Translate

Showing posts with label cultural war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cultural war. Show all posts

Sunday, August 29, 2021

The Far Right's College Crusade: How extremists are infiltrating—and fracturing—campus Republican Groups


Okay, friends and colleagues.  Eyes wide open. 

White supremacist organizations are both infiltrating and getting 
nurtured on our college campuses. Why?

According to this piece, the concern is expressed as "higher ed’s efforts 
to increase racial diversity and inclusion are seen as a 
liberal plot to erase white and Christian traditions and culture."

A liberal plot to erase white and Christian traditions and culture? Really?! 

Just because white and Christian traditions have actually been used
to eviscerate Indigenous languages and cultures doesn't mean people of color are motivated to act equally imperialist as they have
been treated. 

If anything, this more than 500-year colonial experiment is about 
imperialist ways of knowing that those of us in higher education overwhelmingly shun, but which extremist conservative republicans 
as those described below seek to perpetuate.

What's incredible about this fear, if you will, is that according to the
Chronicle of Higher Education, public, four-year institutions 
remain predominantly white at 56.4 percent. For Latinos, African 
American, Asians, and Native Americans, respectively, those figures 
are 19.2 percent, 11.4 percent, and 7.9 percent, and .7 percent. 

Of course, diversity isn't simply about equity, inclusion, and fairness, 
as vital as these are. Ample research shows that diversity is great for 
college campuses, organizations, work environments, the military, 
and government. Currently, in fact, there is a Fierce Urgency for 

Students that join these extremist organizations are not only 
indoctrinated into fearing diversity—and possibly into provoking 
and carrying out violent acts— but are, as a consequence, structured
out of many careers that require cultural competence in an
increasingly diverse world.  Just as importantly, they also structure themselves out of experiencing the wealth, richness, and 
abundant life that an appreciation of diversity brings. 

My thoughts on a Sunday afternoon.

-Angela Valenzuela

The Far Right's College Crusade: How extremists are infiltrating—and fracturing—campus Republican Groups 


by Eric Kelderman, Chronicle of Higher Education, August 6, 2021 Sitting in front of a roaring fire, Kimo Gandall looks and sounds like a politician from a bygone era. Wearing a three-piece suit and holding a tumbler of Elijah Craig bourbon as a soft jazz intro fades, he begins one of his “fireside chat” videos on Facebook or YouTube, taped at his parents’ home in Huntington Beach, Calif.

“I’m going to talk about the issues, how we’re going to implement them and how we’re going to change them,” says Gandall, 23, a former president of the College Republicans at the University of California at Irvine, before he delves into a detailed report on the financial situation of the College Republican National Committee.

The genteel setting sometimes includes a TV tray holding the Bible, Robert’s Rules of Order, and books such as Samuel P. Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations, which theorizes about the likelihood of future wars between the Christian West and the Muslim East.

DAVID WALTER BANKS FOR THE CHRONICLE
Kimo Gandall: “Our goal is not to be a big tent party. Our goal is to convert, essentially.”

But Gandall’s buttoned-down persona is at odds with his darker views. He believes, for instance, that the United States is headed toward a race war fueled by progressive politics and the Black Lives Matter movement. “The leftist narrative now wants you to actually kill each other because you’re of a different race,” he said during a July 2020 podcast. “A lot of the leftist, BLM rhetoric — Black Lives Matter — founded itself on wanting racial division, right, when you have whites bow down to Blacks.”

Gandall, who graduated in June with a degree in political science, is not an outlier. Instead, he has become a key figure in California campus politics, and one of many young conservatives across the nation who are leading campus Republican groups further right, ideologically.

The shift has led to a schism among campus Republicans that mirrors the divide in the national party: In a dozen states, including California, campus conservatives are splintering, in part, over whether to support the former president, Donald J. Trump, and his populist message.

But the division also results from allegations that some campus groups are allying themselves with the far right: Individuals and organizations that are, to varying degrees, “antidemocratic, antiegalitarian and white supremacist,” Cynthia Miller-Idriss, director of research at the Polarization and Extremism Research Innovation Lab, at American University, writes in her book Hate in the Homeland: The New Global Far Right (Princeton University Press, 2020). While such groups are not monolithic, Miller-Idriss explains, a common belief is that dominant groups — white people, men, Christians, Americans — face an existential threat from an increasingly diverse society. Within that framing, higher ed’s efforts to increase racial diversity and inclusion are seen as a liberal plot to erase white and Christian traditions and culture.

As some campus Republicans move toward the far right, what was previously an assault on higher education from groups based largely outside academe has become an inside job; not a mob of tattooed white supremacists marching across campus in paramilitary costumes, but clean-cut undergraduates who are savvy on social media and cloak their extremism in irony and edgy internet memes.

The shift has been felt by some faculty, who fear that any minor misstep with a conservative student could lead to hate mail, a barrage of social-media backlash, and vilification by conservative lawmakers. Students and faculty of color, and those who are Jewish or undocumented fear that the rhetoric of these groups could spark actual violence. Even moderately conservative students find themselves without a place to share their political activism on campus.

Colleges are left in a quandary: How to deal with students who are hostile to core principles of higher education while also fulfilling their duty to uphold the First Amendment.

andall and other young conservatives are disillusioned with mainstream Republicans, who they see as too willing to abandon political and religious traditions to accommodate social and demographic changes.

He calls himself a “paleoconservative,” a term coined in the 1980s by traditionalists who supported strict limits on immigration, an isolationist foreign policy, and trade protectionism. The movement has also been linked to white nationalism, according to the nonprofit Political Research Associates, a social-justice think tank.

Gandall embraces the ideal of a “naturally ordered society,” meaning, for example, that traditional gender roles and heterosexual relationships are required for the good of society. He is against same-sex marriage and has said that “transgenderism is a mental illness.”

He opposes violence and says he could not possibly support white nationalism because he identifies as “half-Hawaiian.” While the College Republicans at UC-Irvine are mostly male and Christian, Gandall said about half its members are from Hispanic or Asian backgrounds.

At the same time, Gandall imagines a violent clash as “the logical conclusion of what the left is doing in their systematic oppression of whites, nationally and in California.”

Thursday, May 06, 2021

Texas Republicans target 'critical race theory' with bill to muzzle teachers on racism, sexism

Glad to see more press coming out on this horrible HB 3979. I wholeheartedly agree with University of Houston history professor Stephanie Boyce who is also affiliated with the Texas Alliance of Black School Educators (TABSE) that rather than restricting student activism, “We should be trying to find ways to make these processes more inclusive, to bring students into the process even more.”

Republican leaders think that "boundless prosperity" is possible without youth ever getting to know too much about the political process. I'm sure this isn't what they thought about with respect to their own children acquiring the skills of political engagement. This is a totally veiled attempt, as I comment herein, to disenfranchise our youth through their own miseducation. 

-Angela Valenzuela

Texas Republicans target 'critical race theory' with bill to muzzle teachers on racism, sexism

Jeremy Blackman, Cayla Harris, Austin Bureau

May 6, 2021Updated: May 6, 2021 8:41 a.m.

Carisa Lopez, representing the Texas Freedom Network, delivers her message to the media outside after speaking to the State Board of Education as it hears comments on proposed changes to the state's social studies curriculum at its meeting in Austin on September 11, 2018.

Tom Reel, Staff / Staff photographer


After months of denouncing calls for the country to more fully reckon with its discriminatory roots, Texas Republicans are joining national conservatives in a push to restrict how teachers can talk about race and racism.

A bill that supporters say will strip politics from public education, but that critics call a thinly veiled attempt to whitewash American history, has already passed the Senate and could be voted on by the House as early as Friday. Both chambers are controlled by Republicans.

The measure targets critical race theory, an academic movement that has become a buzzword among Republicans who dispute the existence of white privilege and systemic racism. The bill would limit teachers from pushing its core tenets, such as connecting modern day inequities to historical patterns of discrimination.

Racism is “part of our reality, and that’s part of our shame, and we shouldn’t do anything to cover that up,” said Rep. Steve Toth, a Republican and the bill’s author in the House. “But what we should also not do is blame that on tender little children that have done nothing wrong.”

The backlash stems in part from the 1619 Project by The New York Times that asserted slavery and its remnants were more integral to the country’s founding than is commonly acknowledged. The essay collection, commemorating the arrival of the first enslaved Africans to colonial Virginia, was awarded a Pulitzer Prize and has been adapted into children’s literature and lesson plans for educators.

School districts in some states are adapting parts of the project into their curriculum, and the Biden administration announced last month that it wants to prioritize education grants to programs that “take into account systemic marginalization, biases, inequities and discriminatory policy and practice in American history.”

The Texas legislation, sponsored in the Senate by Sen. Brandon Creighton of Conroe, would bar schools from requiring teachers to talk about current events, and prohibit teachers from discussing certain viewpoints, including that some people are “inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously.”

Stephanie Boyce, who teaches Black history at the University of Houston and is affiliated with the Texas Alliance of Black School Educators, said teachers are already trained to present diverse viewpoints when discussing subjects. She said supporters are simply trying to block students from learning uncomfortable truths about the country or engaging more actively in the political process.

“It’s not even like they’re trying to make it complicated to see what’s happening,” Boyce said, adding about the restrictions on civic action: “We should be trying to find ways to make these processes more inclusive, to bring students into the process even more.”

She called it “ironic” that “you have people like me, an African American woman whose ancestors built this country, and the Capitol, and all the things that we did for free — that we should have to come before a body of legislators, the majority of which are white and male, and be told what we can and cannot say about race, sex and power dynamics.”

No more class credit for activism

If enacted, the bill would also bar educators from giving students credits for engaging in “political activism,” which includes lobbying legislators, city council members, attending marches and other forms of civic action.

Teachers should not have to “push a particular political agenda,” Creighton told colleagues last month, “but certainly to promote America and our republic for what it is, which is the greatest country in the history of the world, and certainly the most philanthropic.”

Another bill passed by the House on Wednesday would establish a Republican-appointed advisory panel to “promote patriotic education and increase awareness of the Texas values that continue to stimulate boundless prosperity across this state.”

Angela Valenzuela, an education policy professor at the University of Texas at Austin who testified against efforts in Arizona to ban ethnic studies from their classrooms, said Toth and Creighton’s proposal potentially violates free speech and other constitutional rights.

“This is part of a larger agenda to disenfranchise our communities, because we know that people who are critical and involved, that they vote,” she said.

Black, Hispanic and other children of color make up the large majority of students enrolled in Texas schools, according to state education figures.

“The idea that there is going to be a law that potentially bars teachers from discussing certain topics, I find, quite frankly, very offensive,” said Albert Broussard, a Black history professor at Texas A&M University who himself has been critical of parts of the 1619 Project. “It puts students at a tremendous disadvantage, because they’re simply going to fall behind.”

Several Texas-based teachers’ groups and left-leaning advocacy organizations have also come out against the measure, saying it would both hinder classroom discussion and take away student opportunities to participate in the democratic process — something valuable not only for young adults, but also for legislators debating bills that would affect them.

“The policymakers really do benefit from getting the youth perspective, and for the youth themselves, it has been an electric experience for them, having these policymakers acknowledge … the reality (of) what’s happening at schools and how it’s affecting them,” said Vanessa Beltran, a mental health policy fellow at the nonprofit Girls Empowerment Network.

Rep. James Talarico, a Democrat from Round Rock and a former public school teacher, said Toth and Creighton’s legislation conflicts with the state’s existing curriculum standards, which require educators to discuss current events.

“Students desperately need to be able to understand current events, determine fact from fiction and develop media literacy,” he said. “If public education is here as a safeguard for democracy, analyzing and understanding current events is critical to that goal.”

jeremy.blackman@chron.com

cayla.harris@express-news.net