Translate

Showing posts with label suicide. Show all posts
Showing posts with label suicide. Show all posts

Thursday, January 13, 2022

Wave of suicides hits Texas National Guard’s border mission:Four soldiers have taken their own lives in two months

We should all be aware of Governor Greg Abbott's politically-motivated "Operation Lone Star," involving a securing of the U.S.–Mexico border as he reignites his gubernatorial race. It has already had severe consequences for members of the Texas National Guard and Texas State Guard. Note: Suicide is mentioned below. If you need help, please do not hesitate to call: 1-800-273-TALK (8255) and someone at the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline will pick up.

This is separate from the federally-controlled National Guard that is already present along the U.S.-Mexico border, raising the obvious question regarding the necessity for Operation Lone Star. Read this January 7, 2022 piece in the Texas Standard titled, "Gov. Greg Abbott faces criticism over handling of Texas National Guard troops at the southern border," that cites cuts the legislature made to tuition assistance and low morale. And all in the middle of a pandemic.

Who are they "fighting" anyway other than desperate families and children seeking asylum? These are sad times for our state.

One can only imagine how disruptive this has been to these young people for whom the governor's decisions have upended their lives. This differs from federal deployments that give troops several months' time to get their personal affairs in order before getting deployed. As indicated by the Army Times, not giving soldiers ample time wreaks havoc on their lives. This does need to get fully investigated so that their deaths will not have been in vain.

-Angela Valenzuela 


Wave of suicides hits Texas National Guard’s border mission

Four soldiers have taken their own lives in two months have taken their own lives in two months

December 23, 2021

Pfc. Joshua R. Cortez was preparing to accept a “lifetime job” with one of the nation’s biggest health insurance companies in late October. But the Texas National Guard had other ideas. The state’s mission to guard its border with Mexico, known as Operation Lone Star, was rapidly expanding and that meant involuntary activations were necessary to meet Gov. Greg Abbott’s troop quotas.

Cortez was one of the soldiers tapped to go on state active duty orders — with no idea how long the mission would last.

“I’ve been waiting for this job and I’m on my way to getting hired,” the 21-year-old mechanic wrote in his request for a hardship release from the mission. “I missed my first opportunity in September when I had to go on the flood mission in Louisiana. … I can not miss this opportunity because it is my last opportunity for this lifetime job.”

Cortez’s company commander recommended approval. But his battalion commander and brigade commander, Col. Robert Crockem of the 176th Engineer Brigade, disapproved, writing, “Soldier can deploy. If offered a job, then Soldier can be given time for training.”

Crockem signed the form at 8:19 p.m. on Nov. 4.

Sometime in the next 36 hours, Cortez drove to a parking lot in northwest San Antonio and shot himself in the head. First responders found him at 7:40 a.m. on Nov. 6.

Cortez and three other soldiers tied to Operation Lone Star have died by suspected suicide in the past two months, according to family members, Guard troops currently on the mission and official documents obtained by Army Times.


  • Sgt. Jose L. De Hoyos was found dead in Laredo, Texas, on Oct. 26. He was a member of the 949th Brigade Support Battalion’s headquarters company.
  • Cortez died overnight Nov. 6.
  • 1st Sgt. John “Kenny” Crutcher died Nov. 12, as time ran out on his temporary hardship waiver. He was the top NCO for B Company, 3rd Battalion, 144th Infantry.
  • 1st Lt. Charles Williams, a platoon leader in Crutcher’s company, died at home overnight Dec. 17 while on pass.


The string of suicides raises urgent questions about the mission’s conditions and purpose, as well as the way it’s organized and manned through indefinite involuntary call-ups, according to the Texas Army National Guard’s former top enlisted soldier. Operation Lone Star is a separate mission from the federally controlled National Guard task force on the U.S.-Mexico border, which was the subject of a previous Army Times investigation.

Retired Command Sgt. Maj. Jason Featherston, who was the Texas Army National Guard’s senior enlisted leader from May 2020 until retiring Nov. 30, detailed many of the issues plaguing the units, including Guardsmen’s complaints about a seeming lack of purpose in the mission, in a series of interviews.

“The [Texas Military Department]’s leadership has lost focus on what matters most, and that’s the soldier,” he said. “Their inability to focus on the individual soldiers’ needs has cost several lives, and until they [focus], more tragedies will continue to happen.”

Army Times reached an unnamed Texas Military Department spokesperson via email. The department’s public affairs staff typically does not speak on the record, unlike other elements across the National Guard, and obscures their identities via a group email address.

The spokesperson cautioned, “some of these [deaths] are still part of an open investigation” pending a final cause of death. But all four deaths reportedly occurred via self-inflicted gunshot wounds, according to official documents and sources familiar with the deaths.

“The loss of any service member is a tragedy and mitigating loss through enforcing safety protocols and ensuring resources that promote the total health of the force is something the Texas Military Department takes seriously,” the spokesperson added. They pointed to the organization’s 24-hour confidential counseling lines for soldiers and commanders, in addition to their “large team of independently licensed therapists” that offer services free of charge to all department personnel.

“In addition to the aforementioned resources, there is a behavioral health team assigned to Operation Lone Star with members in each region our task force supports,” the spokesperson said. “The OLS behavioral health team practices proactive, face-to-face outreach through education on self-care, crisis mitigation, and resources available.”

Critics of the mission have claimed that its rapid expansion has been motivated by politics. Abbott, the state’s governor, faces a stiff primary challenge in March from conservative firebrand Allen West, a former Army officer who was forced to retire after torturing an Iraqi detainee in 2003.

West, a former Florida congressman who was elected chairman of the Texas Republican Party in July 2020, made securing the U.S.–Mexico border a primary element of his platform. He resigned from the post in June 2021, announcing his candidacy for governor a month later.

Featherston described the mission’s political motives as “common knowledge around the office.” He said the morale of guardsmen sent to Texas’ border began deteriorating when the mission expanded from a small, volunteer-driven effort during the spring and summer — when only 1,000 soldiers were on mission — to an involuntary assignment.

On Sept. 20, Abbott ordered another 1,500 troops activated, according to planning documents. Soon after, on Oct. 7, Abbott activated an additional 2,500 Guard members for the operation, raising the total to 5,000.

As of the most recent manpower adjustments, there are now around 10,000 Texas Military Department personnel supporting Operation Lone Star, according to a November operations order. Of that number, 6,500 are along the border and 3,500 are supporting the mission from other areas of the state.

What’s going on out there

The increased demand for troops on the border meant that the department had to resort to involuntarily activating entire units from the Texas National Guard and mobilizing members of the Texas State Guard.

Pfc. Joshua Cortez, in an undated photo published with his online obituary. (Porter-Loring Mortuaries)

With the September and October activations, units received less than two weeks’ notice to report to the border. One soldier, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told Army Times that his unit had only four days’ official notice.

“Soldiers don’t have time to prepare [for] being away from home” when they receive such little notice, said Featherston. For most federal deployments, Guard troops receive several months’ notice and are carefully walked through a mobilization process that helps them settle their civilian affairs.

For Operation Lone Star, the process was rushed and left many soldiers still trying to resolve issues at home while at the border.

Meanwhile, after the Texas legislature demanded a budget cut, the Texas Guard massively slashed its tuition assistance benefit to balance its books, leaving many troops stranded without the reimbursement payments they’d been counting on for the fall semester, which was already underway.



Tuesday, August 10, 2021

Dr. Emilio Zamora Testimony Against SB 3—Texas' "anti-Critical Race Theory" bill

Before presenting to you Dr. Emilio Zamora's testimony, allow me to provide some context for today's public hearing in the Senate Committee on State Affairs in the second, special legislative session of the 87th Texas State Legislature called by Governor Abbott, that began last Saturday on August 7, 2021.

There were a good number of us who delivered testimony against Senate Bill 3 (SB 3), dubbed an "anti-Critical Race Theory" bill that makes sure white children don't get harmed or that black and brown children don't get victimized by Texas teachers who teach them about race, racism, Anglo supremacy, and the like. 

My friends, these Senators are offering a "solution" to a "problem" that doesn't exist. Except for precious few exceptions, CRT is simply not taught in our state's school system. It's not a curriculum. If anything, it's an approach. I should know. I teach CRT in the college classroom. It's over 40 years old and often preferred to Marxist or class analyses that simply don't tell the whole story of why inequality exists. 

Because life and society are so complex, we use many frameworks in the college classroom and CRT is but one of these.

SB 3 is similar to the initial version laid out in the first-called special legislative session that was hampered by the broken quorum by Texas democrats who fled the state and remain currently in Washington, D.C. While today felt like yet another dress rehearsal, it is worth noting the Rep. Toth letter from the regular legislative session that recently surfaced and about which Dr. Zamora comments. 

Toth's letter is really pathetic and desperate, linking anti-racist pedagogy to youth suicide. You cannot make this stuff up!

Specifically, Toth's letter went out during the regular legislative session to all members of the Texas House on May 7, 2021 (see letter below) to urge House members to support House Bill 3979, SB 3's less ugly twin.  

Passed and signed into law during the regular legislative session by Governor Greg Abbott and scheduled to go into effect on September 1, 2021, the very existence of the twice-filed, Senate Bill 3 makes the point that  HB 3979 doesn't go far enough and that SB 3 is the "fix." 

My husband, University of Texas Historian, and past president of the Texas State Historical Association, Dr. Emilio Zamora, delivered the written testimony provided below. Mine was oral rather than written. Happy to share what Emilio wrote and shared in the two minutes accorded to him. I was able to take these photos in those few minutes we had today on the floor of the Texas Senate.

-Angela Valenzuela  


Testimony Against Senate Bill 3

Second-Called Special Legislative Session of the 87th Texas State Legislature

by

Emilio Zamora, Ph.D.

August 10, 2021


I previously submitted commentary critical of HB 3979 that, among other things, asked for Representative Steve Toth’s statement of enabling intent, that is, his reason for proposing the bill.  The bill did not include such a statement, but I now have his May 7, 2021 letter where he offers overblown and unfounded justifications to obtain co-authors for the bill.  I now wish to comment on his letter in opposition to SB 3, the most recent iteration of HB 3979.  

My immediate response to the bill is that it is irresponsible for Representative Toth to propose policy that is untethered from reality and that builds on imagined exceptions to what actually occurs in classrooms across the state.  His possible exception is the lone publication that some teachers allegedly recommended at some undetermined moment to unidentified students at a school district near Dallas.  

We do not know if one teacher, two or three, recommended the book in question to one, two or three students. Nor do we know if an administrator approved the use of the book or if a teacher or teachers actually used it to teach Anglo supremacy and, at the urging of the author, shamed White students into believing that they carry the burden of all possible dastardly deeds committed by their ancestors. It does not matter that such claims lack evidence or that they only exist in Rep. Toth's imagination as distant, possible exceptions to what is actually occurring in Texas classrooms.

Rep. Toth proceeds to tell us that the onerous publication “has given rise to similarly discriminatory material” like Critical Race Theory and the 1619 Project.  This is an utterly unfounded claim of causation that would fail my basic expectation in a history class for undergraduate history majors.  This baseless assertion should also raise concerns among his colleagues who value truth and sound reasoning and detest the dereliction of a moral-bound duty to be truthful and fair in the give and take of policy-making. Rep, Toth goes further.

He states that HB 3979 intends to end the “proscribing”—I believe he means the prescribing—of “hateful classroom activities and a racially discriminatory curriculum,” again without offering any evidence whatsoever that this is actually occurring in our classrooms. There is more.  

 Rep. Toth continues to heap claim after groundless claim.  He announces his rejection of the notion that “an individual’s moral character or culpability are determined on the basis of skin color.” This sounds fine on the surface, but he is falsely purporting that this is occurring far and wide.  

Rep. Toth takes his accusations to an even higher and irresponsible level when he again suggests “race-shaming” as an ongoing teaching practice and predicts that it will contribute to a high suicide rate among our youth.  His gratuitous use of suicidal tragedy among our nation's youth that exploits the grief of those impacted illustrates just how far Rep. Toth will go to convey his legislative intent.

I do not understand how intelligent and well-meaning legislators would accept these unsubstantiated claims, knowing that Rep. Toth purposefully spreads misinformation that implicates the Senate Committee on State Affairs, as well as others who would vote for SB 3

I understand that political agendas crisscross the debates over policies and that some people at times choose expediency over good sense and credible arguments. Future generations, however, will judge us all on the character that we exhibit in supporting or rejecting SB 3. 

Rep. Toth’s shameful and unfounded justification for HB 3979 stand as prima facie evidence that he and other supporters of the bills in question have opted to make highly consequential education policy without any obvious foundation in truth or reason.