Translate

Showing posts with label immigrant detention. Show all posts
Showing posts with label immigrant detention. Show all posts

Sunday, September 14, 2025

‘I am not the same person.’ Pasadena man recounts 13 days in ICE’s ‘basement’, Jasmine Mendez, Los Angeles Times

 Friends,

I was in California this past week attending a conference on education and justice and learned of this terrifying story of Rami Othmane, a 36-year-old Pasadena resident from Tunisia. On July 13, 2025, Rami was driving to the supermarket when he was suddenly surrounded by masked agents in unmarked cars. Despite showing proof of his pending green card application and following lawful procedures, he was detained and taken to B-18, the infamous “basement” of ICE’s downtown Los Angeles facility.

Rami spent 13 days there — 13 days that felt like an eternity in conditions so degrading they defy belief. No bed, no toothbrush, no soap. The air conditioning blasting like a freezer. The same soggy bean burrito, day after day. An open toilet shared with dozens of other men. Fifteen pounds lost in less than two weeks. And all this while he battled a brain tumor.

How can this happen in a democracy?

Rami’s story is not an isolated one. It is part of a broader strategy to normalize fear — to treat immigrants not as human beings but as disposable bodies. Facilities like B-18 are designed to operate in the shadows, where abuse festers unchallenged. As Rep. Judy Chu observed during her visit, the place was “wiped clean” before her arrival, staged to look good for inspection, while hiding the grim reality. This is how democracies drift toward authoritarianism: when we look away, when “processing centers” become prisons, when national security rhetoric becomes a pretext for erasing lives.

Rami himself says, “I’m not the same person. It’s traumatizing. I hope I go back to where I was, but it’s hard.” His words should haunt us, for he stands in the place of so many more whose suffering remains unseen. They remind us that ICE doesn’t just detain bodies; it breaks spirits.

We cannot allow this to stand. We must demand oversight, accountability, and — most importantly — humanity. Organizations like the National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON), the National Immigration Law Center, immigrant rights coalitions, and countless grassroots groups are leading this fight. They need our support.

-Angela Valenzuela



A man who stayed at a downtown Los Angeles ICE facility described being sick, hungry, sleep-deprived and terrified of what might come next.
(Carlin Stiehl / Los Angeles Times)

  • Rami Othmane recalls sharing an open toilet and sleeping on a concrete floor.
  • He said his wife, chief of medical staff at Huntington Hospital in Pasadena, received death threats and racist comments while he was detained.

Days after her husband’s arrest, Alrashid and the National Day Laborer Organizing Network rallied outside B-18 to shed light on Othmane’s case.  Rami Othmane was driving to the supermarket to pick up ingredients to make dinner when he noticed a car following closely behind. 

Dr. Wafaa Alrashid and Rami Othmane were married in March.
(Dr. Wafaa Alrashid)

“I thought [the driver] was just being aggressive, but a few moments after, they blocked my way,” Othmane said. “They ordered me to leave my car. But I kept asking them — who are you?”

Othmane is a 36-year-old Pasadena resident from Tunisia, and his wife is Dr. Wafaa Alrashid, chief of medical staff at Huntington Hospital in Pasadena, whom he was speaking with as federal agents descended.

“I was surrounded by like five or six masked people in unmarked cars,” Othmane told The Times. “I kept telling them I have my ID and I’m a green card applicant. … I was following the right procedure.”

Othmane spoke with The Times this month about his July 13 arrest and subsequent 13-day

detention in harsh conditions while suffering from a brain tumor. The experience, he said, left him altered.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not respond to The Times’ request for comment on Othmane’s case.

Othmane said that prior to the arrest he was in the process of obtaining an I-130 petition, which would allow him to stay in the country by qualifying his marriage to Alrashid — a U.S. citizen. The couple wed in March.

Othmane said he provided the agents with a receipt of his green card application but was ignored and ordered to get out of the car.

“They took my wallet,” he said. “They just took me.”

He was brought to the downtown Los Angeles ICE facility known as B-18, or “the basement,” a temporary immigration processing center. According to the Pasadena-based Barcena Law Offices, “this is where people go to be detained for less than 12 hours ... [and] are either released or deported.”

But Othmane’s stay was many times longer than that. 

The Pasadena resident said he waited 12 hours just to be processed into the facility. This is despite a 2009 lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union. The suit was brought to end “unsanitary conditions” in B-18, but in a settlement, it was agreed that ICE would not keep detainees for more than 12 hours on any given day or over a two-day period, with limited exceptions.

Further, ICE agreed to put a stop to “the practice of shuttling detainees back and forth to overcrowded local jails in an effort to avoid rules prohibiting long-term detention,” according to an ACLU news release.

“No longer can ICE stuff people into overcrowded cells or deny detainees their right to see a lawyer,” Karen Tumlin, then legal director at the National Immigration Law Center, said in 2009. “As this lawsuit shows, major national policy changes are desperately needed to safeguard against the terrible conditions that afflict so many immigrants held in detention centers across the country.”

After waiting hours to be booked, “the first person I spoke to didn’t understand why they arrested me,” Othmane said. “He said my application was legit.” 

Othmane said he was later booked for overstaying his visa in 2015, although he’d since had that case dismissed by an immigration judge and had a green card application in process. He said he saw an ICE case manager the following day, who also questioned why he’d been booked.

Othmane said he sought to reassure the case manager. “This is how it is, you know, we’ll get through it and survive,” he said.

For 13 days, Othmane endured severe conditions. He lost sleep while sharing a cell and an open toilet with other men who would jockey at night for space to sleep on the cold concrete floor. (“The smell was horrible,” he said.) No bedding was provided. The facility is kept at 50 degrees, according to one Congress member who visited there. 

He lost 15 pounds due to malnutrition. Meanwhile, he was fighting a growing tumor in his head.

“How many nights can you stay without sleep, or without proper food, without brushing your teeth,” Othmane said. “You can hurt your lungs in there because of the horrible AC; you feel like you’re in a freezer.”

Othmane said he was often fed the same finger-sized, wet bean burrito paired with chips and water. He began “to look forward to it,” though, as his quick weight loss began to worry him.

“He does not have a bed to sleep on,” Alrashid said at the rally in July. “My husband is 6 foot 7 inches, for those of you who have met him. He’s a very kind, nice person. But he’s also very tall.”

Othmane said that, while he was detained, his wife received death threats and racist comments on her social media and work email and in letters in the mail. 

“People were telling my wife to leave even though she was born here,” he said. “It’s sad to see that humanity is gone.” 

Due to hunger and severe headaches — a side effect of the tumor — Othmane fainted and was taken to a hospital.

“They gave me liters of IV, food and warm blankets,” he said. “It’s like if you got lost on an island alone for like two weeks or a month, but then they find you ... and try to bring you back to life.”

During the visit, his wrists and ankles were handcuffed, his chest tied down to the hospital bed.

Othmane returned to his cell on July 21. After almost two weeks, he was told he was being transferred to a facility in Arizona — prompting an emotional reaction as the uncertainty of his future in B-18 was coming to an end. 

“I collapsed. I just started crying. It was the best news I ever heard,” he said. “The guards started hugging me; it was like a celebration.”

As Othmane’s transfer was underway, ICE was preparing for a scheduled tour of the facility. U.S. Reps. Brad Sherman (D-Sherman Oaks), Jimmy Gomez (D-Los Angeles) and Judy Chu (D-Monterey Park) visited B-18 on Aug. 11, days after Othmane was moved.

Rep. Chu represents Pasadena, where Othmane lives. She said the facility was “wiped clean.”


Rep. Judy Chu (D-Monterey Park) waits at the entrance to B-18 in downtown Los Angeles on an occasion when she was denied access.

“They let us into the area where the detainees come in. They come in on a van, they are handcuffed and they take them in through this little hallway, where they take their things,” Chu told The Times. “Then we went where the processing desks are, which are surrounded by nine cells capable of holding 336 detainees. But the strange thing is there were so few detainees there.”

Chu later visited the Adelanto ICE Processing Center, which holds about 2,000 people, and spoke with detainees.

“Some of them told me the conditions [in Adelanto] are better than B-18. At least there was a jug of water in the middle of the room. They can talk on the phone, and engage in board games,” the lawmaker said.

ICE agents told Chu that detainees in B-18 are held for no more than 12 hours, but that they have specific waivers that allow them to keep people for 72 hours.

“As we can see,” Chu said, referring to Othmane’s case, “people are being held in B-18 for as long as 13 days. I’m searching if this has happened with others. But B-18 has been a mystery where few have been let in.”

Chu said that during her visit to the facility, she asked about the food and was shown the burritos Othmane was fed. “They told me people could just ask for more food or bottled water by tapping on the window,” she said.

Othmane said more food was provided “if you were lucky.” 

As for hygiene in B-18, Chu said, “there’s no change of clothes, no toothbrush, no toothpaste or soap. They said, well, they’re only here for 12 hours,” she said, although that is not always the case. 

Othmane was removed from the chill of B-18 and driven seven hours inside a truck with no air conditioning to the Eloy Detention Center in Arizona, according to Chu. He spent another 13 days in Eloy before being released on $20,000 bail. Alrashid drove to Arizona to pick him up.


Rami Othmane, shown performing in an undated photo, said his experience in detention was “traumatizing.”(Dr. Wafaa Alrashid)

"When I saw him, it was surreal, honestly,” Alrashid told Newsweek in an interview. “I couldn’t believe I finally could see him in front of me. I could touch him, I could hug him.”

He was released with an ankle monitor, which he said will be removed once he is a green card holder. While awaiting a court hearing in April, he is required to stay within a 70-mile radius of Los Angeles. He also is considering treatment options for his brain tumor.

For now, he remains shaken. 

“I feel so bad for [my wife]. I’m not the same person,” Othmane said. “It’s traumatizing. I hope I go back to where I was, but it’s hard.”

Othmane, a classically trained singer, had a performance scheduled for Aug. 15, seven days after his release. Alrashid asked her husband if he was still up for it; he replied yes.

“I wanted to do it because it’s like therapy,” he said. “But it was one of the toughest performances I’ve ever had. I’m still weak, and I was sick, so I lost my voice.”

Despite his experience at B-18, Othmane said he is trying to stay positive — and is willing to accept deportation if that’s what it comes down to.

But, he said, “I still have faith in the judicial system. Hopefully everything turns out good.”

Monday, April 13, 2020

U.S. Deports 400 Migrant Children Under New Coronavirus Rules: A Kind Of Decision That Should Make Us All Shudder

On an Easter Sunday that also happens to be our first one in an epic national and worldwide coronavirus crisis, it is totally legitimate to ask ourselves what kind of people occupy the White House.  How could they be so callous toward these children whose lives have been the constant target for persecution?

I refer to this cruel and vile action of booting these children out of the country based on a change in administrative rules around three weeks ago on March 21st.  


It's the kind of decision that should make us all shudder.  


It's horrific to read that to perform this operation, they erased laws that provide protections for children from getting trafficked and putting children on a track for asylum in a U.S. immigration court. Instead, U.S. officials got the green light to "quickly remove people without standard immigration proceedings." Apparently, five out of twenty-three such children had tested positive for COVID-19 in early April and were among those deported.  




Melania Trump then came to mind as I recalled the trip that she took to the U.S.-Mexico border to visit migrant children in detention centers wearing a stylish, if vulgar and mean-spirited, green jacket that read, "I really don't care, do u?"

This wasn't a "bizarre" act, as the article expressed.  Nor did her jacket refer—as Trump said in a Tweet that day—to the allegedly "Fake News Media."

Rather, her behavior was consistent with her husband's recent callous and horrific acts of policy, as a response to an apparent coronavirus outbreak where children were returned without their parents to Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador. We've known that they're evil all along, but somehow not everybody does in the U.S.

This story screams for justice. Again, it is incumbent and urgent that all of us of good conscience vote in November and get these horrible people with hearts of darkness out of the White House.

-Angela Valenzuela

"U.S. deports 400 migrant children under new coronavirus rules." 

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. immigration officials have rapidly deported nearly 400 migrant children intercepted at the U.S.-Mexico border in the past two weeks under new rules billed as seeking to limit the spread of the novel coronavirus in the United States, according to government data seen by Reuters.



Tuesday, July 09, 2019

Historians Ask Holocaust Museum To Stop Condemning Migrant Crisis Comparisons

This is a very emotional, albeit healthy discussion.  I agree with the 150 historians who acknowledge the deliberate, state-sponsored brutality against children and families along the U.S.-Mexico border as little different from what we know as "concentration camps."  Concentration camps, by definition, are places of mass civilian detention without trial and that's what's happening at this very moment.

I would also add that the mass deportations that Trump is calling for are part of this same logic of annihilation.

-Angela

#NoToConcentrationCampsForKids #FamiliesBelongTogether #familiestornapart
 #AbolishICE


Nearly 150 scholars asked the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum to stop rejecting analogies to the Holocaust when discussing border detention centers.


Almost 150 historians who specialize in genocide are asking the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum to retract its statement condemning the use of Holocaust analogies when describing inhumane conditions in migrant detention centers.

The scholars penned an open letter on Monday acknowledging support for the museum in Washington, D.C., but also expressing concern regarding its June 24 statement.

“The Museum’s decision to completely reject drawing any possible analogies to the Holocaust, or to the events leading up to it, is fundamentally ahistorical,” read the letter, published in the New York Review of Books.

“It has the potential to inflict severe damage on the Museum’s ability to continue its role as a credible, leading global institution dedicated to Holocaust memory, Holocaust education, and research in the field of Holocaust and genocide studies,” the letter stated.

The clash came after Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) spoke out last month saying the Trump administration has established “concentration camps” along the U.S.-Mexico border where migrant families and children are “brutalized with dehumanizing conditions and dying.” She also used the phrase “Never Again,” a slogan associated with the Holocaust and other historical instances of widespread human rights violations.

Republicans like Rep. Liz Cheney (Wy.) attacked Ocasio-Cortez’s comparison and the Esquire article she shared that cited concentration camp expert Andrea Pitzer. Pitzer has emphasized that concentration camps ― sites for “the mass detention of civilians without trial” ― are very much in place at the border.

While people often equate concentration camps with Nazi death camps, the definition is broader than that, the Esquire article points out. Historical organizations like Densho note that the term “concentration camp” can be a euphemism when a term like “death camp” more truthfully describes a place where people were rounded up and systematically murdered. “Not every concentration camp is a death camp,” the Esquire article states.

Reports have long detailed the horrific conditions that migrants, especially children, are experiencing in Customs and Border Protection facilities at the U.S.-Mexico border. After more than a dozen House Democrats, including Ocasio-Cortez, visited detention facilities in El Paso, Texas, on Monday, they said detained women there were called derogatory names and told to drink water from a toilet. According to CBP, detained migrants drink from a sink attached to the toilet.

In May, a Homeland Security watchdog found that detained migrants have been kept in unsanitary and overcrowded conditions in which some people have to stand on toilets to be able to breathe. A group of lawyersrecently filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after interviewing minors at the facilities who described being hungry, cold, sick, sleep-deprived and lacking basic hygiene.

Last month, four toddlers were so sick and neglected at a facility in McAllen, Texas, that lawyers had to force the government to hospitalize them last week. Five migrant children have died in Border Patrol custody since December, and a sixth was recently discovered to have died in September.

On Sunday, dozens of Jewish protesters were arrested after blocking an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center in New Jersey. The protesters are part of the Jewish organization Never Again Action.

“As Jews, we’ve been taught to never let anything like the Holocaust happen again,” the group wrote on its Facebook page. “Now, with children detained in unacceptable conditions, ICE raids targeting our communities, and people dying at the border while seeking safety in the U.S., we are seeing the signs of a mass atrocity. We refuse to wait and see what happens next.”

The group of historians on Monday urged the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s director, Sara J. Bloomfield, to reverse the museum’s position based on careful historical analysis.

“The very core of Holocaust education is to alert the public to dangerous developments that facilitate human rights violations and pain and suffering,” the letter read. “Pointing to similarities across time and space is essential for this task.”

Do you have information you want to share with HuffPost? Here’s how.



Sunday, February 24, 2019

America, the kidnapper: ‘Likely thousands’ of children still separated by Rex Huppke

I'm re-posting a message from Austin Council Member Gregorio Casar.
“When my children are sitting in their high school history classes one day, what will be the excuse given to them about what we’re doing now? How will they be able to make peace with the trauma and pain our leadership has intentionally inflicted on potentially thousands of men, women, and children seeking refuge in this country?

What is being done to refugee children and families by our federal government is the real national emergency.”

In total agreement.  This is an urgent matter of gross human rights violations inflicted by U.S. government policy to the literal tune of thousands of children getting separated from their families, far too many still in our detention centers and with precious little transparency or accountability.  What could be more urgent?  

-Angela
Column: America, the kidnapper: ‘Likely thousands’ of children still separated




Rex Huppke Chicago Tribune  February 12, 2019
America is a kidnapper.
It became one in late 2017 and early 2018, when the government began quietly separating families — asylum seekers and migrants who entered the country illegally — at our southern border, a test run for a soon-to-be-open policy of taking children from their parents.
ADVERTISING
Our country became a kidnapper in plain sight last April, when then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the Trump administration’s zero-tolerance policy at the border, breaking up families at such a pace that children pulled from the arms of their mothers and fathers were dispersed to refugee sites across the country with no consistent tracking process in place.
And America remains a kidnapper today, because children are still being separated at the border for specious reasons and, according to a federal report and recent testimony before Congress, there may be thousands of additional children we didn’t know were separated, children the government says it now lacks the resources to find.
Ann Maxwell, assistant inspector general at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, testified last week before a U.S. House subcommittee on oversight and investigations: “In conclusion, the total number of children separated from a parent or guardian by U.S. immigration authorities and transferred to HHS for care is not known.”
She said it is “likely thousands more.”
Consider that for a moment: The total number of children, possibly thousands, that our government willfully took from their parents as part of a cruel and clumsy experiment in deterrence is not known.
This story began, in large part, with a little girl who was taken from her mother and shipped halfway across the country to a facility here in Chicago. It has been almost a year since I first wrote about that little girl, and the fact that we’re still talking about children our government unfairly ripped from their parents is unconscionable.
That girl and her mother were separated for months, even though the mother, identified only as Ms. L., had followed all of the laws laid out for asylum seekers. The pair were reunited here fairly quickly after their story was revealed and a lawsuit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union.
That lawsuit grew into a class action and a judge issued a June 26 court order halting the Trump administration’s family separation policy and giving the government 30 days to find the more than 2,600 children being held across the country under the care of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) and reunite them with their parents.
When the government missed that deadline, U.S. District Judge Dana M. Sabraw said: “What was lost in the process was the family. The parents didn’t know where the children were, and the children didn’t know where the parents were. And the government didn’t know either.”
It was a pathetic mess, the result of a draconian policy implemented with no advance planning. The various agencies responsible for these children didn’t have a consistent means of tracking them or their parents. It was slapdash and intentionally brutal.
ADVERTISING
It took months for most of those children to be reunited with their families. But in January, we learned of an entirely different set of children lost in the chaos.
In the months before an official zero-tolerance policy was announced and in the months that following its announcement, there were children separated from their parents at the border, taken into government custody and then released to the care of a relative in the United States.
According to an HHS Office of Inspector General report issued in January, “officials estimate that thousands of separated children entered ORR care and were released prior to the June 26, 2018, court order. Because the tracking systems in use at that time were informal and designed for operational purposes rather than retrospective reporting, ORR was unable to provide a more precise estimate or specific information about these children’s placements (for example, whether the children were released to sponsors who were relatives, sponsors who were nonrelatives, foster care, etc.).”
The court order in the Ms. L. case involves children who were in government custody when the order was issued. Attorneys from the American Civil Liberties Union assumed, logically, that all children separated from their families due to the zero-tolerance policy were part of the lawsuit’s class. That makes sense, given that Ms. L. and her daughter — the family at the center of the case — were reunited well before the court order was filed.
But the government doesn’t see it that way, arguing that the newly identified children are not part of the Ms. L. class and claiming it would be too much work to find them all anyway.
To summarize, our government tore thousands of children away from their parents causing untold trauma, then dragged its feet mightily in reuniting those children with their families. Now we learn there may be thousands of additional children who were placed with U.S. relatives (not their parents), and the government has no plan to reconnect those children with their parents or even consult the parents to see if the current guardianship is acceptable.
These kids weren’t put up for adoption or handed over willingly to U.S. officials in the hope they would get placed with a distant relative. They were taken from their parents — period.
Now government officials are claiming they lack the resources to find these kids. They even have the gall to suggest that uprooting the children from their current guardianship would be too traumatic, after showing no such concern for the children’s well-being when they yanked them away from their parents in the first place.
“The point is, we need to have the information so we can find out from the parent or child what they want to do,” said Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project and a lead attorney on the Ms. L. case. “I think the government doesn’t want to do that or they’ve candidly admitted they don’t think it’s worth the resources. It’s always worth the resources when it’s kids’ lives at stake.”
We are a powerful and wealthy nation. We certainly have the ability and the resources to account for every child we forcibly orphaned. We should, if we still possess even a sliver of compassion, fully clean up this inhumane mess and recognize the stain it will leave on our history.
Until we do that, we’re nothing but kidnappers.