Translate

Showing posts with label school re-opening. Show all posts
Showing posts with label school re-opening. Show all posts

Saturday, October 03, 2020

850 Austin district teachers pledge not to return to school buildings on Monday

Not only should the will and preference of 850 AISD teachers matter for re-opening policy, but we need look no further than the catastrophe that is unfolding before our very eyes at the White House to give us all pause about any form of school re-opening plan. And it all took place in what should have been the safest place in America to be...

-Angela Valenzuela

850 Austin district teachers pledge not to return to school buildings on Monday

October 1, 2020















About 850 Austin district teachers have pledged not to return to their campuses Monday when school buildings reopen for learning.

Concerned about the threat of the coronavirus to both their students and themselves, the educators said they remain committed to teaching their students, but will do so only in a virtual setting.

Of the 925 teachers who requested medical waivers and accommodations to work remotely, 66% had been approved so far, one was denied and the rest are still pending or have been marked inactive, according to district information released Thursday.

In total, 44% of the 1,485 staff members have received accommodations, according to information provided earlier this week.

District leaders said they are approving accommodations for those who medically are at high risk from COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus, and have submitted medical documentation. However, such accommodations have not been extended to educators who have high-risk family members, leaving some teachers to refuse to return in person and others to quit.

"I will not return on Monday nor do I plan to under any circumstances,” said Patrick Stinson, who teaches chemistry and integrated physics and chemistry at Northeast Early College High School. The district two weeks ago denied his request for accommodations, which he sought because his wife has a chronic heart condition. Stinson said he might lose his teaching position with his stance, but he said he is unwilling to expose his wife to risk by being in the classroom setting, where teachers already are exposed to a variety of germs, as school-age children often are carriers.

“Lots of us can’t afford to make this choice and have to do the wrong thing in order to eat,” he said.

Kiker Elementary librarian Sonya Butler notified campus families she’s leaving her position.

“I do not qualify for the accommodations or family leave and due to family situations and health, I am not returning to face to face learning,” she wrote in a letter to the school community. “I am truly heartbroken to leave a job I love so much and people I care about so deeply. However my family must come first and there, since I cannot work remotely, I must resign.”

Safe to return?

The Texas Education Agency requires districts to reopen campuses to students who wish to learn in person, or the schools risk losing state education funding. The agency has allowed districts to delay their start dates, as Austin did, and gradually add students back to campuses within eight weeks of launching. Most Central Texas school districts already have reopened schools. The Austin school district reopens Monday at 25% capacity to its first set of children, including those with special needs, prekindergarten, kindergarten, sixth and ninth grades and to children of staff. Plans call for more students to be added each week thereafter until all who wish to return may do so.

Dr. Mark Escott, interim health authority for Austin-Travis County, told Austin school board members Monday night that he believed it is safe to reopen campuses next week. He said he already has sent his own children back to in-person learning and his wife, who is an educator, also has returned to her campus.

Local and national health experts have cautioned not to reopen schools until the area’s positivity rate — the percentage of people testing positive for COVID-19 among those tested — is less than 5%. Travis County’s positivity rate for three weeks has been under that threshold, though some pockets of Austin, including where high numbers of low-income, Black or Latino families live, have had double or triple those rates.

Escott told board members he’s seen no evidence of coronavirus spread within the classroom setting. He reiterated that the local schools’ cases are almost exclusively attributable to sports and other extracurricular activities, students who have been in congregant settings.

While some classrooms or grade levels could exceed 50%, the majority of district families say they won’t return to the classrooms. Of the 54,300 families who responded to the survey, 57% said they are sticking to virtual learning for their elementary students, while 73% of middle schoolers and 76% of high schoolers plan to remain remote. Among low-income families, 53% of elementary students and 65% of middle school students said they will remain remote, while 68% of high schoolers are choosing virtual instruction.

Calls for change

Education Austin, the district’s largest union, remains in negotiations with district leaders on reopening plans, union President Ken Zarifis said. The pledge among the teachers who won’t return in person is not a strike, he said, because they will continue delivering instruction.

The group held a virtual news conference Thursday and reiterated educators’ concerns, calling again for changes to the reopening plan. The group cites a code of ethics that says educators will not knowingly or recklessly endanger the health of a student. Campus site-specific plans have been fluid, some changing weekly, which some educators say has contributed to the feeling that returning is unsafe.

A caravan of about 150 educators last weekend went to the district’s headquarters and taped to the building signs and messages: “COVID is airborne,” “Put our teachers and students first,” “How is face to face ‘best practices’ during a pandemic?”

District plans continue to call for all staff members without a medical waiver to return to school buildings Monday, but Zarifis said he’s hopeful the district will reexamine its stance and provide more staff members the opportunity to keep working remotely. He said newly hired Superintendent Stephanie S. Elizalde spoke with a few dozen teachers on Wednesday and with him on Thursday about the reopening plans.

“We are encouraged by the superintendent’s engagement around the issues we feel are important, and the safety and teachers of our students, and how we come back to school,” he said.

Elizalde has acknowledged the concerns among employees, but she has said, “Austin ISD starts with students in its decision-making process.”

Austin district administrators will be present at campuses Monday to help teachers and school staff, she said.

“We feel confident that teachers care about their students and will notify us before Monday if they don’t plan on returning. We have contingency plans in place to make adjustments as necessary,” Elizalde said. “This is why we are opening with a maximum of 25% of our students.”

Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Most parents want to cancel school until the spring, finds a new Harris Poll study

Like my dear friend, Martha Cotera says, "COVID is like a pregnancy. You can't speed it up." It's a stab in the dark, but yes, I share in the hope that things can go back to quasi-normal by spring.

-Angela Valenzuela


Most parents want to cancel school until the spring, finds a new Harris Poll study

8.19.2020

A newly released study by The Harris Poll fielded during the first week of August finds that 57 percent of parents of school-age children “wish schools would just cancel this fall and re-open in the spring.” An even higher percentage of fathers—63 percent—say so. These sentiments likely reflect both the extent of frustration with the quality of remote learning last spring and a lack of trust in schools’ ability to facilitate safe, full-time, in-person learning.

This nationally representative online survey of more than 1,000 parents of five- to seventeen-year-olds posed questions related to the 2019–20 and 2020–21 school years, focusing particularly on effects of the Covid-19 pandemic.

During the spring school closures, 60 percent of parents report that their enrolled children spent three hours or less on school work on a typical day. And just 15 percent spent six or more hours. Moreover, almost half of all parents, 46 percent, appear to be OK with capping daily schoolwork at three hours or less in the fall. This all bolsters concerns about academic losses caused by remote learning, suggesting that an inferior method of delivering instruction will likely be made worse by less time spent on schoolwork.

And indeed, remote learning is going to feature into the vast majority of children’s education in the fall, as only 23 percent of families (among those who had been notified by the time of the survey) report that they even have the option of fully in-person schooling, and only 21 percent would choose it—if available—as the ideal instructional method. Forty-three percent prefer that schools be all virtual, and 36 percent favor hybrid.

These data suggest that parents are prioritizing health over learning and that they don’t trust schools to create and maintain safe environments. When asked what their biggest concerns were about the upcoming school year, the leading answer among parents with children entering school this fall—61 percent—was the child’s mental health. Next, at 59 percent, was their physical health and safety. A majority also reported being concerned about harm to their children’s education, social lives, and extracurricular activities. And 58 percent of parents say they will have to make, or have made, tough decisions about staying in the work force or staying home if schools don’t offer in-person instruction in the fall. Yet they still overwhelming reject fully in-person learning.

The survey results also suggest that more parents than ever are willing to make big changes to their children’s education this school year in response to the pandemic and its effects. Fourteen percent of parents report participating in learning pods, for example, which have gotten a lot of press lately. And a whopping 18 percent of moms and dads plan to change schools or switch to homeschooling this year.

No matter the metric, parents are clearly unsure how to balance health and learning, and are frustrated by the uncertainty surrounding Covid-19 in America. Perhaps that’s why a strong majority wish schools would just cancel fall school, and pick it up in early 2021: It would really simplify things. It would also, of course, complicate already disturbing learning gaps.

Note on the survey method: The survey was conducted online within the United States by The Harris Poll from August 4–7, 2020, among 1,002 parents of children ages five to seventeen (“school age children”). Results were weighted for age within gender, region, race/ethnicity, household income, education, and size of household where necessary to align them with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was also used to adjust for respondents’ propensity to be online. Full results are available from The Harris Poll upon request.

POLICY PRIORITY: 

HIGH EXPECTATIONS

TOPICS: 

CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION

 

TEACHERS & SCHOOL LEADERS

Florida Judge Rules State Order Requiring Schools To Reopen 'Unconstitutional'

The net of this ongoing case out of Florida at the moment is that local communities should have the leeway to make decisions that are appropriate to them, while also acknowledging that the state's order—of requiring schools to open by a set date or risk losing funding—as unconstitutional. The Florida Department of Education has appealed the decision, blocking the order from taking effect until the matter is resolved. The teachers union is, of course, urging the judge to reinstate his order. 


Here is a hashtag out of Arkansas that folks are using on Twitter in the wake of such deliberative and now judicial struggles throughout the country: #WeReopenSchoolsWhen.


Another hashtag, in response to the disregard demonstrated by Donald Trump and Besty DeVos, i#NotTheirChildren.


At this point, we must all stay tuned to see what plays out in Florida.

 

-Angela Valenzuela

 

THE CORONAVIRUS CRISIS


Florida Judge Rules State Order Requiring Schools To Reopen 'Unconstitutional'














Layer Elementary School in Winter Springs, Fla., opened with enhanced safety precautions due to COVID-19. An emergency order initially required school districts statewide to open for in-person learning by Aug. 31, but was temporarily struck down by a judge on Monday.

Paul Hennessy/NurPhoto via Getty Images

A Florida judge on Monday ruled against the state's order requiring schools to open for in-person instruction by the end of August, calling parts of it "unconstitutional." He granted a temporary injunction, putting the decision-making power in the hands of individual districts.

The emergency order was issued by Florida Education Commissioner Richard Corcoran in early July as the state's coronavirus cases surged, and mandated that all districts open "brick and mortar schools" at least five days a week for families who want to send their students back, or else risk losing already-allocated funding.

Along with teachers and parents, the Florida Education Association — the state's largest teachers' union — quickly filed a lawsuit, alleging the order violated a provision in Florida's constitution requiring the state to ensure schools operate safely. They were joined by the NAACP and the NAACP Florida State Conference last week.

In a 16-page decision, Circuit Judge Charles Dodson said the order is "unconstitutional to the extent that it arbitrarily disregards safety, denies local school boards' decision making with respect to reopening brick and mortar schools, and conditions funding on an approved reopening plan with a start date in August."

"Schools should reopen when the local decision makers determine upon advice of medical experts that it is safe to do so," he wrote.

On Monday evening, a spokesperson for the Florida Department of Education told NPR that the department had appealed the decision. This automatically placed a stay on the judge's order, blocking it from taking effect until the appeal is over or unless the court rules otherwise. An FEA spokesperson said the union will return to court on Tuesday to ask the judge to reinstate his order.

In a statement shared with NPR, Corcoran said he is "100% confident" the state will win the lawsuit.

"This fight has been, and will continue to be, about giving every parent, every teacher and every student a choice, regardless of what educational option they choose," Corcoran said. "If you are one of the 1.6 million students who have chosen to return to the classroom, a parent, or a classroom teacher that wanted to educate their student in person, we strongly encourage you to call the Florida Education Association and tell them to drop this frivolous lawsuit."

Corcoran defended the state's aggressive approach to reopening schools in an interview on All Things Considered last week, saying transmission rates had dropped significantly and that the educational and developmental consequences of keeping kids home outweigh the risk posed to them by the virus.

Dodson wrote that while it is not entirely clear to what extent children transmit the virus to adults, "what has been clearly established is there is no easy decision and opening schools will most likely increase COVID-19 cases in Florida." He added that the order did not take into consideration community transmission rates, the varying ages of students or proper precautions.

Dodson pointed to the case of Hillsborough County earlier this month, where the local school board voted to delay the start of in-person learning by three weeks based on the advice of medical experts, but walked that decision back after getting a letter from Corcoran that said they would not otherwise receive financial flexibility.

"Defendants arbitrarily prioritized reopening schools statewide in August over safety and the advice of health experts," Dodson wrote. "And all school districts complied in order to avoid a drastic loss of state funding."

In an exception to the order, the state did allow three South Florida counties hard-hit by COVID-19 — Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach — to begin the year with distance learning.

Andrew Spar, vice president of the FEA, said at a press conference that the "overwhelming majority" of districts have already started school, and more are set to open on Monday.

Before the appeal was announced, educators and legal experts said at the FEA press conference that the injunction would allow schools to make their own decisions about remaining open, moving to virtual learning or further delaying opening based on local conditions without having to submit a plan for state approval.

According to the FEA, several counties are struggling with confirmed cases and quarantines soon after reopening for in-person instruction. It said Martin County, the most populous county to open in the first half of August, has had to quarantine nearly 300 students and several educators.

Dodson also acknowledged that teachers overwhelmingly want to be back in school, but many may not be able to stay in the classroom or even in the profession due to unsafe conditions in school buildings that have opened.

For example, he said, some classrooms may not provide enough space for proper social distancing, and teachers may lack adequate personal protective equipment or time to thoroughly sanitize their classrooms. Those safety concerns are exacerbated if teachers or members of their household have pre-existing conditions that could make them more vulnerable to the virus.

"They chose to teach because they have a passion for teaching our children," Dodson wrote. "They want to be in the classroom interacting with their students. But the evidence was clear that there are teachers falling hard through the cracks because of this order."

The FEA praised the court's ruling on Monday.

"This is only a temporary injunction, but we plan to press ahead in court," President Fedrick Ingram said in a statement. "Local communities should have the freedom to make the best decisions for reopening or keeping open local schools. Our districts should not be ruled by reckless edicts from on high. Safety must come before politics."

Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, called the injunction a relief and said "safety has to come first." She also said an appeal was expected.

Earlier on Monday, DeSantis said that Florida had just reported its lowest number of COVID-19 cases since June 14.

 

Sunday, August 23, 2020

Burnout Is Coming to Campus. Are College Leaders Ready? by Kevin R. McClure 8.14.2020

From everyone of my colleagues that I've spoken to, this past Summer was the busiest ever. Non-stop. I can vouch for this, as well. This piece is about how work has its limits—as the very serious issue of burnout abundantly reveals. 

All of us in K-12 and higher education, need to be kind, caring, and considerate to minimize harm in what will predictably be another high-stress semester and year. 

Do read this piece as there's great advice for us all.

-Angela Valenzuela

Burnout Is Coming to Campus. Are College Leaders Ready?

By Kevin R. McClure     Aug 14, 2020


Kevin R. McClure is an associate professor of higher education at the 

University of North Carolina at Wilmington. He is an expert on higher 

education finance, management and leadership.

Wednesday, August 19, 2020

An Analysis of How the Department of Education’s Equitable Services Rule Will Harm Texas Students and School Districts

Funding private schools with our public taxes is a problem, blurring the lines between public and private. In this case, it's even worse, limiting not only monies to Title I schools that enroll low-income students, but also schools' capacity to hire nurses, protective equipment, Chrome books, and so on. 

Scroll down to see how, according to IDRA's Morgan Craven and Roy L. Johnson's analysis, districts will be directly impacted. To this end, I am pleased to learn that the Southern Poverty Law Center, on behalf of the NAACP, has a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education that you can read about here.

-Angela Valenzuela

#SupportPublicEducation

An Analysis Of How The Department Of Education’s Equitable Services Rule Will Harm Texas Students And School Districts

 

• By Morgan Craven, J.D., & Roy L. Johnson, M.A. • IDRA Issue Brief • July 16, 2020 •

See PDF versionSan Antonio • July 17, 2020 – New analysis by IDRA shows that 185 Texas public school districts may have to give up a total of over $44.2 million of their federal CARES Act relief funds to private schools within their district boundaries under a new rule from the U.S. Department of Education. The rule increases the funding districts would usually reserve for private schools by more than $38.7 million.

Federal law requires school districts to reserve federal funds for private schools for “equitable services,” like tutoring and counseling programs, based on the population of private school students living within their districts who come from low-income families. The same applies for CARES Act funds as long as districts only use those funds for their Title I schools.

But the Department’s new rule stipulates that if a school district spends even one dollar of its CARES Act relief funds for a non-Title I school, it must give away a much higher amount to its nearby private schools. The amount must be calculated based on the total population of private school students in the district, regardless of family income.

This means that to have access to the full allotment of relief funds, schools cannot spend those COVID-19 relief funds on protective equipment, cleaning supplies, instructional materials, or any district-wide measures to benefit students in non-Title I schools, including students from families with limited incomes who do not attend Title I schools.

“The Trump Administration’s decision to divert critical COVID-19 relief funds from public schools and the students they serve toward private schools is both tragic and unsurprising,” said Morgan Craven, J.D., IDRA’s National Director of Policy, Advocacy and Community Engagement. “The Department’s interpretation of the CARES Act is completely inconsistent with the letter and spirit of the law and harms students of color, students with disabilities, English learners, students from families with limited incomes and others who most need the funds.”

“The Department of Education’s new rule is truly a double standard. It penalizes districts that spend relief funds to serve students in non-Title I schools by forcing them to give money to private schools serving students of all family incomes,” she added.

Key findings of the analysis show the following:

  • Under previous requirements, the Texas school districts studied would have to reserve less than 1% of CARES Act funds, or about $5.4 million, for private schools in their districts.
  • The Department of Education’s new rule for CARES Act funds requires some public school districts to reserve critical public relief funds for private schools based on the total population of private school students, regardless of financial need. Under this rule, the school districts studied would have to set aside more than a combined total of $44.2 million for private schools in their districts.
  • For CARES Act relief funds, the difference between what the school districts would be required to give to private schools under the normal equitable services calculation and what they may be required to give with the Department of Education’s new calculation is $38.7 million.
  • An additional $38.7 million could pay for 571 school counselors, 678 nurses, more than 51 million protective masks for students, or more than 167,000 Chromebooks.
  • Charter schools do not have to give away any of their CARES Act funding to private schools.

IDRA’s issue brief, Cutting Public School Relief Funds to Subsidize Private Schools, provides a list of the 185 districts and how much each will lose to private schools in its boundaries if the district has to reserve funds based on total private school population (see Appendix B). The districts at the top of the list are:

Houston ISD = $8,609,051
Dallas ISD = $6,856,217
Fort Worth ISD = $2,336,431
San Antonio ISD = $1,951,001
Austin ISD = $1,913,480
Spring Branch ISD = $1,590,259
El Paso ISD = $1,463,783
North East ISD = $1,116,580
Corpus Christi ISD = $684,164
Brownsville ISD = $674,623
Richardson ISD = $578,250

Even though the new Department of Education rule claims to give school districts a choice for how to calculate reserved funds for private schools, it may be a false choice for many Texas school districts. For example, the Texas Education Agency announced that certain CARES Act funds allocated to school districts must be used to replace the average daily attendance (ADA) state funding that was not provided to districts during COVID-19 school closures. Under the Department of Education’s new rule, if a school district uses CARES Act funds to replace lost state funding in any non-Title I schools they would be required to give more money for private schools in their district.

The Department of Education is accepting public comments on its rule, although the rule is currently in effect. Comments can be submitted online on or before July 31, 2020.


Media contact: Christie L. Goodman, APR, IDRA Director of Communications, christie.goodman@idra.org

Friday, July 31, 2020

Editorial: Leave politics out of reopening Texas schools. Listen to the science.

From the editors of the Houston Chronicle. -Angela

Editorial: Leave politics out of reopening Texas schools. Listen to the science.