S., a powerful and provocative book on this is Isabel Wilkerson's (2020) book titled, Caste: The origins of our discontents, that considers how race, like caste, is a deeply ingrained notion that has shaped us as a country. 

Sociology and anthropology has long considered the extent to which our country mirrors more of a class-based society, or one more aptly characterized as one of caste—or in the words of the late Berkeley anthropologist, Dr. John Ogbu, as "caste-like"—inasmuch as a lack of social and economic mobility attaches to entire classes or categories of racial groups, historically.

Just like all forms of racial forms of discrimination, we should all similarly oppose discrimination by caste. Much to ponder here, particularly with the ascendancy of South Asian communities in the U.S.

-Angela Valenzuela

References

Ogbu, J. (1978). Minority Education and Caste: The American System in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Academic Press.

Wilkerson, I. (2020). Caste: The origins of our discontents. Random House.

Newsom vetoes bill banning caste discrimination in California


California Gov. Gavin Newsom sits in the state Assembly at the state Capitol, June 30, 2023, in Sacramento, Calif. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)

BY LAUREN SFORZA - 10/08/23 8:04 AM ET


California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) vetoed a bill Saturday that would ban caste discrimination, saying that the bill is unnecessary because current law already covers it.

“In California, we believe everyone deserves to be treated with dignity and respect, no matter who they are, where they come from, who they love, or where they live,” he said in a letter notifying lawmakers of his veto.

“That is why California already prohibits discrimination based on sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, gender identity, sexual orientation, and other characteristics, and state law specifies that these civil rights protections shall be liberally construed,” he continued. “Because discrimination based on caste is already prohibited under these existing categories, this bill is unnecessary.”

The bill, if signed by the governor, would have added caste as a protected class to California’s current anti-discrimination laws. It largely would have targeted the caste system used in South Asian and Hindu communities and would have made California the first state to explicitly ban discrimination by caste.

Senate Bill 403 defined caste as “an individual’s perceived position in a system of social stratification on the basis of inherited status.” Newsom said that this is already covered in current law, despite the state Assembly the state Senate passing the bill earlier this year. 

The hundreds-year-old caste system divides people based on birth or descent. While caste discrimination has been banned in India for more than 70 years, recent pieces of legislation in the U.S. have pushed it into the spotlight.

Seattle became the first U.S. city to add caste to its anti-discrimination laws earlier this year and Fresno, Calif. became the second last month. Proponents of making caste a protected class say that it will protect those in the lowest division in the caste system from bias in housing, education and technology sectors. 

The Associated Press contributed.

TAGS CASTE GAVIN NEWSOM GAVIN NEWSOM

Copyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Thursday, April 20, 2023

Texas Senate passes bill to kill DEI programs: You can hear all of yesterday's hearing on SB 17 here

These are our students standing up for higher education! So proud of them. You can hear all of yesterday's hearing on SB 17 here: tinyurl.com/mrttabk7

-Angela Valenzuela


Texas Senate passes bill to kill diversity, equity and inclusion programs


“DEI has become a political agenda," said the bill's author, while critics warned that eliminating the programs would jeopardize the progress Texas universities have made in hiring diverse talent.


Jeremy Wallace | April 20, 2023 | Houston Chronicle


Left to right, Jenna Doane, Cecelia jordan, Janeva Wilson, Maria del Carmen Unda, and Lauren Mena Shook discuss proposed legislation to ban diversity hiring programs in Texas colleges at the Texas State Capitol in Austin on April, 6, 2023. The are all members of the education policy planning program UT Austin.Bob Daemrich/Bob Daemrich/Contributor

After more than five hours of debate, the Texas Senate voted 19-12 late Wednesday to bar all public universities and colleges from having diversity, equity and inclusion programs or staff.

State Sen. Brandon Creighton, R-Conroe, said while he is all for diversity, DEI programs have gone too far, and are actually excluding some job candidates and ultimately not succeeding in increasing the diversity of college faculty.

LATEST: Killing diversity hiring programs in Texas colleges could hurt push for more engineers

“DEI has become a political agenda, not a program that follows civil rights law,” Creighton said.

Democrats vehemently opposed the legislation, saying DEI was being mischaracterized by Republicans based on a few isolated incidences, and that it ignored how colleges have used the programs to make sure diverse candidates — once overlooked by universities — are getting a chance to be considered for jobs and future advancement.

The legislation now goes to the Texas House, which must pass the same bill if it is going to make it to Gov. Greg Abbott, who has the final say on whether it will become law.

Creighton argued scrapping DEI would allow more “diversity of thought” and that lawmakers could work on other ways to promote diversity.

But state Sen. Borris Miles, a Houston Democrat and one of just two Black members of the Senate, said that didn’t make sense.

“There is no logic in the belief that you can increase diversity by removing the policies and offices that work to promote diversity,” he said.

EXCLUSIVE: Gov. Greg Abbott explains his fight against diversity hiring programs on college campuses

All 12 Democrats in the Texas Senate voted against the bill.

Like Creighton, Abbott has argued DEI programs sound good on the surface but that they have been manipulated to pass on potential job applicants because of their race. He sent warnings to colleges and universities in February, which was followed by schools like the University of Texas, Texas A&M University and the University of Houston all announcing that they would step back from DEI programs or review how their programs work.

But that hasn’t been enough for the Republican-led Legislature, which has threatened to cut funding for colleges that use DEI programs and now has Creighton’s legislation advancing.

jeremy.wallace@houstonchronicle.com